JOINT WORKSHOP ON MULTIPLE-USE APPLICATIONS. AMS’S 50 MW FLEET FOR SO. CAL EDISON MULTIPLE USE CASE #5: BEHIND- THE-METER DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
New England Developments in Demand Response and Smart Grid 2010 National Town Meeting on Demand Response and Smart Grid Henry Yoshimura, Director, Demand.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
SMUD Sustainable Energy Supply Progress in Carbon Reduction POU 101: CMUA Briefing of Legislative Staff February 26 th, 2015 Obadiah Bartholomy Powering.
1 Wal-Mart’s View on Demand Response Program Design Anoush Farhangi Angela Beehler.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
The Benefits of Dynamic Pricing of Default Electricity Service Bernie Neenan UtiliPoint International Prepared for Assessing the Potential for Demand Response.
Multi-Area Stochastic Unit Commitment for High Wind Penetration in a Transmission Constrained Network Shmuel Oren University of California, Berkeley Joint.
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
Vehicle-Grid Integration (VGI) © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.
ETAAC Energy Sector Energy Storage Smart Grid July 12, 2007 San Francisco, CA.
California SONGS\OTC Plants Assumptions TEPPC – Data Work Group Call Tuesday, September 15, 2015.
Page 1 Schedule Experimental Energy Reduction (EER) updated 2005 Note: This program is available to qualified participants within the EntergyArkansas,
California Energy Commission 2015 IEPR Self-Generation Forecast Sacramento, CA 7/07/2015 Asish Gautam Demand Analysis Office Energy Assessments Division.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
2 nd ACC Workshop June 20, 2014 The SSVEC Perspective David Bane, Key Account Manager
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION. California Perspective on Real Time Pricing Michael R. Jaske, Ph.D. California Energy Commission Committee on Regional Electric.
Energy Storage – Definitions, Properties and Economics Andreas Hauer Latin America Public-Private Partnerships Workshop on Energy Storage for Sustainable.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
FCC Field Hearing on Energy and the Environment Cambridge, MA; November 30, 2009.
Advanced Energy Storage for Load Management 2008 Rulemaking on Load Management Standards Efficiency Committee Workshop March 3, 2008 Charles R. Toca US&R.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Regulation Energy Management Overview CPUC Energy Storage Workshop March 9, 2011.
Voltage Reduction in ERCOT Feasibility Report to ROS Voltage Reduction Task Force.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
The Role of Energy Storage as a Renewable Integration Solution under a 50% RPS Joint California Energy Commission and California Public Utilities Commission.
Dynamic Pricing Case Studies. Digi International.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, Session 6 Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary? Reluctantly…yes But States should also be.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
Edward Randolph Director, Energy Division California Public Utilities Commission September 30, IEP Conference.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
California Energy Commission 2015 IEPR Self-Generation Forecast Sacramento, CA 12/17/2015 Asish Gautam Demand Analysis Office Energy Assessments Division.
1 1 DISTRIBUTION EFFICIENCY INITIATIVE (DEI) Benefits on Both Sides of the Meter RTF MEETING February 5, 2008.
ISO Confidential Overview of California’s Current Drought and its Effects on the Energy System Dede Subakti, P. E. Director, Operations Engineering Services.
Changes in U.S. Regulatory Framework that Supports Energy Storage Deployment Jim Hart Vice President – South America.
UM 1751 Energy Storage Workshop #3 May 9, UM 1751 Workshop #3 Topics Most viable and beneficial applications (HB 2193 time frame: ) Emerging.
Energy Storage and Distributed Energy Storage (ESDER) Initiative California Independent System Operator CAISO – CPUC Energy Storage Workshop May 3, 2016.
Multi-Use Application Use Case #3: Optimized Pricing and Resource Allocation (OPRA) Project. May 3, 2016.
© 2015 Stem, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential 1 © 2016 Stem, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential 1 DRP Data Access Workshop May 23, 2016 Matt Owens Director.
1 City of Palo Alto Utilities Large Commercial Customer Pilot Demand Response Program Customer Meeting March 8, 2012.
DER Provide Grid Services for the 21 st Century Electric System Lorenzo Kristov, Ph.D. Principal, Market & Infrastructure Policy More Than Smart Conference.
Black Start Service in New England System Operator’s Perspective Robert B. Burke ISO New England Inc. July 23, 2002 IEEE - Chicago, Illinois.
Advanced Meter School August 18-20,2015 Time of Use and Load Profile Jeremiah Swann.
Modeling DER in Transmission Planning CAISO Experience
Transmission-Distribution Interface Working Group Meeting
Irvine Ranch Water District Distributed Energy Storage Case Study
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
SMUD - Whole Foods Energy Storage System
Alternative Approach for Loads in SCED v.2
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
TILOS: From energy sustainability on a small Greek island to a global disruption in the power sector Zisimos Mantas Business Development Officer, EUNICE.
Transmission-Distribution Interface Pilot Proposal
Operating a modern renewable-based grid
DR Measurement & Verification
Client: Supermarket Chain Application: Voltage regulation
31st USAEE/IAEE North American Conference
New England Electricity Restructuring Roundtable
Load Response Products from Constellation NewEnergy
2500 R Midtown Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Forging Sustainable Solar (and Storage) Incentives for New England
The Future Grid and Energy Storage
Presentation transcript:

JOINT WORKSHOP ON MULTIPLE-USE APPLICATIONS

AMS’S 50 MW FLEET FOR SO. CAL EDISON MULTIPLE USE CASE #5: BEHIND- THE-METER DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCES PROVIDING SERVICES TO END-USE CUSTOMERS, THE DISTRIBUTION GRID AND THE CAISO MARKET AMS PROJECT 250 KW / 1,500 KWH INSTALLATION

MULTIPLE USE | UTILITY, CUSTOMER AND GRID VALUE

KEY POINTS  CLARITY & CONSISTENCY: INTERCONNECTION, METERING, TELEMETRY AND GENERAL MARKET RULES  URGENCY: THESE PROJECTS ARE ONLINE NOW!  ERR ON THE SIDE OF INNOVATION:  PARTICIPATION IN MULTIPLE PROGRAMS  KEEP THINGS SIMPLE

RECOMMENDATIONS  CONTINUE TO DEVELOP AND REFINE MEASUREMENT RULES  OPEN MORE OF MARKET FOR PDR (REGULATION SERVICES)  RECOGNIZE VALUE OF BTM RESOURCES ON DISTRIBUTION GRID  IDENTIFY USES THAT ARE COMPLIMENTARY / IN CONFLICT - BREAK DOWN BARRIERS  FURTHER EXPLORE:  WHOLESALE AND RETAIL MARKET PARTICIPATION  OTHER VALUES STORAGE CAN PROVIDE (LOCATIONAL VALUE, CVR)

APPENDIX

BATTERY METER MEASURES PERFORMANCE OF FIRM & DISPATCHABLE RESOURCE ‣ BASELINES FOR DR TRIES TO GUESS THE COUNTERFACTUAL OR ALTERNATE UNIVERSE. THEY ARE “GOOD” FOR LOADS BECAUSE THEY ESTIMATE “NORMAL” LOAD PATTERNS ‣ A COUNTERFACTUAL FOR ENERGY STORAGE BEHAVIOR IS A MYTH. WITHOUT DUAL USE, THE STORAGE SYSTEM WOULD NEVER BE INSTALLED ‣ WHEN METERING IS AVAILABLE, PRIOR ACTIVITY OF AN ENERGY STORAGE FACILITIY SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR PERFORMANCE EVLAUTION ‣ DON’T GUESS THE COUNTERFACTUAL IF WE DON’T NEED TO

DEMAND REDUCTION ‣ UNIT CAN SUPPLY 8 UNITS OF ENERGY ‣ RAMP IS “FAST”, I.E. CAN DELIVER ALL 8 UNITS IN ONE HOUR IF NECESSARY ‣ CHARGING IS PERFORMED DURING OFF- HOURS, AND NOT CONSIDERED IN ANALYSIS ‣ “NORMAL” OPERATIONS ASSUMES PEAK- SHAVING ‣ BATTERY IS USED TO SHAVE 8 UNITS OF ENERGY OVER 4 HOURS ‣ PEAK IS REDUCED FROM 9 TO 6

MARKET DISPATCH ‣ ASSUME NOW THAT RESOURCE MAY NOW BE CALLED FOR REDUCTION EITHER BY AN ISO OR A DISTRIBUTION OPERATOR ‣ THE RESOURCE IS ENROLLED TO PROVIDE THE FULL RANGE OF REDUCTION, IN THIS CASE 8 UNITS OF ENERGY ‣ BATTERY IS CALLED TO REDUCE DURING A 3 HOUR WINDOW ‣ 8 UNITS OF ENERGY ARE CONTRIBUTED (MEASURED VIA METER) ‣ NOTE THAT PEAK LOAD IS UNCHANGED DISPATCH WINDOW

DEMAND REDUCTION & DISPATCH ‣ STORAGE OPERATOR MIGHT DECIDE TO NOT PROVIDE FULL REDUCTION AS CALLED, IN ORDER TO PERFORM SOME PEARK REDUCTION ‣ THE RESULTING PROFILE WILL SHOW LESS PEAK REDUCTION BUT ALSO SOME DR, NEITHER OF WHICH SHOW THE FULL BENEFIT OF THE PREVIOUS SCENARIOS ‣ BATTERY TO CALLED TO REDUCE DURING A 3 HOUR WINDOW ‣ 5 UNITS OF DEMAND REDUCTION SUPPLED (AS OPPOSED TO 8) ‣ PEAK REDUCED TO 7 (AS OPPOSED TO 6) DISPATCH WINDOW

DISPATCH PERFORMANCE USING METER PEAK LOAD VIA IOU METER DAY 1 = 6 UNITS DAY 2 = 9 UNITS DAY 3 = 7 UNITS DAY 1 DAY 2 DISPATCH DAY 3 DISPATCH DISPATCH PERFORMANCE CAN BE MEASURED DIRECTLY: DAY 1 = NOT APPLICABLE DAY 2 = FULL REDUCTION (8 ENERGY UNITS) DAY 3 = PARTIAL REDUCTION (5 ENERGY UNITS)

DISPATCH PERFORMANCE USING BASELINE DAY 2  ACTUAL REDUCTION IS THE FULL AMOUNT (8 ENERGY UNITS)  BUT THE BASELINE, DAY 1 IS THE SELECTED BASELINE DAY, AND THE CALCULATED REDUCTION WILL BE ONLY 5 ENERGY UNITS DAY 1 DAY 2: DISPATCHDAY 3: DISPATCH DAY 3  ACTUAL REDUCTION IS 5 ENERGY UNITS, A PARTIAL REDUCTION  USING THE BASELINE, DAY 1 IS AGAIN THE SELECTED BASELINE DAY, AND THE CALCULATED REDUCTION WILL BE ONLY 2 ENERGY UNITS

THANK YOU 25 Stillman Street, San Francisco, CA |