Presented to presented by Alabama Department of Transportation April 8, 2016 The Alabama Transportation Planner’s Guide to Safety Data Access and Documentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oklahoma Strategic Highway Safety Plan presented to Oklahoma Department of Transportation presented by Sam Lawton, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Marc Long,
Advertisements

Strategic Highway Safety Plan/Developing Local Road Safety Plans Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Safety.
Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop Michael S. Griffith, Director FMCSA Office of Research and Analysis TRB Transportation Safety Planning Working Group.
SAFETY-LU CONSIDERTATION OF SAFETY IN TRANSPORTATION PROCESS Chimai Ngo Office of Federal Lands FHWA Chimai Ngo Office of Federal Lands FHWA.
Impacts of “MAP-21”on the National Bridge Inspection Program Tribal Government Coordination Meeting Date August 7, 2014 Presented by: Gary Moss, P.E. Acting.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.
State Crash Forms Catalogue 29 th Intl. Traffic Records Forum Session 36 July 16, 2003 Angie Schmit - TSASS.
ALDOT HSIP FUNDING OPPORTUNTIES ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF SAFETY OPERATIONS SONYA BAKER TIMOTHY BARNETT MAY 13, 2015.
Green Light-Go Program Pennsylvania’s Municipal Signal Partnership Program April 7, 2015 Daniel Farley Chief, Traffic Signal and Arterial Management Section.
Transportation Management Plan Overview. TMP Overview2 Is that the impression people have?
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Highway Safety Provisions Elizabeth Alicandri FHWA.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.
How to use this presentation This presentation is for use by transportation professionals to communicate the TSP concept. The presentation comprises a.
Performance Measurement Requirements Notice of Proposed Rule Making.
Louisiana Safe Routes to School Program Department of Transportation and Development Louisiana Safe Routes to School Program The Application.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Performance Management and Performance-Based Planning and.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
VPPPA Mentoring Program. The VPPPA Mentoring Program is a formal process to assist companies and facilities interested in participating in the Voluntary.
NCHRP Synthesis 458: Roadway Safety Data Interoperability Between Local and State Agencies Presented to ATSIP TRF 2014 Presented by Nancy Lefler Vanasse.
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Schedule.
FHWA10/1/ MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES REWRITE AND OUTREACH EFFORT TARGET DATE: 2001.
Mid-States Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety Conference Guan Xu, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Design.
2-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
Transportation Management Plan Overview. TMP Overview2 Is that the impression people have?
WORK ZONE SAFETY & MOBILITY Meeting the Federal Rule Jim Allen Safety Implementation Engineer ATSSA Illinois Chapter Meeting.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.
Module Crash Data Collection and Uses Describe the process by which crash data are collected and used in road safety management.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. WVDOT Planning Guidebook Interview & Development Process 2015 WVDOT/MPO/FHWA Planning Conference.
October 25, 2015 Funding Your Program October 20, 2008 ATSSA Sign Maintenance and Management Workshop Addison, Texas.
Leanna Depue, Ph.D. On behalf of the Peer Exchange Planning Committee SHSP Survey Summary.
5-1 Lesson 5 | Common Issues & Challenges. Describe how RSAs address project schedule (time), project cost, and agency liability concerns. Explain the.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Measure Update.
HIPAA PRACTICAL APPLICATION WORKSHOP Orientation Module 1B Anderson Health Information Systems, Inc.
Equitable Services, Part 2 Planning for Equitable Services Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation November 2014.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management T3 Webinar Traffic Incident Management (TIM) Performance Measures June 12,
Highway Safety Improvement Program Reporting Requirements Web Conference FHWA Office of Safety June 20, 2006.
Transportation Research Board Agency Update Barbara Hilger DeLucia August 6, 2002.
The Safety Problem Is Global The Safety Solution Is Local and Personal Business of Saving Lives.
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
Indiana’s Public Access Laws Heather Willis Neal Indiana Public Access Counselor Columbus Police Department August 18, 2009.
Caltrans External Advisory Liaison Committee October 2015.
North Carolina Department of Transportation (DOT) In Highway Scene Management.
The Urban Area/NFC Post-2010 Census Statewide Review State Coordinator between FHWA and MPO/local Mike Toth Transportation Planner MDOT Asset Management.
Robert Pollack October 26, FHWA Safety Data Initiatives.
Tiffany Julien Office of Freight Management and Operations Implementation of the National Freight Network 1.
1 CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION’S ARRA REPORTING June 1, 2009 R2 CTDOT Internal Version.
December 16, :00 – 2:45. MPM Team Agenda 1.Review of MPM Program and Team 2.Consensus items document 3. Upcoming activities 4. Discussion.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Advancing Safety through SAFETEA-LU Michael Halladay FHWA Office of.
Highway Safety Analysis: Engineering Kenneth Epstein, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Programs Safety Data and Analysis Tools Workshop.
Oregon’s All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Zahidul Siddique, Ph.D., PE, PTOE Oregon Department of Transportation October 26, st International.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan Development & Implementation Status 2004 Traffic Records Forum David M. Smith Senior Transportation Specialist, Office.
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
Safety Data Initiatives in Reauthorization – What Can We Expect? Kathy Krause, FHWA Office of Safety 30 th Annual International Traffic Records Forum July.
Statewide and Nonmetropolitan Planning Regional Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPOs) State Programs Meeting 8/7/13 John Sprowls Community Planner,
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 and Managing National Highway Performance Michael Nesbitt Federal Highway.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING PROCEDURES FOR REVISIONS STATEWIDE AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS (STIP & TIP) State of Alabama Department.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
Federal Performance Update MPO Coordination Meeting May 10, 2016.
INDOT Office of Traffic Safety Manager, Mike Holowaty
An Overview of 23 USC 409 Dan Magri, P.E.
August 2016 Traffic Records Forum Baltimore, Maryland
Highway Safety Improvement Program —and— Safety Performance Management Measures Final Rules Overview Welcome April 2016 SCOHTS Meeting FHWA-SA
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education
MPO/RPO Safety Performance Measures
System Safety Regulation
Presentation transcript:

presented to presented by Alabama Department of Transportation April 8, 2016 The Alabama Transportation Planner’s Guide to Safety Data Access and Documentation Policies and Practices Guidebook Overview University of Alabama Center for Advanced Public Safety with Cambridge Systematics and Brelend C. Gowan, Attorney at Law & Legal Consultant

Agenda Guidebook Purpose Guidebook Sections »Legal »Data Access »Display Options Training 2 2

PURPOSE AND STRUCTURE

Guidebook Purpose Purpose – Provide guidance for Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), Rural Planning Organizations (RPOs), cities, and counties on proper methods for accessing and documenting crash data pursuant to Title 23 of the United States Code Current status – Data are not to be shared with the public pursuant to Alabama Law and 23 U.S.C. §148(h)(4) and §409 Need – Current restrictions do not allow planning documents to adequately address traffic safety and display crash data 4 4

Guidebook Structure Data Policy: overview of the legal and policy implications concerning crash data reporting Data Access and CARE: information on how to access crash data via the Critical Analysis Reporting Environment (CARE) database Data Display: examples of how crash data might be displayed in planning documents and model disclaimer language 5 5

DATA POLICY

Safety Data Liability Issues & Requirements Overview Federal Requirements Regarding Safety Data Use Alabama Requirements Regarding Access to Safety Data 7 7

Overview 23 U.S.C. §409 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data.

Overview 23 U.S.C. §409 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data.

Overview (continued) 23 U.S.C. §148(h)(4) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section, shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or other data.

Overview (continued) Safety data are treated as confidential Safety data are not share without permission Recipients are aware the information is protected by §409 and §148(h)(4) and have agreed to the use constraints

Federal Requirements: Safety Data Use MAP-21 Goal: to reduce fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads Requirements: »Performance measures and targets for HSIP »Same targets for both NHTSA HSP and FHWA HSIP »Coordination between MPOs and State agencies FHWA assesses progress toward target achievement, which can affect federal funding Safety data accessibility required for managing safety performance

Alabama Requirements: Safety Data Access 23 U.S.C. §409 protects safety data from discovery & admissibility 23 U.S.C. §409 exempts safety data from disclosure to open records requests Alabama Supreme Court case: Ex parte Alabama Dept. of Transp., 757 So. 2d 371 (Ala. 1999)

Alabama Requirements (continued) Alabama DOT does not disclose safety data in response to litigation requests or open records requests Alabama DOT does allow use of safety data for MAP-21 purposes Recipients (e.g. MPOs) must sign a confidentiality agreement

DATA ACCESS AND DISPLAY

Data Access and CARE Critical Analysis Reporting Environment (CARE) developed by the Center for Advanced Public Safety Access Requirements »Windows and Web versions »Private datasets require official request CARE Training »Periodic opportunities »CARE website documentation and videos 16

Data Analysis Display Examples Descriptive assessments Multiple-year rolling average frequencies or crash rates Crash modification factors to estimate safety benefits GIS mapping Highway Safety Manual predictive approaches 17

Descriptive Assessment Examples Source: Alabama DOT 2014 HSIP Report.

Contributing Factors PERCENTAGE OF FATAL CRASHES BY CONTRIBUTING FACTOR Source:

Fatalities by Jurisdiction ANNUAL NUMBER OF MOTOR VEHICLE FATALITIES BY JURISDICTION Source: Regional Planning Commission of Greater Birmingham.

Comparative Assessment Source: Virginia DOT,

Comparative Assessment FREQUENCY RANK VERSUS SEVERITY RANK BY CRASH FACTOR Source: Cambridge Systematics, Inc., ALSAFE Phase 1 Final Report, Huntsville MPO.

GIS Enhanced Safety Analysis Source: Louisiana DOTD Guidelines for Crash Data Analysis.

GIS Enhanced Safety Analysis (continued) Source: Cambridge Systematics, Inc., ALSAFE Phase 1 Final Report.

GIS Risk Map Source: Cambridge Systematics, Inc., for Central Arizona Governments.

HSM Predictive Safety Analysis CRASH FREQUENCY WITH OR WITHOUT PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION Source: Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Kittelson & Associates for Arizona DOT.

SUGGESTED AND EXAMPLE LANGUAGE

Alabama DOT Documents This document is confidential and protected under Alabama Law and Title 23 of the United States Code: 23 U.S.C. §148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section [HSIP], shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or other data.” 23 U.S.C. §409 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data 28

Every Page Footer This report is prepared solely for the purpose of identifying, evaluating and planning safety improvements on public roads; and is therefore exempt from open records, discovery or admission under 23 U.S.C. §409 and 23 U.S.C. §148(h)(4).

Document Admonition This document is exempt from open records, discovery, or admission under Alabama Law and 23 U.S.C. §§ 148(h)(4) and 409. The collection of safety data is encouraged to actively address safety issues on regional, local, and site-specific levels. 23 U.S.C. §148(h)(4) and 23 U.S.C. §409 prohibit the production under open records and the discovery or admission of crash and safety data from being admitted into evidence in a Federal or state court proceeding. This document contains text, charts, tables, graphs, lists, and diagrams for the purpose of identifying and evaluating safety enhancements in this region. These materials are protected under 23 U.S.C. §409 and 23 U.S.C. §148(h)(4). In addition, the Alabama Supreme Court in Ex parte Alabama Dept. of Transp., 757 So. 2d 371 (Ala. 1999) held that these materials are exempt from the Alabama Open Records Act.

Crash Data Display in Sensitive Documents Confidential Information This information is exempt from open records, discovery, or admission under Alabama Law and 23 U.S.C. §148(h)(4) and §409 Contact the ALDOT Traffic and Safety Operations Section at (334) 353 ‑ 6460 before releasing any information.

TRAINING

Guidebook Training Classroom Training Webinars 33

Contact 34 Tim Barnett, ALDOT State Safety Operations Engineer Phone: