Kansas Streambank Database Erika Stanley Kansas Water Office March 16, 2016.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Little Canyon Creek Subwatershed Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project Sponsored by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.

Advertisements

Sleepy Creek Watershed Association Riparian Planting Project Gale Foulds, Sleepy Creek Watershed Association Barbie Elliott, West Virginia Conservation.

West Virginia Conservation Agency. Section 319 Non Point Source Program WVCA is the primary entity responsible for the implementation of the: Agriculture.

Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.

Measure 76 Parks and Natural Resources Fund 15% Lottery Revenue Parks Subaccount Natural Resources Subaccount Grant Fund 65% Operating Fund 35%

Agua Hedionda Watershed Management Plan Copyright © 2005 Kenneth & Gabrielle Adelman. All rights reserved.

Regional Coordination for Implementation of Source Water Protection Projects October 24 th, 2013 Kelly Anderson Philadelphia Water Department’s Source.

Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan.

Assessment of Utah’s Nonpoint Source control program Nancy Mesner, Doug Jackson-Smith, Phaedra Budy, David Stevens Lorien Belton, Nira Salant, William.

Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee November 9, 2010 Information Item Master Water.

Rapid and Torch Rivers August 2013 ESLA. Issue: Increasing Sediment 1993 – Aarwood to Torch River.

Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.

1 Watershed Condition Framework Overview SEAKFHP Strategic Planning Meeting Sheila Jacobson, Fisheries Biologist October 2012.

Kansas Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (KS WRAPS) Agriculture and Natural Resources Budget 1/17/12 Our vision is 'healthy Kansans living.

Amy Sheldon Watershed Coordinator February 3, 2004.

Rick Koelsch University of Nebraska – Lincoln Bob Broz University of Missouri - Columbia.

Maintaining Watersheds. Next Generation Science/Common Core Standards addressed! HS‐ESS2‐5. Plan and conduct an investigation of the properties of water.

Darren Carlson District Manager Kittson Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) 410 South 5 th Street, Suite 106 Hallock, MN (218)

 To conserve our remaining natural resources for future generations  To protect a valuable economic revenue stream  To organize management efforts.

Presented by Insert your name, title, and district Lower Hudson Coalition of Conservation Districts Volunteer Streamwalk Program Developed by the Westchester.

Water Quality Associated with Urban Runoff: Sources, Emerging Issues and Management Approaches Martha Sutula and Eric Stein Biogeochemistry and Biology.

Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.

Habitat Restoration Division Coastal Program Partner For Wildlife Program Schoolyard Habitats Chesapeake Bay Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Suggested Guidelines for Geomorphic aspects of Anadromous Salmonid Habitat Restoration proposals G. Mathias Kondolf.

Sonoma Ecology Center TMDL Implementation Project Update November 4, 2011 Funded by EPA, Managed by SFEP, Administered by MMWD, and north bay partnership.

Step 1: Assess Riparian Resource Function Using PFC §1d. Complete PFC assessment l 17 questions about attributes and processes l Reminder – PFC based on:

Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.

Oregon Case Studies Ryan Johnson. Studies  The response of impounded sediment to a culvert replacement project on Sutter Creek, a tributary of Honey.

EPA and Flood Risk – Programs and Perspectives Rob Wood Acting Deputy Office Director Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds U.S. Environmental Protection.

Bassett Creek Water Management Commission Joint Advisory Group Meeting January 23, 2001.

1 Questions Addressed What are the options for reducing pollutant inputs to Lake Tahoe? Pollutant Reduction Opportunities.

La Moine River Ecosystem Partnership: Organizing for Success Dan Moorehouse & Jeff Boeckler.

NOAA Restoration Center Implementing the Gulf Regional Sediment Management Master Plan …responding to an ongoing emergency, improving responses to new.

LOWER L’ANGUILLE WATERSHED COST SHARE PATRICIA PERRY ST. FRANCIS COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT.

Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)

Price Creek Watershed Project A joint project of the Iowa & Benton County Soil and Water Conservation Districts IOWATER Meeting – November 13, 2007.

Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.

Crossing the Barrier: Integrating GIS beyond the Land Records Arena Ken Curry Land Records Coordinator Land Records Department Trempealeau County Greg.

Surface Water Supplies Joe Zulovich Extension Agricultural Engineer Commercial Agriculture Program.

RIPARIAN PROPER FUNCTIONING CONDITION A Tool for Integrating the Fundamental Sciences into Collaborative Decision-Making.

Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.

USGS Water Quality Programs and the Water Quality Monitoring Framework CONTACTS: Herb Buxton (609) Tim Miller

Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.

Gary Bryant Watershed Coordinator. Funding Funding and support for the development and implementation of the Pecos River Watershed Protection Plan is.

OWEB Effectiveness Monitoring Program Key Components  Effectiveness Monitoring Workshop  Development of definitions  Effectiveness Monitoring of: 

PCWA Study Plan Physical Habitat Characterization Study Plan –Geomorphology Study Plan –Riparian Habitat Mapping Study Plan –Aquatic Habitat Characterization.

HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.

Using Parcel Data and GIS as an Outreach Tool Kansas Natural Resources GIS Technical Meeting March 16, 2016 Darci Paull GIS Specialist Kansas Forest Service.

IOWA NUTRIENT REDUCTION STRATEGY A science and technology-based framework to assess and reduce nutrients to Iowa waters and the Gulf of Mexico James Gillespie.

SARP Science and Data Committee Science Projects Emily Granstaff USFWS & SARP October 25, 2013 Joint SARP, EBTJV, and ACFHP Science Calls.

Mary Apostolico Potomac Watershed Manager. Current Authorities for TMDL Process Federal Clean Water Act, § 303(d) - TMDL List & TMDL Development §303(e)

Riparian Vegetation and Geology in the Jail Branch Watershed in Central Vermont Past and Present Images 1927 Flood 1936 Flood Study Area 23 km Stream

Source: Stream Corridor Restoration Manual WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.

Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans

Innovative Data Management and Planning Strategies for TMDL Compliance

CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL

Prioritising soil conservation and water quality issues for the Waikato River and Waipā River Restoration Strategy, New Zealand. Reece Hill1,2, Dan Borman1,2.

Test Drive Results and Revisions of the New Stream Restoration Crediting Protocols Bill Stack & Lisa Fraley-McNeal December 2, 2013.

Evaluating the long-term future of fine sediment in Lake Powell

Texas Water Resources Institute

Funding from the Local Perspective

Prioritising soil conservation and water quality issues for the Waikato River and Waipā River Restoration Strategy, New Zealand. Reece Hill1,2, Dan Borman1,2.

Henrico County Stream Assessment / Watershed Management Program

Funding from the Local Perspective

Mulberry Watershed Management Plan

Funding from the Local Perspective

Funding from the Local Perspective

WATER RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE Programs & FUNDING IN KANSAS

Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL

Vineyards and Water Quality

Presentation transcript:

Kansas Streambank Database Erika Stanley Kansas Water Office March 16, 2016

Why do we care about streambanks?

Streambank Assessments KWO has evaluated streambank erosion above all public water supply reservoirs Compared historic aerial imagery to most recent NAIP Imagery

Calculating Sediment Loads Bank Height (field measurements, LiDAR) Calculate surface area using ArcGIS Surface Area * Height = Volume Soil Bulk Density * Volume = Mass Divide by # Yrs between photos = Annual sediment load from streambank sites (tons/yr)

Future potential of LiDAR Two LiDAR passes Geomorphic Change Detection Creation of sediment budgets showing accumulation and erosion

Completed Assessments Clinton Milford Perry Tuttle Creek Hillsdale Melvern Pomona Council Grove John Redmond Marion Konopolis Wilson Big Hill Elk City Fall River Toronto

Streambank Stabilization Documentation of projects – 213 constructed projects in database – 19 planned sites

Streambank Restoration Team Increased communication and interagency coordination Interagency priorities and pooling of resources Consistent project administration – KWO – Assessments/Geodatabase – KDHE (WRAPS) – Outreach/Local Coordination – KDA (DOC) – Technical Assistance and Construction Unified outreach strategy to promote awareness and support

Practical Applications Help identify whether streambanks or land surface sources are largest contributors in the watershed Identify which streambank sites are going to give the most bank for the buck Summarize work that has been completed and what still needs to be done Evaluate effectiveness of projects in the future

John Redmond Streambank Assessment Number of “hotspots” identified: 275 Contributing 339,979 tons/year into streams 35 streambank projects have been completed 240 hotspots still need to be address Accounts for 42% of total sediment load deposited into MP Pool Approximate cost: $15M

Future Considerations Add datasets that will help paint a full picture of the watershed – BMP Implementation – Riparian data Continued collaboration with other agencies to help prioritize projects & funding