Planetary Science Decadal Survey 2009-2011 David H. Smith Space Studies Board, National Research Council Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group Arlington,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Call for Proposals: Earth Observations in Decision Support Joint Effort of GEO Capacity Building Committee and User Interface Committee March 2009.
Advertisements

Campus Improvement Plans
Welcome to the 30 th MEPAG Meeting! February 24-25, 2015 Lisa Pratt, MEPAG Chair Murray Formation Slopes of Mt. Sharp Pahrump Hills Curiosity: MSSS / JPL.
Chronology of the History and Social Science Standards of Learning.
A NASA Headquarters Perspective August 24, 2010 George J. Komar Associate Director/Program Manager Earth Science Technology Office.
NSF Merit Review Criteria Revision Background. Established Spring 2010 Rationale: – More than 13 years since the last in-depth review and revision of.
Crowdsourcing and Citizen Science NASA Asteroid Initiative Idea Synthesis #AsteroidGC 1.
M ORAGA H ILLSIDES AND R IDGELINES P ROJECT T OWN C OUNCIL M EETING, M ARCH 11, 2015.
1 Briefing to the CAA on the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF): Finding and Characterizing Earth-like Planets Zlatan Tsvetanov, NASA Program Scientist Charles.
The ionosphere of Mars: A community white paper for the planetary decadal survey Paul Withers (Boston University), J. Espley (NASA/GSFC), R. Lillis (University.
Fundamental Physics and the Decadal Survey Quantum to Cosmos 3 Airlie, VA 7 July 2008 Michael Salamon NASA HQ/Astrophysics Div.
Family Outreach and Response Program Strategic Plan September 26 th, 2012.
Supporting Research and Technology (SR&T) activities are critical in enabling the strategic goals of the Planetary Science Division (PSD) to be met. The.
Mars Program Update James L. Green Acting Director, Mars Exploration Program NASA Headquarters May 13, 2014 NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has.
CEOS-CGMS Working Group on Climate John Bates, NOAA SIT-30 Agenda Item #11 Climate Monitoring, Research, and Services 30 th CEOS SIT Meeting CNES Headquarters,
SolarSystem2012: The Planetary Science Decadal Survey Steve Squyres Cornell University Chairman, Planetary Science Decadal Survey MEPAG Monrovia, CA, 30.
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites John Bates Chair, Joint CEOS-CGMS Working Group on Climate 3 rd WCRP Data Advisory Committee.
PIE in the SKY Marni Goldman Jack Hehn Cherilynn Morrow Robert Ridky.
Understanding the Mars Mission and soil studies by using the web A Web project.
Pine Integrated Network: Education, Mitigation, and Adaptation project (PINEMAP) is a Coordinated Agriculture Project funded by the USDA National Institute.
United Nations Counter-Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate (CTED) Revised documents and procedures for assessing Member States’ implementation efforts.
The Utility of National Academy-Sponsored Decadal Surveys Daniel N. Baker Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics CU-Boulder.
SMD Suborbital Science in the Planetary Science Division Philippe Crane Planetary Atmospheres Discipline Scientist LCANS Meeting 28 April 2007.
Committee on Astronomy and Astrophysics Co-Chairs: Meg Urry Chuck Bennett.
Writing More Effective NSF Proposals Jeanne R. Small Oklahoma City, Oklahoma March 2, 2006 Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) National Science Foundation.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update FGDC Coordination Group Meeting September 10, 2013.
Future of Atmospheric Chemistry Research (sponsor NSF) Statement of Task An ad hoc committee will identify priorities and strategic steps forward for.
July 10, MEPAG Goals Document 2007 Revision Jeffrey R. Johnson Chair, MEPAG Goals Committee U.S.G.S., Flagstaff, AZ.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure 10/31/06 Craig.
Planning and Community Development Department Housing Element City Council February 03, 2014.
Developed by Tina Heafner, NCSS 2008 HOD Steering Committee Chair Updated by NCSS Staff.
Exo-Planet Task Force (ExoPTF) Jonathan Lunine (LPL) Stephen Ridgway (NASA)
Second GPM Applications Workshop 9-10.June Partners in the GPM Constellation Second GPM Applications Workshop 9-10.June.2015.
IMARS History and Phase II Overview Presented to MEPAG 13 May 2014 L. May, NASA HQ NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has not been approved or adopted.
Brian Dewhurst Feb 9, 2007 Board on Physics and Astronomy NRC Astrophysics Update AAAC Feb 8-9, 2007 Brian Dewhurst BPA Staff.
Mars in the Planetary Decadal Survey Steve Squyres Cornell University Chairman, Planetary Science Decadal Survey Steve Squyres Cornell University Chairman,
Workshop on Martian Phyllosilicates: Recorders of Aqueous Processes? MEPAG, March 4, 2009 J-Pierre Bibring IAS Orsay, France ias.fr NOTE ADDED.
6/6/08NASA/USRA Management review- SETI TLR - 1 A New SOFIA Science Vision Charter, Progress, and Plans Tom Roellig.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.
Goals Document: Recent Updates and Future Plans MEPAG #26 4 October 2012 Vicky Hamilton, Chair NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Meeting September 12, 2013.
Evaluating New Candidate Landing Sites on Mars: Current orbital assets have set the new standard for data required for identifying and qualifying new Mars.
1 The United Nations Demographic Yearbook and the Work Programme for Social Statistics Expert Group Meeting to Review the United Nations Demographic Yearbook.
Qualities needed among science teachers- A perspective from Taiwan Huann-shyang Lin National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan.
Science Team Objectives K. Jezek and J. Richter-Menge Science Team Co-leads.
Fall 2002 Internet2 Member Meeting Remote Instrumentation WG T. Charles Yun Program Manager October 2002.
Exec/Board Paris February 2008 WP3.1 Infrastructure Roadmap: Progress Report.
Office of Core and Shared Resources Faculty Council Meeting October 9, 2012.
2010 Planetary Science Technology Review Interim Report; Assessment Phase National Aeronautics and Space Administration Prepared by the PSTR panel, advisors,
Planning for the next NRC Decadal Survey for Solar and Space Physics Daniel N. Baker, Chair, NRC Committee on Solar and Space Physics Arthur Charo, National.
LANCE UWG Applied Science Perspectives Dr. David Green NASA HQ.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
July 29, MEPAG Goals Committee Update Jeffrey R. Johnson Chair, MEPAG Goals Committee USGS Astrogeology Science Center Flagstaff,
MEPAG Meeting October 4, 2012 Monrovia, CA Dave Des Marais, MEPAG Chair NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has not been approved or adopted by,
National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 27, 2013 Defining Potential HEOMD Instruments for Mars 2020 A Work in Progress... NOTE ADDED BY.
PCOS/PhysPAG Town Hall AAS-HEAD, Monterey Richard Griffiths PCOS Program Scientist April 9, 2013 NASA HQ Perspective.
MEPAG: Action Items, Forward Planning Jack Mustard, MEPAG Chair MRO HiRISE / U. Arizona / JPL / NASA NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This document was prepared.
Jim Bell Cornell University The Planetary Society July 30, 2009 Mars Exploration : Rationale and Principles for a Strategic Program Preliminary.
MEPAG Meeting February 27, 2013 web meeting David Des Marais, MEPAG Chair NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has not been approved or adopted by,
The ionosphere of Mars and its importance for climate evolution A community white paper for the 2009 Planetary Decadal Survey Paul Withers
IASC Mission IASC is a non-governmental organization whose aim is to encourage and facilitate cooperation in all aspects of Arctic research, in all countries.
Current and Future Studies Relevant to MEPAG David H. Smith Mars Program Analysis Group Silver Spring, Maryland 3 March 2016 NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER:
Where is this? ENCELADUS by CASSINI Planetary Sciences.
PDS Management Council August 13-14, 2007 UCLA, Westwood CA
Visions and Voyages: The Planetary Decadal Survey
Visions and Voyages: The Planetary Decadal Survey
Terms of Reference for the Near-Earth Object Threat Mitigation
IATI – Planned evaluation of IATI
Visions and Voyages: The Planetary Decadal Survey
Presentation transcript:

Planetary Science Decadal Survey David H. Smith Space Studies Board, National Research Council Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group Arlington, Virginia, 3 March, 2009 NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This document was prepared by National Research Council. The content has not been approved or adopted by, NASA, JPL, or the California Institute of Technology. This document is being made available for information purposes only, and any views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of NASA, JPL, or the California Institute of Technology.

Outline What is a decadal survey? What is a decadal survey? Major topics to be addressed in the new decadal survey Major topics to be addressed in the new decadal survey Organization and schedule of the decadal survey Organization and schedule of the decadal survey Community input Community input

What is a Decadal Survey? Origin Astronomy community in the 1960s. Origin Astronomy community in the 1960s. Purpose Identification of the most important scientific questions to be addressed in the next decade and to prioritize the missions and that can address these questions. Purpose Identification of the most important scientific questions to be addressed in the next decade and to prioritize the missions and that can address these questions. Organization Steering group, supported by topical panels, combined with extensive input from the scientific community Organization Steering group, supported by topical panels, combined with extensive input from the scientific community 1 st Planetary Survey Requested by NASA in 1/01 and completed in 7/02 1 st Planetary Survey Requested by NASA in 1/01 and completed in 7/02 Other Surveys Solar and Space Physics (2002), Earth Observation from Space (2007), Life and Microgravity Sciences (in progress) Other Surveys Solar and Space Physics (2002), Earth Observation from Space (2007), Life and Microgravity Sciences (in progress)

What will the Report Address? Major Tasks The decadal survey will address the following items: Overview of planetary science;Overview of planetary science; Broad survey of the current state of knowledge of the solar system;Broad survey of the current state of knowledge of the solar system; Inventory of the key scientific questions that should guide NASAInventory of the key scientific questions that should guide NASA flight missions and research programs undertaken by NASA and NSF; Assessment of NSF infrastructure supporting planetary research;Assessment of NSF infrastructure supporting planetary research; Recommendations on the optimum balance across the solar systemRecommendations on the optimum balance across the solar system and among small, medium, and large missions and research activities; Prioritized recommendations for New Frontiers and flagship flightPrioritized recommendations for New Frontiers and flagship flight investigations for initiation in the period ; Recommendations for NASA-funded research activities required toRecommendations for NASA-funded research activities required to maximize the science return from the flight investigations; and Technology development needs and opportunities relevant to NASA.Technology development needs and opportunities relevant to NASA.Scope Ground- and space-based planetary science, astrobiology and comparative planetology of extrasolar planets.

Notional Organization Decadal Survey Committee How should the topical panels be organized?

Notional Schedule th Quarter Informal request received, NRC approves initiation, 4 th Quarter Informal request received, NRC approves initiation, Formal request received, Proposal to NASA st Quarter Funding received, Chair identified, Chair and members appointed 2 nd QuarterMeetings of the steering group and panels begin 3-4 th QuarterPanels’ period of peak active st Quarter Panel reports finalized 2-3 rd QuarterPrioritization and drafting of survey report 4 th QuarterDraft survey report to reviewers, Report revised st Quarter Report approved, NASA briefed and report released ( prepublication-format) 3 rd QuarterPrinted report released

New Frontiers in the Solar System Decadal Survey Report

Community Interactions Through town hall meetings at multiple venues: such as scientific conferences, specially arranged meetings, in conjunction with panel and steering-group meetings, and professional meetings. Through town hall meetings at multiple venues: such as scientific conferences, specially arranged meetings, in conjunction with panel and steering-group meetings, and professional meetings. Stimulation of written input from ad hoc community panels Stimulation of written input from ad hoc community panels Web page sponsored by the DPS/AAS in conjunction with PGD/GSA, PSS/AGU and Meteoritical Society Web page sponsored by the DPS/AAS in conjunction with PGD/GSA, PSS/AGU and Meteoritical Society 24 panels formed (3 to 61 members each) involving >308 individuals 24 panels formed (3 to 61 members each) involving >308 individuals 23 finished reports published as The Future of Solar System Exploration, : Community Contributions to the NRC Solar System Exploration Decadal Survey (Marc V. Sykes, Ed., Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conf. Series, Volume 272). 23 finished reports published as The Future of Solar System Exploration, : Community Contributions to the NRC Solar System Exploration Decadal Survey (Marc V. Sykes, Ed., Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conf. Series, Volume 272). Community ad hoc reports used by panels and steering group Community ad hoc reports used by panels and steering group Independent DPS and Planetary Society polls on some key issues Independent DPS and Planetary Society polls on some key issues NRC Report review process solicited comments from 13 reviewers who supplied more that 450 specific comments, response to which immeasurably improved the quality of the report. NRC Report review process solicited comments from 13 reviewers who supplied more that 450 specific comments, response to which immeasurably improved the quality of the report.

Topics of Community Panels MercuryVenusMarsAsteroidsIoEuropaTitan Neptune System Kuiper Belt Objects NEOs: Sample Return NEOs: Human Exploration and Utilization NEOs: Discovery, Tracking and Characterization Lunar Exploration: Robotic and Human Should other, more macro-level topics also be addressed by the community? Comets Interplanetary Dust Interplanetary Dust Planetary Rings Sub-orbital Program Education and Outreach Terrestrial Analogs to Mars Radio Science and the DSN Extraterrestrial Mineralogy Instrument Technology Solar System Astrometry

Optimizing Community Interactions B road community input is a defining feature of a decadal survey Town hall and open meetings as early as possible (e.g., DPS, AGU and VEXAG, MEPAG, OPAG, RAS and LPSC). The schedule last time was suboptimal for engaging in outreach at major community meetings. Town hall and open meetings as early as possible (e.g., DPS, AGU and VEXAG, MEPAG, OPAG, RAS and LPSC). The schedule last time was suboptimal for engaging in outreach at major community meetings. Coordinate with other groups that have overlapping interests. Coordinate with other groups that have overlapping interests. Early stimulation of ad hoc community reports. (The DPS committee was very proactive and successful in generating inputs to the decadal survey). Last time, the community reports could have had a greater impact on the formulation of panel positions if they had arrived earlier. Early stimulation of ad hoc community reports. (The DPS committee was very proactive and successful in generating inputs to the decadal survey). Last time, the community reports could have had a greater impact on the formulation of panel positions if they had arrived earlier. Other actions?

Summary Issues to consider: 1.How should the decadal survey’s topical panels be organized? Who should chair the panels? Who should serve on the steering group and panels? 2.How can community interactions and input be optimized given the decadal survey’s likely schedule. 3.What can the survey committee do to facilitate input from the community and vice versa? Written input is encouraged and preferred. Written input is encouraged and preferred. Decadal survey website on-line at Decadal survey website on-line at