John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge LCD WG6 Meeting, February 16 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge LCWS11, Granada, September
Advertisements

UK egamma meeting, Sept 22, 2005M. Wielers, RAL1 Status of Electron Triggers Rates/eff for different triggers Check on physics channels Crack region, comparison.
SiD PFA Status and Calorimeter Performance Ron Cassell (SLAC) SiD Design Study Meeting 11/15/08.
Higgs branching ratios study Oct Hiroaki Ono (NDU) Oct ILC Physics WG general meeting.
John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge ILD Workshop, LAL Orsay, May
John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge ILD Workshop, DESY, July
22/5/2011 Particle-ID and Tracking performance in CLIC_ILD1/27 CLIC_ILD particle identification and tracking performance J. Nardulli This talk in 2 parts:
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
PFA on SiDaug05_np Lei Xia ANL-HEP. PFA outline Calibration of calorimeter –Done –Not tuned for clustering algorithm Clustering algorithm –Done: hit density.
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
CSC Note Jet 8 Meeting – April 11 '07 Status and plan for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Algorithm design for MAPS clustering Bradley Hopkinson / Birmingham Introduction: ● Using LDC01 detector model in Mokka ● MAPS Mokka geometry (Yoshi.
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
Analysis Meeting – April 17 '07 Status and plan update for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson.
1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
Silicon Detector: Simulation & Reconstruction Norman Graf SiD Advisory Meeting September 14, 2009.
7/6/2011ECAL Studies1/7 ECAL Studies Jacopo Nardulli.
John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge ILD Workshop, LAL Orsay, May
E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge IWLC2010, Geneva, October
Mark Thomson Timing, Tungsten and High Energy Jets.
Status of SiD PFA Development Lei Xia (ANL – HEP) What tools do we need What tools do we need Where are we now Where are we now Future plan Future plan.
Mark Thomson University of Cambridge  LoI loose ends  New physics studies?  What next... Future Plans… This talk:
Status of LCFIVertex K. Ikematsu, A. Miyamoto (KEK) H. Ono (Nippon Dental University) Y. Takubo, K. Yoshida (Tohoku University) T. Suehara, T. Tanabe (University.
E. Devetak – CERN CLIC1 LCFI: vertexing and flavour-tagging Erik Devetak Oxford University CERN-CLIC Meeting 14/05/09 Vertexing Flavour Tagging Charge.
John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge LCD-WG2, May
Event-Specific Hadronic Event Reconstruction 1 Graham W. Wilson, University of Kansas.
SiD performance for the DBD Jan Strube CERN. Overview Software Preparation (CERN, SLAC) Machine Environment (CERN, SLAC) Tracking Performance (C. Grefe)
1 Test Runs with the Detector Model LDC01_05Sc II LCFI Physics Meeting February 05, 2008 Talini Pinto Jayawardena Kristian Harder.
LCFI Package and Flavour 3TeV Tomáš Laštovička Institute of Physics AS CR CLIC WG3 Meeting 9/6/2010.
LHCb production experience with Geant4 LCG Applications Area Meeting October F.Ranjard/ CERN.
John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge LCD WG6 Meeting, April
1Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 ILD and SiD detectors for 1 TeV ILC some recommendations following experience from the CLIC detector study
Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.
Pandora calorimetry and leakage correction Peter Speckmayer 2010/09/011Peter Speckmayer, WG2 meeting.
7 December SLHC Calo Trigger Simulation Status Report Kevin Flood, Michail Bachtis University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Update on CLIC_ILD detector studies necessarily incomplete, but attempting to give you a “glimpse” presented by K. Elsener (CERN), for the CLIC detector.
Taikan Suehara et al., ILC tokusui meeting, 21 Dec page 1 Status of LCFIPlus Taikan Suehara, Tomohiko Tanabe (ICEPP, U. Tokyo)
1ECFA/Vienna 16/11/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare these test beam data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. CALICE has tested an (incomplete) prototype.
John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge LCD-WG2, June
1 D.Chakraborty – VLCW'06 – 2006/07/21 PFA reconstruction with directed tree clustering Dhiman Chakraborty for the NICADD/NIU software group Vancouver.
John MarshallHZ Recoil Mass1 HZ Recoil Mass Analysis: Production Requests LCD WG6 Meeting, 28/02/2012 J.S. Marshall, University of Cambridge.
John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge LCD Meeting, December
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
John MarshallPandora Development1 J.S. Marshall University of Cambridge.
1 1 - To test the performance 2 - To optimise the detector 3 – To use the relevant variable Software and jet energy measurement On the importance to understand.
Issues with cluster calibration + selection cuts for TrigEgamma note Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 12/08/2010.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge LCD Software Meeting, September
Strip-splitting method for ECAL clustering K. Kawagoe (Kobe) for K. Kotera (Shinshu) CALICE meeting, Casablanca 24th September,
Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.
Mark Thomson University of Cambridge High Granularity Particle Flow Calorimetry.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
ATLAS and the Trigger System The ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) Experiment [1] is one of the four major experiments operating at the Large Hadron Collider.
Manqi Ruan Discussing & Support: Roman, Francois, Vincent, Supervisor: Z. ZHANG (LAL) & Y. GAO (Tsinghua)) DQ Check for CERN Test.
J. S. MarshallPandora PFA1 Pandora Particle Flow Calorimetry Tuesday 29 th January 2013 J. S. Marshall University of Cambridge.
John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge LCD-WG2, July
ECAL Interaction layer PFA Template Track/CalCluster Association Track extrapolation Mip finding Shower interaction point Shower cluster pointing Shower.
21/09/2010CALICE Manqi RUAN Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet (LLR) Ecole Polytechnique 91128, Palaiseau Status of DHCAL PFA Study.
Calice09 meeting, KNU, Daegu, Korea, February 19 th 2009 p1p1 PFA and digital calorimeter (ILD) Gérald Grenier IPN Lyon/Université Lyon 1 Calice09 meeting.
Full Sim Status Estel Perez 27 July 2017.
SLAC: SiD AHCAL Status and Update Ross McCoy, Andrew Myers, Andy White.
slicPandora: slic + pandoraPFANew
Top Tagging at CLIC 1.4TeV Using Jet Substructure
Data Analysis in Particle Physics
Individual Particle Reconstruction
Presentation transcript:

John Marshall, 1 John Marshall, University of Cambridge LCD WG6 Meeting, February

John Marshall, 2 Overview For latter half of 2010, CLIC studies used CLIC_ILD_01 model and stable reconstruction code from Ilcsoft v01-09/v With this stability, we were able to perform a number of important validation studies and become quite comfortable with the software (PandoraPFA very well validated during this time). However, in the past month, a large number of changes have been made to the software to address issues of overlaid background and features of the new CLIC_ILD_CDR model. Now aim to perform a high-level validation of these changes to check that software is of the required standard for the CLIC CDR studies. Results in this talk correspond to 64-bit gcc builds of Ilcsoft v01-10 and v01-11-pre02. CLIC_ILD_CDR sample consisted of the following Z  uds events: 91GeV: 9,000 events, process id: GeV: 10,000 events, process id: GeV: 10,000 events, process id: 124 1TeV: 5,000 events, process id: 123 Plus, samples of similar size and specification for CLIC_ILD_01.

John Marshall, 3 Baseline, CLIC ILD 01 Consider results for CLIC_ILD_01 model with Ilcsoft v01-10 as baseline for these validation studies. This represents most recent point at which, I believe, we understood our reconstruction software. PandoraPFA is a special case; in every single validation job, I used the latest Pandora packages and settings. EjEj 45GeV100GeV250GeV500GeV CLIC_ILD_01, v01-10: rms 90 (E j ) / E j 3.42 ± ± ± ± 0.06

John Marshall, 4 CLIC ILD 01, “old config” To add complexity to the validation, recent changes to reconstruction software actually involve adoption of new Marlin processors: Overlay, CLICCDRMaterialDB, NewFTDDigiProcessor, ILDCaloDigi, SiliconTrackingCLIC To try to isolate changes to upgraded packages from use of brand new software, I ran some jobs termed as “old config”, in which the Ilcsoft v01-10 scripts and choice of Marlin processors were used with the Ilcsoft v01-11 tagged packages. Noticed that (for 64-bit build) must use gfortran FORTRAN compiler for MarlinReco in preference to g77 (passing of variables between C++/FORTRAN fails and tracks are lost). EjEj 45GeV100GeV250GeV500GeV CLIC_ILD_01, v01-10, old config3.42 ± ± ± ± 0.06 CLIC_ILD_01, v01-11, old config3.40 ± ± ± ± 0.06

John Marshall, 5 CLIC ILD 01, “new config” Quickly notice degradation in performance of jet energy reconstruction: investigation shows that the degradation can be traced to the calo hit digitization processor and the move from NewLDCCaloDigi to ILDCaloDigi. Impact of changing digitization, and the timing cuts applied in the new processor, are magnified by the subsequently incorrect calibration constants passed to Pandora. Understand that calibration has an impact and that the timing cuts are important, but possible more is going on. Noticed that, if steering parameters UseECalTiming/UseHCalTiming are disabled, further degradation occurs (large effect at high energies). EjEj 45GeV100GeV250GeV500GeV CLIC_ILD_01, v01-10, old config3.42 ± ± ± ± 0.06 CLIC_ILD_01, v01-11, old config3.40 ± ± ± ± 0.06 CLIC_ILD_01, v01-11, new config3.71 ± ± ± ± 0.06 Next step: process the CLIC_ILD_01 samples using v01-11 and the latest v01-11 steering files, from:

John Marshall, 6 CLIC ILD CDR The motivation for these tests was to isolate the impact of changes to the detector. Tried to remove impact of calibration, by applying “official” calibration constants for relevant detector. When moving from CLIC_ILD_01 to CLIC_ILD_CDR, see an overall small degradation in the jet energy reconstruction performance. Not unexpected. EjEj 45GeV100GeV250GeV500GeV CLIC_ILD_01, v01-10, old config3.42 ± ± ± ± 0.06 CLIC_ILD_01, v01-11, old config3.40 ± ± ± ± 0.06 CLIC_ILD_01, v01-11, new config3.71 ± ± ± ± 0.06 CLIC_ILD_CDR, v01-11, old config3.56 ± ± ± ± 0.05 CLIC_ILD_CDR, v01-11, new config3.74 ± ± ± ± 0.06 Next, move to examination of CLIC_ILD_CDR samples, with Ilcsoft v01-11, using both new and old steering file configurations:

John Marshall, 7 CLIC ILD CDR  (truncated width) for reconstructed energy distributions as a function of |cos  | CLIC_ILD_CDR, v01-11, new configCLIC_ILD_01, v01-10, old config

John Marshall, 8 Overlay Aim to add Overlay processor to standard steering files, so that only difference between overlay and non-overlay reconstruction is specified number of background events. EjEj 45GeV100GeV250GeV500GeV No Overlay3.74 ± ± ± ± 0.06 Overlay, NBackgroundEvents=  3.72 ± For 45GeV jets, find that the Overlay processor actually produces a small improvement in reconstructed jet energies. It seems that the Ilcsoft v01-11 version of the processor leaks memory; unable to reconstruct higher energy samples. Running Overlay alone on.slcio files, see that memory usage quickly swells to multiple GB. If this has yet to be resolved, will need to investigate with Valgrind memcheck tool, etc.

John Marshall, 9 CLICTrackSelector Included in new reconstruction software is a new Marlin processor, the CLICTrackSelector. This processor aims to filter out tracks that shouldn’t be considered by the subsequent reconstruction, including PandoraPFA. Reconstructed tracks are selected based on the number of Si hits and the time taken for the track to reach the ECAL. EjEj 45GeV100GeV250GeV500GeV CLIC_ILD_CDR, v01-11, new config3.74 ± ± ± ± 0.06 CLICTrackSelector, 100ns cut3.79 ± ± ± ± 0.06 CLICTrackSelector, 50ns cut3.90 ± ± ± ± 0.06 CLICTrackSelector, 20ns cut4.24 ± ± ± ± 0.06 Results reveal that initial decision of a 20ns cut on arrival time at the ECAL is perhaps too tight. Scanning a few other possibilities, select 50ns as preferred value for further tests.

John Marshall, 10 CLICTrackSelector Sum of selected pfo energies for 200GeV Z  uds events in barrel region, |cos  | < 0.7  (truncated width) for reconstructed energy distributions as a function of |cos  | 100GeV jets

John Marshall, 11 CLICPfoSelection The CLICPfoSelection processor is not included in the Ilcsoft pre-release, but should be available soon. A Pandora algorithm that produces the same functionality is available. The processor filters the output from the Pandora reconstruction, applying a number of timing and p T cuts to photons, neutral hadrons, charged hadrons and tracks without associated clusters. EjEj 45GeV100GeV250GeV500GeV CLIC_ILD_CDR, v01-11, new config3.74 ± ± ± ± 0.06 CLICTrackSelector, 50ns cut3.90 ± ± ± ± 0.06 CLICPfoSelection, loose4.40 ± ± ± ± 0.06 CLICPfoSelection, default5.18 ± ± ± ± 0.06 CLICPfoSelection, tight6.00 ± ± ± ± 0.06 Some further tuning may help reduce degradation of jet energy reconstruction. The addition of this new processor does complete the reconstruction chain for CLIC_CDR.

John Marshall, 12 CLICPfoSelection Sum of selected pfo energies for 200GeV Z  uds events in barrel region, |cos  | < 0.7  (truncated width) for reconstructed energy distributions as a function of |cos  | 100GeV jets