The VCCS Administrative & Professional Faculty Development, Evaluation, and Recognition System Task Force Report March, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Planning, Feedback and Merit Allocation TMG Open Meeting May 1, 2008.
Advertisements

Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
What is Pay & Performance?
Manager Performance Evaluation
Supervising 101 Presenters: Mike Stang, Melanie Tucker Thompson, and Jill Zambito Wednesday, September 26, 2012.
ULS FACULTY LIBRARIAN PEER REVIEW AND MENTORING Margarete Bower Chemistry Library.
Aligning Employee Performance with Agency Mission
UCLA Student Affairs Performance Management Program (PMP)
+ NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS March 2010-April 2011 and January 2011-December 2011.
1 Response to the Employee Survey Recommendations.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Performance Management
1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of The Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management Human Resources Center The Department of Labor’s Performance.
System Office Performance Management
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
A Joint Labor/Management Effort Spring Lori Chapman Labor Relations Associate Office of Faculty & Staff Labor Relations Elizabeth Sullivan Executive.
Compensation Model Supervisor Training Presented by: Jennifer Larson
System Office Performance Management
Principal Leadership Academy Basic Leadership Training November 2012.
CBAP and BABOK Presented to the Albany Capital District Chapter of the IIBA February 3, 2009.
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
Staff performance management. agenda why timeline what’s different key components of step 1 creating goals overall process questions.
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
 Please sign in.  You must register for the course to receive PAC.  PAC is valuable for advancing on the salary schedule.
Performance and Development Process What to take from 2014/15 Improved understanding of the guidelines Reflective Teacher Practice Genuine and meaningful.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
A Performance Management and Evaluation System.  Compliance with BHECM Guidance  Identification of “Best Practice Standards”  A Job Description Review.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Updated Performance Management for Exempt Staff Fall 2009.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Promotion and Ten ure October 15, 2013 S. Laurel Weldon Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs (Interim) PURDUE FACULTY.
Ohio TIF A collaboration of 24 Ohio districts, ODE and Battelle for Kids Five-year grant from the U.S. Department of Education.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
1 ADEPT for School Guidance Counselors. 2 ADEPT Web Site
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
Toolkit #3: Effectively Teaching and Leading Implementation of the Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including the Common Core.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
Promotion and Ten ure October 2015 Alyssa Panitch Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs PURDUE FACULTY.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
System Office Performance Management Human Resources Fall 2015.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Evaluation Plan Steven Clauser, PhD Chief, Outcomes Research Branch Applied Research Program Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences NCCCP Launch.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Agent Performance Review. Goals of a Performance Review Provide opportunity for self-assessment Increase job satisfaction and understanding Recognize.
Using the framework to ground decisions in the quality of teacher practice.
TEACHER EVALUATION TEACHER TENURE TEACHER MENTORING New Educational Laws and What They Mean for Us.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
Mid-Year Performance Review Process University System of New Hampshire System Office | 5 Chenell Drive, Suite 301, Concord, NH
Managing Talent – Maximizing Your Employee’s Potential 3 rd SACCO LEADERS’ FORUM Monique DunbarLorri Lochrie Communicating Arts Credit UnionCentral 1 Credit.
APS Teacher Evaluation System Preparing for Implementation May 2012.
System Office Performance Management
New and Improved Annual Reviews
UCLA Student Affairs Performance Management Program (PMP)
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Employee Performance Management System
Employee Performance Management System (EPMS)
Performance Management Training
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

The VCCS Administrative & Professional Faculty Development, Evaluation, and Recognition System Task Force Report March, 2016

VCCS A&P FACULTY EVALUATION: AVAILABILITY OF RESOURCES

 Executive Summary  Policy (also available in Policy Manual, Section 3.6.1)  Model Plan with associated forms  Guidelines (for local plan development)  Source Guide for Formative Feedback Instrumentation (an Appendix to the Model Plan)  Transition Plan (in two parts)  Informational video (new)

VCCS A&P FACULTY EVALUATION: KEY POLICY PROVISIONS Overall Summary Rating:  Meets Expectations  Does Not Meet Expectations

VCCS A&P FACULTY EVALUATION: KEY POLICY PROVISIONS Prescribed Evaluation Cycles:  Calendar-Year Cycle for professional faculty who are eligible for a multi-year appointment.  Fiscal-Year Cycle for all other professional faculty and for all administrative faculty.

VCCS A&P FACULTY EVALUATION: KEY POLICY PROVISIONS Three Major Components:  Performance Evaluation  Annual Objectives  Reward and Recognition

VCCS A&P FACULTY EVALUATION: KEY POLICY PROVISIONS Frequency of Evaluation:  First-year faculty (including faculty in the first year of a new position): interim evaluation within first 6 months of employment; two evaluations within the first 12 months of employment.  Second-year and third-year faculty: evaluated annually  Professional faculty working under a multi-year appointment: comprehensive evaluation at the end of the last full calendar year included in the multi-year appointment (optional)  Administrative faculty and Professional faculty not working under a multi-year appointment: evaluated annually

Mid-Year Progress Review  Regardless of the nature of the appointment, faculty should meet with their supervisor twice annually, at mid-year and year-end, for a performance review and to discuss the progress toward achievement of annual objectives. VCCS A&P FACULTY EVALUATION: KEY POLICY PROVISIONS

Prescribed Performance Domains:  Core Job Responsibilities (i.e. position description)  Non-routine and/or Strategic Responsibilities and Activities  College, Community, and Professional Service  Professional Growth and Development  Management Effectiveness (required of faculty with supervisory responsibilities)

VCCS A&P FACULTY EVALUATION: KEY POLICY PROVISIONS Formative Feedback:  The college’s evaluation process must provide for solicitation and analysis of formative performance feedback from a sampling of faculty and staff supervised by the faculty member, peers, individuals to whom the faculty member provides a service, and individuals with whom the faculty member has professional interactions  Input must be gathered at least once every three years.

VCCS A&P FACULTY EVALUATION: KEY POLICY PROVISIONS Annual Objectives:  Established in consultation with the supervisor at the beginning of the applicable evaluation cycle.  Objectives represent an extension of expectations associated with performance domains.  Objectives should be related to the strategic goals of the organizational unit, the college, or the VCCS; to the professional growth and development of the faculty member; or to improvement in specific areas of the faculty member’s job performance.  Assessment of achievement of annual objectives is a required component of the comprehensive evaluation.

VCCS A&P FACULTY EVALUATION: KEY POLICY PROVISIONS Reward and Recognition:  Faculty who have demonstrated exemplary performance and whose contributions have had a major positive impact on the organizational unit, the college, or the VCCS must be acknowledged.  The college’s evaluation plan must include formal provisions for recognizing and rewarding performance that exceeds expectations.

VCCS A&P FACULTY EVALUATION: TIMELINE FOR DEVELOPMENT/ADOPTION OF COLLEGE PLANS  New policy effective date: July 1, 2016  Professional faculty with multi-year eligibility – six-month evaluation under new policy/plan to be completed in December, 2016; transition to calendar-year cycle beginning January 1, 2017  All other professional faculty and all administrative faculty – transition to new policy/plan July 1, 2016  Options:  Adopt Model Plan for ; revise as needed for  Implement Model Plan for ; revise as needed during first year of implementation  Revise existing college plan to comply with new policy

VCCS A&P FACULTY EVALUATION: COMMUNICATION & TRAINING  Informational Video  Resources on Web site  System-wide webinar (late March/early April)  Face-to-face training (late April/early May)

VCCS A&P FACULTY EVALUATION: THE “FORMATIVE FEEDBACK” CHALLENGE  solicitation and analysis of formative performance feedback from colleagues to be gathered at least once every three years  Source guide in Model Plan  Investigation of potential for enterprise solution

VCCS A&P FACULTY EVALUATION: FURTHER INFORMATION Questions and Comments: the VCCS Task Force at: