Rene Descartes: March31 1596 – February 11 1650 Father of Modern Philosophy Attempts to reconcile the new scientific method with traditional metaphysics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Philosophy Through the Centuries
Advertisements

the argument from sensory error
The value of certainty. Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis offer.
The evil demon argument. I will suppose, then, not that Deity, who is sovereignly good and the fountain of truth, but that some malignant demon, who is.
SKEPTICISM Section 3. Three Theories of Knowledge.
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ Skeptical Observations 1. Several years have now past since I first realized how many were the false opinions that in my youth I took to be.
Meditations on First Philosophy
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
EPISTEMOLOGY Section 3. Descartes’ Doubt If it is possible that I am dreaming now, then I have reasons to doubt whether my current perceptual beliefs.
Sources of knowledge: –Sense experience (empiricism) –Reasoning alone (rationalism) We truly know only that of which we are certain (a priori). Since sense.
1 The Rationalists: Descartes The Cartesian Doubt Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
René Descartes The father of modern Western philosophy and the epistemological turn Methodological doubt, his dreaming argument and the evil.
DESCARTES Meditation 2 Getting Re-established. Biopsychology – Meditation VI.
The Evil Demon Argument
Chapter 2 The Mind-Body Problem
LECTURE 7 EXTERNALITY BERKELEY AND THE EXTERNAL WORLD.
Descartes’ First Meditation
Descartes & Rationalism
Philosophy of Mind Week 2: Descartes and Dualism
Descartes Meditations The Wax Example. The Extension of the Cogito For even if, as I have supposed, none of the objects of imagination are real, the power.
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
Rene Descartes 1596—1650. Some dates 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1633: Galileo.
Epistemology Section 1 What is knowledge?
PHL105Y November 1, 2004 For Wednesday, read Descartes’s Third Meditation. Brace yourself: it is very hard. The final version of your first essay is due.
Descartes. Descartes - b.1596 d.1650 ❑ Not a skeptic – “there really is a world, that men have bodies, and the like (things which no one of sound mind.
Descartes’ Meditations
Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Theories of Knowledge.
Chapter 2 The Mind-Body Problem McGraw-Hill © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
The Dreaming Argument.
Descartes Meditations. Knowledge needs a foundation Descartes knows he has false beliefs, but he does not know which ones are false So, we need a method.
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
Meditation 6. Trusting the Senses The senses certainly appear real. Rejects God or himself as the source of sense impression & concludes they are real.
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 12 Minds and bodies #1 (Descartes) By David Kelsey.
Descartes' Evil Demon Hypothesis:
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp ) Revised, 8/20/15.
L ECTURE 6: D ESCARTES. L ECTURE O UTLINE In today’s lecture we will: 1.Become introduced to Rene Descartes 2.Begin our investigation into Descartes’
Varieties of Scepticism. Academic Scepticism Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy A return to the Socratic.
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Descates Meditations II A starting point for reconstructing the world.
DESCARTES MEDITATION 1. René Descartes
Descartes' Meditations : Introduction to Philosophy June 4, 2009 Instructor: Karin Howe Carnegie Mellon University.
Rene Descartes ( ) The Father of Modern Philosophy
Argument From Dreaming. 1 This is the second sceptical argument – the second wave of doubt, after the argument from illusion – senses cannot be trusted.
A posteriori Knowledge A priori knowledge A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A priori knowledge.
René Descartes Brandon Lee Block D.
Chapter 3: Knowledge The Rationalist’s Confidence: Descartes Introducing Philosophy, 10th edition Robert C. Solomon, Kathleen Higgins, and Clancy Martin.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
Bouwsma and the evil demon. Bouwsma’s Goal Bouwsma tries to show that in the evil demon scenario we are not actually deceived. Contrary to what Descartes.
WEEK 4: EPISTEMOLOGY Introduction to Rationalism.
Scientific Realism: Appearance and Reality Reality what a concept Ian Hacking.
Introduction to Philosophy Descartes’ First Meditation
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Hume’s Fork A priori/ A posteriori Empiricism/ Rationalism
Skepticism.
Skepticism Introduction.
1st wave: Illusion Descartes begins his method of doubt by considering that in the past he has been deceived by his senses: Things in the distance looked.
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Descartes, Meditations 1 and 2
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
The Evil Demon Argument
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
Descartes Scepticism.
Rene Descartes Father of Modern Philosophy b. March in La Haye France wrote Meditations in 1641 d. February
Philosophy Sept 28th Objective Opener 10 minutes
Meditation 2: The Nature of the Mind, which is Better Known than the Body Descartes Meditation I.
Rene Descartes Father of Modern Philosophy
First Meditation – paragraph 1
Presentation transcript:

Rene Descartes: March – February Father of Modern Philosophy Attempts to reconcile the new scientific method with traditional metaphysics. Rationalism, Dualism.

Descartes’ Skeptical Observations 1. Several years have now past since I first realized how many were the false opinions that in my youth I took to be true, and thus how doubtful were all the things that I subsequently built upon these opinions. 2. Whatever I had admitted...as most true I took in from the senses...; however I noticed that they sometimes deceived me.

Descartes’ Dreams and Demons 3. This all seems as if I do not recall having been deceived by similar thoughts in my dreams. As I consider these cases I see there are no definite signs to distinguish being awake from being asleep. 4. Suppose an evil genius has directed his entire effort to misleading me. The heavens, the air, the earth, the colors, shapes, sounds, and all external things would be nothing but deceptive games of my dreams.

Qualitative indistinguishability of vat experiences and sense experiences. Oh Drat, I’m a brain in a vat!

Cartesian Certainty At length I am forced to admit that there is nothing among the things I once believed to be true, which it is not possible to doubt, not for reasons of frivolity...but because of valid and considered arguments. Med. II: Even if a demon deceives me, “I am, I exist,” is true whenever I doubt it. No perceptual experience is required to obtain this knowledge. “My body exists” cannot be known with certainty. So I am a thinking thing that may have a body.

Non-sensory knowledge of body. This piece of bee’s wax: tastes sweet, smells flowery; feels hard and cold, squeezes when I press it, makes sound when I tap it. I hold it near the fire: taste is gone; smell evaporates; color changes, shape is gone; size increases, makes no sound when tapped. Yet I know it is the same wax. So my knowledge of the wax is is an intuition of the mind occasioned by (but not based on) perception.