The bright side of dread: Anticipation asymmetries explain why losses are discounted less than gains 1 David Hardisty University of British Columbia SCP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
When to pay? Consumer decisions about immediate vs future losses David Hardisty Haas Presentation.
Advertisements

Managing your emotions allows you to express them in healthful ways.
"I can't stand waiting!" Dread looms larger than pleasurable anticipation 1 David Hardisty 1, Shane Frederick 2, & Elke Weber 1 1 Columbia University and.
Dental procedures and movie star kisses: Dread looms larger than savoring 1 David Hardisty 1, Shane Frederick 2, & Elke Weber 3 1 Stanford Graduate School.
Save Energy and Money PNM Energy Efficiency Programs
Welcome Customer Centric Systems Bounded Rationality Jonathan D. Wareham
Choosing energy efficiency David J. Hardisty Sauder School of Business University of British Columbia.
Surveys and Questionnaires. How Many People Should I Ask? Ask a lot of people many short questions: Yes/No Likert Scale Ask a smaller number.
Behavioral Economics Udayan Roy ECO54 History of Economic Thought.
I Want It Now!: Query Theory Explains Discounting Anomalies for Gains and Losses Kirstin C. Appelt 1 David J. Hardisty 2 Elke U. Weber 1 1 Columbia University.
A Brief Introduction to the Endowment Effect Kam Leung Yeung Feb 19, 2013.
FIRST - Grammar Expressions with “bottom” Fill in the missing words in sentences 1-5. The first letter of each word is given. 1. Unfortunately, our team.
My Health – My Decision A class to help people who can make decisions be more involved in their healthcare decisions Created by: Anne Bates, Bill Hill,
Does Prospect Theory Hold in Intertemporal Choice? The interaction of time and risk in preferences for gains and losses David J. Hardisty & Jeff Pfeffer.
David Hardisty Sauder School of Business Operations and Logistics Seminar September 8 th, 2014.
Prospect Theory, Framing and Behavioral Traps Yuval Shahar M.D., Ph.D. Judgment and Decision Making in Information Systems.
Judgment and Decision Making How Rational Are We?.
How to measure discount rates? An experimental comparison of three methods David Hardisty, Katherine Thompson, Dave Krantz, & Elke Weber Columbia University.
Discounting of Environmental Goods and Discounting in Social Contexts David J. Hardisty 1 ; Kerry F. Milch 1 ; Kirstin Appelt 1 ; Michel J. J. Handgraaf.
Behavioral Economics Chapter 30. What Is Behavioral Economics? The study of choices actually made by economic decision makers in an effort to assess the.
Decision-making II choosing between gambles neural basis of decision-making.
Extensions to Consumer theory Inter-temporal choice Uncertainty Revealed preferences.
Dennis Küster Physical exercise and a risky choice: Can we dissociate the emotional state from the nature of the prize?
Hyperbolic discounting : Some old results; some recent results; some interpretation Daniel Read (WBS) Yael Grushka-Cockayne (Darden) Lisheng He (WBS) Umar.
 I can understand the definition of Economics.  I can understand why people have to make choices and that with choosing comes consequences.  I can.
263 US residents completed the study over the internet, making hypothetical choices between immediate and future monetary and environmental gains (within-subjects.
Interest Rates and the Time Value of Money Time Value of Money ▫Imagine a simple investment opportunity with the following cash flows (which are certain.
Choice. There’s never just one reinforcer Hmm…what to do?
Changes in preferences and everyday thinking in the context of poverty Anuj Shah.
Data Source: Owen, Videras and Wu (2008) First, if you had to choose, which of the following would be closest to your views? a. Government should let ordinary.
Tackling temporal tradeoffs in energy efficiency David J. Hardisty Behavioural Sustainability Group Oct 21, 2014.
Decision making Making decisions Optimal decisions Violations of rationality.
Insurance. Standard: Protecting and Insuring People make choices to protect themselves from the financial risk of lost income, assets, health, or identity.
Temporal Discounting of Losses David Hardisty UBC Presentation.
Decision Making choice… maximizing utility framing effects
Time Management. Questions to Help You Manage Your Time: What has to be done? What has to be done? How much of it has to be done? How much of it has to.
Can Money Buy Happiness? Evidence from the Discounting of Uncertain Happiness Tracy A. Tufenk & Daniel D. Holt Psychology Department, University of Wisconsin-Eau.
1 Subjective Evaluation Of Delayed Risky Outcomes: An Experimental Approach Uri Benzion a, Jan Pieter Krahnen b, Tal Shavit c a Department of Economics,
Behavioral Economics (Lecture 8)
Framing Interacts With Political Affiliation to Predict Environmentally-Relevant Purchase Preferences David J. Hardisty, Eric J. Johnson & Elke U. Weber.
QR 24 Economics Review Session 12/3/2009. Agenda Demand curves Supply curves Equilibrium Market failures – Moral hazard – Adverse selection Net Present.
Varieties of Loss Aversion Lyle Brenner University of Florida Collaborators: Baler Bilgin Yuval Rottenstreich Sanjay Sood.
Encouraging Energy Efficiency: Product Labels Facilitate Temporal Tradeoffs David J. Hardisty, University of British Columbia Yoonji Shim, University of.
A Dirty Word or a Dirty World? Framing, Politics, and Query Theory David J. Hardisty, Eric J. Johnson & Elke U. Weber Columbia University Method Abstract.
2.1.2.G1 Money in Your Life Advanced Level. © Take Charge Today –August2013 – Money in Your Life – Slide 2 Funded by a grant from Take Charge America,
Economics Vocabulary. What is Economics? The study of production (making of), distribution (selling of), and consumption of (using of) goods and services.
Experiments and “Rational” Behavior, 5/1/07. Beauty Contest Game Each person choose a number from 0 to 100. We will average these numbers. The person.
Money in Your Life Personal Finance. © Family Economics & Financial Education – May 2012 – Money in Your Life – Slide 2 Funded by a grant from Take Charge.
IT ISN’T GOING TO BE LIKE THIS PERSONAL FINANCE & ECONOMICS.
The Value of Nothing: Asymmetric Attention to Opportunity Costs Drives Intertemporal Decision Making David J. Hardisty University of British Columbia Society.
G1 Money in Your Life “Take Charge of Your Finances” Advanced Level.
Encouraging Energy Efficiency: Product Labels Facilitate Temporal Tradeoffs David J. Hardisty, University of British Columbia Yoonji Shim, University of.
Choice With Uncertainty Review. The green line reflects an interest rate increase or decrease? Increase This is the formula for present or future value?
David J. Hardisty, University of British Columbia
David J. Hardisty, University of British Columbia
The bright side of dread: Anticipation asymmetries explain why losses are discounted less than gains David Hardisty UBC S&P Workshop Jan 9th, 2017.
David J. Hardisty, University of British Columbia
David J. Hardisty, University of British Columbia
The bright side of dread: Anticipation asymmetries explain why losses are discounted less than gains David Hardisty UBC Sauder ACR 2016, Berlin.
Unit 11.
The Sign Effect in Past and Future Discounting
The Sign Effect in Past and Future Discounting
David J. Hardisty, UBC Sauder
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
The sign effect in past and future discounting
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Quattrone and Tversky 1998, Slovic 1987
Presentation transcript:

The bright side of dread: Anticipation asymmetries explain why losses are discounted less than gains 1 David Hardisty University of British Columbia SCP Annual Meeting 2016

2 Co-Authors Shane FrederickElke Weber

Receive $70 now or $70 in a month? 100% choose now Pay $70 now or $70 in a month? 47% choose later Why? The “sign” effect

Receive $140 now or $140 in a month? 100% choose now Pay $70 now or $70 in a month? 47% choose later Why? Anticipation asymmetries Not loss aversion...

Kiss from a movie star: now or next week? (Loewenstein, 1987) Discounting Anticipation 5

Scheduling a dental procedure Discounting Anticipation 6

Loewenstein (1987) 7

8

9 Replication Data

Hypotheses Anticipation of losses > anticipation of gains Even when controlling for loss aversion Due to a qualitative difference Anticipation predicts choices This (partly) explains the “sign effect” 10

Anticipation: what do we call it? 11 Negative Utility Positive Utility Positive Event Impatience Negative Event

Anticipation: what do we call it? 12 Negative Utility Positive Utility Positive Event ImpatienceSavoring Negative Event X

Anticipation: what do we call it? 13 Negative Utility Positive Utility Positive Event ImpatienceSavouring Negative Event X

Anticipation: what do we call it? 14 Negative Utility Positive Utility Positive Event Impatience Pleasurable Anticipation Negative Event

Anticipation: what do we call it? 15 Negative Utility Positive Utility Positive Event Impatience Pleasurable Anticipation Negative Event Dread

Anticipation: what do we call it? 16 Negative Utility Positive Utility Positive Event Impatience Pleasurable Anticipation Negative Event Dread???

Anticipation: what do we call it? 17 Negative Utility Positive Utility Positive Event Impatience Pleasurable Anticipation Negative Event Dread Enjoying the Moment

Overview Study 1a & 1b: Anticipation of $$ gains vs losses Study 2: Generalizing across domains Study 3: Controlling for loss aversion Study 4: Why the asymmetry? 18

Study 1a: Anticipation of $$ gains vs losses 19

Study 1: Methods Between subjects: gain vs. loss 201 MTurkers +$49 today OR +$60 in 89 days? -$49 today OR -$60 in 89 days? Imagine expecting to receive [pay] $60 in 89 days. How psychologically pleasurable or displeasurable would the anticipation be? In other words, how would you feel while waiting for it? strongly dislike the strongly like the feeling of waiting neutral feeling of waiting | | | 26 other intertemporal choices (Kirby, Petry, & Bickel 1999) 20

Study 1: Results Choices Gains: Chose SS gain 57% of the time (332% discount rate) Losses: Chose LL loss 26% of the time (34% discount rate) Anticipation Gains: -5 (SD = 55) Losses: -36 (SD = 46) 21

Study 1: Mediation 22

Study 1b: Consumer choice example 23

Suppose you were choosing between two window air conditioners, described below: * Energy savings [wasted] is the estimated difference in energy usage between the two AC units, based on 4 hours usage per day, 182 days per year, with an electricity rate of $ per kWh. 24 Model A Price: $ year energy savings * : $0 [10-year energy wasted * : $920] BTUs: 12,000 Watts: 2,000 Energy Efficiency Rating: 6.0 Model B Price: $ year energy savings * : $920 [10-year energy wasted * : $0] BTUs: 12,000 Watts: 1,000 Energy Efficiency Rating: 12.0

Study 1b: Methods Which would you choose? A choice of Model B over Model A [Model A over Model B] boils down to spending more [less] money up front in exchange for saving [wasting] money later. How would you feel while waiting for the future energy savings [waste]? Negative (Strongly dislike the feeling of waiting) Neutral (It is just a calculation; I'd feel nothing) Positive (Strongly like the feeling of waiting) 25

Study 1b: Results Choices: Positive frame: 61% chose “impatient" Model A Negative frame: 48% chose “impatient" Model A Anticipation: Positive frame: 21% positive anticipation, 50% neutral, 30% negative Negative frame: 13% positive anticipation, 51% neutral, 36% negative Anticipation mediates the effect of framing on choices 26

Study 2: Generalizing across domains 27

Study 2: Overview CDS Vlab sample of 169 participants 20 intertemporal choice scenarios (10 gain, 10 loss) Time delay: 3 days, one week, one month, one year, or five years 28

Study 2: Events Some Positive Events: receiving a $50 check spending time with your best friend kiss from a movie star (10 total) 29 Some Negative Events: paying a $50 fine a confrontation with your co-worker or family member painful dental procedure (10 total)

Study 2: Stimulus Please imagine the following event: [receiving a $50 check] 1. Assuming this event would definitely happen to you and you knew it were coming, when would you prefer it to happen? immediately OR don’t care when OR [one month] from now 2. If this event were [one month] away, how psychologically pleasurable or unpleasurable would the anticipation be? strongly dislike the strongly like the feeling of waiting neutral feeling of waiting | | | 30

Results: Time preference 31 Negative Events Positive Events Now 41%62% Indifferent 22%31% Later 37%7% Total N=5,420 events (20 events for each of 169 participants)

The “sign effect” 32 Negative Events Positive Events Now 41% 62% Indifferent 22%31% Later37% 7% Total N=5,420 events (20 events for each of 169 participants)

Negative time preference 33 Negative Events Positive Events Now41% 62% Indifferent 22%31% Later 37% 7% Total N=5,420 events (20 events for each of 169 participants)

Anticipation

35 Anticipation predicts time preferences

Studies 1 & 2: Summary Dread is more pronounced than pleasurable anticipation Anticipation value predicts time preference, for both gains and losses Together, this (partly) explains the “sign effect” in intertemporal choice 36

Study 3: Controlling for loss aversion 37

Study 3: Overview 106 participants from Amazon MTurk Dynamically identify subjectively equivalent gains and losses for each subject Compare anticipation for these subjectively equivalent pairs 38

Accept this pair of events? 50% chance of receiving 25 dollars AND 50% chance of paying 25 dollars YesUnsureNo 39

Accept this pair of events? 50% chance of receiving 500 dollars AND 50% chance of paying 25 dollars YesUnsureNo 40

Accept this pair of events? 50% chance of receiving 49 dollars AND 50% chance of paying 25 dollars YesUnsureNo 41

Study 3: Stimulus Please consider the following event: [50% chance of receiving a $49] 1.Assuming this event would definitely happen to you and you knew it were coming, when would you prefer it to happen? ImmediatelyORin one week 42

Time preferences 43 GainsLosses Now79%57% In one week 21%43%

Time preferences 44 GainsLosses Now 79% 57% In one week 21% 43%

Study 3: Stimulus 2.a. Please imagine this event happening one week from now. Would experiencing this event be pleasurable or unpleasurable? Pleasurable experience OR unpleasurable experience 2.b. How strongly would experiencing this event affect your feelings at that time? not at all strongly extremely | | 45 (Wording based on McGraw et al, 2010)

Study 3: Stimulus 3.a. If this event were one week away, would the anticipation be psychologically pleasurable or unpleasurable? In other words, how would you feel while waiting for it? Like the feeling of waiting OR Dislike the feeling of waiting 3.b. How strongly would anticipating this event affect your feelings while waiting for the event? not at all strongly extremely | | 46

Utility for experience and anticipation 47

Study 4: Why the asymmetry? 48

Study 4: Methods 105 participants from Amazon MTurk 10 positive & 10 negative events (same as Study 2) Time preference Two questions for anticipation: …how pleasurable or happy would the anticipation be? …how displeasurable or unhappy would the anticipation be? 49

Study 4 Results 50

Summary Anticipation of losses > anticipation of gains Even when experience utility is matched Anticipation of gains is emotionally mixed Anticipation of losses is more unidimensional Anticipation predicts choices This (partly) explains the “sign effect” 51

Thank You! 52

References Hardisty, D. J. & Weber, E. U. (2009). Discounting future green: Money vs the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), Harris, C. R. (2010). Feelings of dread and intertemporal choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, n/a. doi: /bdm.709 Loewenstein, G. (1987). Anticipation and the valuation of delayed consumption. The Economic Journal, 97, McGraw, A. P., Larsen, J. T., Kahneman, D. & Schkade, D. A. (2010). Comparing gains and losses. Psychological Science. Thaler, R. H. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economics Letters, 8,

Extra Slides 54

More pilot data Gain: Only 6 out of 103 students would pay more for a kiss next week than one today Loss: 20 out of 56 students preferred eating 9 worms today rather than 8 next week (see also Harris, 2010 & Berns et al 2006) 55

Study 2: Events Positive Events: receiving a $50 check receiving a good grade or performance review spending time with your best friend improved energy and health for 10 days a free 5-day vacation to the destination of your choice watching your favorite TV show or reading a good book for an hour getting a gift in the mail from a family member eating a nice meal out at a restaurant winning the lottery a kiss from the movie star of your choice 56 Negative Events: paying a $50 fine receiving a bad grade or performance review a confrontation with your co- worker or family member being sick for 10 days doing difficult home cleaning and renovation for 5 days filling out paperwork and waiting around for an hour at the local Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) giving a stressful 60 minute improvised speech a painful dental procedure having one of your legs amputated getting twenty painful (but harmless) electric shocks in a research experiment

Typical Event Pair 57 EventAnticipationExperienceChoice (1=prefer now) Regression Beta receiving a good grade or performance review ** receiving a bad grade or performance review **

eventaeCorr(a,e)cbeta (a)beta (e) a free 5-day vacation to the destination of your choice ** **.00 eating a nice meal out at a restaurant ** **.15 a kiss from the movie star of your choice ** *.34** receiving a good grade or performance review ** **-.01 getting a gift in the mail from a family member ** **.15 spending time with your best friend ** **.14 watching your favorite TV show or reading a good book for an hour ** **.18* receiving a $50 check ** *.04 improved energy and health for 10 days967.24** **.12 winning the lottery683.20* **.15* doing difficult home cleaning and renovation for 5 days ** **.32** filling out paperwork and waiting around for an hour at the local Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) ** **.26** paying a $50 fine ** **.16 giving a stressful 60 minute improvised speech ** *.26** being sick for 10 days ** **.22** a painful dental procedure ** **.39** receiving a bad grade or performance review ** **.31** a confrontation with your co-worker or family member ** **.32** getting twenty painful (but harmless) electric shocks in a research experiment ** **.33** having one of your legs amputated ** **.33**

Study 1: Proportion of events classified by participants as provoking dread, pleasurable anticipation, or neither, depending on what type of events participants had generated (positive events vs negative events that they would prefer to happen immediately vs later). Total N = 433 events. 59 Positive EventNegative Event ClassificationPrefer NowPrefer LaterPrefer NowPrefer LaterAverage Negative Anticipation74%22%75%63%58% Neutral Anticipation15%14%13%18%15% Positive Anticipation11%64%12%19%27% Total100%

Histogram of Vacation Experience Utility

Histogram of Vacation Anticipation Utility

Histogram of Dentist Experience Utility

Histogram of Dentist Anticipation Utility