Testing the Equality of Means and Variances in Over-Time Data David A. Kenny.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Working with Under-identified Structural Equation Models
Advertisements

Analysis of multivariate transformations. Transformation of the response in regression The normalized power transformation is: is the geometric mean of.
Test of Distinguishability
The STARTS Model David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
G Lecture 10 SEM methods revisited Multilevel models revisited
Structural Equation Modeling Using Mplus Chongming Yang Research Support Center FHSS College.
Social Relations Model: Estimation Indistinguishable Dyads David A. Kenny.
Standardized Change Score Analysis David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
Objectives (BPS chapter 24)
Growth Curve Model Using SEM
T-Tests.
t-Tests Overview of t-Tests How a t-Test Works How a t-Test Works Single-Sample t Single-Sample t Independent Samples t Independent Samples t Paired.
T-Tests.
CHAPTER 4 ECONOMETRICS x x x x x Multiple Regression = more than one explanatory variable Independent variables are X 2 and X 3. Y i = B 1 + B 2 X 2i +
Structural Equation Modeling
Treatment Effects: What works for Whom? Spyros Konstantopoulos Michigan State University.
Measurement Models and CFA Ulf H. Olsson Professor of Statistics.
The Autoregressive Model of Change David A. Kenny.
Change Score Analysis David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
G Lecture 111 SEM analogue of General Linear Model Fitting structure of mean vector in SEM Numerical Example Growth models in SEM Willett and Sayer.
Point Biserial Correlation Example
Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Using SPSS
Multiple Sample Models James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
AM Recitation 2/10/11.
Structural Equation Modeling 3 Psy 524 Andrew Ainsworth.
II.Simple Regression B. Hypothesis Testing Calculate t-ratios and confidence intervals for b 1 and b 2. Test the significance of b 1 and b 2 with: T-ratios.
Means Tests Hypothesis Testing Assumptions Testing (Normality)
Example Models for Multi-wave Data David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
Understanding Multivariate Research Berry & Sanders.
Issues in structural equation modeling Hans Baumgartner Penn State University.
Analysis of Covariance David Markham
- Interfering factors in the comparison of two sample means using unpaired samples may inflate the pooled estimate of variance of test results. - It is.
Phi Coefficient Example A researcher wishes to determine if a significant relationship exists between the gender of the worker and if they experience pain.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Psych 818 DeShon. Purpose ● Takes factor analysis a few steps further. ● Impose theoretically interesting constraints on.
Business Research Methods William G. Zikmund
Multi-sample structural equation models with mean structures Hans Baumgartner Penn State University.
+ Chapter 12: Inference for Regression Inference for Linear Regression.
Cross-lagged Panel Correlation (CLPC) David A. Kenny December 25, 2013.
Randomized completely Block design(RCBD). In this design we are interested in comparing t treatment by using b blocks.
ROB CRIBBIE QUANTITATIVE METHODS PROGRAM – DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY COORDINATOR - STATISTICAL CONSULTING SERVICE COURSE MATERIALS AVAILABLE AT:
Lesson Multiple Regression Models. Objectives Obtain the correlation matrix Use technology to find a multiple regression equation Interpret the.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Psych 818 DeShon. Construct Validity: MTMM ● Assessed via convergent and divergent evidence ● Convergent – Measures of the.
Measurement Models: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Controlling for Baseline
Measures of Fit David A. Kenny January 25, Background Introduction to Measures of Fit.
Measurement Models: Identification and Estimation James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Multiple Regression. Simple Regression in detail Y i = β o + β 1 x i + ε i Where Y => Dependent variable X => Independent variable β o => Model parameter.
Environmental Modeling Basic Testing Methods - Statistics III.
Social Relations Model: Multiple Variables David A. Kenny.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
SEM Model Fit: Introduction David A. Kenny January 12, 2014.
Social Relations Model: Estimation (Indistinguishable) David A. Kenny.
1 Statistics 262: Intermediate Biostatistics Regression Models for longitudinal data: Mixed Models.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Longitudinal Data David A. Kenny December
Two-wave Two-variable Models David A. Kenny December 24, 2013.
Example of Models for the Study of Change David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Final Lecture: Multiple-Group Models, a Word about Latent Growth Models, Pitfalls, Critique and Future Directions.
Data Analysis. Qualitative vs. Quantitative Data collection methods can be roughly divided into two groups. It is essential to understand the difference.
Personality NES Mindfulness Use of Heroin.
Approaches of Model Specification for Testing Factor Mean Differences in Multi-group Higher-order CFA Model Jichuan Wang, Ph.D. Children’s National Medical.
Inference for Regression
Two-wave Two-variable Models
The Trait Model of Change
APIM with Indistinguishable Dyads: SEM Estimation
Full Model: contain ALL coefficients of interest
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University
Adding variables. There is a difference between assessing the statistical significance of a variable acting alone and a variable being added to a model.
Testing Causal Hypotheses
Mortality Analysis.
Presentation transcript:

Testing the Equality of Means and Variances in Over-Time Data David A. Kenny

2 Goal Testing the null hypothesis that the mean or the variance does not change over time. (All of the tests can be done with as few as two time points.)

3 Example Data Dumenci, L., & Windle, M. (1996). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, Depression with four indicators (CESD) PA: Positive Affect (lack thereof) DA: Depressive Affect (used for univariate analyses) SO: Somatic Symptoms IN: Interpersonal Issues Four times separated by 6 months 433 adolescent females Age 16.2 at wave 1

4 Equal Means: Univariate Same variable measured at T times Correlate the T variables. Fix means to be equal (m1 = m2 = m3 = m4) and test with df of T – 1. Alternatively, run a multivariate repeated measures analysis of variance and test the main effect of time.

5

6 Means Example: Univariate Four means: 6.01, 5.70, 5.21, 4.71  2 (3) = 25.56, p <.001; RMSEA = 0.132; TLI =.908 Conclusion: Means differ.

7 Means of a Latent Variable k indicators of a construct measured at T times Correlate the T latent variables. Loadings of the same indicator set equal. Correlate the errors of the same indicator measured at different times. Fix the intercept of the marker variables to zero. Free the other intercepts but set them equal over time; a total of (k – 1)(T – 1) constraints Free factor means and see if the model fits.

8 Equality of the Means of a Latent Variable Assuming good fit of a model with latent means, fix the factor means (m1 = m2 = m3 = m4) to be equal to test the equality of factor means; T – 1 df.

9

10 Example Means: Latent Variable, Base Model Model with No Constraints on the Means –  2 (83) = , p =.003 – RMSEA = 0.034; TLI =.985 Model with Latent Means and Constraints on the Intercepts –  2 (92) = , p =.003 – RMSEA = 0.041; TLI =.979 Fit is worse with the constraints, but the model fit (RMSEA and TLI) are acceptable. Can test if means differ.

11 Example Means: Latent Variable The four means: 25.34, 25.82, 21.72, Base Model –  2 (92) = , p =.003 – RMSEA = 0.041; TLI =.979 Equal Latent Means –  2 (95) = , p <.001 – RMSEA = 0.046; TLI =.973 Test of the null hypothesis of equal variance:  2 (3) = 25.44, p <.001 Conclusion: Means differ.

12 Equal Variance: Univariate Correlate the T variables. Fix the T the variances (s1 to s4) to be equal and test with df of T – 1.

13 Example: Univariate Four variances: 27.91, 27.27, 23.74,  2 (3) = 9.55, p =.023; RMSEA = 0.071;TLI =.973 Conclusion: Variance are statistically different, but the model fits are acceptable, and for parsimony they could be kept equal.

14 Equal Variance: Latent Variable Fix the T factor variances to be equal (s1 = s2 = s3 = s4). Compare this model to a model in which factor variances are free to vary with T – 1 df.

15

16 Example: Latent Variable The four latent variances: 25.34, 25.82, 21.72, Base Model –  2 (83) = , p =.003 – RMSEA = 0.034; TLI =.985 Equal Variances –  2 (86) = , p =.001 – RMSEA = 0.036; TLI =.984 Test of the null hypothesis of equal variance: –  2 (3) = 9.76, p =.021 Variances significantly different, but model fit is not all that different from the base model.