Tsagouri I. 1, A. Belehaki 1, N. Bergeot 2,3, C. Cid 4, V. Delouille 2,3 T. Egorova 5, N. Jakowski 6, I. Kutiev 7, A. Mikhailov 8, M. Nunez 9, M. Pietrella.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
B. Zolesi *, Lj.R. Cander **, A. Belehaki ***, I.Tsagouri ***, M.Pezzopane * and S.Pau * Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Italy; ** Rutherford.
Advertisements

Splinter Session – ‘Space Weather Metrics, Verification & Validation.’ Thursday 20 th Nov., 16: :00 Splinter session - Space weather metrics, verification.
Splinter: SSA Space Weather Service Network Splinter: SSA Space Weather Service Network Tuesday 18th, 15: :00 1.Overview of the P2-SSA activities.
ATMOP Partners Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France 7 th framework project selected.
HF management communication system and link optimization Bruno Zolesi. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia.
B. Nava, S.M. Radicella, R. Leitinger and P.Coïsson The Abdus Salam ICTP, Trieste, Italy IGAM, Graz, Austria XXVIII General Assembly of International Union.
Cosmic Ray Using for Monitoring and Forecasting Dangerous Solar Flare Events Lev I. Dorman (1, 2) 1. Israel Cosmic Ray & Space Weather Center and Emilio.
Algorithm Working Group Space Weather Team Activities and Plans S. Hill, H. Singer, T. Onsager, R. Viereck, D. Biesecker, C. Balch – NOAA/NWS/NCEP/SEC.
ESA SSA Programme Objective:
29 April 2011Viereck: Space Weather Workshop 2011 The Recent Solar Minimum: How Low Was It? What Were The Consequences? Rodney Viereck NOAA Space Weather.
Anna Belehaki National Observatory of Athens, Greece Fifth European Space Weather Week, Brussels, November 2008.
Status of GNSS ionospheric Study in Korea
Space Weather Risk Risto Pirjola, Kirsti Kauristie, Hanna Lappalainen, Ari Viljanen, Antti Pulkkinen Finnish Meteorological Institute, Space Research Unit.
Space Weather Forecast Models from the Center for Integrated Space Weather Modeling The Solar Wind Forecast Model Carrington Rotation 1896Carrington Rotation.
ESA SSA SWE element status and near future plans 7th European Space Weather Week November, Brugge, Belgium Juha-Pekka Luntama Space Weather.
From Geo- to Heliophysical Year: Results of CORONAS-F Space Mission International Conference «50 Years of International Geophysical Year and Electronic.
Third European Space Weather Week, Brussels, November 2006 Session 6 Science Underpinning Space Weather Third European Space Weather Week, Brussels,
Mesoscale ionospheric tomography over Finland Juha-Pekka Luntama Finnish Meteorological Institute Cathryn Mitchell, Paul Spencer University of Bath 4th.
Modeling and visualization software for the nowcasting of the middle atmosphere T. Egorova *, N. Hochmuth ***, E. Rozanov*, **, A.V. Shapiro *,**, A.I.
Solar Irradiance Variability Rodney Viereck NOAA Space Environment Center Derived Total Solar Irradiance Hoyt and Schatten, 1993 (-5 W/m 2 ) Lean et al.,
Monday 13 th November GSY/050388/ © BAE SYSTEMS All Rights Reserved ESA Space Weather Applications Pilot Project Service Development.
Further investigations of the July 23, 2012 extremely rare CME: What if the rare CME was Earth-directed? C. M. Ngwira 1,2, A. Pulkkinen 2, P. Wintoft 3.
Detecting EUV waves Detecting Dimmings www. SolarDemon.oma.be near real-time, Flare, Dimming, and EUV wave Monitoring E. Kraaikamp 1, C. Verbeeck 1, and.
EUV Irradiance Reconstruction in view of PROBA2 Margit Haberreiter, PMOD/WRC, Davos, Switzerland Cis Verbeeck, Veronique Delouille, Rami Qahwaji ESWW9,
Accuracy assessment of the space weather characteristics forecasts used in the Russian Federal Space Agency Monitoring System V. Anashin 1, G. Protopopov.
5 th European Space Weather Week, November 2008, Brussels Operational implementation of the SWIF model in DIAS system Tsagouri Ioanna Koutroumbas.
System for Radiation Environment characterization (fluxes, doses, dose equivalents at Earth, Moon and Mars) on hourly thru yearly time frame Example: Snapshots.
Kp Forecast Models S. Wing 1, Y. Zhang 1, and J. R. Johnson 2 1 Applied Physics Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University 2 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory,
Olga Khabarova Heliophysical Laboratory, Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation RAS (IZMIRAN), Moscow, Russia
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
Nowcast model of low energy electrons (1-150 keV) for surface charging hazards Natalia Ganushkina Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland.
The International Space Environment Service (ISES) Joe Kunches Secretary for Space Weather, ISES Space Weather Week 2005 April 6,2005.
Joint International GRACE Science Team Meeting and DFG SPP 1257 Symposium, Oct. 2007, GFZ Potsdam Folie 1 Retrieval of electron density profiles.
Space Weather Modelling: from Science to Applications Chair: M. Dinguirard ONERA.
ESWW-3 Session 31 Session 3 Virtual Observatories, Data Bases and new Tools Convenor : C.C. Harvey CNRS / Centre d’Etude Spatiale des Rayonnements Toulouse,
Solar Shield project - lessons learned and advances made (ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/Solar_Shield) Pulkkinen, A., M. Hesse, S. Habib, F. Policelli, B. Damsky,
GALOCAD GAlileo LOcal Component for nowcasting and forecasting Atmospheric Disturbances R. Warnant*, G. Wautelet*, S. Lejeune*, H. Brenot*, J. Spits*,
VARIABILITY OF TOTAL ELECTRON CONTENT AT EUROPEAN LATITUDES A. Krankowski(1), L. W. Baran(1), W. Kosek (2), I. I. Shagimuratov(3), M. Kalarus (2) (1) Institute.
Short term variability of the ozone and other species simulated using LYRA data Tatiana Egorova *, Eugene Rozanov *,**, Werner Schmutz * Ingolf Dammash.
Michael Pezzopane et al. Assimilation of autoscaled data and regional and local ionospheric models as input source for a real-time 3-D IRI modeling: additional.
ENERGY ESTIMATION OF THE INTERPLANETARY PLASMA DURING STRONGEST GEOMAGNETIC STORMS OF THE CURRENT 24 SOLAR CYCLE ON MARCH 2015 The geomagnetic storms.
Study on the Impact of Combined Magnetic and Electric Field Analysis and of Ocean Circulation Effects on Swarm Mission Performance by S. Vennerstrom, E.
Abstract/INTRODUCTION Electron density (ED) data returned by the ARIEL 3 and ARIEL 4 Satellites have been separated into seasonal, diurnal, longitudinal.
What is a geomagnetic storm? A very efficient exchange of energy from the solar wind into the space environment surrounding Earth; These storms result.
Real time reconstruction of 3-D electron density distribution over Europe with TaD profiler Ivan Kutiev 1,2, Pencho Marinov 1, Anna Belehaki 2 1 Bulgarian.
GALOCAD GAlileo LOcal Component for nowcasting and forecasting Atmospheric Disturbances R. Warnant, G. Wautelet, S. Lejeune, H. Brenot, J. Spits, S. Stankov.
5-9 November 20129ESSW, Brussels1 Solar activity impact on the Earth’s upper atmosphere review paper SG1.1.4 presented by Ivan Kutiev.
Thermospheric density variations due to space weather Tiera Laitinen, Juho Iipponen, Ilja Honkonen, Max van de Kamp, Ari Viljanen, Pekka Janhunen Finnish.
The CME geomagnetic forecast tool (CGFT) M. Dumbović 1, A. Devos 2, L. Rodriguez 2, B. Vršnak 1, E. Kraaikamp 2, B. Bourgoignie 2, J. Čalogović 1 1 Hvar.
Space Weather Services to Build Global Resilience Expert Meeting on Space Weather Services February 3, 2015 – UNCOPUOS STSC Assembly Goal: Foster greater.
Recommendations for space weather products and services in Europe: report on WG2 work Recommendations for space weather products and services in Europe:
KMA Space Weather Service Presented to CGMS-44 on Working Group SWTT.
JMA Report on Satellite-based Space Weather Activities in Japan
SCSL SWAP/LYRA workshop
ESA SSA Measurement Requirements for SWE Forecasts
S. Datta-Barua, Illinois Institute of Technology G. S. Bust, JHUAPL
Scientists demonstrate a new Solar Energetic Particle warning technique using K-COR ground coronagraph data A Heliophysics science publication using ESA/NASA.
Status of GNSS ionospheric Study in Korea
Utilizing Scientific Advances in Operational Systems
Nowcasting of neutral and ion composition of the mesosphere:
Ionospheric Models Levan Lomidze Center for Atmospheric and Space Sciences Utah State University CEDAR-GEM Student Workshop, June.
R. Warnant*, G. Wautelet*, S. Lejeune*, H. Brenot*,
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
Presentation transcript:

Tsagouri I. 1, A. Belehaki 1, N. Bergeot 2,3, C. Cid 4, V. Delouille 2,3 T. Egorova 5, N. Jakowski 6, I. Kutiev 7, A. Mikhailov 8, M. Nunez 9, M. Pietrella 10, A. Potapov 11, R. Qahwaji 12, Y. Tulunay 13, P. Velinov 7, A. Viljanen 14 1 National Observatory of Athens, Greece; 2 Solar-Terrestrial Centre of Excellence; 3 Royal Observatory of Belgium; 4 Universidad de Alcala, Spain; 5 Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos and World Radiation Center (PMOD/WRC), Switzerland; 6 Institute of Communications and Navigation, German Aerospace Center; 7 Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria; 8 Pushkov Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation (IZMIRAN), Russia; 9 Universidad de Málaga, Spain; 10 Instituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Italy; 11 Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics SB RAS, RUSSIAN FEDERATION; 12 University of Bradford, UK; 13 Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey; 14 Finnish Meteorological Institute Progress in space weather modeling in an operational environment WP1/SG1.3 ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012

Introduction This work is the output from the SG 1.3 of the COST Action ES0803 “Improvement of operational models” ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012 This work aims to review the progress achieved by European research teams involved in the COST Action ES0803 in space weather modeling in an operational environment SG1.3 was formulated within WP1 “ Advanced methods to model and predict space weather effects” to stimulate the effective upgrade of the existing operational modeling capabilities for space weather purposes in Europe. Review of existing SW resources (SG2.1) Identification of scientific advances (SG1.1) Space Weather model assessment (SG1.2) Recommendations of new SW products (SG2.3)

Introduction Within SG1.3, operational space weather modeling capabilities were addressed in terms of three types of space weather products: nowcasts, forecasts, alerts/warnings The upgrade was addressed in all possible means: from the improvement of existing codes and algorithms driven by validation and/or verification tests to the introduction and the implementation of new models. Models that i)run effectively in operational systems, ii)are currently in the process of being transitioned to operations, iii)models that could be considered as candidates for transition to operations by the space weather community today. Operational specifications: the input and output parameters (including the drivers), its operational status and whether it is supported by a comprehensive validation plan, in order to provide a solid basis for future developments. ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012

SWENET: NASA’s CCMC: The group website at Operational modeling for nowcasting and forecasting products and tools 1. Solar Weather Predictions i.Bradford's Automated Solar Activity Prediction System (ASAP) for solar flare predictions (Colak & Qahwaji 2009): a real-time technology for processing satellite images to predict extreme solar flares. ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012  Development of novel machine-learning and feature- selection algorithms (Ahmed et al. 2011)  Comparison of the performance of established solar imaging systems in processing SDO data (Verbeeck et al. 2011).  Introduction of a fast fuzzy-based solar feature detection system for processing SDO/AIA images using fuzzy rules to detect coronal holes and active regions (Colak & Qahwaji 2011).  New method for the 3D visualisation of active regions and sunspots that are detected from SOHO/MDI magnetogram and continuum images (Colak et al. 2011).

LMSAL to produce entries to the Heliophysics Event Knowledgebase – HEK ( Operational modeling for nowcasting and forecasting products and tools 1. Solar Weather Predictions ii. SPoCA (Spatial Possibilistic Clustering Algorithm) -suite (ROB/SIDC) for Near Real Time detection and tracking of Active Regions and Coronal Holes on SDO-AIA data (Delouille et al, 2012): a set of algorithms that is able to detect, extract, and track active regions and coronal holes on EUV images ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012  The SPoCA-suite is based on a fuzzy clustering  The algorithm was applied on the archive of SOHO-EIT data from 1997 till 2005 (Barra et al, 2009) and to a SDO-AIA 19.5nm dataset ranging from June 2010 until October 2011

European Space Weather Portal NASA’s integrated Space Weather Analysis (iSWA) system : Operational modeling for nowcasting and forecasting products and tools 1. Solar Weather Predictions ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012 iii. UMASEP: Forecasting SEP events (Nunez 2011) The UMASEP system (University of Malaga) makes real-time predictions of: i.The time interval within which the integral proton flux is expected to meet or surpass the SWPC SEP threshold of J (E >10 MeV) = 10 pr cm- 2 sr-1 s-1, ii. The intensity of the first hours of Solar Energetic Proton (SEP) events by analyzing flare and near-Earth space environment data (soft X-ray, differential and integral proton fluxes).

Operational modeling for nowcasting and forecasting products and tools 2. Geomagnetic Predictions ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012 i. The UAH-Space Weather Service – warnings for geomagnetic disturbances (Aguado et al. 2010; Cid et al. 2008; Saiz et al. 2008) A double service: (1)warning of severe geomagnetic disturbances by analyzing IMF z-GSM component (2)estimation of the time remaining for the magnetosphere to recover quiet time conditions: theoretical expectations from the hyperbolic model

Royal Meteorological Institute, Belgium Operational modeling for nowcasting and forecasting products and tools 2. Geomagnetic Predictions ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012 ii. The Hybrid Dourbes K model for nowcasting and forecasting the K index (Kutiev et al. 2009) An empirical model that provides analytical formulas for nowcasting and forecasting a quantity, which is a proxy to the geomagnetic K index. HDK is based on the combined use of solar wind parameters and ground-based magnetic data. As input it uses the on-line K index obtained from Dourbes magnetometer and solar wind parameters from ACE satellite.

Examples available at Operational modeling for nowcasting and forecasting products and tools 3. Satellite Environment Predictions ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012 i. Topside Sounder Model Profiler – assisted Digisonde (TaD) for the reconstruction of the electron density profiles up to geosynchronous heights (Kutiev et al. 2009, 2012; Belehaki et al., 2009, 2011, 2012). The new technique connects topside empirical modeling with Digisonde data.

DIAS system: noa.grhttp://dias.space. noa.gr GIFINT services: SWENET: Operational modeling for nowcasting and forecasting products and tools 4. Communication Predictions ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012 Ionospheric nowcasting products: The real-time updating of the Simplified Ionospheric Regional Model (SIRMUP) (Zolesi et al. 2004; Tsagouri et al. 2005) Upgrades to improve the method’s performance under low solar activity conditions (Tsagouri et al. 2009)

DIAS system: noa.grhttp://dias.space. noa.gr Operational modeling for nowcasting and forecasting products and tools 4. Communication Predictions ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012 to provide ionospheric forecasts (foF2) up to 24 h ahead and alerts and warnings (foF2 current/past values, IMF at L1) Introduction and Implementation of the Solar Wind driven autoregression model for Ionospheric short-term Forecast (SWIF) (Tsagouri and Belehaki, 2008; Koutroumbas et al., 2008; Tsagouri et al., 2009) to provide ionospheric forecasts (foF2) up to 24 h ahead and alerts and warnings (foF2 current/past values, IMF at L1) Implementation of the Geomagnetically Correlated Autoregression Model - GCAM (Muhtarov et al., 2002) to provide foF2 forecasts (foF2 current and past values, Ap) Tsagouri 2011

ROB: Operational modeling for nowcasting and forecasting products and tools 5. GNSS Predictions ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012 Ionospheric monitoring based on GNSS data at ROB Since the end of 2011 VTEC maps are produced every 15 minutes on 0.5°x0.5° grid with a latency of 5-10 minutes after the last observation (EUREF Permanent Network, Bruyninx et al., 2012). STEC projection by a thin layer shell approximation located at 450 km (Bergeot et al., 2011) Spline interpolation in a grid of 0.5°x0.5°.

SWACI: Operational modeling for nowcasting and forecasting products and tools 5. GNSS Predictions ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012 TEC modeling activities at German Aerospace Center (DLR) in support of TEC monitoring activities in SWACI DLR is establishing an operational ionosphere data service via the SWACI since A family of regional empirical TEC models the Neustrelitz TEC Model (NTCM),to provide climatological information on TEC behavior: the NTCM‐EU for Europe, and the NTCM‐NP and NTCM‐SP for North and South Pole areas, respectively (e.g., Jakowski 1996; Jakowski et al. 1998; Jakowski et al 2011b). Global TEC model (NTCM‐GL) introduced by Jakowski et al A simple model‐assisted forecasting algorithm (Jakowski et al. 2011)

PMOD/WRC: Operational modeling for nowcasting and forecasting products and tools 6. Predicting the space weather effects in the earth’s atmosphere ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012 Now- and Short-term Forecasting of the Chemical Composition of the Middle Atmosphere A climate-chemistry-ionosphere model (CICM) SOCOL i, based on a general circulation model for complete representation of the chemistry of neutral and ionized species in the atmosphere from the ground up to the mesopause (Egorova et al., 2011) The service of the middle atmosphere parameters nowcasting is fully operational to provide online nowcast of the middle atmosphere every 2 hours for O 3, NO, NO 2, OH, H 2 O volume mixing ratio, electron and total positive ion density, temperature, air density and geopotential height. A short-term forecasting up to 1 day is also available.

EU/FP7 project EURISGIC Operational modeling for nowcasting and forecasting products and tools 7. Ground based predictions ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012 Conversion of post-analysis GIC software to real-time analyzers The EU/FP7 project has the following objectives: To produce the first European-wide real-time prototype forecast service of GIC in power systems To derive the first map of the statistical risk of large GIC throughout Recent developments include Update of previously existing methods and software to be capable for European-scale GIC modeling in the spherical geometry. Testing of the updated GIC software using real-time IMAGE magnetometer data

COST ES0803 Recommendations ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012 Model name and references Observed input Output parameters / products and services Validation results (key references) Prediction mode Solar weather predictions ASAP Colak & Qahwaji 2009 SOHO/MDI (SDO/HMI) Continuum and Magnetogram images Real-time prediction for the occurrence of flares Verbeeck et al Colak & Qahwaji 2011 Forecast SPoCA-suiteSDO-AIA images Detect, extract, and track active regions and coronal holes on EUV images Nowcast UMASEP Núñez 2011 Flare and Near- Earth space environment data (Soft X-ray Differential and integral proton fluxes) SEP warnings i) time interval within which the integral proton flux is expected to meet or surpass the SWPC SEP threshold of J (E >10 MeV) = 10 pr cm-2 sr-1 s-1 ii) intensity of the first hours of SEP events. Núñez 2011Forecast

COST ES0803 Recommendations ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012 Geomagnetic predictions UAH-SWS Saiz et al Aguado et al IMF-Bz component Dst index i) Warning of severe geomagnetic disturbances ii) Estimate of the time remaining for the magnetosphere to recover quiet time conditions. Forecast HDK Kutiev et al. 2009a Ground-based magnetic data Solar wind data K indexKutiev et al. 2009aNowcast and Forecast Satellite environment predictions TaD Kutiev et al. 2009b F10.7 index Kp index Digisonde- derived bottomside electron density profiles Reconstructed electron density profiles up to geosynchronous heights over Digisonde locations Belehaki et al Belehaki et al Nowcast

COST ES0803 Recommendations ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012 Communication predictions SIRMUP Zolesi et al Tsagouri et al. 2009a R 12 Real-time foF2 observations Regional nowcasting foF2 maps Zolesi et al Tsagouri et al Tsagouri et al. 2009a Nowcast SWIF Tsagouri et al. 2009b IMF observations at L1 point foF2 observations foF2 for single locations Regional foF2 forecasting maps Alerts/Warnings Tsagouri et al. 2009b Tsagouri 2011 Forecast GCAM Muhtarov et al Tsagouri 2011 Ap index foF2 observations foF2 for single locations Regional foF2 forecasting maps Tsagouri et al. 2009b Tsagouri 2011 Forecast IFERM Pietrella 2012 ap(τ) foF2 Regional foF2 forecasting maps over Europe Pietrella 2012Forecast NPDM Hoque & Jakowski 2011 F10.7 NmF2 at selected time and location Hoque & Jakowski 2011Nowcast and forecast NPHMF10.7hmF2 at selected time and location Hoque and Jakowski 2012 Nowcast and forecast

COST ES0803 Recommendations ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012 GNSS predictions VTEC- model assisted monitoring at ROB Bergeot et al NRT GNSS data European area VTEC maps VTEC disturbances maps Nowcast NTCM-GL F10.7 (current or predicted values depending on the prediction mode) TEC at selected time and location Jakowski et al. 2011a,bNowcast and forecast Model assisted TEC Monitoring (5 min update) NRT GNSS data Global European area NRT TEC maps Jakowski, 1996, Jakowski et al Gulyaeva & Jakowski, 1999 Belehaki et al Feltens et al Nowcast Model assisted TEC Forecast (1h) NRT GNSS data Global European area NRT TEC map 1h forecast Immediate control at the end of the forecast interval Jakowski et al. 2011b Forecast

COST ES0803 Recommendations ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012 Space weather effects in the Earth’s atmosphere CICM SOCOL i Egorova et al NRT SSI data O 3, NO, NO 2, OH, H 2 O volume mixing ratio, electron and total positive ion density, temperature, air density and geopotential height Nowcast and Forecast CORIMIA Velinov et al., 2012a,b,c Charge Z of the galactic cosmic ray particle Galactic cosmic ray spectrum parameters Atmospheric cut-offs for the corresponding altitude; Electron production rate for the cusp region and corresponding altitude; Electron production rate for the corresponding altitude and geomagnetic latitude; Velinov et al., 2012a Velinov et al., 2012b Velinov et al., 2012c Nowcast CORIAEC Tonev & Velinov, 2011 Solar wind plasma density, velocity, IMF: By, Bz, Distributions of electric field, potential, and current density, Altitudes: km, Latitudes: above 45  Tonev & Velinov, 2011 Nowcast Ground based predictions Real time GIC analyzers RT solar wind data Ground magnetic field GICViljanen et al. 2006Nowcast

Discussion & Conclusions ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012 Considerable progress in operational space weather modeling has been recorded in the last decade in Europe and COST ES0803 activities hold a key role in recent developments Empirical modeling and data driven techniques are still the main drivers for the development of operational models and tools  routine observations from both the space and the ground as well as indices and proxies are of essential importance for the development, validation/verification, maintenance and improvement of space weather operations  the continued improvement and development of space weather observing capabilities could result in better coverage, timeliness, and accuracy of space weather products and services. A strong requirement for the successful transition from research to operational models is the systematic validation of the models’ performance. COST ES0803 spent appreciable effort to put the systematic validation of the European space weather models into discussion and to mobilize the European community towards this direction and this effort should be continued.

Thank you! ESWW9 S5: COST ES0803 Final Results, 5-9 November 2012