“A Learner-Centered Computational Experience in Nanotechnology for Undergraduate STEM Students” IEEE ISEC 2016 Friend Center at Princeton University March.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Advertisements

Program Goals Just Arent Enough: Strategies for Putting Learning Outcomes into Words Dr. Jill L. Lane Research Associate/Program Manager Schreyer Institute.
On the Search of New Engineering Curriculum Model for the 21st Century
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
OverviewOverview – Preparation – Day in the Life – Earnings – Employment – Career Path Forecast – ResourcesPreparationDay in the LifeEarningsEmploymentCareer.
Intel ® Education Programs STEM Business Advocates Linking Employers and Education May 22, 2014.
NSF/TCPP Early Adopter Experience at Jackson State University Computer Science Department.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
STEPPING STONE PROJECT STEPPING STONE PROJECT designing a new engineering discipline presented by team 1.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Industry Advisory Board Department of Computer Science.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
Introduction The Mechanical Engineering Department at WPI was established in 1868 and the first undergraduate degrees were awarded in The Department.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - is a non governmental organization that accredits post secondary educational organizations in : 1)
BY THE NUMBERS WASHINGTON IN FY th : National ranking in NSF funds $140 Million: NSF funds awarded 38: NSF-funded institutions 459: NSF grants.
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
Company LOGO Broader Impacts Sherita Moses-Whitlow 07/09/09.
“Early Estimation of Cache Properties for Multicore Embedded Processors” ISERD ICETM 2015 Bangkok, Thailand May 16, 2015.
OverviewOverview – Preparation – Day in the Life – Earnings – Employment – Career Path Forecast – ResourcesPreparationDay in the LifeEarningsEmploymentCareer.
A Sample Poster — Landscape Layout Name of Team Members Mechanical Engineering Department Introduction The Mechanical Engineering Department at WPI was.
NYIT TUES Evaluation May 2014 Dr. Sarah McPherson Evaluator NYIT School of Education.
MS Thesis Defense “IMPROVING GPU PERFORMANCE BY REGROUPING CPU-MEMORY DATA” by Deepthi Gummadi CoE EECS Department April 21, 2014.
The Society of Women Engineers of Washington University in St. Louis cordially invites you to An Evening with Industry September 13, 2010 Danforth University.
CoE EECS Department Graduate Students Welcome Party – 2014 (Updated on Aug. 22, 2014) Welcome questions: Do you know Einstein? Do you know me? Knowing.
Computer Architecture and Parallel Programming Laboratory (CAPPLab) Group Meetings Greetings! Abu Asaduzzaman Assistant Professor, Elec. Eng. & Comp. Sci.
The Balance Between Theoretical and Practical Work Within Electrical and Computer Engineering Courses Dr. Bahawodin Baha March Development Partnerships.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
S tandards Education in Technology Programs Amin Karim, DeVry University Jennifer McClain, IEEE Educational Activities.
Graduates for the 21 st Century - Perspective from Research Ian Diamond RCUK.
Continuing Education and Curricula for RAC and CE Applications CIWMB CSU, Chico CIWMB CSU, Chico Prepared for Meeting with CIWMB March 7, 2007 Prepared.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
Fall-11: Early Adoption of NSF/TCPP PDC Curriculum at Texas Tech University and Beyond Yong Chen Yu Zhuang Noe Lopez-Benitez May 10 th, 2013.
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
AP + PROJECT LEAD THE WAY PARTNERSHIP OVERVIEW ®.
Science Department Draft of Goals, Objectives and Concerns 2010.
Introduction to STEM Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
1 Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) January 22, 2016.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
Workforce Education & Economic Development 204 Sutton Hall Indiana, PA Fostering partnerships to create and sustain growth.
ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.
Virginia A. Davis, Ph.D. Alumni Professor and Graduate Program Chair Department of Chemical Engineering Auburn University, AL Keywords: 1 st Year Programs,
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
1 Vanderbilt University Name: Vanderbilt TAR Fellows Program Persons responsible: Thomas R. Harris, Derek Bruff, Jean Alley Time Commitment: Introductory.
Computer Engineering Program Outcomes Assessment Dept. of Computer Engineering King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Saudi Arabia Dept. of Computer.
Coding Connections at the Interface of Algebra I and Physical World Concepts Improving Teacher Quality Grant Program Summer 2016.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ABET Outcomes - Definition Skills students have graduation.
“SMT Capable CPU-GPU Systems for Big Data”
Advancing the Wichita State Vision and Mission
Optimizing STEM Programs to Promote Enrollment and Retention
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
Washington THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (NSF) is the only federal agency whose mission includes support for all fields of fundamental science and engineering.
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Inculcating “Parallel Programming” in UG curriculum
Student Membership
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Presented to IEEE Standards Education Committee 11 April 2014
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
ICIEV 2014 Dhaka, Bangladesh
Assessment and Accreditation
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
Potential Influence of Prior Experience in an Undergraduate-Graduate Level HPC Course Chris Fietkiewicz, Ph.D. Department of Electrical Engineering and.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

“A Learner-Centered Computational Experience in Nanotechnology for Undergraduate STEM Students” IEEE ISEC 2016 Friend Center at Princeton University March 5, 2016

“A Learner-Centered Computational Experience in Nanotechnology for Undergraduate STEM Students” IEEE ISEC 2016 Friend Center at Princeton University March 5, 2016 Author and Presenter: Abu Asaduzzaman, Assistant Professor, CE Co-Author: Ramazan Asmatulu, Associate Professor, ME Wichita State University

DRZ3 “A Learner-Centered Computational Experience in Nanotechnology for Undergraduate STEM Students” Outline ► ■ Introduction  Current state of STEM education in the U.S.  Parallel programming for nanotechnology in STEM education  “Learner-centered” “engaged learning” “hands-on experience” ■ Proposed Research Activities  Step 1: Apply parallel programming to analyze nanoscale materials  Step 2: Integrate “hands-on computational experience in nanotechnology” into education through existing and new courses  Step 3: Evaluate learning experiences to improve STEM education ■ Preliminary Work ■ Important Outcomes ■ Discussion QUESTIONS? Any time, please!

DRZ4 Introduction ■ STEM Education in the U.S.  [1-3] Among 33 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries that participated in the Program for International Student Assessment study, the U.S. became 13th in science and 18th in mathematics. Current educational approaches in the U.S. are not generating enough well- trained STEM workforce to achieve the goal that the U.S. needs to maintain its foremost position in the world.  “Engaged learning” is comparatively a new concept where the curriculum should be “learner-centered” instead of “teacher-centered” and should provide “hands-on experience”.  Computational experience in nanotechnology for undergraduate STEM students at Wichita State. “A Learner-Centered Computational Experience in Nanotechnology for Undergraduate STEM Students”

DRZ5 Introduction (+) ■ High Performance Computing: Parallel Programming  Popularity and demands for multithreaded parallel programming are skyrocketing. POSIX Threads [11] and open multiprocessing (OpenMP) [8] for shared memory application program interfaces (APIs); open message passing interface (Open MPI) for message passing APIs [12]. NVIDIA’s compute unified device architecture (CUDA)/graphics processing unit (GPU) technology provides multithreading without “context switching” [13]. ■ Nanotechnology  Nanotechnology is impacting a broad range of highly multidisciplinary fields, such as materials science, sustainable technology, fluid mechanics, mechanical engineering, computer science, and energy savings [14, 15]. “A Learner-Centered Computational Experience in Nanotechnology for Undergraduate STEM Students”

DRZ6 Step 1: Apply parallel programming to nanomaterials ■ Data with dependency  Data with dependency is difficult to process and it requires more processing time.  Data regrouping based multithreading technique helps improve performance. “A Learner-Centered Computational Experience in Nanotechnology for Undergraduate STEM Students”

DRZ7 Step 2: Integrate “hands-on computational experience in nanotechnology” into education ■ Education on parallelism ■ Education on nanotechnology ■ Major steps to  update existing courses to engage STEM students  develop new courses for STEM students ■ Interdisciplinary STEM education  Wichita State College of Engineering  Wichita State College of Education  Wichita State College of Health Professions  Wichita State Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Physics “A Learner-Centered Computational Experience in Nanotechnology for Undergraduate STEM Students”

DRZ8 Step 2: Integrate “hands-on computational experience in nanotechnology” into education (+) ■ Major Steps to Updating Existing and/or Developing New STEM Instructional Models “A Learner-Centered Computational Experience in Nanotechnology for Undergraduate STEM Students”

DRZ9 Step 2: Integrate “hands-on computational experience in nanotechnology” into education (+) ■ Interdisciplinary STEM Education  Wichita State College of Engineering: Project Lead The Way  Wichita State College of Education: STEM Graduate Certificate “A Learner-Centered Computational Experience in Nanotechnology for Undergraduate STEM Students”

DRZ10 Step 2: Integrate “hands-on computational experience in nanotechnology” into education (+) ■ Preparing pedagogical materials  Learner-centered, engaged learning, hands-on experience, real-world industry applications  Structure of classroom, structure of laboratory, plan of assessment ■ Update existing courses to engage STEM students  Multicore Architectures Programming, EECS department  Introduction to Nanotechnology, ME department ■ Develop new courses for STEM students  High Performance Computing Systems EECS department  Advanced Energy Systems, ME department “A Learner-Centered Computational Experience in Nanotechnology for Undergraduate STEM Students”

DRZ11 Step 3: Evaluate learning experiences to improve STEM education ■ The quantitative assessment questions, usually asked by the accrediting association ABET ( are used. “A Learner-Centered Computational Experience in Nanotechnology for Undergraduate STEM Students” Statement to Evaluate (CS 794, Fall 2014)Average Rating Students were engaged in learner-centered activities.9.71 Knowledge in parallel programming has improved.9.71 Understanding nanotechnology concepts has enhanced.7.43 Students learned how to apply analytical techniques to parallel programming and nanotechnology Students are able to apply computational techniques to nanoscience problems This course helps students prepare for future career.9.43 Comparing with other courses you recently took, this course offer better engaging in learning activities

DRZ12 “A Learner-Centered Computational Experience in Nanotechnology for Undergraduate STEM Students” Preliminary Work  “An Effective CUDA-Based Simulation for Lightning Strike Protection on Nanocomposite Materials,” IEEE SoutheastCon’13, Jacksonville, Florida, April 4–7, 2013 [31].  In this work, we develop a fast and effective simulation model using CUDA programming for lightning strike protection analysis on nanocomposite aircrafts. We implement the Laplace’s equation for unknown charge distribution. Simulation results indicate that CUDA-assisted multithreaded parallel programming has the potential to save energy (about 92% in this case) by increasing the speedup factor by about 14 times.

DRZ13 Important Outcomes  Practical Knowledge through Discovery: Widely employed manufacturing processes synthesis and characterization of materials, as well as simulation and optimization; and motivation for engaged life-long learning.  Innovative Research Initiatives and Grant Proposals: Multidisciplinary research to address the new/large challenges.  Societal Benefits: Improve STEM education and increase required STEM workforce. Using lightweight nanomaterials can protect the environment by using high energy-conversion rates; increase life spans; and enhance human memory, physical strength, etc. “A Learner-Centered Computational Experience in Nanotechnology for Undergraduate STEM Students”

DRZ14 Conclusions  In this work, parallel computation is used to analyze nanoscale materials; two existing courses are updated and new courses are developed to integrate “hands-on computational experience” in nanotechnology; and students’ learning experience is assessed.  According to the students’ feedback and class performance, students are better engaged while they learn how to apply computational techniques to nanoscience problems.  The proposed computational experience in nanotechnology has potential to promote knowledge in power-aware parallel computing and nanocomposite fibers by strengthening academic programs at the institutions across the nation. “A Learner-Centered Computational Experience in Nanotechnology for Undergraduate STEM Students”

Thank You! QUESTIONS? Feedback? Contact: Abu Asaduzzaman Phone: CAPPLab: IEEE ISEC 2016 in Friend Center at Princeton University “A Learner-Centered Computational Experience in Nanotechnology for Undergraduate STEM Students”