G040009-00-R 2004 Plan Update LIGO Systems meeting 22 Jan 04 dhs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
Advertisements

LIGO-G PLIGO Laboratory 1 Advanced LIGO The Next Generation Philip Lindquist, Caltech XXXVIII Moriond Conference Gravitational Waves and Experimental.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
G R LIGO Advanced System Test Interferometer LIGO Advanced R&D Review M. Zucker 8 October, 2002.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
G D LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Dennis Coyne Hannover LSC 19 August 2003.
G D Advanced LIGO1 David Shoemaker Aspen at Elba 23 May 2002.
G M Advanced R&D1 Seismic Isolation Retrofit Plan for the LIGO Livingston Observatory Dennis Coyne 29 Nov 2001.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status and Plans Barry Barish LSC Meeting 19-Aug-02.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development Update Dennis Coyne LSC Meeting at LLO 16 March 2004.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors David Shoemaker NSF Operations Review Hanford, 26 February 2001.
LIGO-G06xxxx-00-M Technical Progress Planned/Needed in FY07 Advanced LIGO Program Advisory Panel meeting, 30 November – 1 December 2006, MIT Dennis Coyne,
LIGO-G M 1 Advanced LIGO Status LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting August 15, Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory, Caltech.
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Development Plan R&D including Design through Final Design Review »for all long lead or high risk subsystems »LIGO.
LIGO-G M Status of LIGO Barry Barish PAC Meeting Caltech 3-June-04 Upper limits on known pulsar ellipticities.
LIGO-G M April 5, 2006 Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project Richard.
Overview of Advanced LIGO March 2011 Rencontres de Moriond Sheila Rowan For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
G D Advanced LIGO1 David Shoemaker  Gary Sanders Elba “Aspen” Meeting 23 May 2002.
4/25/11 G v3 1 Facility Modifications and Preparations (FMP) Technical Status Annual NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project April , 2011 John.
LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, 2006 Input Optics (IO) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project David Reitze UF.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Development, Implementation Plan & Schedule Dennis Coyne April.
1 LIGO and GEO Developments for Advanced LIGO Sheila Rowan, Stanford University/Univ. of Glasgow on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Annual.
G M 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC/Virgo MIT July 2007.
LIGO-G Advanced LIGO Detector upgrade is planned for »Factor of 10 increase in distance probed (‘reach’) »Factor of 1000 increase in event.
LIGO-G D The LIGO-I Gravitational-wave Detectors Stan Whitcomb CaJAGWR Seminar February 16, 2001.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
LIGO-G R The LIGO Advanced System Test Interferometer Mike Zucker, David Shoemaker, Ken Mason LLO LSC 16 March 2001.
LIGO-G M Major International Collaboration in Advanced LIGO R&D Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Hanford February, 2001.
G Z LIGO R&D1 Input Optics Definition, Function The input optics (IO) conditions light from the pre- stabilized laser (PSL) for injection into.
LIGO-G M Planning and Implementation Strategy for Advanced LIGO Gary Sanders LSC Meeting Hanford, August 14, 2001.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker NSF LIGO Review 23 October 2002.
G R 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC LHO March 2006.
David Shoemaker Aspen 3 February 03
G R LIGO R&D1 Advanced LIGO Update Dennis Coyne LSC LLO March 2005.
Update on Suspension Activities for Advanced LIGO Caroline A. Cantley University of Glasgow for the GEO600 Group LSC Meeting, Livingston, March 2003 (Technical.
RedGreenBlue Discussion topics LIGO-G v1 Benno Willke, David Shoemaker.
Update on Activities in Suspensions for Advanced LIGO Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University LSC meeting, Hanford, Aug 20 th 2002.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Detectors
G R Proposed Adv. R&D FY R&D for Advanced LIGO David Shoemaker & Dennis Coyne 29 January 2001.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 The Future - How to make a next generation LIGO David Shoemaker, MIT AAAS Annual Meeting 17 February 2003.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.
LSC Meeting at LHO LIGO-G E 1August. 21, 2002 SimLIGO : A New LIGO Simulation Package 1. e2e : overview 2. SimLIGO 3. software, documentations.
Advanced LIGO Status Report
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Status Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT March 24, 2006 March 24, th Eastern Gravity Meeting G R.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors Gary Sanders NSF R&D Review Caltech, January 29, 2001.
G R Thermal Noise Interferometer (TNI) Eric Black 8 Oct 02.
G R Interferometer Sensing & Control P Fritschel 8 Oct 02.
LIGO-G M Overview of the LIGO Continuing Operations (FY FY2006) Proposal Gary Sanders LIGO PAC9 Meeting December 2000.
G R LIGO R&D1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC LHO August 2004.
Advanced Towards Advanced Virgo Giovanni Losurdo – INFN Firenze Advanced Virgo Coordinator on behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
LIGO-G M State of the LIGO Laboratory Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech LSC Meeting, LLO March 16, 2004 State of LIGO.
LIGO- G M LIGO Status Stan Whitcomb Oversight Committee 20 October 2004.
LIGO LAB R&D PROGRAM TECHNICAL REVIEW, OCT 02
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
R&D Highlights Seismic Isolation Suspensions ISC/40m
Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Livingston 21 March 2005
David Shoemaker AAAS Conference 17 February 2003
LIGO Advanced System Test Interferometer
The Next Generation: Advanced LIGO
Auxiliary Optics System (AOS)
Advanced LIGO R&D Review Input Optics
Presentation transcript:

G R 2004 Plan Update LIGO Systems meeting 22 Jan 04 dhs

G R 2 Reductions in R&D costs required Initial LIGO costs greater, and continuing longer, than anticipated – but unquestionably the first priority Pre-isolator development RFI/EMI retrofit Thermal compensator etc. Adjustments in LIGO Lab across the board Equipment (e.g., computing, campus infrastructure) Supplies Personnel (fewer new hires) …and R&D, mostly in equipment Flexibility required at top level of LIGO Lab Uncommitted funds for emergencies If no emergencies, funds can be requested back into e.g., R&D Plan for this – find critical points where putting back elements makes a significant increase in R&D payoff 2004 obviously affected 2005 also likely to be ‘slow’, depending on how things go

G R 3 Overall model for AdL Proposal (February 2003) to NSF requested first funds in 2005 »Hear positive vibrations from NSF, but no official response »Earliest anticipated start now in FY 2006 (i.e., Oct 2005) Adjustments, and schedules, now assume this start date Updated Plan is to (as before) finish designs and prototype testing by start of project funds – about one year later than proposal plan Continued recognition of high value of R&D testing »dhs feels that minimum plan is not satisfactory, but with probable re-transfer of funds can ‘retire sufficient risk’

G R 4 Seismic Isolation Baseline plan called for complete HAM and BSC isolation systems for installation in LASTI, integration with SUS, etc. Replan covers design and fabrication of HAM and BSC mechanical ‘carcasses’ – planned delivery in Oct ’04 --, But not instrumentation (sensors, real-time servo equipment) dhs sees very high priority to request funds for at least partial instrumentation to allow characterization when pieces arrive

G R 5 Suspensions Baseline plan called for Recycling mirror development, Quad development (in LIGO Lab and UK), and Mode Cleaner fabrication (for LASTI IO MC) in 2004 »A bit too much in any event! High priority: capitalize on UK funding for Quad development »Maintain high level of activity on design and prototyping Replan calls for »Continued Quad design/prototyping (one instead of two), »no additional MCs in 2004 (a ‘noise prototype’) in 2005), »Deferral of Recycling Mirror design and prototyping until 2006

G R 6 Input Optics Baseline plan called for fabrication of parts for LASTI Mode Cleaner (3 mirrors, suspensions, controllers, etc.) – »put this on hold, possibly until fabrication funds arrive, using first articles Baseline plan also called for continued development of isolators, modulators, and design work – this is included in the replan

G R 7 Core Optics Baseline plan for 2004 basically unchanged – consider the selection of test mass material and development of coating technology necessary early R&D achievements Coating development »Two vendors (SMA/Lyon and CSIRO) »Series of coating experiments Materials for Q, polish, coating experiments Some infrastructure equipment – metrology, test stands Defer any LASTI/SUS optic finishing to 2005 or 2006 NOT pursing metrology aperture upgrade, backup Fused Silica test mass purchase, SV test glass purchase until 2006/need

G R 8 Auxiliary Optics Baseline plan called for development of photon drive, and adaptive optics prototypes, in 2004 Replan funding calls for deferral to 2006 dhs sees a high priority for some adaptive optics development to allow integration tests with SUS, probably in 2005

G R 9 Pre-Stabilized Laser Most planned activity in Germany (LZH/MPQ), advancing well Baseline has activity in intensity stabilization in LIGO Lab, in »Nice first step finished, paper submitted »Some work this year in the Lab

G R 10 Interferometer Sensing/Control – 40m 40m construction ‘finished’ – process of commissioning dual- recycled interferometer underway Baseline called for generous funding of 40m commissioning; »reduced by a factor of two in replan Baseline called for tests of a number of ISC pieces (ADC/DAC tests, UHF detector parts »Some deferred to 2005; many deferred to 2006 »Much testing of ISC at 40m to be deferred to Construction phase

G R 11 LASTI Recent (Nov LSC) Baseline called for »BSC and HAM isolation systems, with pre-isolators »One test cavity, made of one Quad and one MC »Changeable to a cavity of one Quad and one RM »Complete 3-mirror MC »IO modulation system »180W laser Replan results in »Pre-isolators »Isolation mechanical systems, nominally no instrumentation »One Quad, one MC »Deferred test of one cavity (Quad/MC) to 2006 Allows installation and basic functional tests of suspensions With addition of Seismic instrumentation (to be requested), allows complete servocontrol tests of Quad and MC More testing if time, money, and logic allows; may overlap installation at Observatories

G R 12 Bottom line Replan allows design work to continue, with some deferrals Most critical pieces get through critical stages (Quad and PSL with generous help from GEO funding, and the LSC at large) Will plan to request funds for urgent needs as indicated; input invited; optimistic for some recovery here Hope to hear signals from NSF by mid-year 2004 on construction funds