New Qualifications in Philosophy Higher Philosophy Support Meeting Hutchesons’ Grammar School Thursday 22 January 2015
Aims of the event To…: raise awareness of the role of the SIM to gauge the level of engagement with new courses to highlight key differences between new and old courses to ascertain development and/or support needs
The role of the SIM The Subject Implementation Manager in Philosophy is a new SQA role introduced in August 2014 to assist with the transition to new courses to respond to subject specialist enquiries to provide support to Centres to review/amend Philosophy documentation
Areas of change A number of Centres have started on new N5 and Higher Philosophy. Aspects of these courses that are new include: some content some skills some aspects of internal/external assessment the assignment
Changes in content (1) Some specific content from the ‘old’ Higher has been removed, e.g.: false dilemma (mandatory at N5), argument from ignorance Foundationalism, Coherentism, JTB & Gettier Metaphysics Descartes’ Meditation 6 + Hume’s Enquiry Section IX
Changes in content (2) Some specific new content has been added, e.g: Fallacies - appeals to emotion Philosophical techniques - thought experiments, analogical arguments, counter examples, appeals to intuition ‘Other factors’ – confirmation bias, plausibility of claims, ambiguity study of Hume and Descartes is now mandatory greater emphasis on ideal and preference satisfaction utilitarianism
Greater focus on skills A number of more challenging skills are introduced in the new Higher course specification, e.g.: explaining implications and consequences of arguments and theories presenting arguments using argument diagrams analysing and evaluating epistemological and moral theories applying knowledge to evaluate theories expressing reasoned and well-structured conclusions (20 mark essay only)
Assessment The new Higher involves changes to Unit assessment and significant changes to Course assessment: Unit assessment – UASPs available, pass/fail only, subject to new SQA external verification using Nomineesexternal verification Course assessment – added value (breadth, depth, application) QP worth 60 marks – three sections have 20 marks each (one 20 mark essay per exam) Assignment of 30 marks marked by SQA
Assignment Possibly the biggest change from the ‘old’ Higher: Pupils have a free choice of philosophical question Evidence to be produced independently Research with ‘reasonable assistance’ from teacher Conducted under ‘some degree’ of supervision and control Externally assessed by SQA
SIM Support I am available on Thursdays and Fridays* to: visit Centres to support individual teachers/depts attend subject group/network meetings provide telephone/ support collect, collate and make available examples of good practice provide guidance on content/skills/assessment* general enquiries should be made through mycentremycentre etc