1 City Council Work Session September 24, 2012 State of Transportation in San Leandro.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reston Metrorail Access Group (RMAG) Status Report Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee September 20, 2011.
Advertisements

Reston Metrorail Access Group (RMAG) Status Report Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee November 29, 2011.
Projects in the Forest Grove area Presented by: David Kim, ODOT Metro West Area Manager August 13, 2012.
Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee April 2, 2014 OVERVIEW | SOURCE OF PROJECTS PROPOSED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT.
2010 Budget Challenged with an economic climate that is impacting the City’s revenue streams, the approved budget focuses on continuing to fund programs.
City of Willows Pavement Management Program Road Maintenance Needs March 25, 2014.
Transportation System Needs House Transportation Committee Phil Williams, City of Bremerton Ashley Probart, AWC January 25, 2005.
State of Morrisville Mayor Mark Stohlman July 17, 2014.
Pavement Management Program Overview February 10, 2015 Presented By: Christopher J. Ott, E.I.
Senate Committee on Transportation, Technology and Legislative Affairs House Committee on Public Transportation Thursday, July 18, 2013.
Statewide Transportation Funding At Risk Your Name or Agency Date RTPA RCTF.
Background Why Plan For Transportation? Facts You Should Know Expectations Projects and Costs Conclusions/ Next Steps.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
The Dalles Pavement Preservation Program Presented by Bill Barrier Transportation Manager City of The Dalles Public Works Department.
County of Orange Pavement Management System and Sustainable Treatment Program Clark Shen, Manager OC Construction Materials Lab Krishna Nadaraja, Senior.
PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS: TRANSPORTATION Steve Hansen, PE Director of Public Works – Liberty, MO APWA PW Institute April 8, 2014.
City Transportation Funding Overview House Transportation Committee January 13, 2004 Ashley Probart AWC Transportation Coordinator.
Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan Randell Iwasaki California Department of Transportation.
SUISUN CITY Suisun City Planned Development Area Connectivity for a Better Community.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Funding Overview NYS Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Council August 2, 2010 Albany, New York.
Complete Streets Policy and Implementation Jason Ridgway February 11, 2014.
Paula J. Trigg, County Engineer Public Works and Transportation Committee April 3, 2013.
New Partners for Smart Growth January 27, 2006 Steve Kinsey Supervisor, Marin County Commissioner, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Smart Growth.
Utah Collaborative Active Transportation Study.  Regional Collaboration.
Pass-through Fund and Grant Programs Update A Presentation by John Hemiup Senior Transportation Engineer October 2012.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
US 1 COLLEGE PARK – SEGMENT 1 FROM COLLEGE AVE/REGENTS DRIVE TO MD 193 (UNIVERSITY BLVD) Presentation to College Park City Council August 5,
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Dianne Steinhauser Executive Director Program and Project Delivery Marin County April 9, 2010.
Street Maintenance. The Town of Bayfield maintains centerline miles of road.
Michigan’s Roads Crisis: Study Findings, Conclusions and Where Do We Go From Here? Best Practices Conference Rick Olson, State Representative, 55 th District.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
Public Comment Mobility Vision Plan 2035 MVP Website 2035 MVP Brochure and Survey. Provides specific information on the Plan Update. Survey – your opinion.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
1 Senate Transportation & Housing Committee December 13, 2005 Orange County Transportation Authority.
Council Policy Forum Feb. 23, 2015 CAPITAL PLANNING & INFRASTRUCTURE.
Paving for Progress Aaron D. Granquist, Project Manager, HR Green, Inc. Doug Wilson, Capital Improvement Project Manager, Cedar Rapids Handouts and presentations.
Comprehensive Update on Indian Trail Infrastructure Plan September 8, 2015.
Denver Area Transportation Issues and the Future of Transit Development in the Denver Metro Area Sertoma Club January 12, 2012.
Department of Transportation Report on Condition of County Maintained Road System Agenda Item 53 Board of Supervisor’s Meeting April 26, 2005.
Transportation Investment Act of 2010 AASHTO/MTAP Conference December 6-9, 2010 Savannah, Georgia Steve Kish, Transit Program Manager Georgia Department.
Street Maintenance Program Update City Council Work Session February 5, 2013 Department of Public Works & Transportation.
Regional Transportation Issues Infrastructure Maintenance New Facilities Air Quality Pollution Congestion Freeway System Surface Streets Income.
2 ITS Facts and Figures Founded in 1948 by the California state legislature in response to the deferred maintenance of transportation facilities during.
Regional Transportation Committee (RTC) 10-Year Project Milestone Policy Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee October 26, 2015.
City and County of San Francisco Mayor’s Transportation Task Force: Draft Findings and Recommendations Presentation from the San Francisco Controller’s.
Department of Public Works Approval of a Journal Voucher Amending Projects in the FY 2011 Capital Improvement Program Budget and Appropriate $125,000 in.
Statewide Transportation Funding At Risk Your Name or Agency Date RTPA RCTF.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 6 October 6, 2015.
MED SR 18 Corridor Project MED PID October 13, 2015.
Major Project Scoping Committee.  Two previous studies to develop improvements for the I-35W Corridor ◦ Project Limits were from 42 nd to I-94 ◦ Project.
HB 277 Regional Transportation Sales Tax Preliminary Project List Presentation Mayor and City Council Work Session March 1, 2011.
I-80 San Pablo Dam Road Interchange Project – Phase 1.
A presentation by Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Broward Boulevard Presentation to the Broward MPO TCC and CIR March 2012 Agenda Item NA-1, Attachment.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Public Hearing – FY 2017 – 2021 Recommended Capital Improvement Program Budget April 25, 2016.
University Drive Road Diet September 8, Goals and Objectives A. Reduce vehicular speed in the corridor. B. Provide an attractive bicycle accommodation.
 Connect the Coastside Presentation Half Moon Bay City Council Briefing March 15,
Transportation Program (Infrastructure) Presentation Board of Aldermen Work Session February 29, 2012.
CITY OF BELLEVILLE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
Transportation Initiative Sales Tax Prioritization
Regional Roads Committee
District 3 Complete Streets Projects
River to Sea TPO Meeting US 92/International Speedway Boulevard
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Capital Improvement Program
SANDY SPRINGS CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Early Voting Starts Oct. 20 | Election Day Nov
National Organization of Minority Engineers Leadership Summit
Presentation transcript:

1 City Council Work Session September 24, 2012 State of Transportation in San Leandro

San Leandro Transportation Outline Transportation Modes Rapid Transit Buses Bikes / Pedestrians Roads Funding Opportunity New Funding Impacts A Look Into The Future 2

Transportation Modes Rapid Transit Partner-Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) San Leandro Challenges Parking Land Development Adjacent to Station Station Appearance / Security / Access for the Disabled (ADA) Station Interrelationship with Buses and Pedestrians 3

Transportation Modes Buses Partner - Alameda County Transit FLEX Shuttle Links East Bay Paratransit San Leandro Challenges Complete Public Transit Experience East – West Connection Bus Frequency Future North / South Connection with Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) 4

Transportation Modes Bikes / Pedestrians Highlights San Leandro has one of the most recognized Bike/Pedestrian Master Plans in the State Currently Building Out a Network of Class II and Class III Bike Paths Improving Accessibility for all Users Challenges Older City Limitation Issues Limited Funding 5

Transportation Modes Roads Capacity Needs City Road Condition 6

Capacity Needs Balanced approach toward improved mobility Improvements for other modes, signal coordination Three locations identified in General Plan with capacity issues E. 14 th Street at Dutton Avenue Marina Blvd. at I-880 NB On-ramp Marina Blvd. at I-880 SB On-ramp 7

City Project Types County Wide Transportation Plan CWTP Transportation Expenditure Plan TEP Streetscape PDA Related Local Streets & Roads Rehabilitation – Project Identified in TEP Traffic Signal Improvements

Met Needs – CWTP Existing Projects I-880/Davis Street Interchange I-880/Marina Blvd. Interchange I-880/Washington Ave./Beatrice St. Interchange Downtown San Leandro TOD East 14 th -Hesperian-150 th Improvements Bay Fair BART TOD San Leandro Streetscape and Pedestrian Improvements Traffic Signal System Upgrade

Unmet Needs – CWTP New Projects Marina Boulevard Widening Eden Road East 14 th Street Streetscape Doolittle Drive Streetscape MacArthur Boulevard Streetscape Eastbay Greenway – UPRR Corridor Washington/Lewelling Intersection Traffic Signal System Improvements

11 Overview of the City’s Road Condition

12  America's infrastructure is in dire need of proper, sustained attention  In 2006, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), evaluated the current state of the country's roads, bridges, aviation systems, drinking water, and schools  ASCE's 2006 Report Card for California’s Infrastructure gave the state’s infrastructure a grade of “C-" and called for an annual investment of $37 billion  While the 2012 Report Card Grade has slightly improved to a grade of “C”, the cost of the annual need now tops $65 billion  In San Leandro, the overall rating of our street condition is 55 out of 100 Condition of California’s Infrastructure

City’s Roadway Assets 179 centerline miles 392 lane miles About 818 acres of asphalt About the size of Council District 5 The area of over 600 football fields 1,050 inspected pavement sections analyzed in the Pavement Management System (PMS) 13

Street Network City Streets Most arterial streets on Federal System eligible for grant funding Most residential City streets not grant eligible Parking lots not eligible for Measure B or Gas tax funding State Highway (Caltrans Responsibility) East 14 th Street (State Highway 185) Doolittle Drive North City Limit to Davis Street (State Highway 61) Davis Street – Doolittle Drive to East 14 th Street (State Highway 112) 14

What is Pavement Condition Index 15 Pavement Age (Years) EXCELLENT (100) GOOD (85) FAIR (70) POOR (50) VERY POOR (25) FAILED % DROP IN QUALITY 75% OF PAVEMENT LIFE 40% DROP IN QUALITY 12% OF LIFE SLURRY SEAL or CAPE SEAL OVERLAY / INLAY RECONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDED TREATMENT PAVEMENT CONDITION (Approx. PCI) Rubberized Chip Seal - $2.9 / S.F. Overlay - $3.5 / S.F. Cement Treatment - $5.7 / S.F. State / Alameda County 66 / 67 City 55 Slurry - $1.0 / S.F.

Pavement Condition Index (PCI) vs. Unfunded Backlog   PCI is a indicator of how one street’s condition compares to another   Unfunded Backlog represents the funds required to raise all street segments to a target PCI   PCI Average does not provide a good picture of Unfunded Backlog   Example: 3 streets each 500 feet long and 50 feet wide   All three streets have a PCI of 70 their average PCI is 70 - Recommended Treatment costs would be $75,000   The same 3 streets with PCIs of 25, 90, 95 has the same PCI average of 70; however the recommended treatment costs would be $142,500 16

Street Condition 2007 (PCI 60) 17 Lane Miles

Annual Spending (Millions) 2007 to 2011 Total $15.1M 18

Funds Used For Roads 19

Pavement Improvement Street Reconstruction 15 Lane Miles Overlay, Inlay, or Reconstruction Maintenance Treatments 50 Lane Miles Slurry, Cape Sealing, Microsurfacing 20

Street Condition Example

Street Condition Example

Street Condition Example – 55 23

Street Condition Example

Street Condition 2012 (PCI 55) 25 Lane Miles

Street Condition 2017 (PCI 48) Current Funding Levels $3M / Yr 26 Lane Miles

Funding Opportunity Measure B1 November 6 th Election Ballot ½ Cent Sales Tax Effective Immediately Ongoing Verified Voter Approved Expenditure Plan every 40 years 27

Measure B1 Funding (millions) 28

San Leandro Direct Benefits From the Passage of Measure B1 Annual funding for roads increases from $1.2M to Approximately $3M $30M in additional Streets and Roads Funds $20M in potential project specific funding for arterial street improvements Increase in annual Paratransit funds from $260K to $500K Increase in annual Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety funds from $230K to $410K 29

Indirect Benefits of Measure B1 I-880 Northbound HOV/HOT Project Highway Capital Projects Major Commute Corridor Improvements Freight Corridor Improvements BART Station Modernization AC Transit BRT - East 14 th Street / MacArthur Blvd. AC Transit Operating Funds Student Transit Pass Program Streetscape and TOD Investments – Downtown / Bay Fair Bay Trail andEast Bay Greenway Projects 30

What a $14M per year program might look like lane miles of street reconstruction lane miles of other surface treatments (slurry / cape) The addition or reconstruction of curb ramps to meet Americans with Disabilities Act requirements Traffic signal detection upgrades, striping improvements, and other street related improvements funded by various sources 31

Street Condition 2017 (PCI 65) with additional Meas. B1 funding$14M / year 32 Lane Miles

Summary Under current funding, pavement conditions will continue to decline As pavement work is deferred, the type of repair becomes more intrusive to residents and substantially more expensive As pavement conditions worsen, maintenance needs increase Traditional funding sources continue to be unreliable Measure B1 will provide 5 years of improving street conditions 33

A Look into the Future After 2017, the average PCI will have improved from 55 to 65 $6M per year will be required to maintain the PCI If we do not find long term funding after the 5 years, spending will drop to $4.6M per year with a resulting drop in PCI to 62 by 2022 Regional vs. Local Funding Comprehensive Transportation Solution 34

Questions 35