Generation of Simulated Atmospheric Datasets for Ingest into Radiative Transfer Models Jason A. Otkin, Derek J. Posselt, Erik R. Olson, and Raymond K.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Weather Research & Forecasting: A General Overview
Advertisements

Meteorologisches Institut der Universität München
A NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF LOCAL ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES A.V.Starchenko Tomsk State University.
June 2003Yun (Helen) He1 Coupling MM5 with ISOLSM: Development, Testing, and Application W.J. Riley, H.S. Cooley, Y. He*, M.S. Torn Lawrence Berkeley National.
WRF Physics Options Jimy Dudhia. diff_opt=1 2 nd order diffusion on model levels Constant coefficients (khdif and kvdif) km_opt ignored.
Sensitivity of High-Resolution Simulations of Hurricane Bob (1991) to Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations SCOTT A. BRAUN AND WEI-KUO TAO PRESENTATION.
NOAA/NWS Change to WRF 13 June What’s Happening? WRF replaces the eta as the NAM –NAM is the North American Mesoscale “timeslot” or “Model Run”
The impact of mesoscale PBL parameterizations on the evolution of mixed-layer processes important for fire weather Joseph J. Charney USDA Forest Service,
Recent performance statistics for AMPS real-time forecasts Kevin W. Manning – National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR Earth System Laboratory Mesoscale.
Nesting. Eta Model Hybrid and Eta Coordinates ground MSL ground Pressure domain Sigma domain  = 0  = 1  = 1 Ptop  = 0.
Update of A Rapid Prototyping Capability Experiment to Evaluate CrIS / ATMS Observations for a Mesoscale Weather Event Valentine G. Anantharaj Xingang.
Huang et al: MTG-IRS OSSEMMT, June MTG-IRS OSSE on regional scales Xiang-Yu Huang, Hongli Wang, Yongsheng Chen and Xin Zhang National Center.
Weather Research & Forecasting Model (WRF) Stacey Pensgen ESC 452 – Spring ’06.
HWRF Model Sensitivity to Non-hydrostatic Effects Hurricane Diagnostics and Verification Workshop May 4, 2009 Katherine S. Maclay Colorado State University.
Global Forecast System (GFS) Model Previous called the Aviation (AVN) and Medium Range Forecast (MRF) models. Global model and 64 levels Relatively primitive.
Introduction and Methodology Daniel T. Lindsey*, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR/RAMMB Louie Grasso, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere
Assessment of the vertical exchange of heat, moisture, and momentum above a wildland fire using observations and mesoscale simulations Joseph J. Charney.
Nesting. Eta Model Eta Coordinate And Step Mountains MSL ground  = 1 Ptop  = 0.
The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion.
Development of WRF-CMAQ Interface Processor (WCIP)
Mesoscale Modeling Review the tutorial at: –In class.
Jerold Herwehe 1, Kiran Alapaty 1, Chris Nolte 1, Russ Bullock 1, Tanya Otte 1, Megan Mallard 1, Jimy Dudhia 2, and Jack Kain 3 1 Atmospheric Modeling.
19 December ConclusionsResultsMethodologyBackground Chip HelmsSensitivity of CM1 to Initial θ' Magnitude and Radius Examining the Sensitivity of.
Atmospheric Modeling in an Arctic System Model John J. Cassano Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences and Department of Atmospheric.
Earth Science Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration 18 January 2007 Paper 5A.4: Slide 1 American Meteorological Society 21 st Conference.
Russ Bullock 11 th Annual CMAS Conference October 17, 2012 Development of Methodology to Downscale Global Climate Fields to 12km Resolution.
Simulating Supercell Thunderstorms in a Horizontally-Heterogeneous Convective Boundary Layer Christopher Nowotarski, Paul Markowski, Yvette Richardson.
GOES-R ABI PROXY DATA SET GENERATION AT CIMSS Mathew M. Gunshor, Justin Sieglaff, Erik Olson, Thomas Greenwald, Jason Otkin, and Allen Huang Cooperative.
Huang et al:MTG-IRS OSSE. EMC seminar, 1/11/ MTG-IRS: An Observing System Simulation Experiment (OSSE) on regional scales Xiang-Yu Huang, Hongli.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Hyperspectral Data Applications: Convection & Turbulence Overview: Application Research for MURI Atmospheric Boundary Layer Turbulence Convective Initiation.
Higher Resolution Operational Models. Operational Mesoscale Model History Early: LFM, NGM (history) Eta (mainly history) MM5: Still used by some, but.
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPoRT SAC Nov 21-22, 2005 Regional Modeling using MODIS SST composites Prepared.
The diagnosis of mixed-layer depth above an eastern U.S. wildfire using a mesoscale numerical weather prediction model Joseph J. Charney USDA Forest Service,
Seasonal Modeling (NOAA) Jian-Wen Bao Sara Michelson Jim Wilczak Curtis Fleming Emily Piencziak.
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
D. PosseltIHOP Spring Workshop24-26 March 2003 Simulation of an IHOP Convective Initiation Case for GIFTS Preparation Derek J. Posselt 1, Erik Olson 1,
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
Sensitivity Study of a Coupled Carbon Dioxide Meteorological Modeling System with Case Studies András Zénó Gyöngyösi, Tamás Weidinger, László Haszpra,
WRF Version 2: Physics Update Jimy Dudhia NCAR/MMM.
Ensemble variability in rainfall forecasts of Hurricane Irene (2011) Molly Smith, Ryan Torn, Kristen Corbosiero, and Philip Pegion NWS Focal Points: Steve.
Progress Update of Numerical Simulation for OSSE Project Yongzuo Li 11/18/2008.
Bogdan Rosa 1, Marcin Kurowski 1 and Michał Ziemiański 1 1. Institute of Meteorology and Water Management (IMGW), Warsaw Podleśna, 61
Oct. 28 th th SRNWP, Bad Orb H.-S. Bauer, V. Wulfmeyer and F. Vandenberghe Comparison of different data assimilation techniques for a convective.
Numerical Investigation of Air- Sea Interactions During Winter Extratropical Storms Presented by Jill Nelson M.S. Marine Science Candidate Graduate Research.
D. J. Posselt, J. E. Davies, E. R. Olson3 rd MURI Spring Workshop28-29 May 2003 Generation of Simulated GIFTS Datasets Derek J. Posselt, Jim E. Davies,
Module 6 MM5: Overview William J. Gutowski, Jr. Iowa State University.
Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi
Analysis of High-Resolution WRF Simulations During A Severe Weather Event Jason A. Otkin* Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies, University.
UNIT 1: Weather Dynamics Chapter 1: Inquiring about Weather The Causes of Weather Chapter 2: Weather Forecasting.
Remote sensing and modeling of cloud contents and precipitation efficiency Chung-Hsiung Sui Institute of Hydrological Sciences National Central University.
African easterly wave dynamics in a full-physics numerical model. Gareth Berry and Chris Thorncroft. University at Albany/SUNY, Albany, NY,USA.
Satellite Data Assimilation Activities at CIMSS for FY2003 Robert M. Aune Advanced Satellite Products Team NOAA/NESDIS/ORA/ARAD Cooperative Institute for.
Characteristics of Cyclones over North-western Pacific Region Yoshio Asuma Division of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido.
Numerical investigation of the multi-scale processes inducing convection initiation for the 12 June 2002 IHOP case study Preliminary study: testing the.
High impact weather nowcasting and short-range forecasting using advanced IR soundings Jun Li Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
Assimilating Cloudy Infrared Brightness Temperatures in High-Resolution Numerical Models Using Ensemble Data Assimilation Jason A. Otkin and Rebecca Cintineo.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Combining GOES Observations with Other Data to Improve Severe Weather Forecasts.
A modeling study of cloud microphysics: Part I: Effects of Hydrometeor Convergence on Precipitation Efficiency. C.-H. Sui and Xiaofan Li.
Numerical Weather Forecast Model (governing equations)
MM5- and WRF-Simulated Cloud and Moisture Fields
Water Budget of Typhoon Nari(2001)
P2.36 Generation of Simulated Top of Atmosphere Radiance Datasets for GIFTS/HES Algorithm Development Jason A. Otkin*, Derek J. Posselt, Erik R. Olson,
RECENT INNOVATIONS IN DERIVING ATMOSPHERIC MOTION VECTORS AT CIMSS
Convective and orographically-induced precipitation study
Generation of Simulated GIFTS Datasets
A CASE STUDY OF GRAVITY WAVE GENERATION BY HECTOR CONVECTION
Generation of Simulated GIFTS Datasets
Xu, H., and X. Li, 2017 J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 122, 6004–6024
Comparison of Simulated Top of Atmosphere Radiance Datasets
Presentation transcript:

Generation of Simulated Atmospheric Datasets for Ingest into Radiative Transfer Models Jason A. Otkin, Derek J. Posselt, Erik R. Olson, and Raymond K. Garcia Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies Space Science and Engineering Center University of Wisconsin–Madison

Outline Review prior MURI-funded MM5 model simulations – Convective initiation event (IHOP) – Upper-tropospheric jet streak (THORPEX) Compare WRF & MM5 model simulations of a severe weather outbreak Examine the most recent MURI-funded model simulation – WRF simulated extratropical cyclone (ATREC) Data processing with 32-CPU Altix system

Procedure 1.Use a sophisticated mesoscale model (such as the MM5 or WRF) to produce a highly realistic simulated atmospheric dataset 2.Use forward model calculations performed on simulated temperature, water vapor, and cloud microphysical profiles to generate infrared spectra with high spectral resolution 3.Retrieve temperature and water vapor from top of atmosphere radiances and compare with original simulated atmosphere to assess retrieval accuracy

MM5 Model Characteristics Non-hydrostatic numerical model that solves the full non-linear primitive equations on user-defined terrain- following sigma levels Prognostic variables include perturbation pressure, u, v, w, q w, as well as mixing ratios for other microphysical variables Employs a 24-category topography and land-use dataset with varying horizontal resolution

MM5 Model Characteristics Can run multiple 1- and 2-way interactive and moving nests Includes programs for FDDA, 3DVAR, and analysis nudging Contains a sophisticated LSM to provide heat and moisture fluxes at the surface

MM5 Model Characteristics Employs leap frog temporal differencing with an Asselin filter to remove “computational mode” noise arising from the leap frog scheme 2 nd order centered differencing scheme used for the horizontal and vertical advection terms Contains 4 th order horizontal diffusion/filter terms MM5 has an effective resolution of ~10 *  x

IHOP Convective Initiation Event Objectives: Demonstrate satellite potential to observe moisture convergence prior to convective initiation Demonstrate potential to observe fine-scale rapidly-evolving water vapor structures GOES micron imagery: UTC 12 June 2002 Event Overview: Mostly clear environment preceding late afternoon convection Very complex low-level moisture structures and wind fields Convection initiated in the presence of strong convergence along a fine- scale low-level water vapor gradient

IHOP Convective Initiation Event MM5 Model Configuration: 4 km grid spacing with 60 vertical levels Initialized at 06 UTC on 12 June with 10-km RUC data and then run for 24 hours Nudged toward RUC analyses during 6-hr spin-up period Goddard microphysics MRF planetary boundary layer RRTM/Dudhia radiation OSU land-surface model No cumulus parameterization Geographical region covered by MM5 domain

IHOP Simulation Results Observed GOES-11 imagerySimulated GOES-11 imagery 1900 UTC

IHOP Simulation Results Observed GOES-11 imagerySimulated GOES-11 imagery 2000 UTC

IHOP Simulation Results Observed GOES-11 imagerySimulated GOES-11 imagery 2100 UTC

IHOP Simulation Results Observed GOES-11 imagerySimulated GOES-11 imagery 2200 UTC

IHOP Simulation Results Observed GOES-11 imagerySimulated GOES-11 imagery 2300 UTC

IHOP Simulation Results Color-shaded plot depicts 2-meter mixing ratio White iso-surfaces encompass cloud boundaries Wind vectors at 1.5 km AGL

THORPEX Jet Streak Case Overview: Significant upper-level jet streak with winds in excess of 180 knots Mixture of clear skies with scattered areas of lower- and upper-level clouds Domain coverage includes Aqua overpass, ER-2 flight, and G4 dropsondes Extensive observations were taken as part of THORPEX, GWINDEX, and NOAA NCEP Winter Storms Research Program GOES micron imagery: 2100 UTC 12 March 2003 – 0400 UTC 13 March 2003

THORPEX Jet Streak Case Geographical region covered by MM5 domains MM5 Model Configuration: km grid spacing with 50 vertical levels Initialized at 12 UTC on 11 March with 1° AVN data and then run for 48 hours Goddard microphysics Eta planetary boundary layer RRTM/Dudhia radiation No land-surface model Grell cumulus scheme on outer two domains with explicit convection on inner 4-km domain

THORPEX Simulation Results Observed GOES-10 imagerySimulated GOES-10 imagery 2200 UTC

THORPEX Simulation Results Observed GOES-10 imagerySimulated GOES-10 imagery 2300 UTC

THORPEX Simulation Results Observed GOES-10 imagerySimulated GOES-10 imagery 0000 UTC

THORPEX Simulation Results Observed GOES-10 imagerySimulated GOES-10 imagery 0100 UTC

THORPEX Simulation Results Observed GOES-10 imagerySimulated GOES-10 imagery 0200 UTC

WRF Model Characteristics Integrates fully compressible non-hydrostatic equations on a mass-based terrain-following coordinate Can be run either for idealized or real-data cases Options for one and two-way interactive nests Contains a prototype moving nest

WRF Model Characteristics Option to use 2 nd or 3 rd order Runge-Kutta temporal integration Option to use 2 nd to 6 th order horizontal and vertical advection schemes Effective resolution is ~ 7 *  x

WRF Model Characteristics Includes the NOAH LSM to calculate surface moisture and energy fluxes –Land use categories determine the surface properties at each grid point Version 2 contained a basic version of 3DVAR with a research grade version to be released later this month

WRF-MM5 Comparison: Northern Plains Severe Weather Outbreak Occurred during the evening of June 2003 Over 100 tornadoes reported across the region Manchester, SD destroyed by F4 tornado Very complex cloud conditions to model

Model Configuration 42 hr simulation initialized at 1200 UTC 23 June x 290 grid point domain with 4 km horizontal spacing and 50 vertical levels MM5WRF Goddard microphysics MRF PBL RRTM/Dudhia radiation Explicit cumulus convection OSU land surface model WSM6 microphysics YSU PBL RRTM/Dudhia radiation Explicit cumulus convection NOAH land surface model

Horizontal Variability MM5WRF 2.5 km Water Vapor Mixing Ratio Liquid Cloud Water WRF has much finer horizontal resolution than the MM5 WRF effective resolution is ~7*  x MM5 effective resolution is ~10*  x

Simulated Ice Microphysics WSM6 scheme generates less (more) ice mass in the upper (middle) troposphere - WSM6 contains a new diagnosis of ice crystal concentration Much lower altitude of the ice mixing ratio maximum in the WRF simulation - Goddard scheme assumes a constant sedimentation rate while a variable rate is used by the WSM6 scheme

Simulated Ice Microphysics MM5 Goddard scheme assumes a constant ice diameter of 20  m WRF WSM6 employs a method that relates the mean ice diameter to the amount of ice mass and the number concentration of ice particles - Generates a more realistic distribution of ice particle sizes

Simulated Radiances WRF simulation is characterized by much greater horizontal variability

ATREC Extratropical Cyclone Case Overview: Intense extratropical cyclone developing over the Gulf Stream Significant cloud shield with extensive region of stratiform precipitation Scattered convection along trailing cold front

ATREC Extratropical Cyclone Case WRF Model Configuration: 1070x1070 grid point domain with 2 km grid spacing and 50 vertical levels Initialized at 00 UTC on 05 December with 1° GFS data and then run for 24 hours WSM6 microphysics Yonsei University (YSU) planetary boundary layer RRTM/Dudhia radiation NOAH land-surface model Explicit cumulus Geographical region covered by WRF domain

SGI Altix We are able to perform very large memory-intensive model simulations with very fine horizontal resolution Used hardware money received by Allen Huang from the Navy DURIP program to purchase 24 CPUs with 192 Gb of memory Used grant money received by Bob Aune to purchase 8 additional CPUs Approximately 3 times faster than old cluster 10 Tb of external disk storage