General online meeting SLAC Nov 4, 1999 G.Crosetti, M.Lo Vetere, E.Robutti IFR online calibrations status and plans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 24-28, 2003Computing for High-Energy Physics Configuration Database for BaBar On-line Rainer Bartoldus, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, Yury Kolomensky,
Advertisements

TOF offline and calibration A. De Caro (University and INFN of Salerno)
Peter Chochula, January 31, 2006  Motivation for this meeting: Get together experts from different fields See what do we know See what is missing See.
Online Reconstruction Update Linda R. Coney UCR Mar 25, 2010.
1 Online data quality and monitoring M. Ellis Daresbury DAQ Meeting 31 st August 2005.
Jianchun (JC) Wang, 08/21/99 RICH Electronics and DAQ Chip Carrier Short Cable Transition Board Long Cable Data Board Crate J.C.Wang Syracuse University.
CFT Calibration Calibration Workshop Calibration Requirements Calibration Scheme Online Calibration databases.
X.Dong, USTC/LBNL Feb. 20th, 04, STAR Collaboration Meeting 1 TOF Software Progress Xin Dong, for TOF Group  TOF detectors in Run IV  Online software.
Large Scale and Performance Tests of the ATLAS Online Software CERN ATLAS TDAQ Online Software System D.Burckhart-Chromek, I.Alexandrov, A.Amorim, E.Badescu,
TRD DAQ (U) Software Status TIM CERN May.09 Chanhoon Chung, Mark Millinger, Andreas Sabellek IEKP - Universität Karlsruhe (TH)
2/10/2000 CHEP2000 Padova Italy The BaBar Online Databases George Zioulas SLAC For the BaBar Computing Group.
1 TPC online  offline calibration November 2002.
06/03/06Calice TB preparation1 HCAL test beam monitoring - online plots & fast analysis - - what do we want to monitor - how do we want to store & communicate.
Web Based Monitoring DT online shifter tutorial Jesús Puerta-Pelayo CIEMAT Muon_Barrel_Workshop_07/July/10.
Some notes on ezTree and EMC data in MuDst Marco van Leeuwen, LBNL.
TOF Meeting, 9 December 2009, CERN Chiara Zampolli for the ALICE-TOF.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
Online Calibration of the D0 Vertex Detector Initialization Procedure and Database Usage Harald Fox D0 Experiment Northwestern University.
Real data reconstruction A. De Caro (University and INFN of Salerno) CERN Building 29, December 9th, 2009ALICE TOF General meeting.
DC12 Commissioning Status GOALS: establish operating conditions, determine initial calibration parameters and measure operating characteristics for the.
André Augustinus 10 September 2001 DCS Architecture Issues Food for thoughts and discussion.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
17-Aug-00 L.RistoriCDF Trigger Workshop1 SVT: current hardware status CRNowFinal Hit Finders64242 Mergers31616 Sequencers2312 AMboards4624 Hit Buffers21212.
Clara Gaspar, March 2005 LHCb Online & the Conditions DB.
1 ECS CALO HV Control CALO Piquet Training Session Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Outline  ECS HV control of the ECAL/HCAL sub-detectors.  Introduction.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL, Feb 2005 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software update L3 display 200 GeV February.
DQM status report Y. Foka (GSI) Offline week from pp to PbPb.
Databases in CMS Conditions DB workshop 8 th /9 th December 2003 Frank Glege.
L0 DAQ S.Brisbane. ECS DAQ Basics The ECS is the top level under which sits the DCS and DAQ DCS must be in READY state before trying to use the DAQ system.
Tracker Visualization Tool: integration in ORCA Maria S. Mennea, Giuseppe Zito University & INFN Bari, Italy Tracker b-tau Cosmic Challenge preparation.
1 SDD: DA and preprocessor Francesco Prino INFN Sezione di Torino ALICE offline week – April 11th 2008.
Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009) Shifter and expert level monitoring.
1 Checks on SDD Data Piergiorgio Cerello, Francesco Prino, Melinda Siciliano.
GLAST LAT Project CU Beam Test Workshop 3/20/2006 C. Sgro’, L. Baldini, J. Bregeon1 Glast LAT Calibration Unit Beam Test Status Report on Online Monitor.
GAN: remote operation of accelerator diagnosis systems Matthias Werner, DESY MDI.
TDAQ Experience in the BNL Liquid Argon Calorimeter Test Facility Denis Oliveira Damazio (BNL), George Redlinger (BNL).
LHCb Configuration Database Lana Abadie, PhD student (CERN & University of Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris VI), LIP6.
LAV thresholds requirements Paolo Valente. LAV answers for Valeri’s questions (old) 1.List of hardware to control (HV, LV, crates, temperatures, pressure,
Analysis experience at GSIAF Marian Ivanov. HEP data analysis ● Typical HEP data analysis (physic analysis, calibration, alignment) and any statistical.
MCast Errors and HV Adjustments Multicast Errors (seen on the DATA ERIS connection) have caused a disruption of a HV Adjustment due to a timeout (since.
1 ECS CALO HV Control CALO Piquet Training Session Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Outline  ECS HV control of the ECAL/HCAL sub-detectors.  Introduction.
Calorimeter global commissioning: progress and plans Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay & CERN, 25 jun 2008.
Валидация TRT DCS CONDITIONS SERVICE Евгений Солдатов, НИЯУ МИФИ “Physics&Computing in ATLAS” – 22/09/2010.
1 ECS CALO LED Control System CALO Piquet Training Session Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Outline  Introduction  Calorimeter ECS LED monitoring.
Summary of TPC/TRD/DCS/ECS/DAQ meeting on FERO configuration CERN,January 31 st 2006 Peter Chochula.
PMT time offset calibration (not completed) R.Sawada 27/Dec/2007.
Evelyn Thomson Ohio State University Page 1 XFT Status CDF Trigger Workshop, 17 August 2000 l XFT Hardware status l XFT Integration tests at B0, including:
PC Current Interlocking for the SPS Fast Extractions. 1 J. Wenninger July 2009.
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
The MINER A Operations Report All Experimenters Meeting Howard Budd, University of Rochester Sep14, 2015.
ATLAS Detector Resources & Lumi Blocks Enrico & Nicoletta.
L1Calo Databases ● Overview ● Trigger Configuration DB ● L1Calo OKS Database ● L1Calo COOL Database ● ACE Murrough Landon 16 June 2008.
L1Calo DBs: Status and Plans ● Overview of L1Calo databases ● Present status ● Plans Murrough Landon 20 November 2006.
L1Calo Databases ● Overview ● Recent Activitity ● To Do List ● Run types Murrough Landon 4 June 2007.
THIS MORNING (Start an) informal discussion to -Clearly identify all open issues, categorize them and build an action plan -Possibly identify (new) contributing.
Calorimeter Status Electronics Installation and Commissioning
LAV front-end and readout status
CCS database requirements
TOF CALIBRATION DATABASE
Remaining Online SW Tasks
Level 1 (Calo) Databases
Barrel RPC Conditions Database
The Online Detector Control at the BaBar experiment at SLAC
The IFR Online Detector Control at the BaBar experiment at SLAC
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
The IFR Online Detector Control at the BaBar experiment at SLAC
The Online Detector Control at the BaBar experiment at SLAC
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
Pierluigi Paolucci & Giovanni Polese
Offline framework for conditions data
Presentation transcript:

General online meeting SLAC Nov 4, 1999 G.Crosetti, M.Lo Vetere, E.Robutti IFR online calibrations status and plans

General online meeting SLAC Nov 4, 1999 What we do now 4IFR is using the calibration cycle to pulse the front-end electronics with the purpose of figuring out dead and hot channels. This information is complementary to the one that can be obtained from datastream calibrations. 4Hot channels are not masked online. There are no compelling reasons to do it now.The total event size wouldn’t be reduced much and the trasportation of the IFR data is fast enough. 4As a consequence, no action is performed based on the result of a calibration run in normal situations. 4A calibration run takes a minute or two to be performed. We would like to continue to perform a calibration run once per week and possibly once per day. 4We store the xtc files to keep track of the performances of the electronics over time. 4Plots of the perfomances are produced running offline on the xtc files.

General online meeting SLAC Nov 4, 1999 How we do it 4We use a calibration cycle xtc file to drive the FSMs through the calibration sequence. The calibration cycle is registered with the configuration database. The calibration cycle xtc is loaded on the ROMS (for specific configuration keys) using the “ad interim” rdf system. 4The calibration actions on the ROM are implemented using CalActions class and derived. The kind of cycle to perform is selected in CalMetaFactory according to the calibration cycle tc. 4The L1 dataflow transitions are transported out of the ROMS. 4At the Oep level runs the same code we use for datataking. For the time being this means we only want to log L1 actions to the xtc file. No special parameter has to be provided to OEP. 4Xtc file are processed offline to produce histo/ps files that are inspected visually.

General online meeting SLAC Nov 4, 1999 Short term plan 4We propose to automate (running by the DAQ shifter) the present IFR calibration. An xtc file should be produced. No validation step is required to the DAQ shifter. This will be done offline by IFR experts. 4In case of failure during calibrations it may be necessary to reboot the IFR ROMS. No other actions are forseen. 4For the time been no interaction with the Detector Control is necessary. We perform calibration at any High Voltage. Usually at the Injection set point. 4Daq crates must be powered and Low Voltages, powering the front-end elements, must be on during calibration (as well in datataking). These DC parameters are not in the runnable flag yet.

General online meeting SLAC Nov 4, 1999 Medium term plan 4We want to use CalChan and related structures and sink L1. 4We will refine the calibration sequence with the aim of introducing other checks on the status of the electronics and prepare for TDC boards. 4In the future we would like to change the HV during a calibration cycle between the two values corresponding to the Runnable set point and 0V. But this is not a priority nor mandatory. 4When we will be confident, we would like to start writing into the condition database the results of the calibration process. 4In the long run we will reload the data from the condition database to perform IFB/ITB noisy FECs suppression and ITB time offsets subtraction.