Reducing Ammonia Emissions in Europe – with focus on Denmark Senior Researcher Brian H. Jacobsen Institute of Food and Resource Economics University of.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Evaluation of projections submitted in 2006 national plans under the National Emission Ceilings Directive (preliminary results) Anne Wagner.

Advertisements

Slide: 1Presentation: Liliana Cortellini DG ENV/B3 Vilnius, 14 September 2004 Nitrates Directive: requirements and experiences of implementation Liliana.

Daily Manure Production Per Animal We have estimates of manure production –4.5 kg/day/hd for swine (liquid manure) –45-50 kg/day/hd for dairy cow (liquid)

UN ECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution Průhonice, Czech Republic April 2006 COSTS OF BAT’s IMPLEMENTATION FROM PIG PRODUCTION IN SPAIN;

Slide 1 Intensive Livestock Farming Ineke Jansen Tallinn, March 2007.

NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE AARHUS UNIVERSITY The recent development in Denmark in relation to ammonia regulation Steen Gyldenkærne Dept.

Environmetal problems related to manure management Greenhouse gas emission from manure stores.

Danish Agricultural Advisory Service National Centre Nitrogen Input Control on Danish farms Senioradviser Leif Knudsen Danish Agricultural Advisory Service.

Danish GHG and ammonia emissions

Integrated Assessment Modeling, cost-effectiveness, and agricultural projections in the RAINS model Zbigniew Klimont International Institute for Applied.

Acid Rain Cooperation in Europe. The Problem  Svante Oden (1968): “The Acidification of Air and Precipitation and its Consequences.”  SOx, NOx -> transported.

Acid Rain Cooperation in Europe. The Problem Svante Oden (1968): “The Acidification of Air and Precipitation and its Consequences.” SOx, NOx -> transported.

Ministry of Food Agriculture and Fisheries Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences Options for reducing the greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture.

“Acid” in the Atmosphere Pollution and Impact on Ecosystems.

The Clean Air For Europe (CAFE) program: Scientific and economic assessment Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

Department of Agroecology Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences Dynamic NH 3 model EMEP atmospheric dispersion model. Deposition estimates used in.

Level II Agricultural Business Operations. Nutrients In Nutrients Out.

Manure management facilities on farms and their relevance to efficient nutrient use Bernard Hyde & Owen, T. Carton Teagasc, Johnstown Castle The Fertilizer.

GHG emission projections from the agricultural sector in Denmark Steen Gyldenkærne ( Agronomist, PhD) National Environmental Research Institute Denmark.

Environmental Systems Analysis National Inventories of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Agriculture in the Netherlands Carolien Kroeze, André van.

Innovations in natural fertilizers in agriculture Jaap Uenk, chairman Section manure distribution CUMELA.

European Scenarios of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation: Focus on Poland J. Cofala, M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, L.

Results of the environmental assessments with the CCAT-tool W. de Vries, J.P. Lesschen, J. Kros, M. Kempen and B.S. Elbersen Alterra, Wageningen UR and.

Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol All calculations refer to Parties in the EMEP modelling domain Markus Amann Centre.

Update of COGAP and adoption by signatory states J Webb.

A collation of ammonia research Identifying significant gaps and uncertainties in UK ammonia EF J Webb (ADAS), TH Misselbrook (IGER), Prof. U. Dämmgen,

Inspection on farms – experiences from Denmark The danish approach to IPPC on livestock farming by Peter Dorff Hansen Environmental Division Ringsted Municipality.

Clean Air The revision of the National Emission Ceilings Directive and agriculture FERTILIZERS FORUM 23 June 2015.

RoTAP Chapter 7 European and Global Perspective 4-5 December 2008.

Study on social policy effects resulting from the scope of application of the European framework agreement on the prevention of health risks in the hairdressing.

New concepts and ideas in air pollution strategies Richard Ballaman Chairman of the Working Group on Strategies and Review.

Update on Revision of Annex IX & the Economic Costs of its Provisions Oene Oenema and Mark Sutton (co-chairs TFRN) WGSR-48, April

Background 1 Critical levels of acidification and nutrient- N are still exceeded in many parts of Europe reductions in SO 2 and NO x emissions have been.

Improved fertilizer effect of nitrogen - trials in winter wheat Cattle slurry Pig slurry Digested slurry N-utilization, % (fertilizer.

Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution CAFE team, DG Environment and streamlined air quality legislation.

Economic Assessment Results Markus Kempen. Cross Compliance Assessment Tool Outline Scenarios Definition Agricultural Income Effects Main Market Effects.

Agricultural Ammonia and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Indicator: OECD Experience by Takeo MAKINO Directorate for Food, Agriculture, and Fisheries, OECD EEA,

Flexicurity and the Danish labour market Facts and figures.

Integrated Assessment of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation Janusz Cofala International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg,

Future challenges for integrated assessment modelling Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)

Baseline emission projections and scope for further reductions in Europe up to 2020 Results from the CAFE analysis M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala,

AMMONIA EMISSION PREDICTIONS AND ABATEMENT – ISSUES FOR POLAND Tadeusz Kuczynski 1, Barbara Gworek 2, Andrzej Myczko 3 1-University of Zielona Gora, 2-

An outlook to future air quality in Europe: Priorities for EMEP and WGE from an Integrated Assessment perspective Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment.

Scope for further emission reductions: The range between Current Legislation and Maximum Technically Feasible Reductions M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala,

Cost estimation procedures and benefit estimation Senior Researcher Brian H. Jacobsen Institute of Food and Resource Economics University of Copenhagen.

Baseline and MTFR scenarios EECCA and Balkan countries Janusz Cofala and Stefan Astrom.

The GAINS optimization approach – Basic background information Fabian Wagner International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) IIASA workshop.

Marginal costs of reducing nitrogen losses to water and air in Denmark Senior Researcher Brian H. Jacobsen Institute of Food and Resource Economics University.

Regulating Nitrate Pollution – European Approaches Helle Tegner Anker Faculty of Life Sciences Copenhagen University.

This is how I do conventional farming Kim Kjær Knudsen Allindemaglegård 2. Marts 2012.

The Netherlands: manure policy and request for a derogation to the livestock manure limit of 170 kg N/ha per year for dr. ir. Cindy.

6/23/2018 Sequential and Total Effect of Traditional and Emerging Manure Treatment Processes on Dairy CAFO: Gaseous Emission and Nutrient Fate Khalil,

Costs of slurry separation technologies and use of the solid fraction for biogas - A Danish perspective Senior Researcher Brian H. Jacobsen Institute of.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis when implementing the WFD in Denmark

Overview of existing excretion factors

Excretion – Anne Miek Kremer

Nitrates Directive (91/676/EEC)

State of play in developing the NEC baseline scenario

WORKING PARTY "AGRICULTURE and ENVIRONMENT" of the Standing Committee for Agricultural Statistics December 2008 Policy needs related to N cycle.

M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,

M. Amann, I. Bertok, R. Cabala, J. Cofala, F. Gyarfas, C. Heyes, Z

Task 4 Hans Kros Alterra Workshop ‘Excretion factors’

Stakeholder consultation on the CAFE baseline agricultural scenario

Norwegian agriculture – key figures (2001)

Michael Hamell Head of unit DG ENV Agriculture, Forests and Soil

Agriculture in the Netherlands Baseline projection 2020

Second Stakeholder Expert Group meeting 19-20/01/2012

Steering Group – 22/23 November 2005

Thematic Assessment Report on Ammonia

Screens: 35% of mass transferred to solid phase 35% P and 30% N in solid phase Simple screens and filter-bands produce a solid phase with a very high.

Presentation transcript:

Reducing Ammonia Emissions in Europe – with focus on Denmark Senior Researcher Brian H. Jacobsen Institute of Food and Resource Economics University of Copenhagen

Content 1. Reducing ammonia in Europe – until now 2. Measures to reduce emissions in DK 3. Regulation and limitations on farms (BAT) 4. Societal optimal levels of emissions

Emissions in Europe Reduction of 24% from 1990 to 2008 The 2010 emission will be under the NEC 2010 target

Ammonia emissions in DK divided according to type of animal Danish ammonia emission

Danish measures ( ) Storage of slurry (natural cover or solid) Higher N-utilization on application - from broad spreading to injection - quicker incorporation Improved feeding (lower N) Ban on the use of ammonia in straw Reduction is 29% from 2000 to 2008

Future measures Pigs : - Stables (slatted surface < 50%) - Feeding (new and old stables) - Cooling of slurry - Air cleaning - Acidification - Air cleaning with biological filter Air cleaning with acid Partly slatted floor Tent as slurry cover

Future measures to reduce NH3-N Dairy cows : - Type of stable - Acidification - Starting point is the norms for 2005/06 - Choice of reference technology is important - Technology assessment is required before you build Prefabricated floor

Future Danish regulation Choice of technology has to be BAT (best available technology) Emission in 2010 should be 30% under reference technology Emission near protected area may not be increased or only relatively little More difficult to find locations where production can be increased Could reduce the total number of livestock Application procedure still takes a long time

Recommended NH3 emissions (finishing pigs) Average emission (kg NH3/pig) Reductio n (%) Cost per pig (€/pig) Env. Cost (€/kg NH3) Baseline LU – LU – 3.7 > 500 LU – Reduction increase with farm size - Economics of size is counteracted 1 LU = 35 finishing pigs

Environmental regulation Benefit >> costsNew regulation Benefit ≈ costsNew regulation has to be analyzed more Benefit << costsNo new regulation

Value of reducing emissions (damage cost) € per kg NH3 Belgium30 – 87 Netherlands Germany UK Denmark8 – 23 Spain4 – 13 Nec 2020 analysis (Ilasa)

Loss of lives in months due to PPM 2.5 emission Year 2000 Minimum possible (MMR)

Ecosystem area with nitrogen deposition exceeding critical loads Year 2000 Minimum possible (MMR)

Cost of implementation (selected measures) (€/kg NH3) UKUSNLDK Replace urea0.25Cheap Injection /trailing shoe Solid cover on slurry tanks ExpensivePartly required Feeding Reduce slatted area 322-4

Future EU NH3 emission - From 2010 and beyond (EU 27) (index 100 = year 2000)

Ecosystem area with nitrogen deposition exceeding critical loads (% of area after 2020 ranking) Minimum Germany Belgium Netherlands France Denmark Spain UK EU Nec 2020 analysis (Ilasa)

Conclusions Ammonia emission has been reduced in EU by 28% from 1990 to Some countries (US) find it difficult to estimate the emission. Technologies to reduce emissions further are available in DK, but they are more expensive than in previous regulation. Cost of technologies seems to vary by country, indicating lower costs in countries with strict regulation. Marginal damage costs are larger than the costs for the farmer, but there is a large variation between countries (cost  benefit). Worldwide, the emission will probably increase towards 2020, but it will be reduced in EU.

Please - I am doing my very best