Partnering for a better Belgium? Results of the survey “How do profit and non-profit collaborate for the greater good in Belgium?” Presentation – May 24.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ian Robertson Chief Executive Developing Entrepreneurship as a Corporate Growth Strategy Developing People for Growth and Innovation Sri Lanka 5 th March.
Advertisements

Kevin Morley MBA Head of ICT Policy The Review of the North West Regional Strategy for Information Communication Technology
Professor Dave Delpy Chief Executive of Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Research Councils UK Impact Champion Competition vs. Collaboration:
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Twelve Cs for Team Building
People In Aid Conference
Martin Schuurmans Chair EIT The EIT Sustainable Growth and Competitiveness through Innovation.
Local Education and Training Boards Adam C Wardle Managing Director, Yorkshire and the Humber Local Education and Training Board.
Expanding Engagement with the Private Sector on GEF Projects 1 ECW Nicaragua 3-5 March 2015.
OpenStand and IEEE 802 Konstantinos Karachalios Managing Director, IEEE-SA 17 November 2012.
© 2006 The Finance Project Sustainability Planning: Keys to Success.
FORMULATING THE VISION, MISSION, AND VALUES
Best practice partnership models
Capitalising the full potential of on-line collaboration for SME innovation support H2020-INNOSUP Context and Objectives Info-session Brussels,
Context for Public Health Nutrition Practice: Cultural Competence Coalitions/Collaboration Community-based.
Understanding Boards Building Connections: Community Leadership Program.
Notes for a presentation to the EEN (Canada) Forum Blair Dimock Director, Research, Evaluation and Knowledge Management October 1, 2010 Sharing Practical.
The Business of Empowering Women November 18, 2009 Presentation at the World Bank’s GAP Event Working Women: Better Outcomes for Growth CONFIDENTIAL AND.
Human capital management
W HAT S TARTS H ERE C HANGES THE W ORLD The University of Texas at Austin New Brand Strategy New University Brand Strategy Workshop February 28, 2011.
2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Guidance in Structuring a Communities of Practice.
Exploration into the barriers and obstacles constraining diffusion and adoption of renewable energy solutions Saskia Harkema and Mirjam Leloux Wittenborg.
Jennifer Connolly Junior Achievement of Western Massachusetts.
A Guide for Navigators 1National Disability Institute.
BUILDING SUSTAINABILITY: PARTNERSHIPS AND FINANCE by S. Adrian Ross Senior Programme Officer PEMSEA.
0 A Shared Path Forward for Improved Technology Transfer Matthew Riggins.
United Way Worldwide Talent Core Competencies October 2012.
Capacity 2015 A Capacity Development Platform UNDP take on Capacity Development CD has been a fundamental component of TC since the Marshal Plan (1951)
AN INVITATION TO LEAD: United Way Partnerships Discussion of a New Way to Work Together. October 2012.
International Workshop Sustainable development: Products, consumption, promotion and place marketing T HE ATTRACTIVENESS OF SMART AND GREEN COMMUNITY IN.
Transboundary Conservation Governance: Key Principles & Concepts Governance of Transboundary Conservation Areas WPC, Sydney, 17 November 2014 Matthew McKinney.
1 Tytuł prezentacji Miejsce i data Supporting internal learning and change through stakeholder engagement Boleslaw Rok, LKAEM Kyiv, Ukraine, June 6, 2008.
Patrick Mallon Creating change through Collaboration & Partnership 22 May 2007.
Planning for Sustainability National Child Traumatic Stress Network All Network Meeting February 6, 2007.
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
1 Consultative Meeting on “Promoting more effective partnership between INGOs and other CSOs” building on Oxfam’s “Future Roles of INGO in Cambodia”, 24.
MCESA Re-Engaging Disconnected Youth Summit II “Successes of a Developed Collective Impact Model” Chekemma Fulmore-Townsend President and CEO Philadelphia.
The Competition 1. Know your rivals If you have no competition, there may be no market for your concept OR you have not done your homework. Know your.
Armenia and Diaspora Armenia’s investment climate and Diaspora’s participation in development policies. Hayk Sargsyan, Johns Hopkins University.
Museums and Galleries Education Programme 2 Final Report Centre for Education and Industry University of Warwick.
SAMO PAVLIN, UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA – COOPERATION BETWEEN HEI AND BUSINESSES - WHY DO WE NEED TO COOPERATE? CMEPIUS, LJUBLJANA 25. OKTOBER 2013 LOOKING.
The Trust Company Strategic Partners Symposium Partnership & Collaboration October 2013.
WORKING AT THE SPEED OF CHANGE: how RBA can assist small-medium place-based organisations develop the organisational competencies to thrive in a transitional.
Thinking and Working as a System: Integrated Chronic Disease Prevention in Manitoba Chronic Disease Prevention Alliance of Canada Conference Tuesday, November.
Entrepreneurial Incentives and Venture Philanthropy: Not your Grandmother’s Benevolence! Presented by Allyson Reaves July 11, 2008 International Society.
General Capacity Building Components for Non Profit and Faith Based Agencies Lakewood Resource and Referral Center nd Street, suite 204 Lakewood,
Justin Weligamage Department of Transport and Main Roads Queensland, Australia Collaboration and Partnership in Managing Skid Resistance for TMR Queensland.
Third Sector Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities Presentation to the Public Legal Education in Canada National Conference on “Making an Impact” 26.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Technical Session 1: Enhancing Resilience at the Local Level Background document IFRC & ADRRN.
IYF’s experience leveraging partnerships for youth development WB Y2Y Conference Session 4: Leveraging Partnerships: The Role of Various Stakeholders October.
Scaling for Impact Bonnie Koenig Carolina Tocalli April 2012.
Our Story in Brief It began with a conversation… Selecting the right collaborative model 10 founding members in 1998 Initial focus on bulk purchasing.
“Clouds but little rain…” Views from the Frontline A local perspective of progress towards implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action
From cost to value: 2010 Global Survey on the CIO Agenda June 15 th, 2010 IT ADVISORY KPMG INTERNATIONAL.
1 Ubuntunet Alliance Albert Nsengiyumva Deputy Chair, UbuntuNet Coordinator, RwEdNet Development Partner Meeting 10 November 2008, Lilongwe, Malawi.
INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE SOCIETY Promoting Global Growth and Innovation.
Building Strong Library Associations | Sustaining Your Library Association BSLA Stakeholders Workshop Yaounde, Cameroon, April 2012 Managing Relationships.
Creating Innovation through International collaboration Melanie Relton & Helen Kidd, British Council 7 April 2013, Qatar.
GLOBALIZATION SPREAD OF ECONOMIC INNOVATIONS AROUND THE WORLD AND POLITICAL, LEGAL AND CULTURAL ADJUSTMENTS THAT ACCOMPANY THIS DIFFUSION ASPECTS OF GLOBALIZATION.
EU-China: : Demonstrating Smart Cities achievements Dr Shaun Topham EU eForum.
Employer Supported Volunteering: The Practice and the Promise of Community Engagement Employer Supported Volunteering: The Practice and the Promise of.
V03 Toastmasters City Manager, Jeff Fielding Strategic Leadership March 2, 2016.
Building Strong Library Associations | Regional Convenings DAY 2 Session 6 How will I get support for my proposal? External relationships.
NETWORKS OF EXCELLENCE KEY ISSUES David Fuegi
1 Chapter 9 Implementing Six Sigma. Top 8 Reasons for Six Sigma Project Failure 8. The training was not practical. 7. The project was too small for DMAIC.
COMPLIMENTARY TEACHING MATERIALS
COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION
JanuSolve Digital Financial Services Opportunities.
Presentation transcript:

Partnering for a better Belgium? Results of the survey “How do profit and non-profit collaborate for the greater good in Belgium?” Presentation – May

Contents 2 1About the survey 2Key findings 3Conclusions

1 About the survey 3 More than 205 respondents from profit and non-profit organizations in Belgium participated in the survey Survey design Five topics: o Who? o Motivations? o Characteristics? o Obstacles? o Outcomes? Conducted during the second half of March Short questionnaire with closed- ended questions, most with ordinal scale (e.g. from « very relevant » to « completely irrelevant ») Survey participants were invited by e- mail to respond via a web link with controlled access Full scope in terms of organization type, size, geography and sector Total number of respondents: 205 o Profit organizations: 97 o Non-profit organizations: 108

Contents 4 1About the survey 2Key findings 3Conclusions

5 We define sustainable partnerships as … “Initiatives where private sector companies and non-profit entities enter into an alliance to achieve a common purpose linked to the Sustainable Development Goals and pool core competencies, and share risks, responsibilities, resources, costs and benefits” 2 Key findings

6 A large majority of respondents is engaged in sustainable partnerships 2 Key findings – Who? More than three quarters of profit and non-profit organizations is engaged in partnerships The reasons for not engaging in partnerships are mostly of a practical nature. More precisely: Lack of knowledge about the partners to collaborate with Lack of resources (time, manpower, financing) Less than 1% of respondents perceives engaging in partnerships as “not generating value add” for their respective organization

7 Companies mainly partner with NGO’s, other companies and academia. Non-profits find partners among companies, public authorities and (other) NGO’s Companies and NGO’s are the dominant types of partners for profit and non-profit organizations alike Social enterprises, while gaining in importance in the Belgian non-profit landscape, do not yet prominently feature as sustainable partners, i.e. there exists unfulfilled potential vis-à-vis social enterprises Traditional charities struggle to be recognized as “real” sustainable partners by private sector companies Type of partners Top 3 – Profit: 1. NGO’s 2. Other company/ies 3. Academia Top 3 – Non-profit: 1. Company/ies 2. Public authority/ies 3. (Other) NGO’s 2 Key findings – Who?

8 Across the spectrum, skills, knowledge and resources are drivers for partnerships Companies are motivated by “intangibles”: brand and stakeholder relations Non-profits pursue partnerships more for “tangible” reasons: the realization of the mission, as well as access to skills and resources Companies start to view partnerships as instrumental to business value and innovation, spelling opportunities for shared value creation Why partner? – Profit Why partner? – Non-Profit 2 Key findings – Motivation % of respondents

9 Profits and non-profits engage most in challenges related to economy, climate and consumption It is a combination of environmental & resources- related and social & economic development goals that attract profit and non-profit organizations most * Sustainable Development Goals 2 Key findings – Characteristics

10 Typical “hygiene” activities appear to be important in initiating and executing partnerships Non-profits attach great importance to alignment on objectives and crystallization of the value case of the partnership Companies put a premium on alignment and partner selection Success measurement (in terms of business value & impact) is not (yet) perceived as an important activity when initiating and executing partnerships 2 Key findings – Characteristics

11 Profit and non-profit organizations first and foremost acknowledge the expertise and skills brought by the partner(s) Partners are particularly appreciated for the expertise (skills, knowledge, insights) they bring to bear on both sides of the profit vs. non-profit spectrum Companies value the community access brought by the partners and the enhanced platform to convene and influence For non-profit actors, linking with other networks and attracting support are valued qualities of partners 2 Key findings – Characteristics Top 5 – Profit: 1. Expertise 2. Local community access 3. Convening power 4. Ability to influence opinion 5. Financial support Top 5 – Non-Profit: 1. Business and/or technical expertise 2. Other relationships networks 3. Financial support 4. Convening power 5. Ability to influence public opinion

12 Resources constraints represent the most important barrier to successful partnerships For profit and non-profit organizations, lack of resources and shifting priorities represent significant challenges when executing partnerships Strengthening trust among partners remains a relevant improvement area, particularly as perceived by non-profit organizations An inward orientation does not represent an insurmountable show-stopping barrier to partnerships ProfitNon-Profit 2 Key findings – Obstacles % of respondents

13 More than 80% of companies express satisfaction when it comes to the impact achieved through the partnership. Satisfaction re- business value registers just below the 80% mark More than 90% of non-profit organizations express satisfaction in terms of successful partnerships Outcomes – Profit Outcomes – Non-Profit The majority of profit and non-profit organizations is satisfied with the accomplishments of the partnership 2 Key findings – Outcomes % of respondents

14 A combination of visionary leaders and success stories is what is required to further boost sustainable partnerships in Belgium Outspoken heads of organization together with tangible success stories are the two most important elements to propel sustainable partnerships Regulatory interventions by authorities are not considered critical to further the spread of partnerships. The same applies to (new) sustainability standards Top 4 priorities across profit and non-profit entities 2 2 Key findings – Future Proof of success Visionary leaders Development of staff competent in partnership skills More awareness generation 12 34

15 Contents 1About the survey 2Key findings 3Conclusions

16 3 Conclusions More than three quarters of companies and non-profit organizations is engaged in sustainable partnerships. More fundamentally, 90% of respondents view collaboration as instrumental to tackle societal and environmental challenges Skills, knowledge and resources remain important reasons underpinning partnerships. At the same time: Companies start to view partnering as a vehicle for business value creation and innovation Non-profits engage in partnerships first and foremost to create impact Thus, there exists a real opportunity for shared value in Belgium While principles of sound project management are diligently applied in most partnerships, robust measurement (of impact and business value) constitutes an improvement area

17 Profit and non-profit partners are very satisfied with the outcomes generated by partnerships Profit and non-profit organizations struggle most with keeping focus and committing resources. Importantly, lack of trust is still perceived as an obstacle 3 Conclusions Emblematic success stories and outspoken visionary leaders are required to further propel sustainable partnerships in Belgium

Thank you for your attention!