FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE RATING PROGRAM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Review and Discussion of Draft Scope of Work for Study of Issues Associated with Increasing Transportation.
Advertisements

Preparing a Curb Ramp Project December 15, Tiers of Project Types Non-Signalized Curb Ramp Reconstruction - Typically utilizing standard plans.
Maintenance October 5, District 11 Overview Safety and Move Over Law Adopt-A-Highway Maintenance TOPICS.
Maintenance Rating Program Training 2014 KYTC Division of Maintenance Tracy Nowaczyk, P.E.
DANIEL PETERSON Transportation Operations Supervisor II Alexandria Sub Area MN/DOT Performance Measures: Integrated Roadside Vegetation Management.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
Pavement Management Engineer
Wyoming County Paved Roads Management and Monitoring Khaled Ksaibati, Ph.D., P.E. STIC June, 2014.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Transportation Annual In-Service Training.
A Comprehensive Study on Pavement Edge Line Implementation Presented by: Mark J. Morvant, P.E. Associate Director, Research Louisiana Transportation Research.
TRAILS AS TRANSPORTATION Design & Construction Michael J. Kubek, P.E. Ohio Department of Transportation, District 12 Production Administrator.
Steve Varnedoe Condition Assessment & Funding Needs for North Carolina’s Highway System North Carolina Department of Transportation Report to the Joint.
Highway Maintenance Performance Measurement Annual Report September 2004.
DISTRICT PILOT PROJECT PRESENTATION MAY 2, Highway Safety Manual Implementation.
University of Kentucky College of Agriculture Landscape Architecture Franklin-Simpson County Before : Inadequate gateway point along Highway 100 No Sense.
US Highway 17 (Center Street) Sidewalk Feasibility Study Town of Pierson, Florida.
Mississippi DOT Roadsides, Drainage & Vegetation Management Standards.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Concerns About Highway Design and Operation Barb Mee, AICP City of Asheville Transportation Department
Chap 4 Cross Section Elements (pp.4-1 – 4-66 ) The following topics (pages) are covered in this lecture: Pavement (p.4-1 – 4-7) Pavement (p.4-1 – 4-7)
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
6 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE. Performance Based Maintenance Results Tim Lattner, P.E. Director, Office of Maintenance, Florida Department of Transportation.
EXAM 2 REVIEW. 1. Drainage problem (25 pts) Below you see a cross-section of a ditch. It runs parallel to a 200-acre field consisting of permanent pasture.
MAINTENANCE RATING PROGRAM Allen Mattox District Five Technical Support Manager.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Mission Statement Plan, Design, Construct, Operate and Maintain the roadway system under the jurisdiction of Lee County.
Lec 21, Ch.16, pp : Highway design standards (Objectives) Understand how highways are functionally classified Learn what factors are considered.
Learning Outcomes Identify safety issues unique to local and rural areas. Identify common challenges to improving road safety. Explain why road agencies.
Cross Sections CE 453 Lecture 22 Iowa DOT Design Manual Chapter 3.
Introduction Transportation System Objectives : Military; Knit together the inhabitants of a territory by providing mutual access and communication; Economic.
Safety Audit Components Safety assessment for risk Management.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Shared Roadways Lesson 14 (This picture shows bicyclists not.
MoDOT’s Inventory Systems and Measures for Pavement Marking and Roadway Signing Jim Carney State Maintenance Engineer October 2004.
WVDOT GTI SECTION Status Update for Districts. AGENDA Introduction. Introduction. Status Update. Status Update. How to Spatially Enable Database. How.
US 1 COLLEGE PARK – SEGMENT 1 FROM COLLEGE AVE/REGENTS DRIVE TO MD 193 (UNIVERSITY BLVD) Presentation to College Park City Council August 5,
February 24, 2015 First Public Hearing 1.  Workshop proposed ULDC changes: 1/27/15  Request to Advertise: 1/27/15  First Public Hearing: 2/24/15 
"The Use of Condition Assessments to Improve Maintenance Level of Service in Texas" Joe S. Graff, P.E. Texas Department of Transportation.
Texas Maintenance Assessment Program (TxMAP). Background Developed by TxDOT’s Maintenance Division in 1999 to document the condition of the highway system.
Operation & Maintenance Budget Public Works Department FY Budget Worksession July 13, 2015.
Vegetation Control For Safety Russ Johnson – Maintenance Supervisor - WSDOT Don Petersen – Safety/Design Engineer - FHWA.
SR 997 / KROME AVENUE Florida Department of Transportation April 27th, 2006 South Miami-Dade Watershed Study Advisory Committee.
Condition Assessment & Funding Needs for North Carolina’s Highway System Report to the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee December 12,
DR O.S ABIOLA DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, ABEOKUTA. CVE 505 HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING I.
2009 ROADWAY CONFERENCE 1R PROGRAM Cathy Nelson Steven Lindland.
IRWA Educational Mini Conference IRWA Educational Mini Conference Chapter 26 Presenter: Richard Diaz, Jr. P.E. September 16-17, 2010  Reading Right-of-Way.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
Public Works Department Operation & Maintenance Budget FY Budget Worksession July 15, 2013.
Maintenance Agreement with Town Center At Palm Coast Community Development District City Council Workshop February 10, 2015.
Mike McColeman, P.E. Assistant Maintenance Administrator Ohio Department of Transportation Defining Desired Outcomes Defining Desired Outcomes.
Roadway Median Tree Program Public Works Department July 13, 2015.
1 Performance measurement data are displayed for 10 individual survey cycles, including 3 cycles for each of the fiscal years 2001 through 2003 and the.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Safety Signs. Traffic Light Ahead Slow down and prepare to stop.
Complete Streets Training Module 10 – Street Elements: Design & Safety Considerations for Context-Based Solutions.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Bicycle Facility Maintenance Lesson 16 Publication No. FHWA-HRT
September 28, 2015 PUBLIC WORKS 101. sandyspringsga.gov Adopted City Priorities – FY
The Highway Fund – Planning, Measuring, and Reporting Mike Holder, PE, Chief Engineer 2015 CAPA / DOT Workshop February 24, 2015.
MISSOULA SCHOOL ZONE SPEED LIMITS PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE NOVEMBER, 9, 2011.
Region’s Core Services 202/17/2014 Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect Provide leadership, administrative support, procurement and budgetary and financial.
Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Crash Cushion and Guardrail Approach Terminal In-Service Performance Evaluation.
Michael Soto Program Resources Administrator Office of Maintenance.
2013 Roads and Sidewalk Capital Programs Roads and Parks Maintenance Department Development & Infrastructure Division December 2, 2013.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 Funding Resources for Highway Safety (FY2001 Fed-Aid) $1.4 $5.6 Min. Guarantee Bridge Surface Transp. Program National Hwy.
Future of Roadway Characteristics Inventory (RCI) Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Kirk Hutchison Office of Maintenance.
Reducing Engineering standards: GOOD OR Bad?
Maintenance Rating Program Training
Maintaining a Safer Roadway
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Alex Henry FDOT District Seven Safety Office
Clark County, WA Safety Management Program
Presentation transcript:

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE RATING PROGRAM

Developed in the 80’s by a team made up of maintenance professionals as “A method of conducting a visual and mechanical evaluation of routine highway maintenance conditions”

Purpose of MRP Program “To provide information that should be used to schedule and prioritize routine maintenance activities and provide uniform maintenance conditions that meet established departmental objectives”

MRP Program Each District is evaluated 3 times per year. Random sample points are generated by roadway facility types from RCI data at the State Office of Maintenance. The sample points are selected randomly and printed on a coding form, by district, maintenance area, county, section, location mile post, and facility type.

Facility Types The roadways within a maintenance area are divided into four roadway classifications or facility types: – Rural Limited Access – Urban Limited Access – Rural Arterial – Urban Arterial

MRP Elements The MRP program is divided into five categories or elements: – Roadway – Roadside – Traffic Services – Drainage – Vegetation and Aesthetics

MRP Characteristics Each MRP Element consists of various individual characteristics. Each characteristic within the sample point is evaluated as a yes or no as meeting maintenance conditions / standards as defined in the MRP Handbook.

MRP Characteristics All characteristics are evaluated against an established standard. These are listed in the MRP Handbook, or Design Standards. The characteristics evaluated by MRP teams are represented as features in the RCI and activities in the MMS.

Roadway Characteristics Consists of 9 characteristics: – Flexible Pavement Pothole – Flexible Pavement Edge Raveling – Flexible Pavement Shoving – Flexible Pavement Depression/Bump – Flexible Pavement Paved Shoulder/Turnout – Rigid Pavement Pothole – Rigid Pavement Depression/Bump – Rigid Joint Cracking – Rigid Pavement Paved Shoulder/Turnout

Roadside Characteristics Consists of 5 characteristics: – Unpaved Shoulder – Front Slope – Slope Pavement – Sidewalk – Fence

Traffic Services Characteristics Consists of 8 characteristics: – Raised Pavement Markers – Striping – Pavement Symbols – Guardrail – Signs less than 30 SF – Signs greater than 30 SF – Object Markers – Highway Lighting

Drainage Characteristics Consists of 6 characteristics – Side and Cross Drains – Roadside and Median Ditches – Outfall Ditches – Inlets – Miscellaneous Drainage Structures – Roadway Sweeping

Vegetation Aesthetics Characteristics Consists of 7 Characteristics – Roadside Mowing – Slope Mowing – Landscaping – Tree Trimming – Curb and Sidewalk Edging – Litter Removal – Turf Condition

Random Samples Each maintenance area has 30 random sample points assigned for each facility type: – 30 points for Rural Limited Access – 30 points for Urban Limited Access – 30 points for Rural Arterial – 30 points for Urban Arterial Each maintenance area could have up to 120 sample points per evaluation.

Random Samples Each sample point is 528 feet long. Numerical rating is calculated for each facility type after all samples are evaluated and entered into the data base. A score is calculated from the ratings of each facility type.

Data Collection Each District is responsible for implementing and maintaining the Maintenance Rating Program (MRP). Each District will have an MRP survey team that is composed of a minimum of two people.

Data Collection Team The first responsibility of the team is safety for pedestrians, motoring public, and themselves. Each sample point is located and marked at the beginning, middle, and end with tape or paint.

Data Collection Team Team members walk the sample point together facing oncoming traffic. The team evaluates each characteristic within the sample point with a yes or no rating, depending on whether or not it meets MRP Standards.

MRP Data Coding Sheet

Data Collection Team Team members are trained annually. Each district performs a minimum of one quality control check on their team. The State Office of Maintenance performs an annual quality assurance review of each MRP team.

Any Questions???