Estimating Rainfall in Arizona - A Brief Overview of the WSR-88D Precipitation Processing Subsystem Jonathan J. Gourley National Severe Storms Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Ground Based Meteorological Radars Presented By: David Franc NOAAs National Weather Service September 2005.
Advertisements

Keith Brewster Radar Assimilation Workshop National Weather Center 18-Oct-2011.
Multiple Sensor Precipitation Estimation over Complex Terrain AGENDA I. Paperwork A. Committee member signatures B. Advisory conference requirements II.
DYnamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms Thorwald Stein, Robin Hogan, John Nicol DYMECS.
7. Radar Meteorology References Battan (1973) Atlas (1989)
29 COMET Hydrometeorology 00-1 Matt Kelsch Tuesday, 19 October 1999 Radar-Derived Precipitation Part 2 I.Radar Representation of.
21 September th Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium, Tucson, AZ Future QPE: Dual-Pol and Gap-Filler Radars Kevin Scharfenberg University of Oklahoma/CIMMS.
Echo Tops Fairly accurate at depicting height of storm tops Inaccurate data close to radar because there is no beam angle high enough to see tops. Often.
National Weather Association 31 st Annual Meeting 18 October 2006 Cleveland, Ohio Kevin Scharfenberg University of Oklahoma Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale.
Clear air echoes (few small insects) -12 dBZ. Echoes in clear air from insects Common is summer. Watch for echoes to expand area as sun sets and insects.
The Influence of Basin Size on Effective Flash Flood Guidance
Radar-Derived Rainfall Estimation Presented by D.-J. Seo 1 Hydrologic Science and Modeling Branch Hydrology Laboratory National Weather Service Presented.
THE USE OF DUAL-POLARIMETRIC RADAR DATA TO IMPROVE RAINFALL ESTIMATION ACROSS THE TENNESSEE RIVER VALLEY W.A. Petersen NASA – Marshall Space Flight Center,
Rainfall Monitioring Using Dual-polarization Radars Alexander Ryzhkov National Severe Storms Laboratory / University of Oklahoma, USA.
Operational Weather Radar Featuring: WSR-88D Doppler Radar
Cabo Guasave S-Pol NAME Radar Data - Product Description & Quality Control.
Digital Image Processing Chapter 5: Image Restoration.
Lessons learned in field studies about weather radar observations in the western US and other mountainous regions Socorro Medina and Robert Houze Department.
Tara Jensen for DTC Staff 1, Steve Weiss 2, Jack Kain 3, Mike Coniglio 3 1 NCAR/RAL and NOAA/GSD, Boulder Colorado, USA 2 NOAA/NWS/Storm Prediction Center,
Surveillance Weather Radar 2000 AD. Weather Radar Technology- Merits in Chronological Order WSR-57 WSR-88D WSR-07PD.
Spaceborne Weather Radar
29/08/2015FINNISH METEOROLOGICAL INSTITUTE Carpe Diem WP7: FMI progress report Jarmo Koistinen, Heikki Pohjola Finnish Meteorological Institute.
September 2005WSN05, Toulouse, France Applications of the McGill Algorithm for Precipitation Nowcasing Using Semi- Lagrangian Extrapolation (MAPLE) within.
March 14, 2006Intl FFF Workshop, Costa Rica Weather Decision Technologies, Inc. Hydro-Meteorological Decision Support System Bill Conway, Vice President.
49 COMET Hydrometeorology 00-1 Matt Kelsch Tuesday, 19 October 1999 Radar-Derived Precipitation Part 3 I.Radar Representation of.
Topographic Radar Beam Blockage and its Effects on Radar Rainfall Estimates: The BREAM Model Timothy A. Coleman Atmospheric Science Department The University.
Scott W. Powell and Stacy R. Brodzik University of Washington, Seattle, WA An Improved Algorithm for Radar-derived Classification of Convective and Stratiform.
A Radar Data Assimilation Experiment for COPS IOP 10 with the WRF 3DVAR System in a Rapid Update Cycle Configuration. Thomas Schwitalla Institute of Physics.
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Probability June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
A Doppler Radar Emulator and its Application to the Detection of Tornadic Signatures Ryan M. May.
Wayne Faas Chief, NOAA National Climatic Data Center Data Operations Division December 3, 2003.
CARPE-DIEM 13/6/02, slide 1German Aerospace Center Microwaves and Radar Institute CARPE-DIEM Besprechung Helsinki, June 2004 Ewan.
Towards an object-oriented assessment of high resolution precipitation forecasts Janice L. Bytheway CIRA Council and Fellows Meeting May 6, 2015.
June 19, 2007 GRIDDED MOS STARTS WITH POINT (STATION) MOS STARTS WITH POINT (STATION) MOS –Essentially the same MOS that is in text bulletins –Number and.
COMET HYDROMET Enhancements to PPS Build 10 (Nov. 1998) –Terrain Following Hybrid Scan –Graphical Hybrid Scan –Adaptable parameters appended to.
The Role of Polarimetric Radar for Validating Cloud Models Robert Cifelli 1, Timothy Lang 1, Stephen Nesbitt 1, S.A. Rutledge 1 S. Lang 2, and W.K. Tao.
Multi-Sensor Precipitation Estimation Presented by D.-J. Seo 1 Hydrologic Science and Modeling Branch Hydrology Laboratory National Weather Service Presented.
Why We Care or Why We Go to Sea.
Flash Flood Monitoring and Prediction (FFMP) John Ferree Warning Decision Training Branch Norman, OK John Ferree Warning Decision Training Branch Norman,
Where are the radars located? What is the radar coverage?
Distributed Hydrologic Modeling-- Jodi Eshelman Analysis of the Number of Rain Gages Required to Calibrate Radar Rainfall for the Illinois River Basin.
NEXRAD TAC Meeting August 22-24, 2000 Norman, OK AP Clutter Mitigation Scheme Cathy Kessinger Scott Ellis Joseph VanAndel
“24 hours in the life of a weather radar network”.
EVALUATION OF THE RADAR PRECIPITATION MEASUREMENT ACCURACY USING RAIN GAUGE DATA Aurel Apostu Mariana Bogdan Coralia Dreve Silvia Radulescu.
Quality Control Problems For VAD Winds and NEXRAD Level-II Winds In the Presence of Migrating Birds Li Bi 1, Alan Shapiro 1,2, Pengfei Zhang 3 and Qin.
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation by WSR-88D Radar Dan Berkowitz Applications Branch Radar Operations Center.
WSR-88D Radar Rainfall Estimation Present and Near Future Daniel S. Berkowitz Applications Branch NWS Radar Operations Center Norman, Oklahoma 1.
Curious Precipitation Curtains within the Inflow Region of a Supercell Thunderstorm: A Status Report Rodger A. Brown NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory,
1 COMET Hydrometeorology 00-1 Matt Kelsch Tuesday, 19 October 1999 Radar-Derived Precipitation Part 1 I.Radar Representation of Precipitation.
What does radar measure? Hydrometeors: rain drops, ice particles Other objects: e.g. birds, insects.
METR February Radar Products More Radar Background Precipitation Mode: -Volume Coverage Patterns (VCP) 21: 9 elevation angles with a complete.
Infilling Radar CAPPIs
National Weather Association 31 st Annual Meeting 17 October 2006 Cleveland, Ohio Kevin Scharfenberg University of Oklahoma Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale.
WSR-88D PRECIPITATION ESTIMATION FOR HYDROLOGIC APPLICATIONS DENNIS A. MILLER.

Principals of Radar. F NWS Radar Characteristics 28 foot dish Pulse Width 0.95° Peak Power 750kW –Avg. Power 1.5kW Discrete Pulse Transmissions.
NEXRAD Data Quality 25 August 2000 Briefing Boulder, CO Cathy Kessinger Scott Ellis Joe VanAndel Don Ferraro Jeff Keeler.
JMA Japan Meteorological Agency QPE/QPF of JMA Application of Radar Data Masashi KUNITSUGU Head, National Typhoon Center Japan Meteorological Agency TYPHOON.
1 A conical scan type spaceborne precipitation radar K. Okamoto 1),S. Shige 2), T. Manabe 3) 1: Tottori University of Environmental Studies, 2: Kyoto University.
Tornado Detection Algorithm (TDA) Rapid Update Requirements ORPG Build 5 – AWIPS OB4 Mike Istok NWS/OS&T/SEC NPI Development Manager 30 July 2003.
PRINCIPLES OF METEOROLOCIAL RADAR. OUTLINE OVERVIEW –Sampling –R max –Superrefraction, subrefraction, operational impacts –Sidelobes –Beam Width –Range.
Radar Interpretation Chad Entremont National Weather Service Jackson, MS.
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
CAPS Radar QC and Remapping
A dual-polarization QPE method based on the NCAR Particle ID algorithm Description and preliminary results Michael J. Dixon1, J. W. Wilson1, T. M. Weckwerth1,
Multi-Sensor Precipitation Estimation
Radar/Surface Quantitative Precipitation Estimation
High resolution radar data and products over the Continental United States National Severe Storms Laboratory Norman OK, USA.
the University of Oklahoma
An overview of real-time radar data handling and compression
Presentation transcript:

Estimating Rainfall in Arizona - A Brief Overview of the WSR-88D Precipitation Processing Subsystem Jonathan J. Gourley National Severe Storms Laboratory (Western Storms Group) University of Oklahoma School of Meteorology Norman, OK

Outline Description of the Precipitation Detection Function Overview of the Precipitation Processing Subsystem Examples of individual radar performance Suggestions for improvements of radar rainfall estimates Discussion (questions, comments, complaints)

Precipitation Detection Function (PDF) Category 0 - no detectable precipitation - Reflectivity values < 22.0 dBZ, precipitation area < 10 km 2 - Radar stays in Mode B (Clear Air Mode) - No Precipitation Processing Subsystem (PPS) activation Category 1 - significant detectable precipitation - Reflectivity values > 22.0 dBZ, precipitation area > 10 km 2 - Radar switches to Mode A (Precip Mode) - PPS is activated Category 2 - light detectable precipitation - 1 condition for Cat. 0 is not met - Radar stays in Mode B (Clear Air Mode) - PPS is activated

Precipitation Processing Subsystem (PPS) 4 Step Process Preprocessing - 6 functions Rate - 2 (3) functions Accumulation - 3 functions (Adjustment)

PPS: Preprocessing Input: Reflectivity values from 4 lowest elevation angles within a radius of 230 km. Output: Hybrid Scan Partial Occultation Correction Isolated Sample Volume Check Outlier Check Complete Occultation Correction Tilt Test Bi-Scan Maximization

PPS: Preprocessing - Partial Occultation Correction Purpose: To allow elevation angles which are less than 60% blocked to be utilized in precipitation computations. Function: dBZ values are added to range bins beyond the obstruction. The magnitude of the added dBZ value is a function of the percent blockage. 0-10% = +0 dBZ 11-29% = +1 dBZ 30-43% = +2 dBZ 44-55% = +3 dBZ 56-60% = +4 dBZ

PPS: Preprocessing - Isolated Sample Volume Check Purpose: To reduce the amount of spurious noise and low frequency interference. Function: If a reflectivity value exceeds 18 dBZ and less than 2 of the 8 surrounding values (within the same elevation angle) exceed 18 dBZ, then the value is set to 0 dBZ. 0 dBZ

PPS: Preprocessing - Outlier Check Purpose: To reduce the effects of unrealistically high reflectivities such as those caused by hail contamination. Function: If a reflectivity value in a range bin exceeds 65 dBZ, then it is either replaced by an interpolated value from the 8 surrounding values, or it is set to 1 dBZ. 40 dBZ 1 dBZ

PPS: Preprocessing - Complete Occultation Correction Purpose: To attempt to interpolate values beyond the obstruction if the blockage exceeds 60%. Function: If the complete blockage is less than 2˚ in azimuth, then values behind the obstruction are interpolated from bins on both sides at the same range and elevation angle.

PPS: Preprocessing - Tilt Test Purpose: To suppress the effects of ground clutter and anomalous propagation. Function: Between the ranges of 40 and 150 km, the tilt test assesses the validity of the reflectivity obtained from the lowest scan. If ANY of the following conditions are satisfied, then the lower scan is used to build the hybrid scan. Total echo area < 600 km 2 Area averaged reflectivity < 10 dBZ Area (Echoes which are not vertically continuous) > 0.75 Area (Echoes at lowest scan)

PPS: Preprocessing - Bi-Scan Maximization Purpose: To mitigate the effects of beam losses at far ranges. Function: From 10 to 50 km (KIWA!) or 180 to 230 km (KFSX), Bi-Scan Maximization chooses the maximum reflectivity values from the 2 lowest, available scans.

PPS: Preprocessing - Hybrid Scan Purpose: To attempt to represent, as closely as possible, the atmosphere at a constant height of 1000 m above the radar. Function: In constructing the Hybrid Scan, the tilt to be selected for a given range and azimuth shall be the tilt whose beam center is closest to the optimal height (1000 m) above radar level. In addition, the height of the bottom of the range bin must clear any underlying obstruction by 500 ft. Tilts which failed the previous quality control steps are not considered in building the hybrid scan. 82,800 reflectivity values are stored on a 1˚x1 km polar grid.

PPS: Rate Input: Hybrid Scan Output: Rate Scan Average Rainfall Rate Computation Time Continuity Test (Range Corrected Rate Calculation)

PPS: Rate - Average Rainfall Rate Computation Purpose: To exclude unrealistic rainfall rates and provide smooth spatial continuity between adjacent rainfall range bins. Function: Reflectivity values greater than 65 dBZ are not considered to build the rate scan. In addition, rainfall rate pairs along the same radial are successively averaged to create a 1˚ x 2 km polar grid

PPS: Rate - Time Continuity Test Purpose: To check that the total volumetric precipitation rate does not exceed the rates that are expected with precipitation decay or development. Function: Compares total volumetric rate from current scan to previous scan. If the rate and echo area has decreased, then the test computes the maximum decay rate. If the current precipitation rate is less than the expected minimum rate, or if the difference between the two is small, then precipitation decay is assumed to be too large and the scan is rejected.

PPS: Rate - Time Continuity Test (Continued) Function: An analogous procedure is performed for precipitation development. If the rainfall rate and area has increased between scans, then the maximum expected rate is computed based on the previous scan. If the current “inner” volumetric rain rate exceeds the computed maximum rate, or if the difference is small, then the scan is rejected.

Purpose: To correct for underestimation of rainfall rates at long ranges due to signal degradation and partial beam filling Function: Coefficients are set such that no correction is made at the present time. Range Corrected Rate = C1 + C2 x Precip Rate + C3 x Range where C1=0, C2=1, C3=0 Range Corrected Rate = Precip Rate PPS: Rate - (Range Corrected Rate Calculation)

PPS: Accumulation Input: Rate Scan Output: Accumulation Scan Accumulation Computation Threshold Check Product Generation

PPS: Accumulation - Accumulation Computation Purpose: To compute how much rainfall has accumulated between scans based on rainfall rates. Function: For each range bin, rain rates from consecutive scans are averaged and multiplied by the time lapsed between scans to determine the rainfall accumulated. If the time between scans exceeds 30 min, then data are flagged as missing..03”.025” M.05” ∆t = 6 min∆t = 40 min 15 min

PPS: Accumulation - Threshold Check Purpose: To ensure that unrealistic accumulations are excluded in constructing the products. Function: If hourly accumulations exceed 400 mm (15.75”), then they are considered outliers and are interpolated from the 8 surrounding values. No accumulations greater than 800 mm (31.5”) are allowed

PPS: Accumulation - Product Generation Purpose: To generate hydrometeorological output for a variety of uses. Function: 5 products are generated - 1 Hour Precipitation, 3 Hour Precipitation, Storm Total Precipitation, User Selectable Precipitation and One Hour Digital Precipitation Array. 1 Hour Precipitation - moving 1 hour window which updates every scan. Product is not generated if there is missing data. 3 Hour Precipitation - available after each scan, but updated at the top of each hour. Product requires at least 2 “top of the hour” accumulations before it is generated.

PPS: Accumulation - Product Generation (continued) Storm Total Precipitation - available from the first volume scan that produces a category 1 or 2 in the precipitation detection function. It is updated every volume scan until there is at least 1 hour of category 0 precipitation. This product includes periods in which there may have been missing data. User Selectable Precipitation - uses top of the hour accumulations for the previous 24 hours. Product may contain missing data. 1 Hour DPA - accumulations are converted to a 4 x 4 km grid. 256 data levels (.01”-14.38”) are used in the NWSRFS. Grid format allows mosaicking of data from multiple radars.

PPS: (Adjustment) Input: Accumulation Scan Output: Adjusted Accumulation Scan Purpose: To calibrate the Z-R relationship to the current rainfall characteristics in real-time. Function: Each hour, gage reports (and their 8 surrounding values) are compared to radar accumulations in coinciding areas. The algorithm then computes a multiplicative bias based on the difference in the gage-radar sets. This bias is used to adjust the current hourly accumulations. Furthermore, it is forecast to the next hour in the event that insufficient gage data arrive.