Report on the FCT MDC Stuart Anderson, Kent Blackburn, Philip Charlton, Jeffrey Edlund, Rick Jenet, Albert Lazzarini, Tom Prince, Massimo Tinto, Linqing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
11/12/2003LIGO Document G Z1 Data reduction for S3 I Leonor (UOregon), P Charlton (CIT), S Anderson (CIT), K Bayer (MIT), M Foster (PSU), S Grunewald.
Advertisements

Annoucements  Next labs 9 and 10 are paired for everyone. So don’t miss the lab.  There is a review session for the quiz on Monday, November 4, at 8:00.
ERWin Template Overview By: Dave Wentzel. Agenda u Overview of Templates/Macros u Template editor u Available templates u Independent column browser u.
MP IP Strategy Stateye-GUI Provided by Edotronik Munich, May 05, 2006.
© 2003 Xilinx, Inc. All Rights Reserved Looking Under the Hood.
CHEP04 - Interlaken - Sep. 27th - Oct. 1st 2004T. M. Steinbeck for the Alice Collaboration1/27 A Control Software for the ALICE High Level Trigger Timm.
LIGO-G W Gregory Mendell and Mike Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory The StackSlide Search Summary: November 2003.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
“GENERIC SCRIPT” Everything can be automated, even automation process itself. “GENERIC SCRIPT” Everything can be automated, even automation process itself.
Design Synopsys System Verilog API Donations to Accellera João Geada.
Students: Nadia Goshmir, Yulia Koretsky Supervisor: Shai Rozenrauch Industrial Project Advanced Tool for Automatic Testing Final Presentation.
Research on cloud computing application in the peer-to-peer based video-on-demand systems Speaker : 吳靖緯 MA0G rd International Workshop.
® IBM Software Group © 2009 IBM Corporation Rational Publishing Engine RQM Multi Level Report Tutorial David Rennie, IBM Rational Services A/NZ
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
9 Chapter Nine Compiled Web Server Programs. 9 Chapter Objectives Learn about Common Gateway Interface (CGI) Create CGI programs that generate dynamic.
Update on the LIGO Data Analysis System LIGO Scientific Collaboration Meeting LIGO Hanford Observatory August 19 th, 2002 Kent Blackburn Albert Lazzarini.
LIGO- G Z LSC ASIS Meeting LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 S2 Hardware Pulsar Injections Bruce.
Data Characterization in Gravitational Waves Soma Mukherjee Max Planck Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik Golm, Germany. Talk at University of Texas, Brownsville.
The Continuous Waves UL Group: status report. LSC Meeting LIGO Hanford Observatory August 2002 M.Alessandra Papa LIGO-G Z.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 EDS 3 Release 5: SCED Phase 1 Testing Aug 14, 2007.
Exploring an Open Source Automation Framework Implementation.
Automatic Gain Control Response Delay and Acquisition in Direct- Sequence Packet Radio Communications Sure 2007 Stephanie Gramc Dr. Noneaker.
Mock Data Production, Characteristics, and Confusion Background WG4 f2f – Nice 09/01/10 Tania Regimbau.
Object-Oriented Program Development Using Java: A Class-Centered Approach, Enhanced Edition.
ISV Innovation Presented by ISV Innovation Presented by Business Intelligence Fundamentals: Data Cleansing Ola Ekdahl IT Mentors 9/12/08.
1 Sergio Maffioletti Grid Computing Competence Center GC3 University of Zurich Swiss Grid School 2012 Develop High Throughput.
Unit-1 Introduction Prepared by: Prof. Harish I Rathod
European Test Symposium, May 28, 2008 Nuno Alves, Jennifer Dworak, and R. Iris Bahar Division of Engineering Brown University Providence, RI Kundan.
LAV Software Status Emanuele Leonardi – Tommaso Spadaro Photon Veto WG meeting – 2015/03/24.
Multidimensional classification of burst triggers from the fifth science run of LIGO Soma Mukherjee CGWA, UTB GWDAW11, Potsdam, 12/18/06 LIGO-G
Status of Standalone Inspiral Code Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee LIGO Scientific Collaboration Inspiral Working Group LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z A Coherent Network Burst Analysis Patrick Sutton on behalf of Shourov Chatterji, Albert Lazzarini, Antony Searle, Leo Stein, Massimo.
VAPOR 3.0 Architecture Overview. Purpose of this document Provide understandable overview of 3.0 architecture Enable the development team to maintain.
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
The Category-Partition Method for Specifying and Generating Functional Tests. Thomas J. Ostrand and Marc J.Balcer [ CACM,1988 ]. Slides from Prof. Shmuel.
The Software Development Process
LIGO-G Z 3/15/01Penn State1 The datacondAPI Sam Finn, for the datacondAPI Team: W. Anderson, K. Blackburn, P. Charlton, P. Ehrens, A. Gonzalez,
Multidimensional classification of burst triggers from LIGO S5 run Soma Mukherjee for the LSC Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas.
Calibration in the Front End Controls Craig Cahillane LIGO Caltech SURF 2013 Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jamie Rollins Presentation to Calibration Group 8/21/2013.
LIGO-G Z 5 June 2001L.S.Finn/LIGO Scientific Collaboration1 LDAS Camp.
NSF Review, 18 Nov 2003 Peter Shawhan (LIGO/Caltech)1 How to Develop a LIGO Search Peter Shawhan (LIGO / Caltech) NSF Review November 18, 2003 LIGO-G E.
Martin Hewitson and the GEO team Measuring gravitational waves with GEO600.
11/12/2003LIGO-G Z1 Data reduction for S3 P Charlton (CIT), I Leonor (UOregon), S Anderson (CIT), K Bayer (MIT), M Foster (PSU), S Grunewald (AEI),
1 University of Maryland Runtime Program Evolution Jeff Hollingsworth © Copyright 2000, Jeffrey K. Hollingsworth, All Rights Reserved. University of Maryland.
Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory LIGO-G WLIGO-G WLIGO-G W LIGO S5 Reduced Data Set Generation March 2007.
Liverpool Experience of MDC 1 MAP (and in our belief any system which attempts to be scaleable to 1000s of nodes) broadcasts the code to all the nodes.
LSC Meeting LIGO Scientific Collaboration - University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee 1 LSC Software and Other Things Alan Wiseman University of Wisconsin.
Characterization of PEM Channels Chirpiness of the Test Mass motion due to “Noise” Anthony Rizzi Staff Scientist, LIGO LIGO-G D.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
September 28, 2000 Improved Simultaneous Data Reconciliation, Bias Detection and Identification Using Mixed Integer Optimization Methods Presented by:
1 The Software Development Process ► Systems analysis ► Systems design ► Implementation ► Testing ► Documentation ► Evaluation ► Maintenance.
Stored Procedures / Session 4/ 1 of 41 Session 4 Module 7: Introducing stored procedures Module 8: More about stored procedures.
Validation of realistically simulated non-stationary data. Soma Mukherjee Centre for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville. GWDAW9,
GWDAW91Thursday, December 16 First Comparison Between LIGO &Virgo Inspiral Search Pipelines F. Beauville on behalf of the LIGO-Virgo Joint Working Group.
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M DMT Monitor Verification with Simulated Data John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
Anders Nielsen Technical University of Denmark, DTU-Aqua Mark Maunder Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission An Introduction.
Soma Mukherjee LSC, Hanford, Aug.19 '04 Generation of realistic data segments: production and application. Soma Mukherjee Centre for Gravitational Wave.
Structuring Redundancy for Fault Tolerance Chapter 2 Designed by: Hadi Salimi Instructor: Dr. Mohsen Sharifi.
Some of the utilities associated with the development of programs. These program development tools allow users to write and construct programs that the.
1.3 Operating system services An operating system provide services to programs and to the users of the program. It provides an environment for the execution.
SEARCH FOR INSPIRALING BINARIES S. V. Dhurandhar IUCAA Pune, India.
Week#3 Software Quality Engineering.
LIGO-G W The knownpulsardemod DSO August 2002 LSC Update PULG Session 08/23/02 Gregory Mendell LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Process API COMP 755.
Fault Injection: A Method for Validating Fault-tolerant System
Targeted Searches using Q Pipeline
Machine Independent Features
Chapter 2: System Structures
The STACK-SLIDE Search Initial Report: PULG F2F UWM June 2003
Rational Publishing Engine RQM Multi Level Report Tutorial
Presentation transcript:

Report on the FCT MDC Stuart Anderson, Kent Blackburn, Philip Charlton, Jeffrey Edlund, Rick Jenet, Albert Lazzarini, Tom Prince, Massimo Tinto, Linqing Wen California Institute of Technology LIGO-G E LIGO Hanford Observatory, Aug , 2001

PC - 2 Goals of the FCT MDC (May 2001) FCT MDC consisted of a purely functional test rather than a scientific test, to verify functionality and stability of the FCT dynamically-loaded shared object (DSO) and the LDAS pipeline including it. Initial goal was to get a full FCT pipeline working from end-to-end, using simple implementations of some functionality: more sophisticated processing can easily be added later.

PC - 3 Pre-MDC Development FCT is a self-contained library independent of LAL. This was incorporated into LAL and modified to comply with LAL specifications and interfaces. Parallelization was achieved by folding LAL FCT interface into a DSO which can be loaded by the LDAS wrapper API and run on multiple nodes of a Beowulf system (Wen).

PC - 4 Search options such as dimensionality of parameter space and range over which each parameter is defined are specified in an LDAS script. Frame API obtains data from frame files and passes it to data conditioning API. “Conditioned” data is passed to all nodes of the Beowulf system (currently, no conditioning is done - data is just passed through). Identical data is propagated to all nodes. Outline of the FCT Pipeline

PC - 5 Parallel FCT is performed on the Beowulf with specified parameters – each process is an instance of the FCT DSO, which performs an FCT on the same data but over a different part of parameter space. Trivial event detection currently used. An event is deemed to have occurred if FCT power for some choice of chirp parameters exceeds a threshold. Output from FCT DSO is either no products (if no events are found) or a list of events and corresponding parameters. Events are then inserted into the database. Outline of the FCT Pipeline (Cont.)

PC - 6 Testing of FCT performed in the MDC Simulated data was generated using Matlab and written in Frame format from Matlab using Sam Finn’s mkframe MEX-file in LIGOtools. Test frames contained a single channel at a sampling rate of 2048 Hz representing a gravity wave channel already down sampled from Hz. Data consisted of Gaussian noise with zero mean and unit variance, plus three 2-PN chirps with known coalescence time. The mass parameters chosen were 1.4/1.4, 3.0/1.4 and 3.0/3.0.

PC - 7 Verify FCT DSO in the "standalone" wrapper ie. not as part of LDAS. Verify that FCT DSO rejects invalid parameters and that the LDAS pipeline correctly logs the errors. Verify that FCT DSO successfully completes with a variety of valid parameters and data eg. data lengths of 2^10, 2^16 and 2^22, and 2, 3 or 4 chirp parameters. Verify that FCT DSO works correctly on different numbers of processors and that execution time scales inversely with number of processors. List of Tests Performed

PC - 8 Verify detection: Basic test to show that chirps can be detected in white noise with correct chirp parameters and that correct entries are inserted into the database. Verify long-term stability of pipeline: Consisted of reading 12 hours of data in a looped LDAS job and checking that LDAS and the FCT DSO did not crash or leak; all appropriate results were inserted into the database. Tests Performed (Cont.)

PC - 9 FCT engine –Improving performance and memory usage Parallel search code –Realistic inputs including whitened data, response function, LIGO noise model –More sophisticated event detection –Changing parallel model Hierarchical search methods (Hua Fang, Tinto) Approximate representation of chirp phase at different PN orders (Jeff Edlund, Yi Pan, Tinto) Future Activities