1 Activities for Structuring an Internal Project Management Guideline System at NEDO November 4, 2006 Evaluation 2006 American Evaluation Association Kazuyuki.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CSHE & LH Martin Institute Seminar PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND PERFORMANCE-BASED FUNDING FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING IN AUSTRALIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Contributing.
Advertisements

Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
Local Control and Accountability Plan: Performance Based Budgeting California Association of School Business Officials.
Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.
International Conference on Project Management Nanyang Technological University, Singapore and Society of Project Management, Japan July 31-August 2, 2002,
Credit Reporting: What’s the role for the state? Fredes Montes Financial Infrastructure The World Bank.
Comprehensive M&E Systems
Unit Slides by UK Versity.  Unit aims:  This unit aims to help the learner with an opportunity to develop their project management and research skills.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
Institutional arrangements and legal framework for energy statistics United Nations Statistics Division International Workshop on Energy Statistics
The Technology Integration Planning Model (TIP)
Database Planning, Design, and Administration Transparencies
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
+ Principals Leadership, Learning and Improvement Project Review Process Environmental and Zoo Education Centres 2013 Principals Conference Dr Natalie.
Engaging with stakeholders: Adding value to the energy system 32nd Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment Porto Pedro.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
FEMCIDI Proposed Criteria for the Eligibility and Evaluation of Partnership for Development Activities.
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
GUIDELINES “TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT” Nairobi, January, 2005.
December To share best practices from the experience of 100 NSDS implemented over the last years. To take into account international community.
INTRODUCTION TO THE UNDP APPROACH FOR ASSESSING INVESTMENT AND FINANCIAL FLOWS TO ADDRESS CLIMATE CHANGE Presented by Bill Dougherty, Stockholm Environment.
Experiences in Impact Evaluation: The PEMA Perspective.
Crossing Methodological Borders to Develop and Implement an Approach for Determining the Value of Energy Efficiency R&D Programs Presented at the American.
7. Promoting Student Achievement Individual Differences among Children This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The.
Panel I on the Role of Official Statistics in a Modern Society Structural Reform of the Japanese Official Statistical System - Necessity of Official Statistics.
Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection, ROMANIA 1 BERCEN 1 st Exchange program – November 2002 Croatia PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN COOPERATION.
WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.
The New Framework for Rural Economic Development The New Framework for Rural Economic Development Presented to the National Public Policy Education Conference.
Day 1 Shelter Meeting 09a is hosted by Swiss Solidarity 08:30 – 09:00 09:00 – 09:15 09:15 – 09:30 09:30 – 10:30 10:30 – 10:50 10:50 – 11:00 11:00 – 11:30.
1 Introduction of Research and Development Project Evaluation System at NEDO Momoko OKADA New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization(NEDO)
Environmental Management Plan (EMP) Required for: Full EIA based on Palestinian EIA Policy Category A projects based on World Bank Policy.
United Nations Statistics Division Work Programme on Economic Census Vladimir Markhonko, Chief Trade Statistics Branch, UNSD Youlia Antonova, Senior Statistician,
Methodologies and Tools for Technology Needs Assessment: an Overview Zou Ji Dept. of environmental Economics and Management, Renmin University of China.
MedLiHer Contribution to Implementing the Convention for Safeguarding of the ICH in Mediterranean Countries Phase II Evaluation Meeting Cairo – Egypt 28-30/11/2010.
R&D STRATEGIES IN SUPPORT OF INDUSTRIAL TRANSFORMATION Arm.Dpt. ROMANIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ARMAMENTS DEPARTMENT 01 November 2007.
The added value of the Wind Energy Roadmap Christian Nath – TPWind Executive Committee.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
1 INTERIM REPORT ON SHA DEVELOPMENTAL WORK 7 th Meeting of Health Accounts Experts and Correspondents for Health Expenditure Data Paris, September.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
CJK B3G Standards Collaboration Jinsung Choi Ph.D TTA PG301 Chair & Vice-President of LGE, Mobile Communication Technology Research Lab. Telecommunications.
‘Real Options’ Framework to Assess Public Research Investments Nicholas S. Vonortas Center for International Science and Technology Policy & Department.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Presenter:- Mrs. Josette Maxwell-Dalsou Chief Economist Economic Planning Ministry of Finance, Economic Affairs and National Development.
Governance and Institutional Arrangements What they have to do with Regional Water Planning (RWP)
Follow-up Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for National R&D at NEDO -Part 1- ~Results from follow-up monitoring~ American Evaluation Association Conference.
COMPLIMENTARY TEACHING MATERIALS
Importance of statistics data for regional cooperation
EIA approval process, Management plan and Monitoring
ODB EXPERIENCE IN FINANCING SMEs
Internet Governance Panel
Chapter 10 Understanding Work Teams
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Session 2: Institutional arrangements for energy statistics
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Supporting Data for a KfW Financed Investment Project on the Montenegrin Coast 18 May 2017, Wien ●
Status on the implementation of the National Development Plan
Agenda item 5(b) the Committee’s activities related to the overview of progress in implementing the strategic plan for 2015–2020, including the evaluation.
EPQ Learner Outcomes identify, design, plan and complete an individual project, applying a range of organisational skills and strategies to meet.
4th Meeting of the Energy Resiliency Task Force at EWG53 Singapore, 25 April 2017 APEC Energy Resiliency Project Updates APEC Initiative for Enhancing.
63rd Session of the Evaluation Committee July 2010
The Estonian experience with ex-ante evaluation – set-up and progress
Rankings from the perspective of European universities
The GEF Public Involvement Policy
Evaluation of ESF support to Gender Equality
Executive Summary Survey of Japanese Cross-border M&A
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Role of Evaluation coordination group and Capacity Building Projects in Lithuania Vilija Šemetienė Head of Economic Analysis and Evaluation Division.
Institutional Strengthening (IS) Project
Presentation transcript:

1 Activities for Structuring an Internal Project Management Guideline System at NEDO November 4, 2006 Evaluation 2006 American Evaluation Association Kazuyuki TAKADA New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization

2 Subject of Presentation  NEDO’s strategic national R&D project management and evaluation based on a case-study database Accountability Project Reports G u i d e l i n e DoSee Plan Project Plans Evaluation reports

3 What is NEDO?  An institutional R&D funding and management organization - No laboratories, no researchers  Japan’s largest public R&D management organization for promoting the development of advanced industrial, environmental, new energy and energy conservation technologies - Annual budget of about $2 billion  Approximately 140 projects undertaken each year - Efficient and strategic R&D that is process oriented

4 Problematic Issues Has NEDO been able to be strategic? – Maybe not. Why?  Difficulty in coordinating people in different positions and with different motivations –Coordination among industrial, academic and governmental sectors is a challenge  Know-how to manage NEDO R&D projects is variable –Management know-how often depends on individual persons  Past evaluation reports are scattered –No methodology to inform new project participants of historical evaluation checkpoints

5 How Can NEDO Become More Strategic? -Trial Activities I. Systematize a concept for NEDO’s R&D project management –To share the same terminology among NEDO personnel II. Compile management know-how –To share experience that NEDO has accumulated III. Provide checklists to all NEDO personnel –To not repeat the mistakes of the past NEDO R&D Project Management Guideline

6 I. Systematization  Define lifecycle of NEDO’s R&D projects – Six phases 1 st Develop concept Review 2 nd Survey and estimate Review 3 rd Plan Review 4 th Structure project formation (Select players) Review 5 th Carry out project Review 6 th Prepare next action plan Review

7 I. Systematization  Define multi checkpoints for NEDO R&D projects I. Positioning and Necessity of the Project A. Necessity of NEDO support due to market failure B. Contribution to Japanese industrial competitiveness or solving problems related to energy security and the global environment C. Image of practical application D. Impact of achievement of the project’s goal (outcome) II. Definition of the Project’s Goal E. Setting a challenging project goal F. Reflection of user needs in the project’s goal G. Clarification of the project’s goal H. Logical setting of themes, which structure the project, through segmentation of the project’s goal III. Research Approach and Planning I. Clarification of technological problems to be solved J. Consideration of plural research approaches and selection of an adequate approach K. Planning of the project’s schedule and budget estimate considering uncertainty, based on the selected research approach IV. Selecting Players and Appointing the Project Leader L. Selection of appropriate players who intend practical application and have suitable research resources M. Setting up an adequate project formation N. Appointing a suitable project leader O. Empowerment of the project leader V. Supervision of Progress and Flexible Modification of the Project Plan P. Timely monitoring of the surrounding circumstances and progress of the project, and flexible modification of the project plan regarding positioning, goal, approach, formation, etc. when necessary VI. Confirmation of Players’ Intention of Practical Application Q. Supporting players’ activities for practical application when necessary

8 II. Compilation  Collected historical information Interviews of past project managers Evaluation reports for past projects Results of follow-up monitoring of projects  Extracted information and used it to prepare “Cases” –73 cases covering 38 good practices  Cases prepared to correspond to checkpoints –Enables understanding of the significance of checkpoints

9 III. Presentation  Prepared checklists for each phase –By selecting individual checkpoints –By considering what is important for each phase –By considering past experience  Supplied checklists for each phase to personnel –NEDO personnel can now understand what they should do during each project phase

10 III. Presentation Phases 1st Develop concept 2nd Survey and estimate 3rd Plan 4th Structure project formation (Select players) 5th Carry out project 6th Prepare next action plan Multi checkpoints I. Positioning and Necessity of the project A. Necessity of NEDO support due to market failure B. Contribution to Japanese industrial competitiveness or solving problems related to energy security and the global environment C. Image of practical application D. Impact of achievement of the project’s goal (outcome) II. Definition of the Project’s Goal E. Setting a challenging project goal F. Reflection of user needs in the project’s goal G. Clarification of the project’s goal H. Logical setting of themes, which structure the project, through segmentation of the project’s goal III. Research Approach and Planning I. Clarification of technological problems to be solved J. Consideration of plural research approaches and selection of an adequate approach K. Planning of the project’s schedule and budget estimate considering uncertainty, based on the selected research approach IV. Selecting Players and Appointing the Project Leader L. Selection of appropriate players who intend practical application and have suitable research resources M. Setting up an adequate project formation N. Appointing a suitable project leader O. Empowerment of the project leader V. Supervision of Progress and Flexible Modification of the Project Plan P. Timely monitoring of the surrounding circumstances and progress of the project, and flexible modification of the project plan regarding positioning, goal, approach, formation, etc. when necessary VI. Confirmation of Players’ Intention of Practical Application Q. Supporting players’ efforts for practical application when necessary Checklist

11 Image of the Guideline  Checklists and cases are compiled together  Available as a booklet and through intranet access Chapter II. Checklists for each phase 優れたプロジェクト担当者の実践例 Chapter III. Cases 成功に導くマネジメント例 教訓とすべきマネジメント例 Descripti on Case Checkpoin t Guideline contents are confidential

12 Verification User Survey Results Usefulness of the current guideline Sufficiently useful25% Useful with a few modifications58% It needs many modifications8% It isn’t useful0% Cooperation regarding future modification Yes40% No7% Neither (I don’t know)34%

13 Conclusion  NEDO has just begun to develop an internal system for appropriate project management based on the guideline in order to connect evaluation results to strategic planning  The use of Cases is welcomed by NEDO personnel –The use of only checklists was greatly disliked.  It is important that NEDO allow its personnel to share their know-how through the guideline  In order for NEDO to become more strategically-oriented, it should consider adding program management, portfolio management, resource management, etc. to the guideline.