Role of Tests and Measures in Clinical Practice Paul Mintken PT, DPT, OCS, FAAOMPT Associate Editor, Tests & Measures, PTNow Associate Professor Physical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Likelihood ratios Why these are the most thrilling statistics in Emergency Medicine.
Advertisements

ASSESSING RESPONSIVENESS OF HEALTH MEASUREMENTS. Link validity & reliability testing to purpose of the measure Some examples: In a diagnostic instrument,
Understanding Statistics in Research Articles Elizabeth Crabtree, MPH, PhD (c) Director of Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Management Assistant Professor,
Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Diagnosis.
TESTING A TEST Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine November, 2004.
Divisional Meeting 15 th January 2009 Streptococcal Pharyngitis: A Systematic Review of the Predictive Value of Signs and Symptoms and the External Validation.
Doug Altman Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford, UK
Critically Evaluating the Evidence: diagnosis, prognosis, and screening Elizabeth Crabtree, MPH, PhD (c) Director of Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Management.
Estimation of Sample Size
Azita Kheiltash Social Medicine Specialist Tehran University of Medical Sciences Diagnostic Tests Evaluation.
Evidence-Based Diagnosis in Physical Therapy Julie M. Fritz, PhD, PT, ATC Department of Physical Therapy University of Pittsburgh.
Concept of Measurement
By Dr. Ahmed Mostafa Assist. Prof. of anesthesia & I.C.U. Evidence-based medicine.
Evidence Based Medicine for the Athletic Trainer: What is It?
Thoughts on Biomarker Discovery and Validation Karla Ballman, Ph.D. Division of Biostatistics October 29, 2007.
Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
Measurement and Data Quality
Introduction to Evidence-Based Athletic Training Practice MATA 2015 Mark Weber, PhD, ATC, PT, SCS.
Diagnosis Concepts and Glossary. Cross-sectional study The observation of a defined population at a single point in time or time interval. Exposure and.
HOW TO READ AN ARTICLE ABOUT A DIAGNOSTIC TEST Chitkara MB, Boykan R, Messina C Stony Brook Long Island Children’s Hospital.
Statistics in Screening/Diagnosis
Multiple Choice Questions for discussion
PTP 560 Research Methods Week 3 Thomas Ruediger, PT.
Diagnosis Articles Much Thanks to: Rob Hayward & Tanya Voth, CCHE.
DEB BYNUM, MD AUGUST 2010 Evidence Based Medicine: Review of the basics.
Division of Population Health Sciences Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Coláiste Ríoga na Máinleá in Éirinn Indices of Performances of CPRs Nicola.
Principles and Predictive Value of Screening. Objectives Discuss principles of screening Describe elements of screening tests Calculate sensitivity, specificity.
Vanderbilt Sports Medicine How to practice and teach EBM Chapter 3 May 3, 2006.
Evidence Based Medicine Workshop Diagnosis March 18, 2010.
Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests
EVIDENCE ABOUT DIAGNOSTIC TESTS Min H. Huang, PT, PhD, NCS.
+ Clinical Decision on a Diagnostic Test Inna Mangalindan. Block N. Class September 15, 2008.
Advanced Physical therapy Procedures Ahmed alhowimel.
Diagnosis: EBM Approach Michael Brown MD Grand Rapids MERC/ Michigan State University.
Appraising A Diagnostic Test
Likelihood 2005/5/22. Likelihood  probability I am likelihood I am probability.
Evidence-Based Medicine Diagnosis Component 2 / Unit 5 1 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 /Fall 2010.
1. Statistics Objectives: 1.Try to differentiate between the P value and alpha value 2.When to perform a test 3.Limitations of different tests and how.
1 Session 6 Minimally Important Differences Dave Cella Dennis Revicki Jeff Sloan David Feeny Ron Hays.
TESTING A TEST Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine January 2008.
Prediction statistics Prediction generally True and false, positives and negatives Quality of a prediction Usefulness of a prediction Prediction goes Bayesian.
Diagnostic Tests Studies 87/3/2 “How to read a paper” workshop Kamran Yazdani, MD MPH.
SCH Journal Club Use of time from fever onset improves the diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein in identifying bacterial infections Wednesday 13 th.
Assessing Responsiveness of Health Measurements Ian McDowell, INTA, Santiago, March 20, 2001.
CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY III: JOURNAL APPRAISAL Group 3 February 11, 2010.
Diagnostic Test Characteristics: What does this result mean
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :傅斯誠 Date : 2005/10/26.
EVALUATING u After retrieving the literature, you have to evaluate or critically appraise the evidence for its validity and applicability to your patient.
Timothy Wiemken, PhD MPH Assistant Professor Division of Infectious Diseases Diagnostic Tests.
Shoulder Objective Examination How to Interpret Special Tests.
PTP 560 Research Methods Week 12 Thomas Ruediger, PT.
Using PTNow at the Point of Care: How Can PTNow Help Translate Clinical Practice Guidelines, Tests, and Validated Outcome Measures for Busy Clinicians?
Diagnosis:Testing the Test Verma Walker Kathy Davies.
How Can PTNow Help You When There Is No Clinical Summary? Searching for Your Answers David Scalzitti, PT, PhD, MS 1.
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. Chapter 12 Clinical Epidemiology.
APTA Resources for Clinical Practice An Introduction to PTNow and the Guide to Physical Therapist Practice.
Critical Appraisal Course for Emergency Medicine Trainees Module 5 Evaluation of a Diagnostic Test.
Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 25 Critiquing Assessments Sherrilene Classen, Craig A. Velozo.
Introduction to Evidence-Based Physical Diagnosis
Diagnostic Test Studies
When is the post-test probability sufficient for decision-making?
Evidence-Based Medicine
M. Lee Chambliss MD MSPH Associate Professor
Chapter 7 The Hierarchy of Evidence
Diagnosis II Dr. Brent E. Faught, Ph.D. Assistant Professor
Part 4 appreciate appraise apply
Evidence-based knee and ankle examination (Part 1)
Evidence-based knee and ankle examination (Part 1)
Evidence Based Diagnosis
Presentation transcript:

Role of Tests and Measures in Clinical Practice Paul Mintken PT, DPT, OCS, FAAOMPT Associate Editor, Tests & Measures, PTNow Associate Professor Physical Therapy Program University of Colorado School of Medicine

Objectives Understand what makes a good test/measure Explain the basic constructs of reliability and validity Describe the principles of sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. Understand the value of comparing a test/measure to some reference or gold standard Access the PTNow website for further information!

Why Do I Choose a Measure in My Clinical Practice? To help me, as a clinician, see the effect of my treatment. –Am I getting the results I should? –Am I clinically effective? How do I compare with what’s been published? –I want to monitor and review progress in an objective manner. –I want to use a measure to help motivate my patient.

What Makes a Good Test/Measure? A test must be reliable within and between testers, and give the same result at different times Each time a test/measure is performed we must understand how the results of the test compare with the truth. This is determined by comparing the test results with a measure of the truth. So—how do we do this?

Standard Error of Measurement Describes the range (+/-) within which a patient’s true score might fit within a given test. Example: –SEM for knee flexion goniometry is 3.5 degrees –Measured range is 120 degrees –The variation of the true/actual ROM would be between and degrees

Differences Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) –The smallest change in scores that patients perceive as important –Similar to the concept of CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Minimal Detectable Change (MDC) –Commonly expressed as MDC90 or MDC95 –An index of the reliability of an outcome measure –Similar to the concept of STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE MDC90: Minimum change at 90% confidence –The amount of change in scores required to be 90% confident that it is beyond measurement error

Responsiveness Does the outcome detect changes over time that matter to the patient? Ability of outcome to detect small, but clinically important differences Ceiling & Floor Effects –Ceiling: When the task is too easy, and all patients perform at or near perfect, you have a ceiling effect. –Floor: When the task is too hard and everyone performs at the worst possible level.

EXAMPLE: Achilles Tendinopathy Your patient is a 26-year-old male who was running and heard/felt a “pop” in his left Achilles tendon 3 days ago. He has been able to walk on it with a pronounced limp. There is substantial swelling and discoloration in the posterior heel.

Clinical Summaries Achilles Tendinitis/Tendinopathy

What is the “likelihood” this patient ruptured the Achilles tendon? Let’s go to PTNow: Clinical tools Search by practice area Search by body part Search by ICF domain –Thompson TestThompson Test

In a retrospective study of 174 patients over 13 years with unilateral tears in which surgery was the reference or “gold” standard –Sensitivity: 0.96 –Specificity: 0.98 –+LR=48.00 –-LR=0.04 Link to video

Relevant clinical population Perform the clinical test – on everyone Perform the reference standard – on everyone Compare the results “The optimal design for assessing the accuracy of a diagnostic test is considered to be a prospective blind comparison of the test and the reference in a consecutive series of patients from a relevant clinical population.” Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, et al. Empirical evidence of design- related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA. 1999;282(11):1062.

SnNouts and SpPins  Mnemonics to remember the most useful aspects of tests with moderate to high sensitivity and specificity SnNout : A test with a high sensitivity value (Sn) that, when negative (N), helps to rule out a disease (out) SpPin : A test with a high specificity value (Sp) that, when positive (P) helps to rule in a disease (in)

Contingency Table True Positive Result A False Positive Result B False Negative Result C True Negative Result D Diagnostic Test Positive Diagnostic Test Negative Reference Standard PositiveReference Standard Negative A + B C + D N A + C B + D

Definition: Sensitivity Sensitivity –Test’s ability to obtain a positive test when the target condition is really present –Based on the True Positives – Calculated as: A/(A + C) True Positive Result A False Positive Result B False Negative Result C True Negative Result D

Definition: Specificity Specificity –Test’s ability to obtain a negative test when the target condition is really absent –Based on the True Negatives –Calculated as: D/(B + D) True Positive Result A False Positive Result B False Negative Result C True Negative Result D

What are likelihood ratios? Positive likelihood ratio (LR+) –reflects the odds that a person who tests positive actually DOES have the disorder Negative likelihood ratio (LR–) –reflects the odds that a person who tests negative actually DOES NOT have the disorder

+LR-LRInterpretation > 10 <.1 Large and conclusive shifts in probability Moderate shifts in probability Small shifts in probability Rarely alters probability to an important degree

Thompson Test In a retrospective study of 174 patients over 13 years with unilateral tears in which surgery was the reference or “gold” standard –Sensitivity: 0.96 –Specificity: 0.98 –+LR=48.00 –-LR=0.04 Link to video So if this test is negative, does the patient have a rupture? Not Likely! So is this a good test for screening for Achilles Tendon rupture?

Next Question: Does this patient have Achilles tendinopathy? Let’s go to PTNow: Clinical summary Achilles tendinopathy Search clinical tools –Achilles Tendon Palpation –Arc Sign –Royal London Test Maffulli N, Kenward MG, Testa V, Capasso G, Regine R, King JB. Clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy with tendinosis. Clin J Sport Med. 2003;13:11-15.

Achilles Tendon Palpation Achilles Tendon Palpation Most Sensitive Test Description: Gentle palpation of the Achilles tendon is performed by squeezing the tendon between thumb and index fingers. The patient indicates whether pain was present or absent. Sensitivity: 0.58 –(Not great!) Specificity: 0.84 Intratester reliability –0.27 to 0.72 Intertester reliability –0.72 to 0.85

Royal London Test Royal London Test Most Specific Test Examiner identifies portion of Achilles tendon that is maximally tender to palpation The patient then actively dorsiflexes ankle Examiner once again palpates part of tendon that was identified as maximally tender in maximal dorsiflexion Patients with Achilles tendinopathy report a substantial decrease or absence of pain when palpated in dorsiflexion Sensitivity: 0.54 Specificity: LR = LR = 0.51 Intratester reliability –0.60 to 0.89 Intertester reliability –0.63 to 0.76

Evidence to Practice Nomogram –Pretest probability = 20% of runners develop Achilles problems –+LR = 6 –Posttest probability ~65% Is a treatment threshold reached? –The point at which the examination and evaluation process stops and treatment begins

Patient diagnosed with Achilles tendinopathy What treatments are recommended? Go to the Clinical SummaryClinical Summary Clinical Practice Guideline at JOSPTClinical Practice Guideline

Questions? Please visit the PTNow website Give us feedback How can we help you?