Female college students reporting satisfaction with the shape of their bodies were unlikely to choose their own identified silhouette as their ideal body.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Robin L. Donaldson May 5, 2010 Prospectus Defense Florida State University College of Communication and Information.
Advertisements

An Analysis of Personality Type and Relationship Desirability Within Hook-up Culture: Nice-Guys vs. Bad-Boys An Analysis of Personality Type and Relationship.
The Relationship between Facebook and Body Esteem Comparing College Women Greta Hau & Molly Crabb Advised by: Susan Wolfgram Ph.D. University of Wisconsin-Stout.
A Helpseeking Profile of International Students. Elizabeth A. Klingaman Cristina M. Risco William E. Sedlacek The University of Maryland
Session One. Types of research articles Theoretical Empirical.
 Health Education Research  2008;23(5):  Krayer A, ingledew DK, Iphofen R.
Ashley Adams & Whitley Holt Hanover College
Predicting Body Dissatisfaction: The Utility of Sociocultural Theory and Objectification Theory Andrea Niles, UCLA David Frederick, UCLA Gordon Forbes,
Etiology of Bulimia. What are the factors which contribute to people developing bulimia?
METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY Finding a Research Idea Lawrence R. Gordon.
Body dissatisfaction as a risk factor of eating disturbances Abstract: Body dissatisfaction is important risk factor of eating disturbances (Cash T., 2004).
Sex Differences in Objectification Casie Rindfleisch & Regan A. R. Gurung University of Wisconsin, Green Bay INTRODUCTION METHOD RESULTS DISCUSSION ABSTRACT.
Skin and Perception: Are Beauty Pageants Sexist? Regan A. R. Gurung, Jill West, & Becky Siegler University of Wisconsin, Green Bay INTRODUCTION METHOD.
UCLA Body Project I: Predictors of Body Satisfaction and Appearance Surveillance Among 2,206 White, Asian, and Hispanic Men and Women Johanna M. Jarcho.
The UCLA Body Matrices II David Frederick Anne Peplau UCLA Department of Psychology UCLA Department of Psychology Acknowledgements: Thanks to Jim Compton.
Contact: Online I am “We”: Contrast and assimilation effects in virtual environments Jesse Chandler, Sara Konrath & Norbert Schwarz.
Genetic Factors Predisposing to Homosexuality May Increase Mating Success in Heterosexuals Written by Zietsch et. al By Michael Berman and Lindsay Tooley.
Sex on the Brain? An Examination of Frequency of Sexual Cognitions as a Function of Gender, Erotophilia, and Social Desirability From Journal of Sex Research.
Introduction The current research extends previous studies about the ideal woman’s body type by examining men’s perception of women’s body type. Women.
7 th Grade NPA Objective 3.2. Objective 3.2 Attribute a positive body image to healthy self- esteem and the avoidance of risky eating behaviors.
Examine the Biological, Psychological and Social Origins of Attraction
Alexandra Erno and Vanessa Hernandez.  The neurotransmitters dopamine, adrenaline and serotonin play an important role in the feeling of love – Fischer.
Gender INDEPENDENT T-TEST TABLE VariableMalesFemalestdfSig. IFL1.250 (.543) (.810) **0.000 COM1.850 (1.189) (1.488) **0.000.
Global Consumer Culture Self Esteem & Body Image.
The Effects of Music on our Emotional State: Can it Alter our Moods?
Origins of Attraction MATTHEW CORRINET. Biological: Fischer et al. (2003)  “... used an fMRI... to investigate blood flow in the brains of 20 men and.
Male Athlete and Non Athlete Body Image Differences Haley Heikkinen & Jessica Arp Advised by: Susan Wolfgram, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin-Stout Research.
Students’ Perceptions of the Physiques of Self and Physical Educators
Introduction ► College-student drinking remains a significant problem on campuses across the nation. ► It is estimated that 38-44% of college students.
An Evolutionary Psychology Perspective on Sex Differences in Exercise Behaviors and Motivations Peter K. Jonason Summary and presentation by: Redd Davis,
Emotional Intelligence: The Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence, Emotion Control, Affective Communication and Gender in University Students.
Tonya Filz & Regan A.R. Gurung University of Wisconsin – Green Bay Abstract As class sizes increase due to stagnating budgets, and as colleges and universities.
FIGURE PREFERENCE, BODY DISSATISFACTION, AND BODY DISTORTION IN ADOLESCENCE RACHEL LIBBEN MARY TASSONE ADRIENNE HUDAK.
7.NPA.3.2.  Define body image, negative and positive  List factors that influence body image  Explain the association between self- esteem and body.
Problem-Solving Abilities and Feelings of Control: A Work in Progress Emily M. Kaiser, Department of Communication Studies, College of Arts and Sciences.
Tattoos, Piercings, and Academic Success Student Name Mentor Name, Department Tattoos, Piercings, and Academic Success Student Name Mentor Name, Department.
Attractive Equals Smart? Perceived Intelligence as a Function of Attractiveness and Gender Abstract Method Procedure Discussion Participants were 38 men.
Self Confidence and Diversity at MIT Lizz Albany, Olivia Gierlich, Peter Lee, and Michael Plasmeier.
Figure 1 Stress by parent gender and country of origin at times 1 and 2 ABSTRACT Newly immigrant parents (N = 253) were interviewed to assess their levels.
Introduction Disordered eating continues to be a significant health concern for college women. Recent research shows it is on the rise among men. Media.
Sex differences in romantic kissing among college students: An evolutionary perspective Summary by Amber Kika, Nina Dangourian, and Esmeralda Huerta For.
Body Image Body image reflects how we see our own body, and how we think, feel, and act towards it. Thus, body image is generally defined in terms of four.
Personally Important Posttraumatic Growth as a Predictor of Self-Esteem in Adolescents Leah McDiarmid, Kanako Taku Ph.D., & Aundreah Walenski Presented.
Etiology of Bulimia Nervosa Socio-cultural level of analysis.
What Does ‘Beautiful’ Look Like? How the Media Shapes our Beauty Ideals and Feelings of Self-Worth.
 qiOt9cg  The probability of dominant behaviors increases as the levels of drive rise.  Has been empirically proven.
BODY IMAGE & BODY IMAGE DISSATISFACTION Lauren O’Neal.
Grade 7 Healthy Living Body Image SCO 7.2: demonstrate an understanding of the aesthetic and ability factors that can influence one’s body image.
Relationships between social media exposure & levels of body dissatisfaction Helen Nguyen and Andrea L. Paiva, Ph.D. Introduction Demographic differences.
Template provided by: “posters4research.com”   Ideals: mental constructs that represent an idea of traits we are attracted to in potential partners (Fletcher.
1 The Sexual Objectification of Women in Advertising: A Contemporary Cultural Perspective Author: Amanda Zimmerman & John Dahlberg Instructor: Kate Chen.
Correlation Coefficients of Religious Orientation & Psychological Well-Being Participants 118 male and 381 female undergraduate students at Eastern Kentucky.
GENDER AND CULTURE DIFFERENCES: BULIMIA Ms. Carmelitano.
SATISFACTION WITH BODY IMAGE AND HOW IT AFFECTS SELF-ESTEEM WITH PEOPLE WHO ARE IN RELATIONSHIP Between 6 months to 2 years.
Biological, Cognitive and Sociocultural Explanations to the origins of attraction The Origins of Attraction.
Wendy L. Wolfe, Kaitlyn Patterson, & Hannah Towhey
“S/he’s Got it Goin’ On”: Exploring Ethnic Differences in Body Talk
The Relationship Between Instagram Photo Editing and Undergraduate College Women’s Body Dissatisfaction Madeline Wick, Cindy Miller-Perrin, & Jennifer.
Body image & Self-Esteem: What’s the connection?
Cognitive APPROCH TO EATING DISRODER
Authors *Dr. Asma Parveen *Uzaina
Attitudes, and Job Satisfaction
Attitudes, and Job Satisfaction
Body image & Self-Esteem: What’s the connection?
Kristin E. Gross & David E. Szwedo James Madison University
Body image & Self-Esteem: What’s the connection?
Body image & Self-Esteem: What’s the connection?
Presentation transcript:

Female college students reporting satisfaction with the shape of their bodies were unlikely to choose their own identified silhouette as their ideal body type. Surprisingly, only 5 of 60 female participants (8%) identified their own body type as the type considered most attractive by other female college students and only 2 of the 15 female participants (13%) who self-reported having the body shape deemed most attractive thought others would consider it as the most attractive. Many external factors have been thought to influence body image, such as media exposure (Eyal & Te’en-Harari, 2013) and use of the social networking website Facebook (Rutledge, Gillmor, & Gillen, 2013). However, there are also internal factors at play that can affect the way people see themselves. Research has shown that compared to men, women tend to compare themselves to other women whom they perceive to have better physical qualities than their own. In other words, women are self-critical in comparison whereas men are self-hopeful (Franzoi, Vasquez, Sparapani, Frost, Martin, & Abely, 2012). Some studies have even found that normal/healthy weight women actually desire to be underweight (Desai & Patoliya, 2011). Gillen and Lefkowitz (2011) found a significant discrepancy between women’s perceptions of their own body size and the size they believe men see as ideal and that this discrepancy was the best predictor of body image and self-esteem. We already know that a negative body image can contribute to low self-esteem, and this is especially true in a culture where thinness is so highly valued. Fernandez and Pritchard (2012) found a relationship between self-esteem and drive for thinness in women and found that social pressures were a significant predictor of drive for thinness. This study sought to explore what factors are associated with a woman’s perception of her own body type. We asked college women to rate their own satisfaction with their body, to select a silhouette that most closely resembled her own, to indicate the silhouette she would prefer to have, how men and other women might view her body type, and so on. Primarily, we were curious about the relationship between a woman’s degree of satisfaction with her own body type and her views of what men and other women would think about body type in general and most importantly, what our female participants would think about others’ views of their own body types. Female students enrolled in advanced psychology courses at a small university were administered a 15-item survey, a set of seven female silhouettes varying in shape, and a set of five male silhouettes also varying in shape. The students were asked to consider the given silhouettes when answering the questions. The survey asked participants to rate their satisfaction with their own body type, how attractive the opposite sex would find their body type, to identify their own body type from the female silhouettes given, identify the body type they would prefer to have, what body type men would find most attractive, what body type women would find most attractive, their preference for male body type, and a series of questions regarding their use of social media. Satisfaction with one’s own body type and perception of men’s attraction to one’s own body type were assessed using seven point Likert scales. Satisfaction and attraction were both operationally defined as a five or above on the 7-point Likert scale. For questions pertaining to the attached male and female silhouettes, participants were asked to circle the letter corresponding to a specific silhouette. We expected that self- reported satisfaction would have the most influence on a female selecting the same silhouette for the questions, “Which female silhouette most closely resembles your own?” and “Which female silhouette would you most prefer to have?” Thirty-eight of 60 female participants (63.3%) reported that they were satisfied with their body types. In other words, these participants “want what they’ve got.” Surprisingly, only 5 of 60 female participants (8%) identified their own body type as the type considered most attractive by other female college students and only 2 of the 15 female participants (13%) who self-reported having the body shape deemed most attractive by our participants thought others would consider it as the most attractive. In sum, the overwhelming majority of women did not report that other women find their body types attractive. No statistics are required to see that this is an alarming finding. We were surprised to find that despite claiming to be satisfied with their body types, most women still did not choose their current body type as their ideal body type. This suggests a degree of discontinuity in responses that may be attributable to the power of the specific question employed to elicit particular responses related to body image or possibly to a realistic and healthy assessment of one’s own body image; perhaps women are thinking “I’m OK with my body image although having something more perfect wouldn’t be bad.” We think this latter explanation is likely to be untrue given the current literature on women’s dissatisfaction with their bodies and our finding that only 5 of the 60 women in our current sample thought their own body types would be viewed as most attractive by other women and even more persuasive is the finding that only 2 of the 15 women with the body shape deemed most attractive by the entire sample of women thought that other women would find their particular shape as most attractive. So even when a woman has the ideal body shape insofar as other women are concerned, she does not think this is likely to be the case. This supports a finding by Gillen and Lefkowitz (2011) that a racially diverse group of women believed that their male and female peers’ ideal body size did not match their own size. Our findings are important because they suggest that women have succumbed to the objectification of their bodies by other people and perceive others’ expectations of their bodies to be higher than their own expectations. We were surprised and a little sad to see the results indicate that females’ own satisfaction was insufficient to lead them to “want what they’ve got” nor to think that others may be more accepting of how they look than they are themselves. Abstract Introduction Methodology Conclusion Findings Do Women “Want What They’ve Got”? Shannon Gunnip, Arthur Frankel, Debra Curtis Salve Regina University Newport, RI