Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities Session 4: Final (Update) Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STRAND II MEASURING SOCIAL ADDED VALUE. Main topics Comparability (framework?) Dissemination: bottom up process Dilemma: how to justify capacity building/processes/cultural.
Advertisements

Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs Implementation of Transnational cooperation in the Czech Republic in Markéta Pěchoučková
Commission européenne The European Social Fund Investing in your Future.
Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation
Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DG “PROGRAMMING OF THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT” OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT” EVALUATION.
Ex-ante conditionality – General guidance Workshop on strategic programming, monitoring and evaluation Ilse De Mecheleer, DG EMPL Madrid, 22 February 2013.
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
NDP Evaluation Process Presentation by David Hegarty, NDP/CSF Evaluation Unit Irish Evaluation Network 21 March 2003.
Managing authorities working with cities Regions for Economic Change 17 th February 2009 Peter Ramsden Pole Manager.
1 Monitoring and evaluation after 2013 – some first ideas, mainly for ERDF / CF Evaluation network DG REGIO 14 th October 2010.
EU-Regional Policy and Cohesion Structural Funds and Accession 1 SPP BUILDING IMPLEMENTATION CAPACITY Training seminar on evaluation Prague February.
1 ESF 2000 – 2006 EX POST EVALUATION International Evaluation & Methodology Conference 6-7 May 2010 Budapest Anna Galazka European Commission, DG Employment,
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
1 João Delgado DG Education and Culture Unit B4, Professional training; « Leonardo da Vinci » Strasbourg, 8 July 2010 Mobility for Apprentices Status and.
Walking on two legs: LEARNING EVALUATION 1 Göran Brulin, Senior Analyst and professor, Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth Sven Jansson, National.
Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities David Hegarty NDP/CSF Evaluation Unit Ireland.
Information by the Managing Authority on thematic evaluation of EU structural funds in Iruma Kravale Head of Strategic Planning Unit, European.
POLAND Modernisation of development policy Sofia, June 5, 2012.
1 Incorporating New Concepts into Programme Planning: the Experience of the Horizontal Principles in the NDP Friday 24 th September 2004 IEN Conference.
Ex-ante evaluation for RDPs 4 th International Evaluation Conference Budapest, 26th September 2013 Zélie Peppiette, DG AGRI Rural Development.
Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities Session 5: Ex-Ante Evaluation and Lisbon Strategy.
Guidance notes on the Intevention Logic and on Building a priority axis 27 September 2013.
1 Ongoing activities in the Czech Republic Jana Chladná National Coordination Authority The Ministry for Regional Development 7. May 2010, Budapest.
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 Structural Funds Evaluation A VIEW FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION Anna Burylo, DG Regional Policy, Evaluation.
Regional Policy Common Strategic Framework The Commission's revised proposal for the CPR - COM (2012) 496 of 11 Sept.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Community-led local development Articles of the Common Provisions Regulation.
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
Integrated Territorial Investment (ITI) Zsolt SZOKOLAI European Commission DG for Regional Policy.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Regional Policy How are evaluations used in the EU? How to make them more usable? Stockholm, 8 October 2015 Kai Stryczynski, DG Regional and Urban Policy.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT meeting, 12 December 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION National evaluation conference Marielle Riché Evaluation unit, DG REGIO Bucharest, 18.
Structural Funds Managing Authority – Ministry of Finance 1 Technical Assistance Ilze Aleksandroviča Head of Control and Development Division EU Funds.
Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities Session 3: Mid-Term Evaluation.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Future outlook and next steps for ESPON The ESPON 2013 Programme OPEN DAYS Bruxelles, 10 October 2007.
Your Input Feedback from NGOs Presentation by Anne Marie Darmanin.
Czech Republic: Implementation of Transnational cooperation October 8, 2008 Open days, Brussels.
1 Mid-term evaluation of National Strategic Reference Framework Czech Republic 2011.
Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities Session 2: Ongoing Evaluation.
Structural Funds Financial Management and Control, Romania
Proposed Organisation of Evaluation of the Romanian NSRF and Operational Programmes, Niall McCann, Technical Assistance Project for Programming,
Evaluation : goals and principles
Mid-Term Evaluation of CSF for Ireland
CZ Evaluation - state of play
Gender Equality Ex post evaluation of the ESF ( )
UNDP-UNEP POVERTY & ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE (PEI): MID-TERM REVIEW
Ex-ante evaluation: major points and state of play
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
Anne-Charlott Callerstig & Renate Wielpütz
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
VC/2012/0413 – ‘’Providing targeted advice on ESF support to apprenticeship and traineeship schemes’’ Flavia Pesce, IRS Rome, 16th October 2014.
Purpose of the presentation
State of play of OP negotiations
Monitoring & evaluation in
Technical Working Group meeting 21 March 2012 Brussels
Costas VOYIATZIS DG EMPL - Evaluation and Impact Assessment Unit
Future Monitoring and Evaluation: Focus on results Antonella Schulte-Braucks Ines Hartwig ESF Evaluation Partnership Brussels 17 November 2011.
FEAD Evaluation Partnership meeting 10 March, 2016 DG EMPL G4
ESF EVALUATION PARTNERSHIP
Guidelines on the Mid-term Evaluation
Evaluation and Impact Assessment Unit DG EMPL Ines Hartwig
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
The National Strategic Reference Framework and NDP
The approved ESPON 2013 Programme
Evaluation of Youth Employment Initiative
Jeannette Monier and Louise Reid
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities Session 4: Final (Update) Evaluation

Presentation Structure Context Regulation Commission Guidance Final Evaluation in Ireland Organisation Focus Final Evaluation in Czech Republic

Context Article 42(4) of 1260/1999 Requires mid-term evaluation update by end 2005 At OP and CSF level Commission guidance Working Paper issued Also separate paper on ESF

Final Evaluation in Ireland Process has not yet started Evaluation Unit to prepare paper Evaluation will be a “light touch” Will cover EU-funded measures (CSF) Update mte analysis to end 2004 Main issues Progress to end 2004 (1 st 5 years) Update on developments since mte Focus on impacts or likely impacts

Final Evaluation in Ireland Process likely to start in H OP evaluations followed by CSF Some may be carried out internally Will try to focus on issues relevant to post 2006 Regional competitiveness and employment objective

Final Evaluation - Czech Republic Commission sees 2004 to 2006 as opportunity to develop evaluation capacity Recommends that new MS should Undertake update of progress in implementation of programes Focus on outputs/results to date Problems Data only available for 1 year Limited outputs and results Trend analysis difficult

Final Evaluation in Czech Republic Might be better to focus on other issues Management/implementation Indicator quality Project selection Targeting Cost developments/project management Similar to pre mid-term evaluation in Ireland

Final Evaluation in Czech Republic Thematic approach Issues which affect more than 1 programme Links between programmes Integration of horizontal principles Keep focus on post 2007 period evaluation should assist preparations or help management of future OPs