Public Involvement How to Plan and Conduct Effectively Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation’s Office of Environmental Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bob Vasek Cooperative Agreements Engineer Mn/DOT Metro State Aid Overview and Planning and Programming Tom Leibli Cooperative Agreements Project Manager.
Advertisements

ODOT- Office of Environmental Services. How to plan and implement effective Public Involvement Meetings.
ODOT- Office of Environmental Services. Every ODOT project has the potential to create an impact on the public. The public relies on our transportation.
ODOT’s Public Involvement Process PI and the Project Development Process Minimum PI Requirements.
Developing a Public Involvement Plan Why Develop a PI Plan? PI Plan Format Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental.
Stakeholders and the Public
Public Involvement How to Plan and Conduct Effectively Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation’s Office of Environmental Services.
The Building Blocks of Public Involvement Presented By Kevin E. Davis Environmental Supervisor ODOT Office Of Environmental Services The Ohio Planning.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
NEPA ASSUMPTION SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT DELIVERY PROGRAM.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
U.S. 33 Northern Connector Alternative
Environmental Assessment Public Meeting
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA’s Talking Freight Seminar presented by Michael Williamson Cambridge Systematics, Inc. April.
ODOT’s New PI Manual Kevin E. Davis Environmental Supervisor Office of Environmental Services.
Surface Transportation project delivery program
© 2003 TranSystems Corporation Advisory Committee Meeting January 19, 2010.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Environmental Justice: Policies, Guidance, and Answers to Frequently Asked Questions FTA Region VII Civil Rights Training.
Ohio Department of Transportation John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director Project Development Process November 28, 2011.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District Harbor Bridge Project U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge)/SH 286 (Crosstown Expressway) Agency Scoping.
S.R. 144 Intersection Improvement and Road Reconstruction Project Tuesday, October 11, :30pm Presentation Neil A. Armstrong Elementary School 1000.
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
Barrington Road at Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (Interstate 90) Interchange Improvement Study Hoffman Estates Village Hall June 27, 2012.
Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
U.S. 224 Road Reconstruction Project from the St. Mary’s River Bridge to just east of Jackson Street in Decatur, Adams County 6:30pm Presentation Erekson.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: FROM PLANNING TO PROJECT Ohio Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
U.S. 31 at C.R. 400 South Intersection Improvement Clifty Creek Elementary School May 22, 2014, 6:00 p.m.
The PDP and Decision-Making
Community Impacts Environmental Justice Public Involvement Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District Harbor Bridge Project U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge)/SH 286 (Crosstown Expressway) Citizens Advisory.
Project Development Process. ODOT’ PDP A project management and transportation decision-making tool. Developing the detail to the level necessary to make.
Public Involvement. Why? Who Cares? –What we do matters to the public –Effective PI enables proactive input and enhances the decision- making process.
Public Meetings Preparation Type of Meetings Responding to Comments Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Public Involvement How to Plan and Conduct Effectively Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation’s Office of Environmental Services.
ODOT’s Public Involvement and Aesthetic Design Process.
Project Scoping. Project Scoping – learning objective Who should complete the Project Initiation Package (PIP)? How is PDP Path used in scoping? Task.
Delivering the Message Public Notification vs. Public Involvement Strategic Communication Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of.
Stakeholders Engaging Stakeholders Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Developing a Public Involvement Plan Why Develop a PI Plan? PI Plan Format Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental.
General Tab Project, Cost Schedule, and Work Limits Roadway Character
Developing a Purpose & Need Statement. Objectives  Understand when the P&N is developed in the PDP  Understand the importance of a well- written/well-justified.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
U.S. 20 Intersection Improvement Project at Waverly Road Porter Town Hall Thursday, August 13, 2015.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge) Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens’ Advisory.
I-465 at I-65 Interchange Modification Public Meeting 6:00pm Monday, October 1, 2012 South Grove Intermediate School Beech Grove, Indiana.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Public.
Community Impacts Environmental Justice Public Involvement Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Waterdown Road Corridor Class Environmental Assessment (Phase 3 & 4) Community Services Committee May 9, 2012.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
Developing a Public Involvement Plan Why Develop a PI Plan? PI Plan Format Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Developing a Public Involvement Plan
How to Plan and Conduct Effectively
Community Impacts Underserved Populations Public Involvement
General Tab Project, Cost Schedule, and Work Limits Roadway Character
Environmental Prequalification Requirements
Community Impacts Underserved Populations Public Involvement
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
General Tab Project, Cost Schedule, and Work Limits Roadway Character
S.R. 261 Intersection Improvement at Fruitwood Lane in Newburgh
NEPA Assignment Program Overview
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

Public Involvement How to Plan and Conduct Effectively Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation’s Office of Environmental Services

Why? Who Cares??  Public involvement (PI) matters to those that rely on and use transportation systems  Communities have a vested interest in shaping transportation decisions  Every project has the potential to impact quality of life and day-to-day activities  Effective PI enables proactive input and enhances the decision-making process Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services 2

Why it’s Important  Manages public expectations  Assures appropriate decisions are made  Helps identify and define specific transportation and community needs  Builds consensus via proactive participation  Develops partnerships Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services 3

Benefits of PI  Communication  Builds credibility, trust and transparency  Increases awareness  Early and continuous  Instills collaboration  Adds value  Required by law Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services 4

PI Laws and Regulations  National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Section 102 [42 USC 4332]  Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ)  40 CFR and  Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)  23 CFR and  23 CFR  Ohio Revised Code (ORC)  Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services 5

FHWA Regulations  Planning and Project Development  Metropolitan and Statewide Planning 23 CFR and  Systems-level, corridor, or planning study  Long-range planning Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services 6

FHWA Regulations  Early coordination  23 CFR  States required to have an approved PI process pursuant to CEQ regulations  Early and continuous opportunities for agency and public participation during project planning and development  Reasonable public notice for all PI activities Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services 7

Ohio Revised Code  ORC  Provide the opportunity for the public to participate in project development  Adequate and reasonable public notice for all PI activities Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services 8

Class Objectives  Understand legal requirements  Understand how PI is integrated with ODOT’s Project Development Process (PDP)  Learn when and how to develop a PI Plan  Learn PI methods and techniques  Learn how to effectively engage the public and properly address concerns  Learn how to effectively plan and conduct public meetings and public hearings Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services 10

Introductions  Name  District/Position  PI experience Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services 11

ODOT’s Public Involvement Process PI and the Project Development Process Minimum PI Requirements Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services

A Phased Approach  Projects categorized as one of five paths  Each path advances through five phases  PI is “right-sized” within each phase to better support decision-making  Provides flexibility  Appropriate PI activities conducted Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services 13

Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services 14 ID Stake- holders PI continues to build from here Property owner /const. notification letters, One-on-one/ small group mtgs Web, , social media, etc City/ township meetings PI mgs One-on- one/small group meetings City/ township meetings Higher level of Web, , social media PI mtgs, etc. Specific PI mtgs/ hearings One-on- one/small group meetings City/ township meetings Higher level of Web, , social media Specific PI mtgs One-on- one/small group meetings City/ township meetings Higher level of Web, , social media Specific PI mtgs

PDP Project Paths

Public Involvement 16 Path 1Path 2Path 3Path 4Path 5 PI PlanNo As AppropriateYes PI Activities As Appropriate Yes (As appropriate for Non-Complex Projects) Yes Stakeholder Consultation As Appropriate Yes (As appropriate for Non-Complex Projects) Yes

Minimum Public Involvement Requirements  Minimum requirements are built-in to assure appropriate PI is conducted  Project-by-project  Not interpreted to mean that each project will only require the minimum  The PI approach is commensurate with a project’s type and complexity Unanticipated impacts and unusual circumstances may require elevated PI  Ensures legal requirements are met and decision-making is enhanced Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services 17

Minimum Public Involvement Requirements  Avoid oversimplifying and failing to anticipate the need for PI  Conversely, do not build more into the process than is reasonably needed or required  Be flexible, as it may become necessary to elevate the level of PI  Be proactive (not just reactive)  Consider and address community needs appropriately as a project progresses  See ODOT-OES’ PI Manual for more details Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services 18

Public Involvement 19 Path 1 projects are defined as “simple” transportation improvements generated by traditional maintenance and preventive maintenance. They may involve structure and roadway resurfacing. These projects have no ROW or utility impacts.

Minimum PI Requirements - Path 1 Projects Public Involvement for Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP) Once projects proposed, STIP document released for public review and comment May include meeting with local and regional stakeholders Extensive Public Involvement activities may be needed Based on input, project programmed and authorized for design activities to begin Public Involvement opportunities continue as project progresses through NEPA and PDP 20

Minimum PI Requirements – Path 1 Projects (Cont’d) List active projects on ODOT District website Provide contact information Public notifications Standard plan notes executed by contractor Construction schedule coordination Detours Road closures 21

Path 1 Considerations Internal consultation with specific ODOT offices Stakeholder consultation Maintenance of Traffic concerns Minor local controversy 22

Public Involvement 23 Path 2 projects are also simple projects that may be similar in work type to Path 1 projects. They involve non- complex structure and roadway work such as culvert rehabilitations/replacements, in kind bridge replacements, resurfacing, shoulder widening, signal installations and improvements (coordination) and possibly isolated intersection improvements, such as turn lane installations. These jobs can include minor ROW acquisition (strip takes, temporary easements, and or channel easements).

Minimum PI Requirements – Path 2 Projects Property Owner Notification Letters If impacted Use format provided in Public Involvement Manual (6.3.1) Stakeholder Consultation May include local officials, interest groups, organizations Public Notifications Standard plan notes executed by contractor 24

Path 2 Considerations Internal consultation with specific ODOT offices Stakeholder consultation Maintenance of Traffic concerns Minor local controversy Additional PI if needed Resource specific PI Section 106 Noise Aesthetic Design 25

Public Involvement 26 Path 3 projects involve a higher level of complexity than projects in Path 1/2. They involve moderate roadway and structure work and may include capacity additions. Some examples are minor realignments and/or reconstruction, corridor capacity improvements, additional through lanes, turn lane installations, interstate reconstruction and/or widening (typically median widening), auxiliary lane additions, interchange reconstruction or construction of a new interchange at an existing overpass/underpass. They can involve ROW acquisition including relocations.

Minimum PI Requirements – Path 3 Projects Property Owner Notification Letters If impacted Use format provided in Public Involvement Manual (6.3.1) Potential for increased contact with property owners Stakeholder Consultation May include local officials, interest groups, organizations Public Notifications May require Public Information Officer involvement May require project updates via , direct mailing, flyers, etc. 27

Minimum PI Requirements – Path 3 Projects (Cont’d) Press Releases Open House Public Meeting As appropriate Public review and comment period Includes consideration of and response to comments 28

Path 3 Considerations Complex Path 3 projects generally require Feasibility Study Stakeholder consultation occurs at completion of Feasibility Study Stakeholder consultation occurs at completion of Alternatives Analysis Review (AER) – if needed Stakeholder meetings may be held prior to presenting Feasible Alternatives to public Comments received are addressed as project continues through the Project Development Process 29

Public Involvement 30 Path 4 projects include roadway and structure work that add capacity and involve consideration of complex and competing interests. Path 4 projects may have multiple alignment alternatives. Projects include highway widening (typically not within the median) in suburban settings, new alignments in rural settings, or implementing corridor wide access management Path 5 projects have the highest complexity due to their urban setting and they typically add capacity.

Property Owner Notification Letters If impacted and as appropriate Include PI language (6.3.1) Increased contact and involvement with property owners Stakeholder Consultation High level of involvement May include developing an Advisory Committee, Steering Committee, etc. May involve multiple stakeholder meetings 31 Minimum PI Requirements – Path 4 & 5 Projects

Public Notifications PIO highly involved Greater emphasis on providing project updates via , direct mailings, flyers, newsletters, and surveys Use of social media more prominent Press Releases PIO involved to ensure contact with diverse media outlets More numerous and specific in nature Potential for increased media attention 32 Minimum PI Requirements – Path 4 & 5 Projects

Public Meetings Open House style or formal presentation strongly recommended Open mic strongly encouraged for higher level CEs Open mic REQUIRED for EAs and EISs Public review and comment period Includes consideration of and response to comments Public hearings are REQUIRED for Path 4 projects that are an EA or EIS 33 Minimum PI Requirements – Path 4 & 5 Projects

Stakeholders given opportunity to review Feasibility Study and Alternatives Evaluation Report (AER) Stakeholder consultation typically occurs after completion of Feasibility Study and AER 34 Path 4 & 5 Considerations

Summary –Required by law to give opportunity to comment and provide input Stakeholders, underserved populations, general public all equally important but consider each perspective Can result in better project –Begins in Planning Phase of PDP and continues throughout process –Level of PI is commensurate with scope and intensity of project Follow minimum requirements and adjust if necessary –If it’s not in the EnviroNet System = IT DIDN’T HAPPEN! Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services 35