POWER 3 Study Confirms Safety and Efficacy of Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Molina JM, Cohen C, Katlama C, et al.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TMC125 Safety and Tolerability: 24-week Results of the Pooled DUET-1 and -2 Trials R Haubrich, M Schechter, S Walmsley, M Peeters, M Janssens, G De Smedt.
Advertisements

Phase 2 of new ARVs TAF (TFV prodrug) - Study Study
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV  SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of RTV vs Cobi  GS-US Gallant JE. JID 2013;208:32-9 GS-US  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of COBI compared with RTV.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Clinical Aspects of Treatment with Tipranavir Dr Kevin Curry Boehringer Ingelheim, Bracknell, UK.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
TITAN = TMC114/r In Treatment-experienced pAtients Naïve to lopinavir
Switch to ATV-containing regimen  ARIES Study  INDUMA Study  ASSURE Study.
1 Atazanavir (ATV) With Ritonavir (RTV) or Saquinavir (SQV) vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in Patients With Multiple Virologic Failures 24-Week Results.
Combined PI and NNRTI Resistance Analysis of the Pooled DUET Trial: Towards a Regimen-Based Resistance Interpretation J. M. Schapiro, J. Vingerhoets, S.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Treatment- Experienced (TE) Patients Infected with R5 HIV-1: 96-week Combined Analysis of the MOTIVATE 1 & 2 Studies.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
The MONET trial: darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy shows non-inferior efficacy to standard HAART, for patients with HIV RNA
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
NIAID ERADICATE Open-label W12 ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 Treatment naïve HIV infection on stable ART ≥ 8 weeks and HIV RNA < 50 c/ml.
Switch PI/R to ETR  Etraswitch. Etraswitch Study: Switch PI/r to ETR Continuation of current PI/R + 2 NRTI N = 21 N = 22 ETR 400 mg QD* + 2 NRTI  Design.
Potential Utility of Tipranavir in Current Clinical Practice Daniel R. Kuritzkes, MD Director of AIDS Research Brigham and Woman’s Hospital Division of.
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
Agenda  Update on Darunavir: Perry Mohammed  Update on Etravirine: Rekha Sinha  Update on TMC278: Peter Williams  Update on TMC207: Karel De Beule.
DIONE – 24 week efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of DRV/r QD in treatment-naïve adolescents, 12 to
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen  SWAN Study  SLOAT Study.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Superior Outcome for Tenofovir DF (TDF), Emtricitabine (FTC) and Efavirenz (EFV) Compared to Fixed Dose Zidovudine/Lamivudine (CBV) and EFV in Antiretroviral.
Results From DUET-1 and DUET-2: ETR Plus DRV/RTV Associated With High Rates of Viral Suppression in Treatment-Experienced Patients This program is supported.
Weekly Alendronate Safe and Effective at Increasing Bone Mineral Density in HIV-Infected Persons on Antiretroviral Therapy Slideset on: McComsey GA, Kendall.
VIKING Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir in treatment-experienced subjects SE/HIV/0023/14b January 2014.
HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Slideset on: Hecht FM, Wang L, Collier A, et al. A.
Previous SVR With Interferon-Based Therapy for HCV Lowers Risk of Hepatotoxicity in HIV/HCV-Coinfected Individuals on Antiretroviral Therapy Slideset on:
Slideset on: Gathe J, da Silva BA, Cohen DE, et al. A once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen is noninferior to twice-daily dosing and results in.
Slideset on: Emery S, Neuhaus JA, Phillips AN, et al. Major clinical outcomes in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive participants and in those not receiving.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
First-Line Treatment of HIV Infection With Either NNRTI- or PI-Based Regimens Effective for Long-term Disease Control Slideset on: MacArthur RD, Novak.
KLEAN Study: Fosamprenavir/Ritonavir Associated With Similar Efficacy and Safety as Lopinavir/Ritonavir SGC in Treatment- Naive Patients Slideset on: Eron.
Tipranavir/Ritonavir Superior to Comparator PI/Ritonavir at Week 48 in Multiclass-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Hicks CB, Cahn P, Cooper DA, et al.
Adefovir Suppresses HBV DNA Levels in Lamivudine-Resistant HIV/HBV Patients Slideset on: Benhamou Y, Thibault V, Vig P, et al. Safety and efficacy of adefovir.
Rilpivirine-TDF-FTC versus Efavirenz-TDF-FTC STaR Trial
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Dolutegravir plus Rilpivirine as Maintenance Dual Therapy SWORD-1 and SWORD- 2: Design
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-2 (TMC125-C216)
Switch to DTG + RPV Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
Switch to RPV-TDF-FTC from Ritonavir-boosted PI Regimen SPIRIT STUDY
Lopinavir-ritonavir mg BID (n = 354)
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients ASTRAL-5
Once Daily Etravirine versus Efavirenz in Treatment-Naive SENSE Trial
Dolutegravir versus Raltegravir in Treatment Experienced SAILING Study
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-1 (TMC125-C206)
Atazanavir + ritonavir vs. Lopinavir-ritonavir CASTLE Study
Darunavir/r versus Other PIs in Treatment Experienced POWER 1 and 2
Saquinavir + RTV versus Lopinavir-RTV in Treatment-Naïve GEMINI Trial
LPV-RTV versus LPV-RTV + ZDV-3TC in Treatment-Naïve MONARK Trial
Switching the NRTI Backbone to Tenofovir DF-Emtricitabine TOTEM
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced HIV Coinfection
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
Presentation transcript:

POWER 3 Study Confirms Safety and Efficacy of Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Molina JM, Cohen C, Katlama C, et al. Safety and efficacy of darunavir (TMC114) with low- dose ritonavir in treatment-experienced patients: 24-week results of POWER 3. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;46: This program is supported by educational grants from Jointly sponsored by Postgraduate Institute for Medicine and Clinical Care Options, LLC

clinicaloptions.com/hiv POWER 3: Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Background  Virologic and immunologic responses in treatment-experienced patients on current antiretroviral regimens inferior to those of treatment-naive patients  Darunavir/ritonavir a potent boosted PI active against wild-type and many PI-resistant viruses [1]  POWER 1 and 2 studies demonstrated efficacy and safety of darunavir/ritonavir in treatment-experienced individuals [2] –Parallel dose-ranging trials in treatment-experienced patients  Current POWER 3 study designed to provide additional data on efficacy and safety of darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg in treatment-experienced, HIV- infected patients [3] 1. De Meyer S, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49: Clotet B, et al. Lancet. 2007;369: Molina JM, et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;46:24-31.

clinicaloptions.com/hiv POWER 3: Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Summary of Study Design  327 patients from 2 open-label phase IIb trials (TMC114-C215 conducted at 13 international sites and TMC114-C208 in Australia) –Additional data on 600/100-mg darunavir/ritonavir dose for regulatory approval –Inclusion criteria: ≥ 3 months prior NRTI use, use of ≥ 1 prior NNRTI, ≥ 1 PI-based regimen for ≥ 3 months, PI therapy for ≥ 8 weeks before screening, HIV-1 RNA > 1000 copies/mL, ≥ 1 IAS-USA primary PI mutation at screening, darunavir naive  Genotypic resistance testing performed at screening to help guide selection of optimized background regimen (OBR) comprising NRTIs ± enfuvirtide  Primary endpoint: ≥ 1 log 10 reduction in HIV-1 RNA at Week 24 (intent-to-treat, time-to-loss-of-virologic-response [ITT, TLOVR] analysis)  Secondary endpoints –HIV-1 RNA < 50 and < 400 copies/mL at Week 24 (ITT, TLOVR analysis) –Mean change in HIV-1 RNA at Week 24 (ITT, noncompleter = failure) –Mean change in CD4+ cell count at Week 24 (ITT, last observation carried forward) –Safety and tolerability Molina JM, et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;46:24-31.

clinicaloptions.com/hiv POWER 3: Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Main Findings  Darunavir/ritonavir plus OBR associated with substantial virologic responses and immunologic improvement at Week 24 Molina JM, et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;46: Outcome at Week 24Patients > 1 log 10 copies/mL reduction in HIV-1 RNA, %65 HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL, %57 HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL, %40 Mean change in HIV-1 RNA, log 10 copies/mL-1.65 Mean change in CD4+ cell count, cells/mm 3 +80

clinicaloptions.com/hiv POWER 3: Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients n = Main Findings (cont’d)  Darunavir fold change ≤ 10 and HIV-1 RNA ≤ 100,000 copies/mL at baseline significantly associated with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 24 Molina JM, et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;46: HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL (%) ≤ 10 > 100,000 9 > 40 ≤ 100,000 < Darunavir Fold Change HIV-1 RNA, log 10 copies/mL 50-99≥ 200 CD4+ Cell Count, cells/mm P <.0001 P =.0036 P <.0001

clinicaloptions.com/hiv POWER 3: Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Other Outcomes  Most adverse events mild to moderate in severity –25% of patients reported ≥ 1 grade 3 or 4 adverse event *At Week 48. Molina JM, et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;46: Grade 3-4 Adverse Events With Incidence ≥ 2, %Darunavir/Ritonavir (n = 298) Diarrhea14 Nasopharyngitis11 Nausea10 Elevated cholesterol4 Elevated triglycerides6 Decreased white blood cell count7 Decreased lymphocytes5 Elevated pancreatic amylase7 Elevated ALT2 Elevated AST2 Neutropenia5

clinicaloptions.com/hiv POWER 3: Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Summary of Key Conclusions  Darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg twice daily safe and effective in treatment-experienced patients with drug- resistant HIV –Rates of virologic suppression similar to those seen in POWER 1 and 2 randomized studies –Full susceptibility to darunavir strongest predictor of response –Safety profile of darunavir/ritonavir similar to that observed in POWER 1 and 2 Molina JM, et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;46:24-31.