Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 1/16 An Analysis of the Welfare Effects of Parallel Trade Freedom Frank Müller-Langer International Max Planck.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OT Airport privatization and international competition joint work with Noriaki Matsushima.
Advertisements

The assumption of maximizing behavior lies at the heart of economic analysis. Firms are assumed to maximize economic profit. Economic profit is the difference.
The World of Oligopoly: Preliminaries to Successful Entry
Monopoly Standard Profit Maximization is max r(y)-c(y). With Monopoly this is Max p(y)y-c(y) (the difference to competition is price now depends upon output).
PAUL.S.CALEM DANIEL.F.SPULBER.   This paper examines two part pricing by a multiproduct monopoly and a differentiated oligopoly.  Two part pricing.
Chapter Twenty-Seven Oligopoly. u A monopoly is an industry consisting a single firm. u A duopoly is an industry consisting of two firms. u An oligopoly.
Cournot versus Stackelberg n Cournot duopoly (simultaneous quantity competition) n Stackelberg duopoly (sequential quantity competition) x2x2 x1x1 x1x2x1x2.
12 Prepared by: Fernando Quijano and Yvonn Quijano © 2004 Prentice Hall Business PublishingPrinciples of Economics, 7/eKarl Case, Ray Fair Monopoly.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 The Theory of Tariffs and Quotas.
MonopolyMonopoly Chapter 12. Introduction Monopoly is the polar opposite of perfect competition. Monopoly is a market structure in which a single firm.
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
Oligopoly Fun and games. Oligopoly An oligopolist is one of a small number of producers in an industry. The industry is an oligopoly.  All oligopolists.
Voting, Spatial Monopoly, and Spatial Price Regulation Economic Inquiry, Jan, 1992, MH Ye and M. J. Yezer Presentation Date: 06/Jan/14.
Copyright©2004 South-Western 16 Oligopoly. Copyright © 2004 South-Western BETWEEN MONOPOLY AND PERFECT COMPETITION Imperfect competition refers to those.
CHAPTER 9 Basic Oligopoly Models Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
Cournot versus Stackelberg n Cournot duopoly (simultaneous quantity competition) n Stackelberg duopoly (sequential quantity competition) x2x2 x1x1 x1x2x1x2.
Possible Barriers to Entry “a market served by a single firm” 14 Monopoly.
Figure 12.1 Perfect Price Discrimination
Monopoly Monopoly and perfect competition. Profit maximization by a monopolist. Inefficiency of a monopoly. Why do monopolies occur? Natural Monopolies.
Differentiating products in order to overcome Bertrand paradox n With homogeneous goods, competition can be quite intense: Even in a market with only two.
Oligopoly chapter 19 Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of.
© 2006 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited. All rights reserved.1 Chapter 11: Monopoly Prepared by: Kevin Richter, Douglas College Charlene Richter, British Columbia.
The Production Decision of a Monopoly Firm Alternative market structures: perfect competition monopolistic competition oligopoly monopoly.
Differentiating products in order to overcome Bertrand paradox n With homogeneous goods, competition can be quite intense: Even in a market with only two.
ECON6021 (Nov 2004) Oligopoly. Market Structure Monopoly – a single firm A patented drug to cure SARS A single power supplier on HK Island Oligopoly –
Course outline I Homogeneous goods Introduction Game theory
Perfect Competition and the
The Dominant Firm Model. Evolution of a Dominant Firm The typical cost structure for digital products is necessary, but not sufficient, for the emergence.
Chapter: 13 >> Krugman/Wells Economics ©2009  Worth Publishers Perfect Competition and The Supply Curve.
Copyright © 2004 South-Western Monopoly vs. Competition While a competitive firm is a price taker, a monopoly firm is a price maker. A firm is considered.
Chapter 7 Profit Maximization and Competitive Market.
1. Introduction to Price Fixing: Legal and Economic Foundations Antitrust Law Fall 2014 Yale Law School Dale Collins SLIDES FOR CLASS.
CHAPTER 9 Perfect Competition and the Supply Curve PowerPoint® Slides by Can Erbil © 2004 Worth Publishers, all rights reserved.
1 Monopoly and Antitrust Policy Chapter IMPERFECT COMPETITION AND MARKET POWER imperfectly competitive industry An industry in which single firms.
MONOPOLY Why do monopolies arise? Why is MR < P for a monopolist?
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Monopoly Chapter 12.
CHAPTER 14 Monopoly PowerPoint® Slides by Can Erbil © 2004 Worth Publishers, all rights reserved.
Lecture 4 Strategic Interaction Game Theory Pricing in Imperfectly Competitive markets.
MIS An Economic Analysis of Software Market with Risk-Sharing Contract Byung Cho Kim Pei-Yu Chen Tridas Mukhopadhyay Tepper School of Business Carnegie.
Lecture 12Slide 1 Topics to be Discussed Oligopoly Price Competition Competition Versus Collusion: The Prisoners’ Dilemma.
Perfect competition, with an infinite number of firms, and monopoly, with a single firm, are polar opposites. Monopolistic competition and oligopoly.
A monopolistically competitive market is characterized by three attributes: many firms, differentiated products, and free entry. The equilibrium in a monopolistically.
Monopoly CHAPTER 12. After studying this chapter you will be able to Explain how monopoly arises and distinguish between single-price monopoly and price-discriminating.
 The Free Enterprise System.  Traits of Private Enterprise.
Parallel Trade and the Pricing of Pharmaceutical Products Frank Müller-Langer Conference on „Health Economics and the Pharmaceutical Industry“
1. Introduction to Price Fixing: Legal and Economic Foundations Antitrust Law Fall 2015 NYU School of Law Dale Collins SLIDES FOR CLASS.
Copyright © 2006 Thomson Learning 15 Monopoly. Figure 1 Economies of Scale as a Cause of Monopoly Copyright © 2004 South-Western Quantity of Output Average.
The Economic Framework For our purposes two basic sets of agents: –Consumers –Firms Interact through markets Faced with some economic environment or market.
Chapter 12 Monopoly. Basic Definitions Imperfect Competition: Occurs when firms in a market or industry have some control over the price of their output.
15-1 Economics: Theory Through Applications This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported.
Monopoly 2 Bad things that monopolist do!. Laugher Curve The First Law of Economics: For every economist, there exists an equal and opposite economist.
Review Monopoly Summary A monopoly is a firm that is the sole seller in its market. It faces a downward-sloping demand curve for its product. A.
Chapter 6 Extensive Form Games With Perfect Information (Illustrations)
Extensive Form Games With Perfect Information (Illustrations)
OT Long-Run Effects of Tax Policies in a Mixed Market Joint work with Susumu Cato.
Pricing of Competing Products BI Solutions December
ETHICS IN THE MARKETPLACE chapter 5. Competition  is part of the free enterprise system. Competition tends to produce efficiency in the market and benefits.
Chapter 15 Monopoly!!. Monopoly the monopoly is the price maker, and the competitive firm is the price taker. A monopoly is when it’s product does not.
Price Discrimination 1. Defined: Sellers engage in price discrimination when they charge different prices to different consumers for the same good, because.
Lecture 14 Intellectual property, patent policy Chapter 23.
The analytics of constrained optimal decisions microeco nomics spring 2016 the oligopoly model(II): competition in prices ………….1price competition: introduction.
Lecture 7 Price competition. Bertrand’s Model of Oligopoly Strategic variable price rather than output. Single good produced by n firms Cost to firm i.
Microeconomics 1000 Lecture 13 Oligopoly.
ENTREPRENEURS IN A MARKET ECONOMY
Carnegie Institution of Washington
Economics September Lecture 16 Chapter 15 Oligopoly
Markets with Market Power
Markets with Market Power
Parallel Trade with an Endogenous Market Structure
BEC 30325: MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS
Presentation transcript:

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 1/16 An Analysis of the Welfare Effects of Parallel Trade Freedom Frank Müller-Langer International Max Planck Research School for Competition and Innovation, Munich International Conference on Innovation, Competitiveness and Growth, Institute of Economics, Zagreb, November 27, 2008

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 2/16 Frank Müller-Langer Agenda 1Introduction 2Double marginalization model with complete information 3Welfare Analysis 4Conclusion

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 3/16 Frank Müller-Langer Parallel Trade (PT) ‏ When does parallel trade actually occur? Why should we care about this issue? - WTO members are free to choose whether to allow or prohibit parallel trade (Art. 6 of TRIPS) - Restraints on parallel trade vary widely between developed and developing countries and even amongst developed countries - Advocates of strong patent rights for new pharmaceutical products support a global regime of banning parallel trade

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 4/16 Frank Müller-Langer Questions to be Analyzed 1.Why may parallel trade actually occur in equilibrium when information is complete? 2. Is parallel trade freedom beneficial or detrimental to the producer of a patented product? 3. Is parallel trade freedom beneficial or detrimental to global welfare?

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 5/16 Frank Müller-Langer Agenda 1Introduction 2Double marginalization model with complete information 3Welfare Analysis 4Conclusion

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 6/16 Frank Müller-Langer Assumptions Player 1: Monopolistic manufacturer of pharmaceuticals in country A Manufacturer has marginal costs of zero Player 2: Exclusive distributor in country B Players’ payoff functions: their profits Demand in country A: Demand in country B: Parallel trade is allowed Distributor: marginal costs of parallel trade,

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 7/16 Frank Müller-Langer Structure of the Game First stage: manufacturer chooses the wholesale price at which he sells the pharmaceutical product to the distributor in country B, Second stage: distributor chooses the retail price in country B, p B Third stage: manufacturer and distributor simultaneously choose the prices at which they sell the product in country A in a Bertrand price competition, and

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 8/16 Frank Müller-Langer 3rd Stage: Bertrand Price Competition Parallel trade will never occur in any sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium in the double marginalization game with complete information Proposition 1

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 9/16 Frank Müller-Langer Net Effect of PT Freedom on m‘s Profit Parallel trade freedom is detrimental to the manufacturer as it reduces his profit Proposition 2

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 10/16 Frank Müller-Langer Agenda 1Introduction 2Double marginalization model with complete information 3Welfare Analysis 4Conclusion

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 11/16 Frank Müller-Langer Effect of PT Freedom on Global Welfare First step: Calculate the different levels of consumer surplus, profits and welfare in country A and B as well as global welfare if PT is allowed/prohibited Second step: Calculate the net effect of PT freedom on global welfare by subtracting global welfare if PT is prohibited from global welfare under PT freedom

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 12/16 Frank Müller-Langer Effect of PT Freedom on Country B Market in country B remains unserved if parallel trade cost are very low and countries are sufficiently heterogeneous in terms of market size Proposition 3

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 13/16 Frank Müller-Langer Proposition 3 Parallel trade freedom has positive welfare properties if countries are sufficiently heterogeneous in terms of market size Effect of PT Freedom on Global Welfare Proposition 4

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 14/16 Frank Müller-Langer Effect of PT Freedom on Global Welfare Proposition 5 Parallel trade freedom can have negative welfare properties if trade costs are intermediate and countries are virtually homogeneous in terms of market size

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 15/16 Frank Müller-Langer Agenda 1Introduction 2Double marginalization model with complete information 3Welfare Analysis 4Conclusion

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 16/16 Frank Müller-Langer Summary of the Main Results PT will never occur in a double marginalization game with complete information The manufacturer strategically sets prices in order to prevent the occurrence of PT PT freedom is detrimental to the manufacturer The question as to whether PT freedom has positive or negative welfare properties depends on the heterogeneity of the countries and the level of trade cost

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 17/16 Frank Müller-Langer Thank you

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 18/16 Frank Müller-Langer Idea for Further Research Game with asymmetric information with respect to local demand functions Exclusive distributor has better information than the manufacturer about local demand in country B Manufacturer overestimates demand in country B Will parallel trade occur in equilibrium in a game with asymmetric information?

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 19/16 Frank Müller-Langer Game with Asymmetric Information First stage: Manufacturer chooses the price at which he charges the distributor in country B Second stage: Nature chooses the demand in country A and country B Third stage: Distributor chooses the price he charges his customers in country B Fourth stage: Manufacturer and distributor play a Bertrand game

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 20/16 Frank Müller-Langer Determinants of Parallel Trade First strand of literature Exclusive distribution rights in foreign markets and parallel trade [Maskus and Chen (2002, 2004)] Second strand of literature Price regulations by national governments and parallel trade [Ganslandt and Maskus (2004), Jelovac and Bordoy (2005)]

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 21/16 Frank Müller-Langer Distributor‘s Decision In the second stage, the distributor anticipates that he will be driven out of the market in country A in the third stage Parallel trade does not occur

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 22/16 Frank Müller-Langer Maximization Problem of the Manufacturer

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 23/16 Frank Müller-Langer Solution 1 for Low Trade Cost and High We use the Kuhn-Tucker Theorem and obtain two solutions Solution 1: Solution 1 only satisfies the non-negativity restrictions if

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 24/16 Frank Müller-Langer Solution 2 for equal to the monopoly price in the double marginalization game when parallel trade is prohibited equal to the profit-maximizing wholesale price in the double marginalization game when parallel trade is prohibited

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 25/16 Frank Müller-Langer Parallel Trade in the WTO Article 6 of the TRIPS Agreement: “(…) nothing in this Agreement shall be used to address the issue of the exhaustion of intellectual property rights.” National exhaustion vs. international exhaustion of intellectual property rights

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 26/16 Frank Müller-Langer Hypothesis Depending on Nature’s choices with regard to local demand functions parallel trade may occur in equilibrium

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 27/16 Frank Müller-Langer Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Infectious diseases kill 14 million people around the world every year, with 90 per cent of those deaths occurring in the developing world Furthermore, almost 1,400 new medicines have been developed in the last 25 years, but only 1 per cent of these were medicines for parasitic and infectious tropical diseases that are rampant in the developing world

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 28/16 Frank Müller-Langer Hypothesis Hypothesis: There is an important rationale for restricting parallel trade of medicines for parasitic and infectious tropical diseases that are rampant in middle income and low income countries Parallel trade would further reduce the incentives to invest in R&D for medicines for parasitic and infectious tropical diseases

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 29/16 Frank Müller-Langer Ideas for Further Research Parallel trade and medicines for neglected infectious diseases - 99 per cent of global demand for medicines for such diseases is generated in the developing world - Country A high-income country: - Country B low-income country:

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 30/16 Frank Müller-Langer Follow-up Paper: New Timing of the Game Stage 0: Manufacturer chooses retail price in country A Stage 1: Manufactuer chooses wholesale price in country B Stage 2: Distributor chooses retail price in country B Stage 3: If, a third firm will enter the market, buys the product from the distributor in country B and then re-sells the product in country A

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 31/16 Frank Müller-Langer Advantages of Bertrand over Cournot 1.Parallel trade is an important issue in the context of third-degree price discrimination, as it erodes the monopolist’s ability to discriminate prices across markets -> Prices and not quantities should be the decision variables in a model that elaborates on these issues

Welfare Analysis of Parallel Trade Freedom 32/16 Frank Müller-Langer Advantages of Bertrand over Cournot 2.Since prices are the decision variables in our model and not just an endogenous consequence of the firms’ output decisions, we do not need to resort to any additional mechanism such as an (artificial) auctioneer to determine the market-clearing price The Bertrand setup includes an explicit description of all components required for understanding how the market actually operates