Institutional Effectiveness: Seniors’ Evaluations of UNC Charlotte Findings from the 1998-2006 Senior Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MIAMI UNIVERSITY Office of Residence Life. Mission Statement The Office of Residence Life collaborates with other offices to facilitate students' successful.
Advertisements

“Yes, No, Maybe So”: What We Know and Don’t Know about Student Retention Kathleen M. Morley, Ph.D. Betsy O. Barefoot, Ed.D. Policy Center on the First.
Division of Student Affairs and Enrollment Management Supporting Student Success and Retention.
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
2006 Student Opinion Survey Summary November 2006 GUSTO Town Meeting on Accreditation & Assessment Genesee Community College Presented by: Carol Marriott.
Sophomore Success Program- A Residential Model with Graduation in Mind Cal Poly San Luis Obispo Housing & Residential Life October 2006.
Academic Advising Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment and Faculty Governance UNC Charlotte Office of Academic Affairs.
1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
1 NSSE Results Indiana University Kokomo Sharon K. Calhoon Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Presentation to Clerical.
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Preliminary Analysis of the 2013 Canadian Graduate and Professional Student Survey (CGPSS) - York University Results Richard Smith Acting Director Office.
Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
Intro Tour of the Male Student Mind In American Higher Education European Access Network National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland June 28, 2007 Tom.
Great Lakes Council of Business Schools and Programs Regional Conference October 6 – 7, Dr. Reginald J. Gardner Campus College Chair – School of.
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
Student Satisfaction Geneva College Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI: Noel-Levitz) 1997 to 2013.
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Campus Climate for UNC Charlotte Faculty Findings from the 1998, 2001, & 2004 UCLA HERI Faculty Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment Office of.
Achievement of Educational Outcomes: Seniors’ Self-Evaluations Findings from the 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004 and 2006 Senior Surveys Cathy Sanders Director.
Achievement of Educational Outcomes: Seniors’ Self- evaluations from 2004 & 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement (NSSE) Cathy Sanders Director of.
Faculty Perceptions of the Importance of Selected Educational Outcomes Findings from the 1998, 2001, and 2004 UCLA HERI Faculty Surveys Cathy Sanders Director.
Visioning and Fostering Quality Teaching and Learning in Higher Education in Ontario Council of Ontario Educational Developers: Judy Britnell (Ryerson)
2007 Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Bruce Schultz, Dean of Students and Associate Vice Chancellor for Student Development Michael Votava, Associate.
1Confidential The K-12 Value Chain Curriculum Development Non-academic Supplemental Programs Professional Development Core Academic Instruction Counseling,
DIXIE STATE UNIVERSITY The Faculty Role in Student Retention
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
THE IMPORTANCE OF TEACHING AT RYERSON PREDICTORS OF STUDENT SATISFACTION CHRISTOPHER EVANS VICE PROVOST ACADEMIC.
Implementing Change: A Holistic Approach to Developmental Education Sue Cain, Director Transition and University Services Eastern Kentucky University.
Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Adding Challenge to Challenge and Engagement Assessment Committee February 7, 2006.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
TENN TLC addresses retention through student engagement UT SIFE students 13 May 2010.
Student Clark Atlanta University Opening Session Thursday, August 13, 2009 Division of Enrollment Services & Student Affairs Randy Gunter,
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
Student/Faculty Interaction Presenter: Dr. Steady Moono Dean of Student Success Montgomery County Community College.
Accountability systems engage individuals and institutions to do and be all they can be, compliance systems demand that individuals and their institutions.
NSSE and the College of Letters and Sciences Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis November 7, 2008.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
ENHANCING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IWU DR. MARY ANN SEARLE VICE PRESIDENT FOR ENROLLMENT & STUDENT AFFAIRS.
Topic #1 – COMPLETERS (Graduation and Transfer) Key AC Evidence Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
Teaching in a Web-Based Distance Learning Environment: An Evaluation Summary Based on Four Courses Charles Graham, Joni M. Craner, Byung-ro Lim, & Kursat.
Dean of Undergraduates Mission Statement “To set high and clear expectations for our students as leaders across the spectrum of human endeavor, while providing.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”) 8/26/
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
Accentuating Time in Student- Professor Interactions: Time, Value and Course Quality Dr. Ann V. Doty.
1 Results From UNCG’s Spring 1998 Sophomore Survey Office of Institutional Research September 1998 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
Institutional Effectiveness: Sophomores’ Evaluations of UNC Charlotte Findings from the Sophomore Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL STUDIES 1 Graduate and Professional Studies at Texas A&M University Dr. Karen Butler-Purry Associate Provost for Graduate and.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
Foundations of Excellence SHARING THE InFOE. PowerPoint Overview  Survey Overview  Faculty/Staff Survey  Who Responded  Dimension Results  Student.
UAA Fall 2002 Leadership Retreat “ Focusing on Student Success ” Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Fall 2001 Results Anchorage Campus.
Organizational Process The activities conducted by an educational institution or school is called organizational process Which consist of series of steps.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey University of Louisville Fall of 2002.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Learning Communities Promoting community, curricular connections, collaboration, & reflective practice (Levine Laufgraben, 2005, p. 375)
Student Support (Re)defined: How We Can All Support Student Success
Student Evaluations of Teaching (SETs)
Director, Institutional Research
UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
2013 NSSE Results.
Presentation transcript:

Institutional Effectiveness: Seniors’ Evaluations of UNC Charlotte Findings from the Senior Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment Office of Institutional Research UNC Charlotte Survey Response Rates % % % % %

Please evaluate how well faculty members at this campus do each of the following:

Set high expectations for you to learn

Respect the diverse talents and ways of learning of you and your classmates

Encourage you to be an actively involved learner

Encourage student-faculty interaction, in and out of the classroom

Give you frequent and prompt feedback

Encourage you to devote sufficient time and energy to your coursework

Develop opportunities for you to learn cooperatively with fellow students

Care about your academic success and welfare

Based on your experience so far, how would you evaluate the following services?

Academic advising services

Library services

Technology services

Career-related services

Based on your experience so far, how would you evaluate the following services?

Registration process

Financial aid, application/award process

Campus food services

Campus health services

Campus counseling

Business services/cashier/student accounts

Campus residence life programs for students living in university-owned housing

Opportunities to participate in campus recreational & other extra-curricular or co- curricular activities

Opportunities to participate in community service projects

Opportunities to develop leadership skills

All things considered, how would you characterize the intellectual environment on this campus?

All things considered, how would you evaluate the overall quality of instruction?

All things considered, how would you evaluate the overall education that you are receiving at this institution?