Brown, W., & Moore, C. (2000). Is prospective altruist- detection an evolved solution to the adaptive problem of subtle cheating in cooperative ventures?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Public Goods & Reputation: Humans Recall Eusocial Insects: Altruism Inclusive Fitness Kin Selection Monogamous Queens Multiply-Mated Queens Lower r Kinship,
Advertisements

Critical Thinking “The important thing is not
Chapter 8: The Evolution of Social Behavior What is social behavior? –Types of social interactions The Conundrum of Altruism Kin Selection or Inclusive.
Descriptive Approach Pragmatic Reasoning Schemas (Cheng & Holyoak)
Cooperation and Reciprocal Altruism
 Cognitive Modules › Background  Wason Selection Task › Purpose › Puzzles vs Social Contract problems  Fiddick & Erlich’s Paper › Introduction › Methods.
Reciprocal Altruism and Group Behavior
The SOCIAL CONTRACT. Trivers – Reciprocal Altruism and the Human Psychological System Humans have an acute sense sense of fairness and a built in “cheating.
Ernst Fehr University of Zurich Simon Gaechter University of St. Gallen.
Altruism: Voluntary or Coerced? Altruism Requires Decrease Actor’s Direct Fitness Increase Recipient’s Direct Fitness Social Insects Eusociality  Sterile.
Cooperation Reciprocators, Cheaters, and Everyone Else.
Chapter 16: Evolution and Human Behavior Minds/brains are products of Natural Selection Evolutionary Psychology Human Universals Evolution of Culture Human.
Food and Moving onto the Savannah What is social behavior?
Altruistic behavior: Behaviors benefit others rather than the individual committing the behavior. Human, rare in early childhood Nonhuman: sentinel behavior.
Social Psychology Alive, Breckler/Olson/Wiggins Chapter 12 Chapter Twelve Helpful Social Behavior.
Emotions: Emotions: Hampson, E., van Anders, S. M., & Mullin, L. I. (2006). A female advantage in the recognition of emotional facial expressions: test.
Genetic mechanisms explaining how evolution is linked to organizational behavior: The genetic basis of work attitudes and emotions. Zhaoli Song National.
©John Wiley & Sons, Inc Huffman: Psychology in Action (8e) Evolution of cooperation: Why make friends? Why be nice, making friends must have offered.
Sociality and the adaptive value of helpful behavior
Jump to first page HYPOTHESIS TESTING The use of sample data to make a decision either to accept or to reject a statement about a parameter value or about.
Game AI Fundamentals. What is Artificial Intelligence (AI)? Not easy to answer… “Ability of a computer or other machine to perform those activities that.
1 Power and Sample Size in Testing One Mean. 2 Type I & Type II Error Type I Error: reject the null hypothesis when it is true. The probability of a Type.
SARA NISHIKAWA, BOBBY CASTILLO AND ARI SATURNE EVOLUTION Kruger, D. J. (2003). Evolution and altruism: Combining psychological mediators with naturally.
Educational Psychology, 11 th Edition ISBN © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. The Learning Sciences and Constructivism Chapter.
Chapter 4: Local integration 1: Reasoning & evolutionary psychology.
Emotions and Learning Styles: Why these are important Chapter Two- Supplement McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Evolution of Logical Reasoning
Testing Hypothesis That Data Fit a Given Probability Distribution Problem: We have a sample of size n. Determine if the data fits a probability distribution.
Presented by Antú Schamberger, Amanda Douglas, and Joel Schreiber Stevens, J. R. & Hauser, M. D. (2004). Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the.
HOW TO CRITIQUE AN ARGUMENT
Evolutionary Psychology. Evolved Mechanisms ALL psychological theories imply evolved psychological mechanisms –Where did these mechanisms come from? –Why.
Math 4030 – 9a Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
Chapter Eight The Evolutionary Approach: Change Over Time.
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning & Decision-Making May 28, 2003.
Wasieleski, David M.; Hayibor, Sefa; Journal of Business Ethics, Vol 78(1-2), Mar, pp [Journal Article] Johnathan Lou, Charlie Kittler,
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A. Mertler Chapter 12 Assessing Group Work.
Evolution, Biology and the Cooperative Instinct
Designing Assignments for Critical Thinking Ann Alexander Grand Rapids Community College June 9, 2005.
Emotional Closeness as a Mediator of the Effect of Genetic Relatedness on Altruism By: Josephine D. Korchmaros and David A. Kenny Presentation By: Kristin.
Hamilton vs. Kant: Pitting adaptations for altruism against adaptations for moral judgment by Ana Lira and Chi-Yun Lee.
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning.
Altruism & Kin Stewart-Williams, S. (2007) Altruism among kin vs. nonkin: effects of cost of help and reciprocal exchange. Evolution and Human Behavior,
The Practice of Statistics Third Edition Chapter 11: Testing a Claim Copyright © 2008 by W. H. Freeman & Company Daniel S. Yates.
Cognition Thinking: some of it is conscious but most of it is mental processes we take for granted and are cognitively impenetrable (phoneme parsing; trajectory.
Cognitive Adaptations for Social Exchange Leda Cosmides and John Tooby presented by Nat Twarog.
Anonymity and Altruistic Punishment Kaytlyn McBride, Maiya Guillory & Steve Zigtema Piazza, J., & Bering, M.J. (2008). The effects of perceived anonymity.
The official view of the newspaper. The editorial or opinion page is dominated by comment and analysis rather than objective unbiased reporting. Purpose.
Investigate Plan Design Create Evaluate (Test it to objective evaluation at each stage of the design cycle) state – describe - explain the problem some.
Is domain-specific reasoning in conditional reasoning tasks really domain-specific? The 2 nd London Reasoning Workshop 28-29/08/2007 Akira Nakagaki (Waseda.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY Module 78 - Aggression. Aggression ■Aggression –Any action, verbal or physical, meant to hurt others ■Instrumental Aggression –Aim is.
Scientific/Mathematical Thinking and Human Nature Uri Leron Technion – Israel Institute of Technology Submitted to The Journal of Half-Baked Ideas.
Altruism & Kin Stewart-Williams, S. (2007) Altruism among kin vs. nonkin: effects of cost of help and reciprocal exchange. Evolution and Human Behavior,
Non-kin interactions: Reciprocal altruism in animals
Effective Presentations
Chapter 6 Heuristics and Controlled Problem Solving
Kinship and Inclusive Fitness
Cooperation within Groups
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY MARQUEZ, QUENIE V. AB PSYCHOLOGY 3
Anonymity and Altruistic Punishment
Thinking Like a Scientist
Theories of Altruism Contrast two theories of altruism.
Professor of Philosophy College of Mount St. Joseph
The Scientific Method.
The detective must be memorable.
#1 #2 #3 Solve: 21 ÷ Solve: Solve: 3 (7 + 4) 12 ÷ 3 – 2 + 1
Reciprocity and Cooperation
Rational analysis of the selection task
The Elements of Reasoning
Evolutionary Perspectives
Human Nature and Economics
Presentation transcript:

Brown, W., & Moore, C. (2000). Is prospective altruist- detection an evolved solution to the adaptive problem of subtle cheating in cooperative ventures? Supportive evidence using the Wason selection task. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(1), Lara Heisser, Jennifer Lambert, and Nisha Patel

Background Altruism is a behavior that reduces the fitness of the donor and increases the fitness of the recipient. Reciprocal altruism is likely to evolve when withholding reciprocity is detected Brown, W., & Moore, C. (2000). Is prospective altruist-detection an evolved solution to the adaptive problem of subtle cheating in cooperative ventures? Supportive evidence using the Wason selection task.

Video

Brown, W., & Moore, C. (2000). Is prospective altruist-detection an evolved solution to the adaptive problem of subtle cheating in cooperative ventures? Supportive evidence using the Wason selection task.

Wason Selection Task Wason selection task designed for the detection of altruism Brown, W., & Moore, C. (2000). Is prospective altruist-detection an evolved solution to the adaptive problem of subtle cheating in cooperative ventures? Supportive evidence using the Wason selection task.

Experiment 1 Testing logic: control vs altruistic detection Problem 1: Wason task used as a control Problems 2&3: Altruistic detection problems Brown, W., & Moore, C. (2000). Is prospective altruist-detection an evolved solution to the adaptive problem of subtle cheating in cooperative ventures? Supportive evidence using the Wason selection task.

Hypothesis Subjects would solve Wason tasks designed to detect altruists than the control problems Brown, W., & Moore, C. (2000). Is prospective altruist-detection an evolved solution to the adaptive problem of subtle cheating in cooperative ventures? Supportive evidence using the Wason selection task.

Results Experiment 1 Subjects detected the altruists all together Not mediated by logical reasoning since the problems were switched Brown, W., & Moore, C. (2000). Is prospective altruist-detection an evolved solution to the adaptive problem of subtle cheating in cooperative ventures? Supportive evidence using the Wason selection task.

Methods for Experiment 2 Problem 1: Altruisitic detection problem Problem 2: Cheater detection problem Problem 3: School problem Brown, W., & Moore, C. (2000). Is prospective altruist-detection an evolved solution to the adaptive problem of subtle cheating in cooperative ventures? Supportive evidence using the Wason selection task.

Experiment 2 Discussion Subjects performed better on altruist detection task No significant difference in performance of altruistic detection task and cheater detection task Brown, W., & Moore, C. (2000). Is prospective altruist-detection an evolved solution to the adaptive problem of subtle cheating in cooperative ventures? Supportive evidence using the Wason selection task.

Overall Subjects are detecting altruists rather than giving logically correct responses Adaptive benefit of detecting altruists is that altruists would gain allies and friends to rely on for hunting, gathering, social activities Purpose of altruist detection task was to determine genuiness Brown, W., & Moore, C. (2000). Is prospective altruist-detection an evolved solution to the adaptive problem of subtle cheating in cooperative ventures? Supportive evidence using the Wason selection task.

Criticism Sample size too small to detect a significant effect Human decision making is not based on simple rules, can be provoked by other emotions to choose certain cards Brown, W., & Moore, C. (2000). Is prospective altruist-detection an evolved solution to the adaptive problem of subtle cheating in cooperative ventures? Supportive evidence using the Wason selection task.