Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 2 nd September 2004 p. 0 Recent results on vertex charge reconstruction Sonja Hillert.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ILC Software and Physics Workshop, Cambridge, 4 th April 2006Overview of the LCFI Vertex PackageSonja Hillert (Oxford)p. 0 Overview of the LCFI Vertex.
Advertisements

Vertex Detector Contribution to ILC Physics Analyses, 16 th November 2005Sonja Hillert (Oxford)p. 0 Vertex Detector Contribution to ILC Physics Analyses.
Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford Simulation Software Meeting ~ DESY 28 June 2005 p. 0 Tools for optimising and assessing the performance of the vertex.
ILC Snowmass workshop, August 2005 p. 0 Physics potential of vertex detector as function of beam pipe radius Sonja Hillert, Chris Damerell (on behalf of.
Towards a C++ based ZVTOP Ben Jeffery (Oxford) LCFI Collaboration ZVTOP Introduction Motivation Progress Plans & Release Schedule.
LCUK Meeting, 26 th September 2006Sonja Hillert (Oxford)p. 0 LCFI Simulation and Physics Studies LCUK Meeting, Durham, 26 th September 2006 Sonja Hillert.
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Feasibility study of measurement of Higgs pair creation in a gamma-gamma collider Shin-ichi Kawada Advanced Sciences of Matter, Hiroshima University LCWS11.
Electroweak b physics at LEP V. Ciulli INFN Firenze.
1 WP1: Physics Studies General Strategy P.2 The Document Structure P.3-6 LCFI Physics Meeting 25/11/04 LCFI Proposal Dave Jackson.
1 The Topologies For a B decay to a single cascade charm D B IP lB lB lD lD ZVTOP vertex found furthest from IP contains the cleanest set of true B,D tracks.
Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.
1 LCWS talks I Sat 19 March Tracking and Vertexing session: 09:00-09:15 Sonja Hillert (University of Oxford) Heavy Flavour ID and Quark Charge Measurement.
Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2005 International Linear Collider Workshop, Stanford, 19 th March 2005 p. 0 Heavy flavour ID and quark charge measurement.
On the Trail of the Higgs Boson Meenakshi Narain.
LCFI Collaboration meeting, 8 May 2007Sonja Hillert p. 0 Some input distributions from LC-PHSM most sensitive input variables for the flavour.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.
LCFI Collaboration Meeting, RAL, 6 th March 2007Sonja Hillert (Oxford)p. 0 WP 1 – Simulation and Physics Studies Overview of recent progress LCFI Collaboration.
Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.
1 Ghost Trackers If there’s something strange (or charm or bottom) in your neighbourhood… Dave Jackson Oxford University / RAL LCFI Collaboration 28 th.
Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Veronique Boisvert, Fabrizio Salvatore, Tao Wu LCWS 08, Chicago, 18 November 2008 Sensitivity to the Higgs self-coupling.
Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Veronique Boisvert, Fabrizio Salvatore, Tao Wu ILD Workshop, Cambridge, 12 September 2008 Sensitivity to the Higgs.
Application of Neural Networks for Energy Reconstruction J. Damgov and L. Litov University of Sofia.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford PPRP open session: LCFI, London, 8 th September 2004 p. 0 Linear Collider Flavour Identification (LCFI) - Part 1 -
E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
2007 International Linear Collider Workshop, DESY, 2 nd June 2007Sonja Hillert (Oxford) p. 0 The LCFIVertex package Sonja Hillert (Oxford) on behalf of.
LCWS 2004, ParisSonja Hillert, University of Oxfordp. 1 Flavour tagging performance analysis for vertex detectors LCWS 2004, Paris Sonja Hillert (Oxford)
1 ZH Analysis Yambazi Banda, Tomas Lastovicka Oxford SiD Collaboration Meeting
Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2005 International Linear Collider Workshop, Stanford, 20 th March 2005 p. 0 Heavy flavour ID and quark charge measurement.
20 June 2005Sonja Hillertp. 1 A M J J A S O N D J F M FY 05 / 06 FY 06 / 07 FY 07 / 08FY 08 / 09FY 09 / GEANT work 1.2 charge generation.
2004 Xmas MeetingSarah Allwood WW Scattering at ATLAS.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
Status of LCFIVertex K. Ikematsu, A. Miyamoto (KEK) H. Ono (Nippon Dental University) Y. Takubo, K. Yoshida (Tohoku University) T. Suehara, T. Tanabe (University.
E. Devetak – CERN CLIC1 LCFI: vertexing and flavour-tagging Erik Devetak Oxford University CERN-CLIC Meeting 14/05/09 Vertexing Flavour Tagging Charge.
ECFA ILC workshop, Valencia, 9 th November 2006Sonja Hillert (Oxford)p. 0 Overview of the LCFI Vertex Package ILC workshop, Valencia, 6 – 10 November 2006.
LCFI Package and Flavour 3TeV Tomáš Laštovička Institute of Physics AS CR CLIC WG3 Meeting 9/6/2010.
1 Calorimetry Simulations Norman A. Graf for the SLAC Group January 10, 2003.
B-Tagging Algorithms for CMS Physics
Taikan Suehara, 16 th general meeting of ILC physics (Asia) wg., 2010/07/17 page 1 Model 500 GeV Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo.
Contributions from T Baltz, A Djouadi. The Higgs Sector of the LCC4 Point LCC4 Benchmark LCC4 point in A 0 Funnel region Benchmark point defined in cMSSM.
Benchmarking SiD Andrei Nomerotski, Univ.of Oxford SiD meeting in Paris, 11 Feb 2008.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
C. Milsténe Charm Jet Identification Using Flavor Tagging C. Milstene- Fermilab- July/07/06 In collaboration with: A. Freitas( Zurich U.), A. Sopczak (Lancaster.
ILC Software and Tools workshop LAL-Orsay, 3 rd May 2007Sonja Hillert (Oxford) p. 0 The LCFIVertex package Sonja Hillert (Oxford) on behalf of the LCFI.
Benchmarking Tracking & Vertexing Andrei Nomerotski (Oxford) SiD Tracking Meeting, 7 December 2007.
Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN.
By Henry Brown Henry Brown, LHCb, IOP 10/04/13 1.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
C. Milsténe1 Charm Jet Identification Using Flavor Tagging C. Milsténe- Fermilab- ILC workshop Fermilab - October In collaboration with: A.
E. Devetak - IOP 081 Anomalous – from tools to physics Erik Devetak Oxford - RAL IOP 2008 Lancaster‏ Anomalous coupling (Motivation – Theory)
TILC08 workshop, Sendai 4 th March 2008Sonja Hillert (Oxford) p. 0 LCFI Vertex Package: Parameter Optimisation Sonja Hillert (Oxford) on behalf of the.
LCFI Oversight Committee Meeting, 12 th July 2006Sonja Hillert (Oxford)p. 0 WP 1 – Simulation and Physics Studies LCFI Oversight Committee Meeting, 12.
1 Studies of Heavy Flavour Jet Tagging with ZVTOP in JAS3 Overview Jet flavour tagging in JAS3 Cosθ dependence Primary vertex momentum Use of neutral energy.
Palaiseau, 13/1/ 2005 P. Colas - Optimising tracking 1 Optimising a Detector from the Tracking Point-of-View P.Colas, CEA Saclay constraints role Optimisation.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
LCFI Physics Studies Meeting, 18 th October 2005Sonja Hillertp. 0 Using event display for improving Q vtx reconstruction  event display might help to.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 1 st September 2004 p. 0 Recent results from R&D towards a vertex detector at the international.
E. Devetak - SiD Meeting RAL 081 Anomalous – from tools to physics Erik Devetak Oxford - RAL SiD 04/2008 Abingdon‏ Anomalous coupling (Motivation.
ILD Optimisation Meeting, 21 st May 2008Sonja Hillert (Oxford)p. 0 LCFIVertex: suggestions for input to DST files  Introduction  Minimal flavour tag.
LCFI physics studies meeting, 7 th December 04Sonja Hillertp. 1 Charge efficiency and leakage rates  purity vs efficiency plots give only part of the.
Full Sim Status Estel Perez 27 July 2017.
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
Erik Devetak Oxford University SiD Workshop 24/02/2009
Tools for optimising and assessing the performance
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
SM-like Higgs searches
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Presentation transcript:

Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 2 nd September 2004 p. 0 Recent results on vertex charge reconstruction Sonja Hillert (Oxford) on behalf of the LCFI collaboration 2 nd ECFA workshop on Physics and Detectors at the Linear Collider Durham, 2 nd September 2004

Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 2 nd September 2004 p. 1  physics studies performed in the context of R&D work of the LCFI collaboration  aim at providing a guideline for vertex detector design, e.g. How close to the interaction point does the inner layer need to be? Which layer thickness should be aimed at? (multiple scattering) How many layers are needed?  to answer these questions study e.g. impact parameter resolution vertex charge reconstruction specific physics channels expected to be sensitive (future)  need to be sure to use all available information that might depend on detector design  develop existing flavour tagging tools further Introduction: aim of the studies presented

Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 2 nd September 2004 p. 2  Simulation a Grande Vitesse (SGV) version 2.31 by M. Berggren flexible, well-tested fast simulation, originated from DELPHI interfaced to PYTHIA version JADE algorithm (y-cut 0.04) for jet finding vertex finding: ZVTOP by D. Jackson  future: Java analysis studio, version 3 (JAS3), by T. Johnson object oriented software being developed at SLAC Software tools

Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 2 nd September 2004 p. 3 Motivation and selection cuts  discerning charged b jets ( ) from charged b-bar jets ( ) can aid background suppression in multi-jet events, e.g. Higgs-decay, allow measuring parity of Higgs boson, CP asymmetries in SUSY processes  study monoenergetic jets from at with exactly 2 jets found jets sufficiently back-to-back: jets well contained in detector: thrust angle within B hadron initiating jet can be unambiguously identified:  at generator level, 40% of jets stem from charged hadrons

Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 2 nd September 2004 p. 4 Vertex finding and track attachment goal: find all stable B decay chain tracks -- procedure:  ‘mask’ all K S,  decay products: removed at track selection step using MC information; expected to be reliably identified in the reconstruction and recovered at a later stage  run ZVTOP to find vertex candidates, require tracks to have d 0 < 1.0 cm  seed vertex (candidate furthest from IP) used to define the vertex axis  consider all tracks initially passed to ZVTOP and assign those to B decay chain, which at point of closest approach to the vertex axis have T < 1 mm: cleaning cut, only small effect (L/D) min < L/D < 2.5: main cut, where (L/D) min is optimised for each detector configuration independently

Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 2 nd September 2004 p. 5 Vertex charge and Pt-corrected mass vertex charge Q vtx and M Pt determined from tracks assigned to B decay chain:  sum of charges of these tracks: Q sum  reconstructed vertex charge  from sum of four-momenta: P vtx, M vtx  apply kinematic correction (partly corrects for missing neutral particles):  M Pt used as ‘b tag’ parameter

Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 2 nd September 2004 p. 6 Improvement since LCWS – 1 MC: B _ + MC: neutral B hadrons comparison of reconstructed Qsum distributions for the different generator level charges LCWS new

Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 2 nd September 2004 p. 7 Definition of efficiency and purity efficiency with : # (jets) with L Dec > 300  m and M Pt,cut varied between 0 and 4.5 GeV : # (jets) in event selection cuts Purity for discerning b from b-bar: : # (jets) from b-quark with + # (jets) from b-bar quark with

Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 2 nd September 2004 p. 8 Improvement since LCWS – 2  differences in the procedure: in new result K S,  decay products are masked L/D cut for track assignment has been optimised  large increase in purity and efficiency, especially at large efficiencies: at  b ~ 70% (M Pt > 2.0 GeV):  b = 5%,  (b) = 4%

Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 2 nd September 2004 p. 9 Detector configurations considered Standard detector characterised by :  good angular coverage (cos  = 0.96)  proximity to IP, large lever arm: 5 layers, radii from 15 mm to 60 mm  minimal layer thickness ( % X 0 ) to minimise multiple scattering  excellent point resolution (3.5  m) standard detector is compared to  degraded detector: beam pipe radius 25 mm, inner layer removed factor 2 worse point resolution  improved detector: factor 4 less material (  factor 2 less multiple scattering) factor 2 better point resolution

Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 2 nd September 2004 p. 10 Optimisation of L/D cut  maximise  (b) and efficiency note: fragmentation tracks (MC level) assigned to B decay chain may result in wrong Q vtx and M Pt > 5.5 GeV  reason for drop of  (b) and  b near 0 cut value chosen

Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 2 nd September 2004 p. 11 Purity and efficiency for optimised L/D procedure conclusions:  purity flat out to efficiency of ~ 70% for standard detector  significant detector dependence: at lower  b detectors differ mainly in efficiency: at  b = 20%:  b = 5% at higher  b they differ also significantly in purity: at  b = 70% (M Pt > 2.0 GeV):  b = 6%,  (b) = 2%  result underlines the need for a small beam pipe radius

Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 2 nd September 2004 p. 12 Future plans  replace one-dimensional L/D cut by a more powerful neural net approach similar to what was formerly used at SLD (  T. Wright’s thesis, SLAC-Report-602 ): five input variables: T, L, L/D, angle of track to vertex axis, normalised 3D impact parameter of track to IP NN configuration: 5 inputs, 6 nodes in hidden layer, 1 output node neural network package has already been developed (D. Bailey)  develop improved NN-based flavour-tagging procedure  extend study to other jet energies  study impact of vertex charge reconstruction on analysis of benchmark physics processes, such as Higgs physics, e.g. Higgs parity, and CP asymmetries in SUSY

Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 2 nd September 2004 p. 13 Optimisation of track attachment cut  main track attachment cut on L/D needs to be optimised for each detector separately to obtain fair comparison  otherwise difference in performance between detectors may decrease or increase: Additional Material ~ Additional Material ~ Additional Material

Sonja Hillert, University of Oxford 2 nd ECFA LC workshop, Durham, 2 nd September 2004 p. 14 Effect of track selection cuts  track selection cuts currently fixed; too little known about global detector to relax them at present  consider tracks from B decay chain that are not assigned to B decay chain in the reconstruction (“ missed tracks ”)  upper plot : fraction of wrong charge vertices with missed tracks vs efficiency  lower plot : fraction of missed tracks, which are missed because of the track selection: for standard detector below 20%  conclusion: track selection is not a limiting factor; there is still much room for improvement Additional Material ~ Additional Material ~ Additional Material