W ILLIAM A. R AWLINGS, C ITY M ANAGER “E STABLISHING A SOLID FINANCIAL FOUNDATION WHILE PRUDENTLY PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE ” J UNE 21, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wisconsin Transportation Finance and Policy Commission Freight Rail Day 2012 October 26, 2012.
Advertisements

TOWN OF ORONO FY2014 Draft Municipal Budget Presentation June 10, 2013.
Public Hearing FY 2011 Budget 1. City Council Goals FY 2011 Flood Recovery and Protection –Identify Funding and Sources for Flood –Restore Affordable.
FY 2014 YEAR IN REVIEW SPONSORED PROJECTS EXPENDITURES OFFICE OF GRANTS & CONTRACTS
P RESENTED B Y M R. A LI A SGHER K HAN P ARTNER, H AIDERMOTA BNR &C O. & M R. S ABOOR K ARAMAT A SSOCIATE, H AIDERMOTA BNR & C O.
The 2015 Budget is balanced. The 2015 Budget is balanced. Total County budget is $466 million. Total County budget is $466 million. $191 million – Corporate.
2011 PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX RATE Funding the 2011/12 General Fund Budget Public Hearing – August 9, 2011.
Darrell Knecht President, IEMA Coordinator Howard County Emergency Management & E911 Cresco, Iowa Doug Reed 1 st Vice President, IEMA Director Pottawattamie.
1. 2 Valuation Growth – Will most likely show little to no growth again in 2010 affecting the 2011 mill levy rate. Retail Sales – Sales tax collections.
W HAT IS HOLDING OUR ECONOMY BACK ? H OW CAN WE GET BACK ON TRACK ? 1.
Page 1 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY ADMINISTRATION 230 Betty Masuoka Assistant City Manager City of Sacramento March 20, 2001.
2011 The City of Kelsey Accumulated $42,479,925 in total revenue 2012 City Management has predicted generated revenue estimates of $43,500,000.
T UBA C ITY F UND B ALANCE A NALYSIS & E XPENDITURE R EVIEW April 30,
FULTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT DRAFT BUDGET.
First Interim Budget Report Activity through October 31, 2013 Presented December 11, 2013 Nellie Meyer, Ed.D., Superintendent Bryan Richards, Chief.
Reduction and Deferral of Impact Fees Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item March 29, 2011.
PACS B UDGET H EARING M AY 13, P ULASKI A CADEMY & C ENTRAL S CHOOL D ISTRICT G OALS Instructional Goals: 1. All students will meet or exceed NYS.
Sustainability and Total Cost of Ownership Strategies for Higher Education.
Budget Overview. Predicated on the concept of fund accounting Separates accounting of monies for purpose of performing specific functions in accordance.
U TAH S TATE BUDGET E ARMARKS, D EBT AND T RANSPORTATION Presentation by Natalie Gochnour Associate Dean, University of Utah Chief Economist, Salt Lake.
City Manager’s Proposed Budget for Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011 City of Palo Alto Finance Committee May 19, 2009 Public Works Department- Enterprise Funds.
City of Houston Long Range Financial Management Task Force City Financial Overview Part I August 29,
Govt. Reporting - 1 GOVERNMENTAL REPORTING City Council Budgetary Hearing.
Debt Management Overview Presentation to Board of Estimates August 29, 2011.
T OWN OF N ORTH A NDOVER F INANCIAL F ORECAST F ISCAL Y EARS Andrew Maylor Town Manager December 2, 2013.
Finance Department Presentation to the City of Houston Budget and Fiscal Affairs Committee First Quarter Review General Fund Five Year Scenario and FY2012.
PRESENTED B Y B ARRISTER A LI K HAN& O WAIS A ZIZ, A TTORNEY.
WELCOME TO THE BUDGET HEARING AND ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SOUTH MILWAUKEE.
A T DHRP WE ARE C URRENTLY D ISCUSSING E XCEPTIONAL O PPORTUNITIES FOR : F INANCIAL C ONSULTANTS | M ANAGEMENT C ONSULTANCY | N EGOTIABLE P ERSONAL I NSOLVENCY.
First Budget Hearing (Final Hearing For Non-Ad Valorem Assessments) Board of County Commissioners September 06, 2007.
D OS P ALOS B OARD M EETING October 21, 2010 Misty Key Assistant Superintendent Business Services Merced County Office of Education.
Paper # LOS ANGELES COUNTY PRIORITIZATION OF SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECTS Fernando Villaluna, P.E. 1.
Introduction to Transportation Systems. SUMMARY NOTE TO INSTRUCTORS: These slides cover major ideas from the course, and should be supplemented with other.
2011 Local Government Fiscal Survey Results VML/VACO October 2011.
Administrative Services EVANSTON October 19, 2015 FY 2016 Proposed Budget Presentation Martin Lyons Assistant City Manger / CFO 1.
Proposed FY 2016 Budget Town of Lisbon Presentation to Board of Selectmen October 7, 2015.
FY11 Budget Presentation 1 May SWEETWATER SPRINGS WATER DISTRICT Review of the FY10 (Current Year) Budget No Big Surprises (Well, Filter Rehabilitations)
FY 2014 Budget / Actual Performance through November 2013 John W. Lawson Chief Financial Officer January 9, 2014.
Page 1 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POLICY ADMINISTRATION 230 Betty Masuoka Assistant City Manager City of Sacramento March 2002.
December 2, 2008 City of Glendale - Finance Department 1 First Quarter Financial Update December 2, 2008.
FY2013 Budget Presentation Public Hearing June 11, 2012 Municipal Court Room.
CrossRef Annual Member Meeting Financial Review Bob Campbell, Treasurer.
G RANT R EVENUES Total Grants $79.8 million An improvement of $2,684,200 or 3.5% from Spring Estimates. Excluding Grants with direct offset expenses.
Overview Fiscal Year 2015 Recommended Operating Budget City Council Work Session March 25, 2014 City Manager and the Department of Budget & Evaluation.
SUMMARY OF FY2016 PROPOSED BUDGET July 21,
City of Woodstock Proposed Budget FY 2014 Presented May 20, 2013.
FY PROPOSED BUDGET  A "Target Level" expenditure base was established for all departments six- months’ worth of operations (July 1, 2016 – December.
City of Joliet 2016 Proposed Budget November 30, 2015.
Fiscal Year 2015/16 Proposed Budget - Recap City of Barstow June 15, 2015 Barstow City Council The crossroads of opportunity… where the best is yet to.
R EVENUE D ISCUSSION F OLLOW U P & D IRECTION A GENDA I TEM 12.1 C ITY C OUNCIL M EETING A PRIL 20, 2016.
City of Twin Falls 2015 Fiscal Year City Manager’s Recommended Budget July 28, 2014.
L EWIS -P ALMER S CHOOL D ISTRICT #38 Budget Adjustment
R EVENUE D ISCUSSION F OLLOW U P & D IRECTION A GENDA I TEM 12.1 C ITY C OUNCIL M EETING A PRIL 20, 2016.
Year-End FY Financial Review October 28, 2009.
Tom Polonis Deputy Assistant Director Assistant Chief Response Tom Polonis Deputy Assistant Director Assistant Chief Response Nim Kidd Assistant Director.
Village of Tarrytown Tentative Budget Fiscal Year 2012 – 2013 June 1, 2012 through May 31, 2013.
PUBLIC WORKS FY 2012 Proposed Budget May 24, 2012.
 Snapshot and Summary  Private vs. Public Sector Financial Statements  Statement of Financial Position  Tangible Capital Assets  Statement of Operations.
C APITAL I MPROVEMENTS P LAN C ITY M ANAGER R ECOMMENDATION October 28, 2014 FY 2016 – FY 2020.
1 Budget Presentation Fiscal Year 2011 May 10, 2010.
The California Court Association (CCA) was formed in 1952 with an initial membership of 135 people. In 2016, CCA's membership has grown to over 3,000.
Chenango Forks Central School District Budget Hearing May 5, 2015.
C OMPREHENSIVE A NNUAL F INANCIAL R EPORT F ISCAL Y EAR
A N UPDATE TO THE C ITY C OUNCIL ON M AJOR I NFRASTRUCTURE P ROJECTS 1 C ITY OF M ENIFEE P UBLIC W ORKS W ORKSHOP A PRIL 30, PM I MPROVING THE QUALITY.
League of Wisconsin Municipalities Urban Policy Forum June 8, 2017
Fire-Rescue and Emergency Services FY 2018 Departmental Budget
CITY OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH
Draft FY11 Budget Presentation
Mid-Year Financial Review Fiscal Year
Financial Trends Analysis
Presentation transcript:

W ILLIAM A. R AWLINGS, C ITY M ANAGER “E STABLISHING A SOLID FINANCIAL FOUNDATION WHILE PRUDENTLY PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE ” J UNE 21, 2011

O VERVIEW B UDGET : T EAM A PPROACH T HE BUILDING OF A COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL BUDGET R EVENUE B REAKDOWN E XAMINATION OF LONG TERM REVENUES E CONOMIC D EVELOPMENT P LAN B RIDGING THE REVENUE GAP H OW DOES THIS HELP CREATE THE G ENERAL P LAN ? B UDGET H IGHLIGHTS B ALANCED BUDGET, PERSONNEL, EXPENSES 2

 B UDGET : T EAM A PPROACH S TAFF IS PRESENTING A COMPREHENSIVE MUNICIPAL BUDGET THAT PROVIDES FOR & PLANS FOR THE FUTURE S TAFF HAS WORKED DILIGENTLY ON A NUMBER OF REVENUE SCENARIOS FOCUSED ON PROVIDING FOR THE LONG - TERM FINANCIAL HEALTH OF THE C ITY R EVENUE GENERATION IS A NECESSARILY KEY COMPONENT FOR M ENIFEE NOW & IN THE FUTURE P ERFORMED A STUDY TO DETERMINE THE C ITY ’ S FUTURE REVENUE & COST RELATIONSHIP P ERFORMED A STUDY TO ASSESS CURRENT & AVAILABLE REVENUE SOURCES 3

 R EVENUE B REAKDOWN M ENIFEE ’ S CURRENT REVENUE STREAMS DO NOT SUPPORT ENHANCEMENT OF C ITY SERVICES A S THE C ITY CONTINUES TO COMPLETE ITS SEPARATION FROM THE C OUNTY, IT DOES NOT YET HAVE FULL ACCESS TO THE FUNDING SOURCES “ TYPICAL ” CITIES DO M ENIFEE ’ S TOTAL & PER CAPITA SALES TAX GENERATION IS DRAMATICALLY LOWER THAN OTHER CITIES IN THE REGION *B Y SIMPLY EQUALING H EMET AND P ERRIS, M ENIFEE WOULD GENERATE AN ADDITIONAL $9.5M IN ANNUAL SALES TAX REVENUE *B Y SIMPLY EQUALING H EMET AND P ERRIS, M ENIFEE WOULD GENERATE AN ADDITIONAL $9.5M IN ANNUAL SALES TAX REVENUE 4

 S OLUTION : F OCUSED E CONOMIC D EVELOPMENT S TAFF DEVELOPED A DRAFT E CONOMIC D EVELOPMENT P LAN TO CREATE REVENUE & PROVIDE NEEDED AMENITIES R EVENUE WILL BE GENERATED BY RESTAURANTS, RETAIL / COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES AND JOB CREATION – WHICH WILL DRIVE FUTURE BUDGET CYCLES T HE E CONOMIC D EVELOPMENT P LAN WILL DRIVE THE COMPLETION OF THE G ENERAL P LAN BY CREATING SPECIFIC RETAIL / COMMERCIAL AREAS U NTIL THE COMPLETION OF ADDITIONAL FUNDING SOURCE TRANSFERS FROM THE C OUNTY, INCREASED SALES & USE TAX FROM IMPLEMENTING THE E CONOMIC D EVELOPMENT P LAN WILL BE THE PRIMARY WAY TO INCREASE REVENUE TO THE C ITY 5

 B UDGET H IGHLIGHTS E CONOMIC D EVELOPMENT IS A MAJOR FOCUS OF THIS & FUTURE BUDGET CYCLES 8 NEW POSITIONS ARE BEING ADDED WITHOUT AN OVERALL INCREASE OF THE BUDGET I NCLUDES FUNDING FOR THE FIRST OF THREE YEARS OF C OUNTY LOAN REPAYMENT I NCLUDES $4.3M IN C APITAL R OAD P ROJECT F UND S I NCLUDES THE FORMAL ESTABLISHMENT OF A 25% RESERVE ($6M) & CONTRIBUTIONS FOR RESERVES I NCLUDES $300K IN CAPITAL REQUESTS ( ADMIN SUPPORT, F INANCE, F IRE S TATION I MPROVEMENTS & E MERGENCY E QUIP ) S TAFF IS PRESENTING A BALANCED O PERATING B UDGET 6

 B UDGET P RESENTATION T ERRI W ILLOUGHBY, F INANCE D IRECTOR, WILL PROVIDE A HIGH LEVEL OVERVIEW OF THE BUDGET :  R EVENUES VS. E XPENDITURES  FY 2011/12 S OURCES OF R EVENUES  E XPENDITURES BY T YPE ( I. E. S ALARIES /S ERVICES & S UPPLIES )  M AJOR D IFFERENCES FROM FY 2010/11  S TAFFING O VERVIEW BY D EPARTMENT  C APITAL R EQUESTS  E NDING F UND B ALANCE  O THER F UNDS : S UMMARY  CIP: F ORECAST FOR THE F UTURE 7

8

 B UDGET IS A FINANCIAL PLAN OF EXPENDITURES C OUNCIL SETS GOALS AND POLICY B UDGET ALLOCATES RESOURCES TO FOLLOW AND MEET THESE GOALS B UDGET PROVIDES A GUIDE TO STAFF TO CARRY OUT C OUNCIL POLICY 9

 B ALANCED B UDGET WITH CONTINUED EMPHASIS ON ENHANCING SERVICE LEVELS  E NHANCED FUNDING FOR E CONOMIC D EVELOPMENT PROGRAM  A DDED E IGHT (8) ADDITIONAL POSITIONS  I NCLUDED FIRST OF THREE YEARS OF REPAYMENT OF C OUNTY L OAN  I NCLUDED FUNDING FOR CONTRIBUTION TO RESERVES  C APITAL R EQUESTS TO SUPPORT NEW PERSONNEL AS WELL AS IMPROVEMENTS TO ENHANCE SERVICE FOR RESIDENTS  C APITAL I MPROVEMENT P LAN INCLUDES $4.3 MILLION IN NEW PROJECTS FOR F ISCAL Y EAR 11/12 10

11

12

13

D EPARTMENT B UDGET A MOUNT % OF B UDGET P OLICE $9,116, % F IRE 6,962, % A DMINISTRATION 4,000, % C OMMUNITY D EVELOPMENT 2,151, % P UBLIC W ORKS /E NGINEERING 1,181, % E CONOMIC D EVELOPMENT 983, % C ITY C OUNCIL 185,969.8% T OTAL B UDGET :$24,582, % 14

15

16

D EPARTMENT FY 10/11 F UNDING FY 11/12 F UNDING N OTES E CONOMIC D EVELOPMENT :219,200983,993I NCREASED EMPHASIS ON PROGRAM N ON - D EPARTMENTAL ,667 A DDED FUNDING FOR 1/3 OF C OUNTY L OAN R EPAYMENT AND R ESERVE F UNDING. N ON - D EPARTMENTAL ,333A DDED FUNDING TO INCREASE RESERVES V ARIOUS -0- A DDED 8 NEW POSITIONS F INANCE 434,665456,953 A DDED ADDITIONAL MODULE OF ACCOUNTING SOFTWARE P LANNING 1,731,860641,386 O NE - TIME EXPENDITURE OF G ENERAL P LAN PREPARATION INCLUDED IN FY 10/11 17

P OSITION T ITLE D EPARTMENT H IRE D ATE A DMINISTRATIVE A NALYST /G RANTS S PECIALIST C ITY M ANAGER 10/01/11 A SSISTANT P UBLIC W ORKS D IRECTOR P UBLIC W ORKS 9/01/11 A SSOCIATE E NGINEER E NGINEERING 1/01/12 A SSOCIATE P LANNER P LANNING 1/01/12 B USINESS L ICENSE C LERK F INANCE 10/01/11 C ODE E NFORCEMENT O FFICER IC ODE E NFORCEMENT 9/01/11 C ODE E NFORCEMENT T ECHNICIAN C ODE E NFORCEMENT 9/01/11 E CONOMIC D EVELOPMENT D IRECTOR E CONOMIC D EVELOPMENT 7/01/11 18

D EPARTMENT R EQUEST A MOUNT C ITY C OUNCIL P ODIUM DOORS FOR C HAMBER $5,000 I NFORMATION T ECHNOLOGY C OMPUTER E QUIPMENT 35,000 E MERGENCY M GMT E MERGENCY E QUIPMENT 53,800 F INANCE A DDITIONAL F INANCE SOFTWARE 55,370 N ON -D EPARTMENTAL O FFICE FURNITURE / NEW EMPLOYEES 36,000 B UILDING & S AFETY R ACK FOR PLANS 1,000 C ODE E NFORCEMENT E QUIPMENT /V EHICLES FOR NEW STAFF 87,300 E CONOMIC D EVELOPMENT C ONFERENCE BOOTH & VIDEO PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT 5,000 P OLICE R ADIOS 14,200 F IRE B UILDING IMPROVEMENTS 20,000 T OTAL C APITAL $312,670 19

20

Fund Beginning Fund Balance- ProjectedRevenuesExpenditures Ending Fund Balance- Projected Gas Tax$71,476$2,392,367$2,460,000$3,843 Measure A1,022,870892,0001,911,3603,510 TCRF433, ,000424,261 SLESF0100,000 0 AQMD146,69179,75079,000147,441 RBBD1,269,8451,357,50010,0002,617,345 CSAs2,740,9332,053,0052,177,4022,616,536 DIF3,802,4541,801,62605,604,080 Veteran ‘s Memorial 25,70021, EMPG2,186123,26057,15268,294 LLMD 89-1-C32,86331,52030,00034,383 Total$9,518,655$8,857,228$6,855,913$11,519,970 21

 G AS T AX : F UNDED TAX ON FUEL USED TO PROPEL A MOTOR VEHICLE OR AIRCRAFT. A LLOCATED TO S TATE ’ S T RANSPORTATION D EBT S ERVICE, S TATE PROGRAMS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ; AND 44% TO LOCAL AGENCIES. L OCAL AGENCY SHARE CAN BE USED FOR PLANNING, CONSTRUCTION, IMPROVEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF PUBLIC STREETS.  M EASURE A: V OTER - APPROVED FUNDS FROM LOCAL SALES TAX FOR TRANSPORTATION  TCRF: T RANSPORTATION C ONGESTION R ELIEF F UND  SLESF: S UPPLEMENTAL L AW E NFORCEMENT S ERVICES F UNDS - F ROM S TATE V EHICLE L ICENSE F EES FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT. 22

 A IR Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT D ISTRICT : F UNDING FROM VEHICLE REGISTRATION FEES TO FUND PROJECTS THAT REDUCE AIR POLLUTION.  RBBD F UNDS : R OAD AND B RIDGE B ENEFIT D ISTRICT. F UNDING FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS.  CSA: C OMMUNITY S ERVICE A REA : S PECIAL CHARGES ARE LEVIED TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR VARIOUS TYPES OF MAINTENANCE WITHIN EACH AREA.  DIF: D EVELOPMENT I MPACT F EES : F EES PLACED ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAND OR CONDITIONS REQUIRED FOR THE APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO FUND THE FUTURE IMPACT OF DEVELOPMENT. 23

 V ETERAN ’ S M EMORIAL F UND : F UNDED BY DONATIONS.  EMPG: E MERGENCY M ANAGEMENT P ERFORMANCE G RANT. P ROVIDES FUNDING TO ASSIST LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN PREPARING FOR ALL HAZARDS.  LLMD 89-1: S PECIAL DISTRICT SET UP TO PROVIDE LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING WITHIN A CERTAIN AREA. F UNDED BY ASSESSMENTS. 24

25 N EW P ROJECTS FOR F ISCAL Y EAR 11/12 N EWPORT ROAD : H AUN TO M ENIFEE $1,150,000 S LURRY S EAL P ROGRAM 760,000 N EWPORT R OAD S IGNAL C ONSTRUCTION 200,000 G ARBANI R OAD R EPAIRS 400,000 S TREET S TRIPING 100,000 M AINTENANCE 1,700,000 A DMIN C OST R ECOVERY 71,630 T OTAL :$4,381,360

 S LOW BUT STABLE ECONOMIC RECOVERY  I NCREASE EXISTING REVENUE SOURCES  D EVELOP ADDITIONAL REVENUE SOURCES TO INCREASE DIVERSITY OF REVENUE  M AINTAIN PRUDENT SPENDING PLAN 26

 S TATE B UDGET N EED TO “ CONTROL OUR OWN DESTINY ” P OSSIBLE EFFECTS MAY INCLUDE :  P OSSIBLE ELIMINATION OF SLESF FUNDING ($100,000)  B OOKING FEES : T HE C ITY MAY BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BOOKING FEES AGAIN. T HE EFFECT IS NOT KNOWN AT THIS TIME.  N EW L EGISLATION  L EGISLATION PENDING TO INCREASE USE TAX COLLECTIONS ON INTERNET SALES 27

28