Test the Main effect of A Not sign Sign. Conduct Planned comparisons One-way between-subjects designs Report that the main effect of A was not significant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multiple-choice question
Advertisements

Mixed Designs: Between and Within Psy 420 Ainsworth.
2  How to compare the difference on >2 groups on one or more variables  If it is only one variable, we could compare three groups with multiple ttests:
Chapter Fourteen The Two-Way Analysis of Variance.
Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences Two-Way Between-Groups ANOVA
Smith/Davis (c) 2005 Prentice Hall Chapter Thirteen Inferential Tests of Significance II: Analyzing and Interpreting Experiments with More than Two Groups.
Introduction to Factorial ANOVA Designs
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Statistics for the Social Sciences Psychology 340 Spring 2010.
Two Factor ANOVA.
TWO-WAY BETWEEN SUBJECTS ANOVA Also called: Two-Way Randomized ANOVA Also called: Two-Way Randomized ANOVA Purpose: Measure main effects and interaction.
C82MST Statistical Methods 2 - Lecture 7 1 Overview of Lecture Advantages and disadvantages of within subjects designs One-way within subjects ANOVA Two-way.
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900 Lecture 17: Repeated-Measures ANOVA.
PSY 307 – Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900
Statistics for the Social Sciences Psychology 340 Spring 2005 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
One-way Between Groups Analysis of Variance
Statistics for the Social Sciences
PSY 307 – Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences Chapter 16 – One-Way ANOVA (Cont.)
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900
Factorial Designs More than one Independent Variable: Each IV is referred to as a Factor All Levels of Each IV represented in the Other IV.
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900 Lecture 14: Factorial ANOVA.
Comparing Several Means: One-way ANOVA Lesson 14.
Introduction to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Repeated Measures ANOVA Used when the research design contains one factor on which participants are measured more than twice (dependent, or within- groups.
1 Two Factor ANOVA Greg C Elvers. 2 Factorial Designs Often researchers want to study the effects of two or more independent variables at the same time.
ANOVA Chapter 12.
PS 225 Lecture 15 Analysis of Variance ANOVA Tables.
ANOVA Greg C Elvers.
Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences Second Edition Chapter 12: Between-Groups ANOVA iClicker Questions Copyright © 2012 by Worth Publishers Susan A.
One-Way Analysis of Variance Comparing means of more than 2 independent samples 1.
Chapter 11 HYPOTHESIS TESTING USING THE ONE-WAY ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE.
Comparing Several Means: One-way ANOVA Lesson 15.
Analysis of Variance (Two Factors). Two Factor Analysis of Variance Main effect The effect of a single factor when any other factor is ignored. Example.
© Copyright McGraw-Hill CHAPTER 12 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Chapter 7 Experimental Design: Independent Groups Design.
PSY 307 – Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences Chapter 16 – One-Factor Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Between-Groups ANOVA Chapter 12. >When to use an F distribution Working with more than two samples >ANOVA Used with two or more nominal independent variables.
Chapter 10: Analyzing Experimental Data Inferential statistics are used to determine whether the independent variable had an effect on the dependent variance.
Statistics for the Social Sciences Psychology 340 Fall 2013 Tuesday, October 15, 2013 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Statistics for the Social Sciences Psychology 340 Fall 2012 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
ANOVA: Analysis of Variance.
Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences Second Edition Chapter 13: Within-Groups ANOVA iClicker Questions Copyright © 2012 by Worth Publishers Susan A.
Chapter 14 Repeated Measures and Two Factor Analysis of Variance
Analysis of Variance (One Factor). ANOVA Analysis of Variance Tests whether differences exist among population means categorized by only one factor or.
1 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Educational Technology 690.
1 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA) Heibatollah Baghi, and Mastee Badii.
Chapter 13 Repeated-Measures and Two-Factor Analysis of Variance
Two-Way (Independent) ANOVA. PSYC 6130A, PROF. J. ELDER 2 Two-Way ANOVA “Two-Way” means groups are defined by 2 independent variables. These IVs are typically.
Psy 230 Jeopardy Related Samples t-test ANOVA shorthand ANOVA concepts Post hoc testsSurprise $100 $200$200 $300 $500 $400 $300 $400 $300 $400 $500 $400.
Chapter 11 Analysis of Variance. 11.1: The Completely Randomized Design: One-Way Analysis of Variance vocabulary –completely randomized –groups –factors.
ANOVA, Continued PSY440 July 1, Quick Review of 1-way ANOVA When do you use one-way ANOVA? What are the components of the F Ratio? How do you calculate.
Research Methods and Data Analysis in Psychology Spring 2015 Kyle Stephenson.
Smith/Davis (c) 2005 Prentice Hall Chapter Fifteen Inferential Tests of Significance III: Analyzing and Interpreting Experiments with Multiple Independent.
Statistics for the Social Sciences Psychology 340 Spring 2009 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 11 Testing for Differences Differences betweens groups or categories of the independent variable.
Research Methods and Data Analysis in Psychology Spring 2015 Kyle Stephenson.
Introduction to ANOVA Research Designs for ANOVAs Type I Error and Multiple Hypothesis Tests The Logic of ANOVA ANOVA vocabulary, notation, and formulas.
Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 12: Single Variable Between- Subjects Research 1.
Simple ANOVA Comparing the Means of Three or More Groups Chapter 9.
Outline of Today’s Discussion 1.Independent Samples ANOVA: A Conceptual Introduction 2.Introduction To Basic Ratios 3.Basic Ratios In Excel 4.Cumulative.
F-Tables & Basic Ratios. Outline of Today’s Discussion 1.Some F-Table Exercises 2.Introduction to Basic Ratios [Between-Subject ANOVA] 3.Independent Samples.
Factorial BG ANOVA Psy 420 Ainsworth. Topics in Factorial Designs Factorial? Crossing and Nesting Assumptions Analysis Traditional and Regression Approaches.
MM570Sec02 Zrotowski Unit 8, Unit 8, Chapter 9 Chapter 9 1 ANOVA 1 ANOVA.
ANOVA PSY440 June 26, Clarification: Null & Alternative Hypotheses Sometimes the null hypothesis is that some value is zero (e.g., difference between.
Between-Groups ANOVA Chapter 12. Quick Test Reminder >One person = Z score >One sample with population standard deviation = Z test >One sample no population.
Chapter 10: Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). t test --Uses the t statistic to compare 2 means One-Way ANOVA --Also know as the F test --Uses the F statistic.
Six Easy Steps for an ANOVA 1) State the hypothesis 2) Find the F-critical value 3) Calculate the F-value 4) Decision 5) Create the summary table 6) Put.
Main Effects and Interaction Effects
Statistics for the Social Sciences
Analysis of Variance: repeated measures
Presentation transcript:

Test the Main effect of A Not sign Sign. Conduct Planned comparisons One-way between-subjects designs Report that the main effect of A was not significant You must explore the main effect STOP Conduct Post-Hoc tests If hypotheses were specified before data collection: If no hypotheses were specified: T-tests with Bonferroni Correction (Contrasts in SPSS) Tukey tests If IV = 2 levels, no need for follow-up tests

Factorial designs Two-factor designs

Two (or more) IVs are manipulated at the same time Advantages of factorial designs: Joint manipulation of independent variables. Causal links between each variable and behavior. Interactions: opportunity to determine how two independent variables combine to influence behavior.

2 x 2 between-subjects factorial design Gender (A) (a1)(a2) MaleFemale Anxiety (B) Hi (b1) a1b1a2b1 Low (b2) a1b2a2b2

What are the sources of variability? –Variable A (gender) –Variable B (anxiety) –Interaction of A and B

For one-way ANOVA we have: Deviation of a subject’s score from the grand mean can be divided into 2 components: Total deviation = within-groups deviation + between-groups deviation

Deviation of a subject’s score from the grand mean can be broken down into 4 components Main effect of A Main effect of B Interaction of A x B Effect of random error (individual differences) Total deviation = within-groups deviation + between-groups deviation

Division of the Between-Groups deviation A main effect = B main effect = Interaction =

For between-groups SS Any difference between conditions may be due to: – Main effect of A –Main effect of B –Interaction between A and B

Partitioning the total variability Total deviation Within-groups deviationsBetween-groups deviations A main effectA x B InteractionB main effect

Source of Variance Sums of Squares Degrees of freedom Mean SquaresF A a – 1 B b -1 A x B (a-1)(b-1) Error term (a)(b)(n-1) Total (a)(b)(n) -1 Summary Table

Source of Variance Sums of Squares Degrees of freedom Mean SquaresF A a – 1 B b -1 A x B (a-1)(b-1) Error term (a)(b)(n-1) Total (a)(b)(n) -1 Summary Table

Source of Variance Sums of Squares Degrees of freedom Mean SquaresF A a – 1 B b -1 A x B (a-1)(b-1) Error term (a)(b)(n-1) Total (a)(b)(n) -1 Summary Table

Source of Variance Sums of Squares Degrees of freedom Mean SquaresF A a – 1 B b -1 A x B (a-1)(b-1) Error term (a)(b)(n-1) Total (a)(b)(n) -1 Summary Table

Source of Variance Sums of Squares Degrees of freedom Mean SquaresF A a – 1 B b -1 A x B (a-1)(b-1) Error term (a)(b)(n-1) Total (a)(b)(n) -1 Summary Table

Computational calculations 1.Compute squares ( scores) and sums (treatments and grand total) 2. Compute A x B matrix 3. Compute basic ratios 4. Compute Sums of Squares 5. Find degrees of freedom 6. Compute Mean Squares 7. Compute Fs. 8. Find Fcrit to establish if H0 can be rejected

Basic ratios

Formulas for SS

2 x 3 between-subjects factorial design Reinforcement (A) PraiseCriticismSilence Type of pb (B): Simple Praise/Crit/simpleSilen/simple simple Complex Praise/Crit/cplexSilen/cplex cplex n= 5 in each cell N = 30 children

Degrees of freedom dfReinf = 3-1 = 2 dfPb Type = 2-1 = 1 dfInteraction = (3-1)(2-1) = 2 dfw/in = (3)(2)(5-1) = 24 dfTotal = (3)(2)(5) – 1 = 29

Find critical Fs for each effect For Main effect of Reinforcement (A): –Fcrit(2,24)=3.40 –Fobt (2,24) = 9.61* For Main effect of Pb Type (B): - Fcrit(1,24) = Fobt(1,24) = 11.67* For Reinforcement x Pb Type interaction: -Fcrit(2,24) = Fobt(2,24)= 4.47*

Source of Variance Sums of Squares Degrees of freedom Mean Squares FEta squared A (Reinforcem ent * B (Pb type) * A x B (interaction) * Error term (w/in) Total

Compute Eta squared Compute eta squared for each effect using the appropriate SS each time

Compute Eta squared Compute eta squared for each effect using the appropriate SS each time

Source of Variance Sums of Squares Degrees of freedom Mean Squares FEta squared A (Reinforcem ent *.30 B (Pb type) *.18 A x B (interaction) *.14 Error term (w/in) Total

Decision tree for an interaction

Test A x B interaction Not Significant Significant Test Simple effects* Test Main effects nssign. Not sign.Sign. Stop planned/ post hoc STOP * For each variable and at each level Post-Hoc comp Or planned Test Main effects

What to do when we have a statistically significant interaction? We analyze the Simple Effects

Simple effects of Reinforcement at each level of Problem Type Reinforcement PraiseCriticismSilence Problem TypeSimple Complex

Reinforcement for Simple Problems A= Reinforcement B1 = Simple problems Error term comes from general ANOVA

1. Results for Simple effects of Reinforcement for Simple problems Significant simple effect of Reinforcement for Simple problems, F(2,24) = 4.34, p <.05 [Fcrit(2, 24) = 3.40] Then: Explore sig. effect by conducting Post-hoc comparisons (Tukey) Results: Praise > Silence, p <.05

Simple effects of Reinforcement at each level of Problem Type Reinforcement PraiseCriticismSilence Problem TypeSimple Complex

2. Explore Simple effects of Reinforcement for Complex problems Result: Significant simple effect of Reinforcement for Complex problems, F(2,24) = 9.73, p <.05 Then: Explore sig. effect by conducting Post-hoc comparisons (Tukey) Results: Praise > Silence, p <.05 Praise > Criticism, p <.05

In English

The effect of Reinforcement on children’s behavior depends on the Type of Problem: i.e. When the problems are simple, silence leads to worse performance compared to praise. BUT When the problems are complex, praising children is better than both criticizing them or being silent

Simple Effects of Problem Type at each level of Reinforcement Reinforcement PraiseCriticismSilence Problem TypeSimple Complex

A1 = Praise B = Problems Problems For Praise

Results for Simple effect of Problems for Praise Result: No significant Simple effects of Problems for Praise Results for Simple effect of Problems for Criticism Result: Significant Simple effects of Problems for Criticism, F(1, 24) = 19.31, p Complex] Results for Simple effect of Problems for Silence. Result: No significant Simple effects of Problems for Silence

*

In English

The effect of type of Problem on children’s behavior depends on Reinforcement i.e. When adult praises or is silent, the difficulty of the problem does not affect performance. Children perform similarly on simple problems or difficult ones. BUT When they are criticized, their performance on complex problems drops significantly compared to their performance on simple problems.

Test the Main effect of A (or B) Not sign Sign. Conduct Planned comparisons Exploring main effects Report that the main effect of A was not significant You must explore the main effect STOP Conduct Post-Hoc tests If hypotheses were specified before data collection: If no hypotheses were specified: T-tests with Bonferroni Correction (Contrasts in SPSS) Tukey tests If IV = 2 levels, no need for follow-up tests

Steps to take to explore the significant main effect of Reinforcement

NEED TO CONDUCT FOLLOW-UP TESTS BECAUSE IV HAS MORE THAN 2 LEVELS Explore sig. main effect by conducting Post- hoc comparisons (Tukey) Results: Praise > Silence, p <.05 (only comparison significant)

Steps to take to explore the significant main effect of problem

NO FOLLOW-UP TESTS BECAUSE THERE ARE ONLY 2 LEVELS. Significant ME of Problems means that the 2 means (simple and complex) differ significantly. –Mean for Simple: 6.40 –Mean for Complex: 4.07 Performance for simple problems was significantly better than for complex problems.

The end