Imagery For The Nation Cost Benefit Analysis October 24, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GIS Executive Council and Advisory Committee Update November 2010.
Advertisements

Planning, Budgeting, Acquisition & Management of Capital Assets Capital programming is an integrated process within an agency for planning, budgeting,
Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
Progress Toward Impact Overall Performance Study of the GEF Aaron Zazueta GEF Evaluation Office Hanoi, March 10, 2010.
Brian A. Harris-Kojetin, Ph.D. Statistical and Science Policy
Systems Analysis and Design Feasibility Study. Introduction The Feasibility Study is the preliminary study that determines whether a proposed systems.
Presented By: Thelma Ameyaw Security Management TEL2813 4/18/2008Thelma Ameyaw TEL2813.
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
Chapter 10 Ranking and Value Management of Computer System Performance.
Oregon GIS Utility & Hazard Surveys Webex Session.
1 Imagery for the Nation FGDC Coordination Group Update 1-meter 1-foot 6 inches Vicki Lukas, USGS September 4, 2008.
Chapter 2 A Strategy for the Appraisal of Public Sector Investments.
Patrick DeCorla-Souza, P3 Program Manager, FHWA
Shared Services Workshop Break-out Session Summaries July 7, 2015.
Imagery For The Nation Overview NAIP Planning/Requirements Meeting November 2007.
PEIP National workshop in Montenegro: developing environmental infrastructure projects in the water sector Feasibility Study Preparation Venelina Varbova.
1 ECGD3110 Systems Engineering & Economy. 2 Lecture 1 Introduction to Engineering Economics.
Report on Harmonization and Alignment of TA support in Vietnam (Statement of Intent Milestone 2) Ron van Konkelenberg Le Duc Chung Phung Van Quan.
National Agriculture Imagery Program NAIP Informational Meeting July 19, 2006 Washington DC Jim Mauck U.S. Geological Survey, 511 National Center,
Chapter 5 : Initiating and Planning Systems Development Projects.
Crossing Methodological Borders to Develop and Implement an Approach for Determining the Value of Energy Efficiency R&D Programs Presented at the American.
Evaluating Investments in Information Technology Shannon Crump December 9, 2002 ISM 6021.
1 Dan Widner VGIN Coordinator VGIN Advisory Board January 9,
1 ECGD4214 Systems Engineering & Economy. 2 Lecture 1 Part 1 Introduction to Engineering Economics.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
Imagery for the Nation FGDC Steering Committee January 30, 2006.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
Draft GEO Framework, Chapter 6 “Architecture” Architecture Subgroup / Group on Earth Observations Presented by Ivan DeLoatch (US) Subgroup Co-Chair Earth.
Federal Geographic Data Committee, Coordination Group Meeting Washington, DC 7 June 2005 Study Results Geospatial Interoperability Standards: A Return-on-Investment.
12/10/15.  It is a Cross Life Cycle Activity (CLCA) that may be performed at any stage ◦ In fact, some part of it (e.g. risk analysis and management)
1 Imagery for the Nation FGDC Steering Committee Meeting May 1, meter 1-foot 6 inches.
Shirin Ahmed Acting Assistant Director for Decennial Census Programs U.S. Census Bureau Reducing the Cost for the 2020 Decennial Census of the United States.
FEASIBILITY STUDY.
FHWA Office of Freight Management Freight Technology Assessment Tool.
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
Feasibility Study.
Methodologies and Tools for Technology Needs Assessment: an Overview Zou Ji Dept. of environmental Economics and Management, Renmin University of China.
Business Analysis. Business Analysis Concepts Enterprise Analysis ► Identify business opportunities ► Understand the business strategy ► Identify Business.
State Financial Resiliency for Disaster Preparedness “TEAM EMT” Matthew Baker, Mike Kahle, Brandon Key, Kelly McCoy, Adriana Valenciano Trachtenberg School.
State Financial Resiliency for Disaster Preparedness “TEAM EMT” Matthew Baker, Mike Kahle, Brandon Key, Kelly McCoy, Adriana Valenciano Trachtenberg School.
United Nations Development Programme Ministry of Labour and Social Policy Local Public Private Partnerships THE BULGARIAN EXPERIENCE.
Capital Insight Pty Limited ABN Berry Street North Sydney NSW 2060 t f Health Economics.
1 Cross-Cutting Issues 5310-JARC-New Freedom U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration SAFETEAU-LU Curriculum August 7, 2007.
Evaluating Project Alternatives Topics Feasibility Studies Alternatives Studies Reading Assignment Textbook – Appendix C.
Module 4: Systems Development Chapter 13: Investigation and Analysis.
1 Coordinator’s Report Dan Widner VGIN Coordinator VGIN Advisory Board Meeting October 2,
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program eDeployment Kickoff August 26, 2003.
1 Statewide Lidar Cost/Benefit Analysis Sam Hall Geospatial Projects Manager Virginia Geographic Information Network January 9, 2008.
Imagery for the Nation Update and Next Steps FGDC Coordination Group Vicki Lukas U.S. Geological Survey October 13, 2009.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program Smart Choice Pre-Select Phase Transition September 2002.
1Your reference The Menu of Indicators and the Core Set from the South African Point of View Moses Mnyaka 13/08/2009.
Select Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Office of Major Project Development (OMPD) Overview November 2015.
Neighborhood Planning Process Lacoochee/Trilby Neighborhoods.
Internal Communications Overview: Acquisition Model and Considerations A tool from HFMA’s Value Project Toolkit: hfma.org/valueprojecthfma.org/valueproject.
Texas Geographic Information Council September 19, 2007 Texas Geographic Information Council September 19, 2007.
Geospatial Line of Business FGDC Steering Committee Meeting October 23, 2006.
Imagery for the Nation Cost Benefit Analysis Federal Geographic Data Committee Steering Committee Meeting May 23, 2007 Shirley Hall Farm Service Agency,
Geospatial Line of Business FGDC Steering Committee Meeting October 24, 2007.
Project Management PTM721S
Economic issues Formulation of Business cases H. Sudarshan
The Feasibility Study: something we already know
Capital Project / Infrastructure Renewal – Making the Business Case
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 8. Routine monitoring.
Business System Development
Scope Management Chapter 5
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Scope Management Chapter 5
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Imagery For The Nation Cost Benefit Analysis October 24, 2007

2 Agenda  Introduction  Methodology  Description of Current State and Future State  Description of Alternatives  Assessment of Alternatives  Findings

3 Purpose & Scope  The Purpose of the IFTN Cost Benefit Analysis is to:  Respond to FGDC tasking to NDOP  Assist with IFTN program and budget decisions  Provide justification for future planning  Demonstrate the need for consistent federal funding  Identify lead federal agencies to facilitate coordination mechanisms  The Scope of the Cost Benefit Analysis consists of:  A study that is modeled after OMB Circular A-94, and follows USDA and USDOI 2007 Information Technology Capital Planning g uidance  An assessment of the baseline and four IFTN proposed alternatives  Evaluation of the proposed alternatives to include calculation of financial metrics (ROI, NPV)  Recommendations based on statistically valid data gathered from representatives of the orthoimagery community

4 Methodology Methodology Overview ProcedureActivity Identify Alternatives Status quo (baseline) and four viable alternatives were identified through consultation with IFTN Sponsors. Perform Data Collection Primary and secondary data collection was gathered on 643 programs (govt. agencies, private sector users, photogrammetric firms) using interviews, surveys, and facilitated sessions. Estimate Costs Lifecycle costs were estimated for the period from 2007 – 2016 adhering to OMB A-94 guidance. Estimate Benefits Quantifiable (cost savings and cost avoidance) and non-quantifiable lifecycle benefits were estimated based on SAMPLE SIZE ONLY. Compare Alternatives Alternatives were evaluated in the following areas: Business processes, cost, non-quantifiable benefits, risk, and requirements.

5 Current State Business Processes are hampered by a lack of coordination between federal, state, and local government resulting in overlapping imagery acquisition efforts and disparate employment of standards.  Orthoimagery coverage limited in accessibility and scalability  Common standards are not universally implemented  Limited coordination between all levels of government results in duplicative efforts  Each organization independently manages its program, regardless of jurisdictional consideration or sharing similar requirements with other organizations Description of Current State

6 Description of Future State  Creates a national aerial imagery program to collect and disseminate standardized multi- resolution products on “set” schedules  Federal, state, and local partners can exercise cost sharing options for any required orthoimagery enhancements  Provides a reliable business model for orthoimagery production  IFTN imagery will be placed in the public domain and archived for historical purposes IFTN proposes streamlined business processes through a single coordination and distribution entity that will concentrate on acquisition and standardization concerns.

7 Description of Alternatives  Alternative #1 – Original IFTN Concept  Nationwide coverage of 1-m resolution imagery that is federally funded  1-ft resolution imagery that is federally funded with coverage that is determined by a population model  6-in resolution imagery of identified urbanized areas that is acquired through a mandatory 50% cost share program  Frequency: ―1 M. = Every Year in Lower 48 States, 3 Years HI and Insular Areas, 5 Years AK ―1 Ft. & 6 In. = Every 3 Years  Alternative #2 – Original IFTN Concept with Full Federal Funding for 1-ft Program/No population model  Alternative #3 – Original IFTN Concept with Mandatory 50% Cost Share for 1-ft Program/No population model  Alternative #4 – Original IFTN Concept with Optional 50% Cost Share for 1-ft Program/No population model

8 Assessment of Alternatives  The alternatives were evaluated using the following criteria:  Business Processes – Current and future state approach to examine the concept of operations.  Non-Quantifiable Benefits – Those which cannot be assigned a numeric value, and can be related to improvements in quality of service, improved decision making, and enhanced products.  Cost Comparison – Cost effectiveness of each alternative. Determined using several financial metrics (ROI and NPV).  Business Requirements – Ability of each alternative to meet the expected user requirements.  Risk – Ability of the alternative to achieve overall investment objectives within defined financial, technical, operational, legal and contractual, and organizational constraints.

9 Findings: Functional Comparison of the Current State and Alternatives Criteria Current State Alternative #1: Original IFTN Concept Alternative #2: Original IFTN Concept with Full Federal Funding for 1-ft Program Alternative #3: Original IFTN Concept with Mandatory 50% Cost Share for 1-ft Program Alternative #4: Original IFTN Concept with Optional 50% Cost Share for 1-ft Program Score Business Processes Non-Quantifiable Benefits Cost Business Requirements Risk Total Score: Rating Scale: 1-Lowest value2-Marginal value3-Good value4-Best value

10 Findings: Preferred Alternative  This alternative presents a positive ROI and NPV while providing an equitable program to all federal, state, and local agencies.  This is particularly appealing to western states, since most of their less populous areas require higher resolution imagery to support industries such as, utility corridors, transportation, energy development, and tourism.  The rate of adoption of such a program is also estimated to be higher than that of Alternative #1 due to the population requirements which limit the national coverage of 1-ft imagery.  Alternative #4 offers the flexibility that will allow statewide coordinating councils (with federal representation) to determine the exact land area of coverage for the 1-ft program. The Preferred Alternative is #4: Original IFTN Concept with Optional 50% Cost Share for 1-ft Program

11 Breakout of Total Costs by Agency: Alternative #4 Other Surveyed Programs includes costs of federal, state, and local programs adopting IFTN between FY07 and FY12. The total costs assume a 90% adoption rate for these programs by 2012, with 10% residual for the remainder of the lifecycle.

12 Financial Viability of Alternative #4  The estimated ROI of 0.37:1 for Alternative #4 means that benefits from cost savings and avoidance will accrue at a rate estimated at $0.37 for each $1 of non-recurring investment funding.  The Net Present Value of the estimated lifecycle benefits ($31M) represents 2% of the total risk adjusted life cycle costs of Alternative #4.  There is a positive correlation between quantifiable benefits and identification of additional baseline programs. This translates to a direct increase in both ROI and NPV for every additional program respondent.  Bottom line financial conclusion demonstrates program consolidation and IFTN adoption decreases costs for federal, state, and local programs.

13 Questions & Answers