Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | www.nist.gov/baldrige Baldrige Examiner Preparation 2016 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2012 EXAMINER TRAINING Examples of NERD Comment Formatting
Advertisements

Baldrige National Quality Program 2003 Baldrige National Quality Program The Site Visit Process and Evaluating Site Visit Issue Worksheets.
Using Baldrige to Create Organizational Alignment & Integration
EVALUATOR TIPS FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT WRITING The following slides were excerpted from an evaluator training session presented as part of the June 2011.
June 2002QPRC 2002, Tempe, Arizona A Workshop on Assessing to the Baldrige Criteria Cheryl L. Jennings, Motorola Lynn Kelley, Textron.
Welcome, Panel of Examiner and Process Development Members! Washington State Quality Award PEPD #1 Training 2008.
1 Performance Assessment Process: The Reviewer’s Perspective May 2014.
2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Self-Assessing Your Organization with the Baldrige Criteria.
PROJECT TITLE Project Leader: Team: Executive Project Sponsor (As Required): Date: Month/Day/Year 110/17/2014 V1.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
WSQA PEPD Mentor Training Session 1: Mentoring role and responsibilities.
ExCEL Academic Liaison Meeting Supporting Quality After School Programs for Our Students Tuesday, September 23, 2014.
1 MQA Feedback Report Update Board of Education February 19, 2015 Building learners of tomorrow…
Baldrige National Quality Program Information and Analysis: The Foundation for Performance Excellence Harry S. Hertz DAMA - NCR Meeting March 13, 2001.
JUDGES MEETING 1. Judges Meeting The Judges Meeting –Each Team will be assigned a date and time. Each Senior Examiner will be expected to present their.
Leadership and Strategic Planning
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Self-Assessing Your Organization with.
Customer Focus Module Preview
2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Polishing Feedback Comments Sample 1: Process Strength.
NAUGATUCK HIGH SCHOOL STRATEGIC PLAN Presentation to Board of Education November 13, 2014 A collaborative effort between teachers, students, and administrators.
Strategic Human Resource Alignment: The Context for Changing Teacher Compensation Herb Heneman & Tony Milanowski Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Introduction to the Baldrige Excellence.
Site Visit. 2 Process Intent Observation (IO) Strength to Comment Intent Observation: “Double plus on the process used for strategic planning.” Comment:
2010 MBNQA WINNER: K & N MANAGEMENT – SMALL BUSINESS CATEGORY PRESENTED BY: MOORE, YAGER, TODD, PEAVY.
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Producing a High-Quality Scorebook 2015 Presentation for Senior and Alumni Examiners.
Applicant Name RMPEx Site Visit Opening Meeting Team Leader - Team Members –
2015 Pre-Examiner Training and Preparation Course
Michigan Quality Leadership Award New Examiner Training 2014.
Scoring 1. Scoring Categories 1 – 6 (Process Categories) Examiners select a score (0-100) to summarize their observed strengths and opportunities for.
Application Workshop – Session One April 26, 2011.
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Introduction to the Baldrige Excellence.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
ADMN 6130 Class 4 “Cheap teaching is like cheap dentistry, cheap cotton, or cheap anything else.” - Annual Report of the Owensboro Public Schools
2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Polishing Feedback Comments Sample 2: Process OFI.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
DE-PBS Cadre May 8, Appreciation “Gratitude makes sense of our past, brings peace for today, and creates a vision for tomorrow” -Melody Beattie.
Working with the BOSS (Baldrige Online Scoring Solution) Wisconsin Forward Award Examiners
Applicant Name RMPEx Site Visit Opening Meeting Team Leader - Team Members –
1 ©2002 Minnesota Council for Quality Evaluation Techniques for Team-Leaders and Judges August 2002.
Site Visit Training. Learning Objectives: Describe the purpose of each phase of the Site Visit process and the team’s deliverables.  Describe the major.
2013 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Comment Writing for High-Quality Feedback Reports.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Facilitate Group Learning
September 2013 DO NOW! On a note card write down One success of your CLT today One challenge your CLT today faced today One way the Professional Learning.
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program |
Key Work of School Boards Name Workshop Facilitator.
TIG Ensuring Vertical Articulation in the Science Curriculum.
Quality Texas Foundation Site Visit Team Closing Meeting January 15, 2014.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2016
Welcome, Examiners! Washington State Quality Award Return Examiner Training 2009.
ADMN 6130 Class 3 If you don’t organize the chaos, the chaos will organize you.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
2016 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Writing High-Quality Feedback for 2016 Baldrige Award Applicants.
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | New Examiner Orientation and Examiner Training Experience Welcome to … BALDRIGE.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
2016 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Producing “Straight A” Feedback for Baldrige Applicants 2016 Presentation for Senior.
ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth.
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
Examiner Development Model: On-Boarding
Alexander Graham Bell Elementary School
February 24, 2011 Board of Education Workshop
Finalizing Award Recommendations
Applicant Name RMPEx Site Visit Opening Meeting
Examiner Development Model: On-Boarding
Updating Items in Scorebook Navigator
Marcia Harrington, PhD Executive Director
Presentation transcript:

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Examiner Preparation

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Learning Objectives… “Brilliant at the basics” Enhance your ability to:  evaluate an award application by: - increasing skill in applying the six-step evaluation process - increasing knowledge of the Baldrige Framework  write feedback comments that result in an accurate, value-added, actionable feedback report. 2

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Course Overview  Wednesday – Prework Review Item 4.1, Criteria Discussion Item 4.2  Thursday – Six-Step IR Process Practice on Non-Prework Items 1.1, 3.1, 5.1, 6.1, Consensus Review - Key Themes - Judges Expectations (time permitting  Friday – Prework Review Item 7.2 3

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Today’s Agenda…  Getting Ready To Learn  Begin with the End in Mind  Segment 1: Prework Item 4.1  Item 4.2 Criteria Discussion  Wrap Up 5:00 pm.  Reception 4

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 5

6

Step 1: Read the Criteria. 7

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 2: Determine Most Relevant Key Factors. 8

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Key Factors Table Activity Using round robin, each person gives a key factor from prework for 4.1 and rationale. Write on flipchart. Table discusses to clarify / understand the rationale. Indicate on flipchart how many in the table group chose that KF. Also indicate if, after the discussion, anyone would have removed their KF. (cross these off the list). Prepare to report out the discussion around each KF

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 3: Read & Analyze the Application. 9

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 4: Identify Strengths / OFIs. 10

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 12 Strengths/OFIs Table Activity Using round robin, each person gives a strength from prework for 4.1 and rationale. Write on flipchart. Table discusses to clarify / understand the rationale. Do another round for OFIs. Indicate on flipchart how many in the table group chose the same strength / OFI. Also indicate if, after the discussion, anyone would have removed their strength / OFI. (cross these off the list). Prepare to report out the discussion around each strength / OFI.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 5: Write Feedback Ready Comments 11

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Step 6: Determine the Scoring Range and Score 12

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Scoring Table Activity Using round robin, each person gives the scoring range from prework for 4.1 and rationale. Write on flipchart. Table discusses to clarify / understand the rationale. Indicate on flipchart how many in the table group chose the same range. Also indicate if, after the discussion, anyone would have changed their range. (indicate the change on the flipchart). Prepare to report out the discussion around scoring ranges chosen.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Agenda for Thursday  Segment 2 — IR Practice NON - Prework Items 1.1, 3.1, 5.1, 6.1, 6.2 (3.2 if 6 tables)  Consensus Review  Key Themes  Judges Expectations (time permitting) 13

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Table 1 – Item 1.1 Table 2 Item 3.1 Table 3 – Item 5.1 Table 4 Item 6.1 Table 5 – Item 6.2 Table 6 Item 3.2 (if needed) Today’s Table Assignments 14

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 1.Using a round-robin approach, participants in turn share a strength and the rationale for the strength, then list the strength on your flip chart. 2.Do another round for the OFIs. Decide and indicate on the flipchart the most important key strengths/OFIs (around six). Be prepared to discuss your table’s strengths and OFIs. Step 4 Exercise: 15

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program |  Planning Call 1 (happens during IR)  Planning Call 2  Item Leads Work their Assigned Items (KFs, strengths/OFIs, feedback ready comments, scoring)  Team members provide feedback  Planning Call 3  Consensus Call Consensus Review Process: Highlights 16

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Consensus Review Synthesis Of Item Six step approach is systematic and enhances core competencies (Fig ) (RH) + Process improvement approach was improved two years ago to include best practice search (Fig.6.1-2) (DE) + Processes are improved every three years on a scheduled cycle (BK) + Approach applies to all business processes rated A or B or higher (HS) -- The approach does not appear to require flowcharting so it’s not clear how current state is identified (CH) -- C rated processes are improved using a more casual PDCA approach (FT) 17

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Consensus Review Synthesis “The six step approach to process improvement (Figure 6.1-2) addresses core competencies and is evaluated and improved on a three year cycle. The most recent enhancement added a step to include a best practice search. This approach is systematically deployed to processes rated A or B, with processes rated C or below are improved using the PDCA approach. This systematic approach to process improvement reinforces the value of “Always Improving”. ADLI (RH, DE, BK, HS)” 18

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Consensus Review Synthesis Rationale: EE’s observation on lack of flowcharting was not used as it’s prescriptive and flowcharting is not required. FF’s observation on C processes being improving using a PDCA approach was not used as it is not required that only one approach be used for all processes. Since A and B processes are the applicant’s most important and these are improved using the six step approach, using PDCA on less important ones is not an OFI in my opinion. 19

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | The Consensus Call Agenda 1. Review agenda and rules 2. Review draft key factors 3. Review draft key themes 4. Discuss / Consense on Items 5. Confirm scores 6. Finalize key factors and key themes 7. Discuss / confirm scoring bands 8. Next Steps 20

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | The Judging Process Early June Meeting  Planning  Introduction of New Members Late August Meeting  Selection of Applicants for Site Visits September - SV Applicant Review November –  Recommendations for Award  Recommendations for Category Recognition 21

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Agenda for Friday  Closing Plenary 12:15 – 1:00 pm  Segment 3 - Prework Review Item

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 26 Key Factors Table Activity Using round robin, each person gives a key factor from prework for 7.2 and rationale. Write on flipchart. Table discusses to clarify / understand the rationale. Indicate on flipchart how many in the table group chose that KF. Also indicate if, after the discussion, anyone would have removed their KF. (cross these off the list). Prepare to report out the discussion around each KF

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 27 Strengths/OFIs Table Activity Using round robin, each person gives a strength from prework for 7.2 and rationale. Write on flipchart. Table discusses to clarify / understand the rationale. Do another round for OFIs. Indicate on flipchart how many in the table group chose the same strength / OFI. Also indicate if, after the discussion, anyone would have removed their strength / OFI. (cross these off the list). Prepare to report out the discussion around each strength / OFI.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 28 Scoring Table Activity Using round robin, each person gives the scoring range from prework for 7.2 and rationale. Write on flipchart. Table discusses to clarify / understand the rationale. Indicate on flipchart how many in the table group chose the same range. Also indicate if, after the discussion, anyone would have changed their range. (indicate the change on the flipchart). Prepare to report out the discussion around scoring ranges chosen.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Optional Slides Follow

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Sample Process Strength 2.2a(4) To mitigate the strategic challenge of competitors wishing to hire its engaged workforce, the applicant ensures that workforce plans support any needed changes. For example, through data and budget analysis and surveys, the applicant takes a proactive approach to workforce capacity and allocates instructional staff to areas of greatest need through “vertical teamwork.” RelevanceNugget Examples 53 words, 372 characters/spaces

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Sample Process OFI 4.2a(1) It is not clear how the applicant systematically transfers knowledge specific to the needs of parents and volunteers in support of the PhilP that all are accountable for student performance. For example, parents and volunteers do not appear to be included in teachers’ grade-level discussions, and parents do not appear to have access to teachers’ online forums, blogs, and classroom support server (Figure 4.2-1). RelevanceNugget Examples 64 words, 415 characters/spaces

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Sample Results Strength 7.3a(1) Strong results for key measures of workforce capability and capacity may help strengthen the engagement factor of having sufficient resources to get the job done. Rates of certification (Figure 7.3-1) and student-teacher ratio (Figure 7.3-2) have improved over the periods shown, reaching 100% or close to 100% for all segments, and the student-teacher ratio in elementary and middle schools compares favorably to that of a Baldrige Award winner. Relevance Nugget Examples

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Sample Results OFI 7.2a Results related to key student requirements, such as stimulating creative thought, treating students fairly, and maintaining a safe school, are missing. Tracking such results may give the applicant insights into how to retain families and how to attract families to the district. Relevance Nugget Examples

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | UNDERSTANDING SYSTEMATIC APPROACH 34

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | UNDERSTANDING DEPLOYMENT 35

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | UNDERSTANDING IMPROVEMENT/LEARNING/INNOVATION 36

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | UNDERSTANDING INTEGRATION 37

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Key Themes l Key themes are addressed to the applicant’s senior leaders and serve as an executive summary. l Key themes summarize the most vital issues for the organization as a whole, including what the organization must do to remain or become competitive and to ensure long-term sustainability. l Key themes are strategic in nature and may address how well the organization is managing a major change or improvement; competitiveness or social issues; or significant customer, market, product, or technological opportunities and challenges. l The team leader or a designated team member uses the team’s Consensus Review Worksheets to develop an initial list of key theme ideas. l Key themes are organized into 4 groups: process strengths, process OFIs, results strengths, and results OFIs.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 39

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 40

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Consensus Review l All members of the Board of Examiners are expected to participate in the Consensus Review as a condition of being appointed to the Board. l The individual examiners assigned to your Item will now come together to work as a team, generating a scorebook that builds on the individual work, while reflecting the wisdom of the group. l Consensus begins early in July and extends to mid August, depending on the Wave you selected.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Consensus Review continued l Consensus Review includes individual work, online collaboration, and conference calls. l Each member of the team will serve as the lead for several items (usually three). l The objective of the assignment will be to produce item worksheets that incorporate the best thinking of each team member while forming a concise and coherent whole.

Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Consensus Review continued l BOSS will aggregate your teammates’ Independent Review Worksheets for your lead items. l You will record your work for each item on a Consensus Review Worksheet within BOSS. l You will receive feedback from all of your team members on your Consensus Review Worksheets, and you will provide feedback to all of your team members on their Consensus Review Worksheets. l The Step-by-Step for Consensus Review will be available to guide you through the process.