Electronics for the Liquid Scintillator OA Detector Option Alfons Weber Feb 2004 with help from: ANL, Cambridge, FNAL, Harvard, RAL, UMN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 Back to the drawing board Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Real system New VFE chip A simple system Some questions.
Advertisements

SciFi Tracker DAQ M. Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) MICE meeting at LBNL 10.Feb.2005 DAQ system for KEK test beam Hardware Software Processes Architecture SciFi.
A scalable DAQ system using the DRS4 sampling chip H.Friederich 1, G.Davatz 1, U.Hartmann 2, A.Howard 1, H.Meyer 1, D.Murer 1, S.Ritt 2, N.Schlumpf 2 1.
Coupling an array of Neutron detectors with AGATA The phases of AGATA The AGATA GTS and data acquisition.
SciFi Tracker DAQ M. Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) MICE Tracker KEK Mar. 30, 2005.
20 Feb 2002Readout electronics1 Status of the readout design Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Basic concept Features of proposal VFE interface issues.
1 MICE Tracker Readout Update, Preparation for Cosmic Ray Tests Introduction/Overview AFE-IIt firmware development VLSB firmware development Hardware progress.
28 August 2002Paul Dauncey1 Readout electronics for the CALICE ECAL and tile HCAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College, University of London, UK For the CALICE-UK.
6 June 2002UK/HCAL common issues1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: UK commitments Trigger issues DAQ issues Readout electronics issues Many more.
The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.
4 Dec 2001First ideas for readout/DAQ1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College Contributions from all of UK: result of brainstorming meeting in Birmingham on 13.
Alfons Weber Towards Electronics for a Long Baseline Neutrino Detector Alfons Weber STFC & University of Oxford ν.
3/7/05A. Semenov Batch-by-Batch Intensity Monitor 1 Two-Channel Batch by Batch Intensity Monitor for Main Injector BBI.
DLS Digital Controller Tony Dobbing Head of Power Supplies Group.
MR (7/7/05) T2K electronics Beam structure ~ 8 (9?) bunches / spill bunch width ~ 60 nsec bunch separation ~ 600 nsec spill duration ~ 5  sec Time between.
Future DAQ Directions David Bailey for the CALICE DAQ Group.
U N C L A S S I F I E D FVTX Detector Readout Concept S. Butsyk For LANL P-25 group.
M. Lo Vetere 1,2, S. Minutoli 1, E. Robutti 1 1 I.N.F.N Genova, via Dodecaneso, GENOVA (Italy); 2 University of GENOVA (Italy) The TOTEM T1.
A Readout Electronics for MAPMT Matteo Turisini – E. Cisbani Italian National Institute of Health – INFN Rome 1 JLab/CLAS12 RICH Meeting - 16/Nov/2011.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
David Bailey University of Manchester. Overview Aim to develop a generic system –Maximise use of off-the-shelf commercial components Reduce as far as.
S.Vereschagin, Yu.Zanevsky, F.Levchanovskiy S.Chernenko, G.Cheremukhina, S.Zaporozhets, A.Averyanov R&D FOR TPC MPD/NICA READOUT ELECTRONICS Varna, 2013.
ICARUS General Trigger Design Contributions from: M.Della Pietra, A.Di Cicco, P.Di Meo, G.Fiorillo, P.Parascandolo, R.Santorelli, P.Trattino B.Baboussinov,
11th March 2008AIDA FEE Report1 AIDA Front end electronics Report February 2008.
21-Aug-06DoE Site Review / Harvard(1) Front End Electronics for the NOvA Neutrino Detector John Oliver Long baseline neutrino experiment Fermilab (Chicago)
Features of the new Alibava firmware: 1. Universal for laboratory use (readout of stand-alone detector via USB interface) and for the telescope readout.
DAQ for 4-th DC S.Popescu. Introduction We have to define DAQ chapter of the DOD for the following detectors –Vertex detector –TPC –Calorimeter –Muon.
NUMI Off Axis NUMI Off Axis Workshop Workshop Argonne Meeting Electronics for RPCs Gary Drake, Charlie Nelson Apr. 25, 2003 p. 1.
Latest ideas in DAQ development for LHC B. Gorini - CERN 1.
May, 2006FEE 2006 / Perugia, Italy(1) Front End Electronics for the NOvA Neutrino Detector John Oliver, Nathan Felt Harvard University Long baseline.
LHCb front-end electronics and its interface to the DAQ.
1 07/10/07 Forward Vertex Detector Technical Design – Electronics DAQ Readout electronics split into two parts – Near the detector (ROC) – Compresses and.
Guido Haefeli CHIPP Workshop on Detector R&D Geneva, June 2008 R&D at LPHE/EPFL: SiPM and DAQ electronics.
Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL
SPIROC update Felix Sefkow Most slides from Ludovic Raux HCAL main meeting April 18, 2007.
Calorimeter Digitisation Prototype (Material from A Straessner, C Bohm et al) L1Calo Collaboration Meeting Cambridge 23-Mar-2011 Norman Gee.
1 MICE Tracker Readout Update Introduction/Overview TriP-t hardware tests AFE IIt firmware development VLSB firmware development Hardware progress Summary.
1 Level 1 Pre Processor and Interface L1PPI Guido Haefeli L1 Review 14. June 2002.
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
11 October 2002Paul Dauncey - CDR Introduction1 CDR Introduction and Overview Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
TPC electronics Status, Plans, Needs Marcus Larwill April
HBD/TPC Electronics Status Works done to for a)Prototype detector readout b)Understand packing density and heat loading issues c)Address the overall system.
1 19 th January 2009 M. Mager - L. Musa Charge Readout Chip Development & System Level Considerations.
15-Aug-08DoE Site Review / Harvard(1) Front End Electronics for the NOvA Neutrino Detector John Oliver, Nathan Felt, Sarah Harder Long baseline neutrino.
S.MonteilPS COMMISSIONING1 MaPMT-VFE-FE ELECTRONICS COMMISSIONING AND MONITORING. OUTLINE 1)Ma-PMT TEST BENCHES MEASUREMENTS 2)VFE AND FE ELECTRONICS FEATURES.
CLAS12 Central Detector Meeting, Saclay, 3 Dec MVT Read-Out Architecture & MVT / SVT Integration Issues Irakli MANDJAVIDZE.
Upgrade with Silicon Vertex Tracker Rachid Nouicer Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) For the PHENIX Collaboration Stripixel VTX Review October 1, 2008.
August 24, 2011IDAP Kick-off meeting - TileCal ATLAS TileCal Upgrade LHC and ATLAS current status LHC designed for cm -2 s 7+7 TeV Limited to.
LECC2003: The 96 Chann FED Tester: Greg Iles30 September The 96 channel FED Tester Outline: (1) Background (2) Requirements of the FED Tester (3)
PHOTOTUBE SCANNING SETUP AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Doug Roberts U of Maryland, College Park.
IRFU The ANTARES Data Acquisition System S. Anvar, F. Druillole, H. Le Provost, F. Louis, B. Vallage (CEA) ACTAR Workshop, 2008 June 10.
SKIROC status Calice meeting – Kobe – 10/05/2007.
SiW Electromagnetic Calorimeter - The EUDET Module Calorimeter R&D for the within the CALICE collaboration SiW Electromagnetic Calorimeter - The EUDET.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
Digital Acquisition: State of the Art and future prospects
A General Purpose Charge Readout Chip for TPC Applications
CALICE DAQ Developments
Silicon Lab Bonn Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
VELO readout On detector electronics Off detector electronics to DAQ
Status of n-XYTER read-out chain at GSI
The digital read-out for the CSC system of the TOTEM experiment at LHC
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
BESIII EMC electronics
John Harvey CERN EP/LBC July 24, 2001
The digital read-out for the CSC system of the TOTEM experiment at LHC
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
SVT detector electronics
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
TELL1 A common data acquisition board for LHCb
Presentation transcript:

Electronics for the Liquid Scintillator OA Detector Option Alfons Weber Feb 2004 with help from: ANL, Cambridge, FNAL, Harvard, RAL, UMN

Jan System Overview Physics Specifications light level, noise APDs FE chip Measurements (Leon) Readout Architecture Analogue or digital pipeline DAQ system Timing System R&D for the next year

Jan Requirements (I) Signal size Sensitive to MIP from 14.4 m into detector 25 pe How many electrons is this? signal 2500 electrons, noise 500e (250e) Dynamic range (8bits) 25 pe = 1 mip = 5 ADC 4 (near/far) x 5 ADC x 5(no of mips) = 100 ADC Livetime For beam physics no deadtime around spill For SN (Not proven) advantage*feasibility/cost=low no deadtime for 10 sec ? For calibration (cosmics) maximize livetime out of spill (100 spills / 1sec) Charge pulse

Jan Requirements (II) Possible Triggers External Trigger Spill SN random Internal Trigger (not necessary) neutrino interactions cosmics (SN) Near Detector compatibility ? many overlapping events during 10 usec Different electronics (fast) Failure rate <<10 -5 day = 1 every 10 days MTBF = 10 5 x 24 h

Jan APD Operation + - h+h+ e Si Ar coating Contact layer Collection Region Avalanche region Drift Substrate Contact layer Electric Field p n-n- n n ++ Electrons generated by the incident light are multiplied in the high field region at the junction. Two 16-channel arrays A dime (10¢) Roger is with Hamamatsu now

Jan Noise + - ADC Preamp Noise Sources Fluctuations on signal Fluctuations on thermal electrons Excess noise factor – Gaussian Variance = F - 1 Johnson noise at the pre-amp input – Gaussian.

Jan Off Axis APD Readout (analogue) Proof of principle: existing MASDA chip (FNAL) in spill analogue pipeline, out of spill digitisation NOT optimised to imput capacitance

Jan Features Slowly leaking integrator : falltime constant - T f Controlled risetime : T r Multiple samples separated by Ts/2  ADC digitizes data every Ts/2 T r<< T s<< T f Sample subtractions done on digital data within FPGA investigated by Harvard Ts/2 TfTf TrTr TsTs FPGA Front end chip Ethernet Off Axis APD Readout (digital) continues digitisation: digital pipeline, regular reset

Jan Multiple Correlated Samples Do not only sample pulse before and after APD signal Use multiple samples to reduce noise Digitisation and low noise amplifier Ts 3Ts Simulations by John Oliver

Jan Multiple Correlated Samples No of samples CoefficientsNormalized sigma^2Normalized sigma /3, 1/32/3 = /11, 3/11, 2/1166/121 = /25, 6/25, 4/25, 3/25 12/25 = Conclusion  Using 8 samples, improvement is of order ~ sqt(2)  Other optimizations possible : e.g. Use samples below & above optimal  Noise improvement of > 30% or more are possible  ….. and best of all, its free !

Jan APD Box Receive optical signals house FE electronics house digitisation interface to DAQ

Jan PCB Sideview Put bare APD onto PCB Flip-chip alignment to <<150 μm (Ray Yarema) cool APD to 0 0 F

Jan APD Box (II) Difficult! Needs dedicated electro-mechanical engineering (FNAL, UMN) To be considered: optical & digital & LV connections light tight condensation noise insulation (external & digital) heat load from cooled APDs …

Jan APD Box (design idea) Heat sink Peltier element APD array USB connection Alignment collarLight seal

Jan DAQ System (RAL) Readout/DAQ is cost sensitive item Want: Low cost per channel Scalable, flexible system Minimise off-detector links (major cost item) Use standard technology where possible Future upgrade paths considered Aggregate data from multiple APD boxes (96) Use (Gbit) Ethernet for off-detector links Total throughput scales with increased links COTS technology for DAQ backend

Jan Input constraints 10,000 APD boxes 64 channels / box (2 scintillator modules) 8 2 MHz Continuous sampling, but ZERO suppressed Assume spill = 20 µs Data rate Noise: x 2 MHz x 8 Byte, Signal: 0 Hz 1 MB/s per APD box = 10 GB/s total raw data rate 20 bytes per spill per APD box 200 kBytes per spill 100 Hz readout rate = 20 MB/s total rate

Jan Readout Rings

Jan Readout RAL Ethernet link FPGA development boards LVDS links optional ADC daughter board

Jan Readout Concentrator Node PC with several network cards

Jan DAQ Backend PC with Gigabit Ethernet

Jan Clock & Timing System FE needs timing to be synchronised across the detector FE may need accurate spill signal in time: analogue pipeline not to late: digital pipeline Need to get spill signal from FNAL to OA site Need to distribute clock around the detector.

Jan MI Timing Events (I) Start Cycle Flat Top Extract

Jan MI Timing Events (II) Signals available Start of NuMI cycle (earliest) ~1.4 sec in advance: $23 & $A5 predicts spill to within 1/60 Hz = 16.6 msec spill-to-spill jitter: 20 µsec Flat top ~0.4 sec in advance: $25 spill-to-spill jitter: 10 µsec??? Kicker fire (most accurate) few µsec in advance: $74 & $A9 spill-to-spill jitter: nsec ???

Jan Signal Transmission Conventional HEP timing signal distribution at OA site But: How do we get the spill signal to the detector? Options: Internet (slow, ~0.5 sec latency ?) Phone line (fast, msec latency) Dedicated radio transmitter (fast)

Jan R&D Plans for FY04. Objectives: Demonstrate readout of 14.5 m long strip with cooled APD. Build ~ 5 readout boxes with un-optimized Mazda chip and packaged APD’s – analog store Build 1 prototype readout box with digital store. Design and cost APD readout box Design for manufacturability. Thermal, optical and electrical. Refine system cost estimate. DAQ specification.

Jan R&D in Deliverables Readout Modules for readout of 14.4 m tubes. analogue pipeline (MASDA) digital pipeline Engineering and Design. Gbit Ethernet on FPGA Clock & Timing system APD box Power distribution system Detailed system cost estimate.

Jan

Jan APD Box Functions (SAB) Slave and Master APD Box Receive clock/spill signal Digitise/timestamp APD signals Sparcify data (zero suppression) Transmit data for “spill” on request All implemented in FPGA (firmware) Master APD Box only Receive clock/ctrl signals from timing system Re-transmit clock/ctrl on SAB ring Read out SAB via ring SABs are daisy-chained Ring architecture: each SAB can be accessed on either leg Redundancy: save against single SAB failure Encapsulate data and transmit it to Readout Concentration Node 95 SAB are read out by one MAB (8 planes)

Jan Digital Functionality in APD Box Ethernet & clock only needed for MAB RAM optional top part isolated from light-tight box analogue amplifier & APD Ethernet SAB ring SAB ring clock PSU ADC FPGA power RAM PHY monitoring & control T

Jan Readout Concentrator Node (RCN) RCN is a standard PC with several network cards In Spill mode: Receive data from several 4-16 MABs over Ethernet, i.e. 8 RCNs needed Traffic shaping and buffering Transmit data to Trigger Processing Nodes Also in self-triggering mode (only): Receive trigger primitives/Make L1 trigger decision Broadcast trigger time to MABs & other RCN Receive data for trigger time More RCNs possible

Jan Trigger Farm / Data Merging One Master RCN coordinating transfer of data to trigger farm Trigger Processing Nodes (TPNs) All detector data together for the first time Run S/W trigger algorithm(s) to identify events Cosmics Beam events ??? Data Merging node takes data from TPNs for storage Can easily take many spill triggers / sec