Hasmukh Goswami College Of Engineering

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LECTURER5 Fracture Brittle Fracture Ductile Fracture Fatigue Fracture
Advertisements

ME 240: Introduction to Engineering Materials Chapter 8. Failure 8.1 CHAPTER 8.
CREEP  It can be defined as the slow & progressive (increasingly continuing) deformation of a material with time under a constant stress.  It is both.
Chapter 11 Mechanical Properties of Materials
Design of Machine Elements
CTU in Prague, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering DAF Page 1 Concentration factors Shape Factor or Stress Concentration Factor of an Elastic Stress Relative.
Engineering materials lecture #14
Chapter Outline Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design.
Basic Mechanisms of Fracture in Metals
ME 388 – Applied Instrumentation Laboratory Fatigue Lab.
Design of Machine Elements
Over the Next Several Days
Chapter 18 Shafts and Axles Dr. A. Aziz Bazoune
DESIGNING AGAINST FATIGUE
Design of an Aerospace Component
Fatigue Failure Through Bending David Burnette ME 498.
Three Stages of Fatigue Failure
Chapter 5 – Design for Different Types of Loading
THEORIES OF FAILURE THEORIES OF FAILURE FOR DUCTILE MATERIALS
Section VI Shaft Design.
Chapter 6 Fatigue Failure Theories
ENGR 225 Section
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Chapter 5, Part B Failure Modes
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Ken Youssefi Mechanical Engineering Dept., SJSU 1 Failure Theories – Static Loads Static load – a stationary load that is gradually applied having an unchanging.
Chapter 7 Fatigue Failure Resulting from Variable Loading
Chapter 7 Fatigue Failure Resulting from Variable Loading
Fatigue Fatigue is the lowering of strength or the failure of a material due to repetitive stress, which may be above or below the yield strength. Many.
Design Stress & Fatigue
DESIGN FOR FATIGUE STRENGTH
1 Jiangyu Li, University of Washington Lecture 18 Fatigue Mechanical Behavior of Materials Sec Jiangyu Li University of Washington Mechanics of.
Chapter 7 Fatigue Failure Resulting from Variable Loading
Mechanics of Materials Lab
FATIGUE Fatigue of Materials (Cambridge Solid State Science Series) S. Suresh Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
Mechanical Behavior, Testing and Manufacturing Properties of Materials
Fatigue Failure Due to Variable Loading
1 Design for Different Type of Loading Lecture Notes Dr. Rakhmad Arief Siregar Kolej Universiti Kejuruteraan Utara Malaysia Machine Element in Mechanical.
Failure Criteria and stress concentration
Week 4 Fracture, Toughness, Fatigue, and Creep
Fatigue of Materials. Fatigue Definition: Damage accumulated through the application of repeated stress cycles Variable amplitude loadings cause different.
Registered Electrical & Mechanical Engineer
FATIGUE Fatigue of Materials (Cambridge Solid State Science Series) S. Suresh Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998) MATERIALS SCIENCE &ENGINEERING.
Chapter 7 Fatigue Failure Resulting from Variable Loading
MECH 401 Mechanical Design Applications Dr. M. O’Malley– Master Notes
Ch 7 Shafts.
Machine Design I (MCE-C 203) Mechatronics Dept., Faculty of Engineering, Fayoum University Dr. Ahmed Salah Abou Taleb Lecturer, Mechanical Engineering.
Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila Lecture No. (4&5)
Jiangyu Li, University of Washington Yielding and Failure Criteria Plasticity Fracture Fatigue Jiangyu Li University of Washington Mechanics of Materials.
Course No.: MEBF ZC342 MACHINE DESIGN
D ESIGN C ONCEPTS & M/ C D RAWING ME-309 DME-I Prepared By: Prof. Ketul Brahmbhatt.
EGM 5653 Advanced Mechanics of Materials
153 書名: Essentials of Mechanical Engineering Design, 1/E 作者: Shigey Mischke Budynas 書號: MX0398.
FATIGUE TESTING Presented by- BIPIN KUMAR MISHRA 2011EME11 SHEELOO SINGH 2011EME08.
DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS
ATMIYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & SCIENCE MECHNICAL DEPARTMENT
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING
FLUCTUATING STRESSES SUBJECT: Design of machine elements
Dr. S & S.S.GHANDHY GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE
Stress Concentration Effect
Methods to Maximize Design Life
TABLE 2.1 Relative Mechanical Properties of Various Materials at Room Temperature (in Decreasing Order). Metals Are in Their Alloy Form.
1/18/2019 6:28 AM C h a p t e r 8 Failure Dr. Mohammad Abuhaiba, PE.
Mechanical Properties: 2
Behavior of Materials in Service (2)
FATIGUE FATIGUE Dr. Mohammed Abdulrazzaq
Lab8: Fatigue Testing Machine
Lab8: Fatigue Testing Machine
DR. AL EMRAN ISMAIL FRACTURE MECHANISMS.
Yielding And Fracture Under Combine Stresses
Presentation transcript:

Hasmukh Goswami College Of Engineering DME Submitted by: Enrolment no:- 130240119108 130240119556 130240119560 130240119540 SEM. 5 Mechanical Engineering

Fatigue Failure It has been recognized that a metal subjected to a repetitive or fluctuating stress will fail at a stress much lower than that required to cause failure on a single application of load. Failures occurring under conditions of dynamic loading are called fatigue failures. Fatigue failure is characterized by three stages Crack Initiation Crack Propagation Final Fracture

VW crank shaft – fatigue failure due to cyclic bending and torsional stresses Propagation zone, striations Crack initiation site Fracture area

928 Porsche timing pulley Crack started at the fillet

bicycle crank spider arm This long term fatigue crack in a high quality component took a considerable time to nucleate from a machining mark between the spider arms on this highly stressed surface. However once initiated propagation was rapid and accelerating as shown in the increased spacing of the 'beach marks' on the surface caused by the advancing fatigue crack.

Crank shaft Gear tooth failure MAE dept., SJSU

Hawaii, Aloha Flight 243, a Boeing 737, an upper part of the plane's cabin area rips off in mid-flight. Metal fatigue was the cause of the failure. MAE dept., SJSU

Fracture Surface Characteristics Mode of fracture Typical surface characteristics Ductile Cup and Cone Dimples Dull Surface Inclusion at the bottom of the dimple Brittle Intergranular Shiny Grain Boundary cracking Brittle Transgranular Shiny Cleavage fractures Flat Fatigue Beachmarks Striations (SEM) Initiation sites Propagation zone Final fracture zone

Fatigue Failure – Type of Fluctuating Stresses max min 2 Alternating stress Mean stress m = max min 2 +

Fatigue Failure, S-N Curve Test specimen geometry for R.R. Moore rotating beam machine. The surface is polished in the axial direction. A constant bending load is applied. Motor Load Rotating beam machine – applies fully reverse bending stress Typical testing apparatus, pure bending

Fatigue Failure, S-N Curve Finite life Infinite life S′e = endurance limit of the specimen Se ′

Relationship Between Endurance Limit and Ultimate Strength Se = ′ 0.5Sut 100 ksi 700 MPa Sut ≤ 200 ksi (1400 MPa) Sut > 200 ksi Sut > 1400 MPa Steel Steel 0.4Sut Se = ′ Sut < 60 ksi (400 MPa) Sut ≥ 60 ksi 24 ksi 160 MPa Sut < 400 MPa Cast iron

Relationship Between Endurance Limit and Ultimate Strength Aluminum Aluminum alloys Se = ′ 0.4Sut 19 ksi 130 MPa Sut < 48 ksi (330 MPa) Sut ≥ 48 ksi Sut ≥ 330 MPa For N = 5x108 cycle Copper alloys Se = ′ 0.4Sut 14 ksi 100 MPa Sut < 40 ksi (280 MPa) Sut ≥ 40 ksi Sut ≥ 280 MPa For N = 5x108 cycle

Correction Factors for Specimen’s Endurance Limit For materials exhibiting a knee in the S-N curve at 106 cycles = endurance limit of the specimen (infinite life > 106) Se ′ = endurance limit of the actual component (infinite life > 106) Se N S 106 103 = fatigue strength of the specimen (infinite life > 5x108) Sf ′ = fatigue strength of the actual component (infinite life > 5x108) For materials that do not exhibit a knee in the S-N curve, the infinite life taken at 5x108 cycles N S 5x108 103

Correction Factors for Specimen’s Endurance Limit Se = Cload Csize Csurf Ctemp Crel (Se) ′ Load factor, Cload Pure bending Cload = 1 Pure axial Cload = 0.7 Pure torsion Cload = 1 if von Mises stress is used, use 0.577 if von Mises stress is NOT used. Combined loading Cload = 1

Correction Factors for Specimen’s Endurance Limit Size factor, Csize Larger parts fail at lower stresses than smaller parts. This is mainly due to the higher probability of flaws being present in larger components. For solid round cross section d ≤ 0.3 in. (8 mm) Csize = 1 0.3 in. < d ≤ 10 in. Csize = .869(d)-0.097 8 mm < d ≤ 250 mm Csize = 1.189(d)-0.097 If the component is larger than 10 in., use Csize = .6

Correction Factors for Specimen’s Endurance Limit For non rotating components, use the 95% area approach to calculate the equivalent diameter. Then use this equivalent diameter in the previous equations to calculate the size factor. A95 dequiv = ( d95 d )1/2 0.0766

Correction Factors for Specimen’s Endurance Limit surface factor, Csurf The rotating beam test specimen has a polished surface. Most components do not have a polished surface. Scratches and imperfections on the surface act like a stress raisers and reduce the fatigue life of a part. Use either the graph or the equation with the table shown below. Csurf = A (Sut)b

Correction Factors for Specimen’s Endurance Limit Temperature factor, Ctemp High temperatures reduce the fatigue life of a component. For accurate results, use an environmental chamber and obtain the endurance limit experimentally at the desired temperature. For operating temperature below 450 oC (840 oF) the temperature factor should be taken as one. Ctemp = 1 for T ≤ 450 oC (840 oF)

Correction Factors for Specimen’s Endurance Limit Reliability factor, Crel The reliability correction factor accounts for the scatter and uncertainty of material properties (endurance limit).

Fatigue Stress Concentration Factor, Kf Experimental data shows that the actual stress concentration factor is not as high as indicated by the theoretical value, Kt. The stress concentration factor seems to be sensitive to the notch radius and the ultimate strength of the material. Kf = 1 + (Kt – 1)q Notch sensitivity factor

Fatigue Stress Concentration Factor, Kf for Aluminum

Design process – Fully Reversed Loading for Infinite Life Determine the maximum alternating applied stress, a, in terms of the size and cross sectional profile Select material → Sy, Sut Choose a safety factor → n Determine all modifying factors and calculate the endurance limit of the component → Se Determine the fatigue stress concentration factor, Kf Use the design equation to calculate the size Se Kf a = n Investigate different cross sections (profiles), optimize for size or weight You may also assume a profile and size, calculate the alternating stress and determine the safety factor. Iterate until you obtain the desired safety factor

Design for Finite Life Sn = a (N)b equation of the fatigue line Se 106 103 A B N S Sf 5x108 103 A B Point A Sn = .9Sut N = 103 Point A Sn = .9Sut N = 103 Point B Sn = Se N = 106 Point B Sn = Sf N = 5x108

Design for Finite Life Sn = a (N)b Sn Se ( ) ⅓ Sn n a log Sn = log a + b log N Apply conditions for point A and B to find the two constants “a” and “b” a = (.9Sut)2 Se b .9Sut 1 3 log log .9Sut = log a + b log 103 log Se = log a + b log 106 Sn = Se ( N 106 ) ⅓ .9Sut log Sn Kf a = n Design equation Calculate Sn and replace Se in the design equation

The Effect of Mean Stress on Fatigue Life Mean stress exist if the loading is of a repeating or fluctuating type. Mean stress Alternating stress m a Sy Yield line Gerber curve Se Sy Soderberg line Sut Goodman line

The Effect of Mean Stress on Fatigue Life Modified Goodman Diagram Alternating stress m a Sy Yield line Se Safe zone C Goodman line Sy Sut Mean stress

The Effect of Mean Stress on Fatigue Life Modified Goodman Diagram Sy Yield line - Syc Se Safe zone Sut Goodman line C Safe zone - m Sy +m

The Effect of Mean Stress on Fatigue Life Modified Goodman Diagram Se 1 = Sut a m + Infinite life a = Se nf Finite life Sn 1 = Sut a m + a + m = Sy ny Yield Se a + m = Sy ny Yield C Safe zone Safe zone - m - Syc Sy Sut +m

Applying Stress Concentration factor to Alternating and Mean Components of Stress Determine the fatigue stress concentration factor, Kf, apply directly to the alternating stress → Kf a If Kf max < Sy then there is no yielding at the notch, use Kfm = Kf and multiply the mean stress by Kfm → Kfm m If Kf max > Sy then there is local yielding at the notch, material at the notch is strain-hardened. The effect of stress concentration is reduced. Calculate the stress concentration factor for the mean stress using the following equation, Kfm = Sy Kf a m nf Se 1 = Sut Kf a Kfmm + Infinite life Fatigue design equation

xya alternating component of shear stress Combined Loading All four components of stress exist, xa alternating component of normal stress xm mean component of normal stress xya alternating component of shear stress xym mean component of shear stress Calculate the alternating and mean principal stresses, 1a, 2a = (xa /2) ± (xa /2)2 + (xya)2 1m, 2m = (xm /2) ± (xm /2)2 + (xym)2

Combined Loading a′ = (1a + 2a - 1a2a)1/2 Calculate the alternating and mean von Mises stresses, a′ = (1a + 2a - 1a2a)1/2 2 m′ = (1m + 2m - 1m2m)1/2 2 Fatigue design equation nf Se 1 = Sut ′a ′m + Infinite life

Design Example m = 0 a = I πd 3 d 3 10,000 lb. 6˝ 6˝ 12˝ A rotating shaft is carrying 10,000 lb force as shown. The shaft is made of steel with Sut = 120 ksi and Sy = 90 ksi. The shaft is rotating at 1150 rpm and has a machine finish surface. Determine the diameter, d, for 75 minutes life. Use safety factor of 1.6 and 50% reliability. d D = 1.5d A R1 R2 r (fillet radius) = .1d Calculate the support forces, R1 = 2500, R2 = 7500 lb. The critical location is at the fillet, MA = 2500 x 12 = 30,000 lb-in a = Calculate the alternating stress, Mc I = 32M πd 3 305577 d 3 m = 0 Determine the stress concentration factor r d = .1 D = 1.5 Kt = 1.7

Design Example Assume d = 1.0 in Kf = 1 + (Kt – 1)q = 1 + .85(1.7 – 1) = 1.6 Using r = .1 and Sut = 120 ksi, q (notch sensitivity) = .85 Calculate the endurance limit Csurf = A (Sut)b = 2.7(120)-.265 = .759 Cload = 1 (pure bending) Crel = 1 (50% rel.) Ctemp= 1 (room temp) 0.3 in. < d ≤ 10 in. Csize = .869(d)-0.097 = .869(1)-0.097 = .869 Se = Cload Csize Csurf Ctemp Crel (Se) = (.759)(.869)(.5x120) = 39.57 ksi ′

Design Example Sn Se ( ) ⅓ Sn ( ) ⅓ n = Sn a = log log Kfa d 3 Design life, N = 1150 x 75 = 86250 cycles Sn = Se ( N 106 ) ⅓ .9Sut log Sn = 39.57 ( 86250 106 ) ⅓ .9x120 log = 56.5 ksi n = Sn Kfa = 56.5 1.6x305.577 = .116 < 1.6 So d = 1.0 in. is too small a = 305577 d 3 = 305.577 ksi Assume d = 2.5 in All factors remain the same except the size factor and notch sensitivity. Using r = .25 and Sut = 120 ksi, q (notch sensitivity) = .9 Kf = 1 + (Kt – 1)q = 1 + .9(1.7 – 1) = 1.63 Csize = .869(d)-0.097 = .869(2.5)-0.097 = .795 Se = 36.2 ksi →

Design Example a = d = 2.5 in. n = Se = 36.2 ksi Sn = 53.35 ksi → a = 305577 (2.5)3 = 19.55 ksi n = Sn Kfa = 53.35 1.63x19.55 = 1.67 ≈ 1.6 d = 2.5 in. Check yielding n = Sy Kfmax = 90 1.63x19.55 2.8 > 1.6 okay