Choosing Atrium Lighting In the new Graduate School of Business Knight Management Center Group 10 Rachel Martin David Mount Leah Strickman Emma Wendt

Existing atrium decision process Atrium lighting as project focus Recommended decision process: MACDADI o Organizations o Goals o Preferences o Options o Analysis o Value o Innovations Overview

We speculate atrium selection is problematic No Stakeholder goals up front Few options provided Stakeholders engaged late; act as designers Atrium Current State Narrative Midterm: Pre-data

Midterm: Post-data Atrium appears in the architect’s plans We changed our project to a more detailed decision The Atrium Lighting Decision We focus our project on lighting Actual atrium selection is even more problematic than we suspected Atrium Current State Narrative

Narrator model from architect Thorough atrium lighting design process, but stakeholders not included Architect’s Atrium Lighting Decision

Our Future State Narrative Stakeholders matter Atrium Lighting Decision Future State Narrative Narrator link

Students Faculty Staff Designers Donors Owners Community Stakeholders Designers Owner MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value MACDADI Model Organizations Stakeholders matter

MACDADI Model Clarify goals to clarify design decision Promotion of Academic Excellence Functionality Library Feel Accessibility Study Space Inspire Visual Wow Factor Aesthetic Appropriate Lighting Level Economic Responsibility Ease to Construct Proven Design Time To Build Time to Design Code Compliant Environmental Sustainability LEED Platinum Get Daylighting Credit ComfortInnovative MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value

MACDADI Model Weighting preferences shows economics and owners matter most

MACDADI Model Designers generate 3 options MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value 6 Sawtoothes 0 Sawtoothes 3 Sawtoothes

MACDADI Model Analysis - Outlined ratings for 3 goals MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value Goal 1: Promotion of Academic Excellence Rating Example:

MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value MACDADI Model Analysis – 6 and 3 panels similar and better

MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Weights * Value MACDADI Model Value

Weighting Automation – Greater ability to add, delete and organize goals, options and preferences ‘Tiers’ of Goals – Increased ability to roll-up sub-goals into high-level goals Simplify Innovation

Weighted the opinions of different stakeholders to acknowledge the relative importance of each MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value

Innovation Weight stakeholders – owners and economics become more important MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value

Innovation MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value Weight stakeholders – final design doesn’t change

Consider stakeholders o Weight stakeholder preferences o Recognize economics can still be most important goal Choose 6-sawtooth option Summary