Assessment Annotations A Simple and (Almost) Painless Way to Document Assessment of Student Learning DREXEL UNIVERSITY Assessment Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
Advertisements

Follow-up Reporting Expectations Part II MSCHE 2009 Annual Conference Mary Ellen Petrisko.
Follow-up Reporting Expectations MSCHE Annual Conference 2009 Mary Ellen Petrisko.
Scottish Learning and Teaching Strategies Support Group Academy Scotland - Enhancement and Engagement 24 May 2007.
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
PROFESSIONAL REFLECTIVE JOURNALS AND TIME LOGS Tools for an Effective Field Placement.
Program Goals Just Arent Enough: Strategies for Putting Learning Outcomes into Words Dr. Jill L. Lane Research Associate/Program Manager Schreyer Institute.
Quality Assurance / Institutional Effectiveness and Course Syllabi Requirements of the Commission for Academic Accreditation UAE Ministry of Higher Education.
The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd Continuous Improvement in Residential Aged Care.
Strand C – In Depth. Competencies 8 and 9: The teacher demonstrates a willingness to examine and implement change, as appropriate. The teacher works productively.
Professional Recognition: Gain the recognition you deserve
Rejected! Rebounding From and Moving Forward Following a Monitoring Report Requirement.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
How to Interpret and Apply the Characteristics of Excellence: A Framework for Determining Compliance Karen Stout, President Montgomery County Community.
A plain English Description of the components of evaluation Craig Love, Ph.D. Westat.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
Understanding Teaching Effectiveness and Assessment Projects.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
How to Fill Out the CARD Form (Course Assessment Reporting Data Form)
Academy for Student-Centered Learning – Workshop Two Melia Fritch, Shawna Jordan, & Shannon Washburn October 28, 2013 CREATING STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING.
Building a Learning Community to Assure Quality through the Accreditation Process: Collaboration between Community Colleges, Public and Private Higher.
Helping Your Department Advance and Implement Effective Assessment Plans Presented by: Karen Froslid Jones Director, Institutional Research.
Session Materials  Wiki 
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Opening Doors to the Future Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Building a Program Assessment Plan Jack McGourty Associate Dean Fu Foundation School.
Making It Meaningful: Authentic Assessment for Intentional Education David W. Marshall, PhD Joanna M. Oxendine, MEd.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Assessment Annotations A Simple and (Almost) Painless Way to Document Assessment of Student Learning DREXEL UNIVERSITY Assessment Conference.
IMPROVE STUDENT LEARNING for Institutional Effectiveness THE REASON: Improvement of Student Learning and Institutional Support Services THE OCCASION: Regional.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Designing for Learning Tools to Help Faculty Design More Inclusive Courses Beth Harrison, PhD University of Dayton.
What the *!# Is Middle States Looking For? A Review of Standards 7 and 14—Institutional & Student Learning Assessment Presentation to the Association of.
Presentation by: Carol Mattson, Dean of Academic Services, Fullerton College Nancy Deutsch, Reading Faculty/Staff Development Coordinator, Cypress College.
August 19, The current situation Fall 2008 – incoming college students needing writing remediation: 36.7% of incoming students in 2 year institutions.
2006 Fall Workshop PLANNING and ASSESSMENT: A TUTORIAL FOR NEW DEPARTMENT CHAIRS – A REFRESHER COURSE FOR OTHERS.
Strengthening Student Success Conference October 7 – 9, 2009 Assessing and Improving Student Learning throughout Student Services Presenters from Sacramento.
Assessment of Student Learning in General Education AAHE/NCA 2003 Assessment Workshop Omaha, Nebraska ● June 2003.
Team working in distributed environments M253 Communicating, Cooperating & Collaborating on Line Faculty of Computer Studies Arab Open University Kuwait.
Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
August 15th 2007 Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes by Kirby Hayes.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
Business Project Nicos Rodosthenous PhD 08/10/2013 1
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution License 1 Wikispaces for Teachers A Guide to Using Them in Your Classroom.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
March  Third annual 2141 Club meeting  Recognizing new members  Introductions  Developing a support network.
SNU HLC/NCA Accreditation Update SNU Graduate & Professional Studies Fall Meeting October 24, 2008.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
Introduction to the quality system in MOHE Prof. Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP.
PLCs in Mount Airy City Schools Purpose of PLCs Collaborative meetings of educators in which data-driven decisions are made to improve teacher’s instruction.
Collaborative Grouping 6-12 Math Teachers. Workshop Outcomes Participants will gain effective strategies for forming and facilitating a classroom culture.
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES & UAS Accreditation. Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU)
Understanding Assessment Projects. Learning Objectives for this Session After completing this session you should be able to… 1.Articulate the requirements.
Statement of Teaching Philosophy and Practice
Clear & Convincing Evidence
Introduction to the NSU Write from the Start QEP
Level 4 Diploma in Dance Teaching
Looking at your program data
Thursday overview Introduction
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Faculty performance for Institutional achievement
Brooklyn College Fall 2019 OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness August 29th 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Annotations A Simple and (Almost) Painless Way to Document Assessment of Student Learning DREXEL UNIVERSITY Assessment Conference

Assessment Annotations The topic of this workshop stems from an article published in the September- October 2014 issue of Assessment Update. This session will share one way in which institutions can document classroom-level student learning but will also allow for additional ideas to be shared by the participants.

Our Story LBC’s 2007 self-study process resulted in a progress letter “documenting implementation of an organized and sustained process to assess the achievement of student learning outcomes.” (Sound familiar to anyone?) The progress letter was accepted but with the stipulation of “a prompt staff visit to discuss the Commission’s expectations” regarding additional direct evidence of student outcomes for our next Periodic Review Report.

Our Story LBC’s 2007 self-study process resulted in a progress letter “documenting implementation of an organized and sustained process to assess the achievement of student learning outcomes.” (Sound familiar to anyone?) The progress letter was accepted but with the stipulation of “a prompt staff visit to discuss the Commission’s expectations” regarding further direct evidence of student outcomes for our next Periodic Review Report.

“You are not assessing student learning at the course level!!” Okay, time to... The reprimand by our MSCHE liaison...

“You are not assessing student learning at the course level!!” The reprimand by our MSCHE liaison... Actually, this reprimand brought about several reactions from our faculty...

Our Story Your response, verbal or otherwise, as a faculty member?

Our Story The frustration was evident in his voice and on his face. Most of the heads in the room were now turned towards me, many nodding in agreement with their wrought colleague. My first thought was... Right in the middle of the meeting, one member of the faculty from the other side of the room turned towards me and said “Dale, just tell us what to do and we will do it!”

Our Story “FINALLY, faculty buy-in!” But not exactly the way we would have preferred.

Our Story If you were in my shoes at that moment, as someone who oversees assessment of student learning at program, department, or institutional levels, what would be your reaction?

What do you think the liaison's response was to this comment? You’re the content expects, not Dale! Our Story

Colleges and universities are often cited by accreditors for not having enough direct evidence that student learning outcomes are being met at the course level. In many cases it is not that assessment is lacking in the classroom, it is a matter of documenting that assessment. Progress Report Monitoring Report Supplemental Information Warning Probation Show Cause

Our Story After the meeting we determined that assessment of student learning WAS occurring in the classroom, it was just a matter of documenting it. Hence the creation of the Assessment Annotation.

Assessment Annotations Annotation = the act of adding notes or comments to something; to make or furnish critical or explanatory notes or comments. Based upon a review of the literature and insights gained from the presenter’s service on accreditation team visits, the Assessment Annotation electronic form was created.

Assessment Annotations An Assessment Annotation is a relatively short and simple electronic form used to document the results of embedded classroom assessment activities. The form not only allows faculty members to document a specific assessment activity and its results, but it also links the assessment to course, program, and higher level outcomes to provide direct evidence of student learning.

Assessment Annotations If you are an instructor who wants to use this form for your own benefit, you can create a drop-down menu of all the classes you teach and tie them to the SLOs for each course so, like the program space, when you choose a course, the SLOs for that course will automatically populate.

Steps to Complete an Assessment Annotation Before class: Decide on an assessment activity you would like to conduct and document. Write out a brief description of the activity and verify which of your Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) it addresses. [no need to record all CATs; possibly just ones tied to programmatic outcomes being reviewed that year.]

Steps to Complete an Assessment Annotation During class: Conduct the assessment activity and take notes on it, based on whether or not the students are demonstrating the accomplishment of the intended student learning outcome.

Steps to Complete an Assessment Annotation After class: Once back in your office (or wherever!), complete the form using your notes from before class and during class.

Assessment Annotation Form

Do you think your program or institution might be able to incorporate a similar system for documenting course-level outcomes that feed programmatic outcomes? From your perspective, do you see any ‘issues’ with the Assessment Annotations? What are some ways your program or institution are already documenting course- level and programmatic outcomes?

Any questions or additional thoughts?

Dale L. Mort, Ph.D. Assoc. V.P. Institutional Effectiveness Lancaster Bible College | Capital Seminary & Graduate School