Bob Laxdal, SRF Department Head, TRIUMF Living with a High Field Solenoid in a Cryomodule 11/5/2012 1TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PXIE: SSR1 Section Focusing Lens 1.Requirements table 2.Developed at FNAL 3.Available from vendors 4.Used at ANL 5.Layout of the SSR1 cryomodule 6.Case.
Advertisements

1 Superconducting Magnets for the MICE Channel Michael A. Green Oxford University Physics Department Oxford OX1-3RH, UK.
ANL HWR Cryomodule Status Update 27 January 2015 Zachary Conway On behalf of the ANL Linac Development Group Argonne National Laboratory Physics Division.
Solenoid-Based Focusing Lens for a Superconducting RF Proton Linac Presentation prepared for AEM 11/08/20101I. Terechkine.
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
Progress on the MuCool and MICE Coupling Coils * L. Wang a, X. K Liu a, F. Y. Xu a, A. B. Chen a, H. Pan a, H. Wu a, X. L. Guo a, S. X Zheng a, D. Summers.
Discussion on Studies at Test Stands Roger Ruber Uppsala University.
R&D Status and Plan on The Cryostat N. Ohuchi, K. Tsuchiya, A. Terashima, H. Hisamatsu, M. Masuzawa, T. Okamura, H. Hayano 1.STF-Cryostat Design 2.Construction.
ATLAS Intensity and Efficiency Upgrade ATLAS USERS MEETING Speaker: Mike Kelly Physics Division May 15, 2014.
SCU Segmented Cryostat Concept M. Leitner, S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers September 2 nd, 2014.
MICE CC Test Status Ruben Carcagno 11/06/13 1. Cooldown Coil Temperature (calculated average in each of 8 coil segments) SC Transition (voltages across.
Focusing Lens for the SSR1 Section of PXIE Preliminary analysis of main options 3/13/2012I. Terechkine1.
Status of the HINS Linac Front End Focusing Lens Development Can we use these lenses in the SSR1 crymodule of PXIE ? 9/27/20111 I.Terechkine for PXIE Cryomodule.
Americas Main Linac Cavity and Cryomodule WBS X.9 Resource Proposal.
5 K Shield Study of STF Cryomodule Norihito Ohuchi, Norio Higashi KEK Xu QingJin IHEP 2008/3/3-61Sendai-GDE-Meeting.
Focusing Lens for PXIE SSR1 Cryomodule Summer 2012 Status 7/10/2012I. Terechkine1.
MICE Coupling Coil Testing at Fermilab All Experimenters Meeting Ruben Carcagno March 19, R. Carcagno - MICE CC Testing at Fermilab3/19/2012.
Warm and Cold Ion Linac: Comparison and Optimization March 30, 2015.
Advances in Development of Diffused Nb3Sn Cavities at Cornell
PIP-II Solenoid Focusing lens for SSR2 Cryomodule Kumud Singh, Affiliation: Bhabha Atomic Research Centre PIP-II Technical Meeting 19 Jan 2016.
Highlights of Prototype SC Magnet Tests (LCLSII- 4.5-EN-0612) and Proposed Production Magnet Test Plan (LCLSII-4.5-EN-611-R0) and XFEL Magnet Test Results.
SSR1 Cryomodule Development for PXIE - Alignment T. Nicol Decenber 6, 2011.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
Magnetic Shielding for Cryomodules Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) MSU, March 6-7, 2013 Reflections by T. Arkan, T. Nicol, and I. Terechkine 3/14/2013MSU.
ESS AD RETREAT 5 th December 2011, Lund “A walk down the Linac” SPOKES Sébastien Bousson IPN Orsay.
Magnet R&D for Large Volume Magnetization A.V. Zlobin Fermilab Fifth IDS-NF Plenary Meeting 8-10 April 2010 at Fermilab.
Experimental study on heat transfer through a few layers of multilayer insulation from 300 K to 4.2 K Zhanguo Zong, Norihito Ohuchi, Kiyosumi Tsuchiya,
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
NSCL Professor, SRF Department Manager Kenji Saito Status of FRIB: design plans, cavity and cryomodule development TTC Meeting November TTC meeting.
Low Beta Cryomodule Development at Fermilab Tom Nicol March 2, 2011.
Superconducting Accelerating Cryo-Module Tests at DESY TESLA Technology Collaboration (TTC) Meeting, February 28 - March , Milano, Italy Denis Kostin,
Spoke section of the ESS linac: - the Spoke cryomodules - the cryogenic distribution system P. DUTHIL (CNRS-IN2P3 IPN Orsay / Division Accélérateurs) on.
Introduction to the effort on C-ADS accelerator physics and review charges Jingyu Tang For the Joint IHEP-IMP group on the C-ADS Accelerator Physics International.
Possible Configurations for Prototypes of PX Cryomodules: SSR0 and SSR1 Prepared for discussion at the HINS  PX technical meeting 12/10/20101I. Terechkine.
September 27, 2007 ILC Main Linac - KOF 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin for Magnet group.
ESS SC cavities development G. Devanz TTC meeting, march 1st 2011, Milano.
Cavities, Cryomodules, and Cryogenics Working Group 2 Summary Report Mark Champion, Sang-ho Kim Project X Collaboration Meeting April 12-14, 2011.
325 MHz Superconducting Spoke Cavity Coupler status. T. Khabiboulline Power Coupler design for Superconducting Spoke cavities. Originally.
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science under Cooperative Agreement DE-SC , the State of Michigan.
Overview of the RISP SCL
V. Paramonov, on behalf INR team.
Requirements for Efficient CW SRF Cryomodules
Cavity Test Results for PIP-II
Quench estimations of the CBM magnet
Technical Issues Facing in the FRIB Cryomodule
State of the Art and Future Potential of Nb/Cu Coatings
Progress and Issues with VTS Upgrade
TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF
THE HIE-ISOLDE SUPERCONDUCTING CAVITIES:
Materials, Advanced Accelerator Science & Cryogenics Division
High Q Cavity Operation in the Cornell Horizontal Test Cryomodule
Injector Performance Requirements Conventional Facilities Update
Operation experience of cryogenic system and cryomodules for the superconducting linear accelerator at IUAC, New Delhi. T S Datta ( On behalf of Cryogenics.
LCLS Injector: Introduction D. H
HIE-LINAC status report
PERMANENT MAGNET QUADRUPOLE FOR THE LINAC 4 CCDTL
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
FRIB summary of performance degradation - VTA to cryomodule
The superconducting solenoids for the Super Charm-Tau Factory detector
Cryomodules Challenges for PERLE
Studies on orbit corrections
as a prototype for Super c-tau factory
8-T Solenoid Package and Local Magnetic Shielding in FRIB Cryomodules
FLUX TRAPPING STUDIES ON LOW BETA CAVITIES
Magnetic Field Sensors and Measurements in Cryomodules
Magnetic shielding and thermal shielding
The LCLS-II HE High Q0 and Gradient R&D Program
Injector Physics C.Limborg-Deprey Feb.8th 2006
IR Beam Transport Status
HWR and Test Cryomodule for China ADS
Presentation transcript:

Bob Laxdal, SRF Department Head, TRIUMF Living with a High Field Solenoid in a Cryomodule 11/5/2012 1TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF

11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF 2 General Comments Many new facilities are proposed or in progress with SC solenoids providing transverse focusing –SC solenoids are placed in cryomodules in close proximity to cavities Proposals with both single and multiple solenoids in a cryomodule –In low beta section frequent transverse focusing is required Concerns –Interaction of solenoid field on the cavity Promote a quench if field is too high Trap field in case of a quench –Interaction with solenoid field on environment –Alignment of the solenoid Tuning steering coils to compensate misalignment

ISAC-II FRIB ANL IUAC SARAF LNL IFMIF B-ISOL Project-X HIE-I Low Beta Hadron Linacs Existing or Proposed using SC Solenoids CADS 11/5/2012 3TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF ReA3

11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF 4 Upgrades, Projects and Proposals for Ions ProjectLabSC SolRT quadsParticleStructure ISAC-IITRIUMF  HIQWR UpgradeANL  HIQWR HI-LinacIUAC  HIQWR SARAF-ISOREQ  P, dHWR ReA3MSU  HIQWR FRIBMSU  HIQWR, HWR IFMIFVarious  dHWR Project-XFNAL  H-HWR, spoke C-ADSIHEP, IMP  pHWR, spoke B-ISOLCIAE/PKU  P,d,HIQWR, HWR, spoke HIE-REXCERN  HIQWR (sputter) SPIRAL-IIGANIL  P,dQWR RISPKorea  P, HIQWR, HWR, Spoke

Some examples TRIUMF ISAC-II Cryomodules – one 9-Tesla solenoid per cryomodule ANL energy upgrade cryomodule – one 9-Tesla solenoid per cryomodule IUAC heavy ion cryomodule – one SC solenoid per cryomodule 11/5/2012 5TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF

Others with multiple solenoids 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF6 Project X ANL MSU SARAF

Residual magnetic field goals 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF7 f (Hz) Rs (nΩ) Residual field will be 100% trapped in the superconductor Vortices will have normal cores which increase surface resistance by Rmag A reasonable goal is to have Rmag ≤ 3nΩ - must have B<30mG at 100MHz and B<10mG at 1GHz

Magnetic Issues 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF8 High field solenoid in a cryomodule Can magnetically pollute the environment Components, including mu metal shield, that are in the environment that can be magnetized will be magnetized by the field from the solenoid Can produce field when at zero current Once a field is energized and while still in the superconducting state the solenoid will have `frozen flux’ even when the current is zeroed. problem if cavities warm above transition Can degrade cavity performance during quench through trapped flux in the quench heat zone

Magnetic Pollution 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF9 Possible cures: Choose materials that are not easily magnetized 316LN ss – although this can become susceptible to magnetization after welding or cold working Pay attention to hardware – bolts, nuts, especially near high H zones Isolate the cavity from the environment Add cold mu metal around the cavity Adds to expense and complication of assembly Isolate the solenoid from the enviroment Add an iron return core Add a shield around the magnet OR: Start unpolluted and use the solenoid to erase magnet memory by employing a degaussing cycle before every warm-up

Magnetic Pollution – ISAC-II Mapped the internal magnetic field with a fluxgate magnetometer 1.SCB3 after solenoid powered then warmed (no hysteresis cycle) 2.SCB1 before powering the solenoid 3.SCB1 after powering the solenoid and with hysteresis cycle Hysteresis cycle required to reduce memory of solenoid 11/5/ TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF

Frozen flux 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF11 Possible cures: Isolate the cavity from the environment Add cold mu metal around the cavity Adds to expense and complication of assembly Isolate the solenoid from the enviroment Add a shield around the magnet Practical solution: Add a heater to the solenoid to allow heating above transition to quench the flux if required

Frozen Flux Mapping data* for ISAC-II Solenoid  Solenoid is brought to 9 T and a)Ramped to zero with no cycle at 4K b)Taken to zero through hysteresis cycle at 4K c)Ramped to zero and warmed to 20K * Data taken by Accel Frozen flux in solenoid produces a large (20G) field in cavity region when no hysteresis cycle is used. Cycling the magnet does reduce the field at the cavity but only warming the solenoid can eliminate the field. 11/5/ TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF

Perturbing the cavity performance 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF13 Procedurally the solenoid is only turned after the cavity is cold As long as the broadcast field at the cavity Bsol is much less than Hc1 (B~160mT) then the outer wall of the cavity will act as a Meissner shield and stop the flux from penetrating to the rf side Solenoid can be designed with bucking coils to reduce the fringe field at the cavity Brf Bsol

11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF14 Bucking coils  Focussing in the SC Linac is provided by superconducting solenoids (B  9T)  End fringe fields controlled with active `bucking’ coils (B cavity  0.03T) Cavity Prototype Solenoid at Accel

Quench 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF15 However during a quench the stored energy in the cavity will be dissipated at the quench location and depending on the energy content, the wall thickness and the thermal conductivity the outer wall can be heated to produce a normal hole in the superconducting wall The normal hole will soon cool but the flux will trapped lowering the surface resistance in the hot zone thus lowering the cavity Q Brf Bsol

Study at FNAL on Quenches with solenoid background field 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF16 Modeling Quench Propagation in Superconducting Cavity Using COMSOL – FNAL Note TD I. Terechkine Superconducting Cavity Quenching in the Presence of Magnetic Field – FNAL Note TD T. Khabiboulline, J. Ozelis, D. Sergatskov, I. Terechkine SSR1 CAVITY QUENCHING IN THE PRESENCE OF MAGNETIC FIELD – FNAL Note TD T. Khabiboulline, D. Sergatskov, I. Terechkine This was studied in two separate cavity tests at FNAL – one with an elliptical cavity and one with a spoke cavity – *thanks to Yuri Terechkine for pointing out the studies

FNAL study 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF17 Study 1: A 1.3GHz cavity with a known quench location was installed in the VTA with a solenoid installed in the bath near the quench location – the cavity was quenched at various solenoid field strengths and the cavity Q was measured Study 2: A 325MHz spoke cavity was placed near a solenoid and resistive heaters were placed at various locations to initiate quenches with a pulse of heat from the bath side – the Q of the cavity was measured as a function of the solenoid field and the position of the quench

FNAL study conclusions 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF18 A model was developed linking the reduction in Q and the fringe field from the magnet based on an estimation of the size of the `normal opening’ during the quench A procedure for `annealing’ the quench zone trapped flux was developed by repeated quenching of the zone in the presence of no field – the `normal opening’ was created several times to release the trapped flux anneal

FNAL conclusions 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF19 A model is developed that can fit the results and can be extended to other geometries A quench can trap fringe field flux and reduce the Q – the negative effects can be reduced by repeated quenching in zero-field

ISAC-II perspective 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF20 In ISAC-II we chose a minimalist strategy – choose non magnetic materials where possible and use procedures to mitigate solenoid effects – no shielding between cavity and solenoid Must do a degaussing of the solenoid before any planned warm-up to erase magnet memory During cryogenic events (1-2 per year) of more than a few hours if cavities warm above transition then the solenoid is degaussed and then heated above transition to release frozen flux 30 min to degauss and 30 min to warm to 25K 60 min to cool everything down Cavities are insensitive to quench degradation since they have a reactor grade jacket which acts as a Meissner shield

11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF21 Cavity #1Cavity #2Cavity #3Cavity #4 Day 3: Solenoid not hysteresis cycled – trapped flux gives large field near solenoid Cavity Q through warming cycles

FRIB experience 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF22 TDCM was constructed to study (among other things) the interaction of the solenoid with the cavities and environment Initial test showed too high background field resulting in reduced Q Tests will be conducted this month after recent improvements

TDCM-2 tests at FRIB Using magnetic sensors to estimate magnetization from solenoid K.Saito, 25 Sept 2010 Close to the Cavity A at High Magnetic area (0-2G) On the Magnetized SS bellows (0-20G) Close to the m metal surface (0-30kG) Close to the m metal surface (0-30kG), Slide 23 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF

Other issues 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF24 Alignment of solenoids Beam dynamics requirements set the specification of the alignment tolerance ( mm) In general the alignment of the solenoid dominates that of the cavities in the alignment error budget How to handle for multi-solenoid modules Precise strongback with all solenoids aligned warm Individual alignment for each solenoid Alignment correction Many proposals are incorporating steering coils inside the solenoid For tuning you need one independent diagnostic for each element to be tuned A solution for multi-solenoid cryomodules is to use one cold BPM for each solenoid Development at FRIB and FNAL (among others) Performance is promising

Conclusion 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF25 Many new projects in progress or proposed will use superconducting solenoids in cryomodules Due to the interaction of residual and fringe fields with cavity performance it is important to pay attention during design and development – and to imagine mitigation strategies of potentially reduced Q during operation Alignment of solenoids in the cryomodule is an important technical issue Many common issues – people making or planning test facilities (ie TDCM) – TTC is an excellent forum to communicate the results to the community

Thanks 11/5/ TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF