Comparison of MODIS and SeaWiFS Chlorophyll Products: Collection 4 Results Janet W. Campbell and Timothy S. Moore University of New Hampshire MODIS Science.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

SeaDAS Training ~ NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group 1 Sea surface temperature (SST) basics NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group Goddard Space Flight Center,

Advertisements

Satellite Ocean Color Overview Dave Siegel – UC Santa Barbara With help from Chuck McClain, Mike Behrenfeld, Bryan Franz, Jim Yoder, David Antoine, Gene.

Welcome to the Ocean Color Bio-optical Algorithm Mini Workshop Goals, Motivation, and Guidance Janet W. Campbell University of New Hampshire Durham, New.

Achieving Global Ocean Color Climate Data Records ASLO Aquatic Sciences Meeting 17 February 2011 – San Juan, Puerto Rico Bryan A. Franz and the NASA Ocean.

Nares Strait Aug.-3, 2009 Level-1B 645nm.

AVHRR, SeaWiFS The NRT satellite observing system for the Adriatic sea The satellite OC observing system ADRICOSM experience In the framework of ADRICOSM.

Evaluation of Trends in Chlorophyll-a Concentration in Response to Climatic Variability in the Eastern Bering Sea from MODIS Puneeta Naik a,b and Menghua.

Characterization of radiance uncertainties for SeaWiFS and Modis-Aqua Introduction The spectral remote sensing reflectance is arguably the most important.

Liang APEIS Capacity Building Workshop on Integrated Environmental Monitoring of Asia-Pacific Region September 2002, Beijing,, China Atmospheric.

MODIS Ocean Science Team Team Members and Associate Team Members Contributors to the Ocean Presentations Mark Abbott Oregon State University Barney Balch.

ISOPLETHS OF CHLOROPHYLL IN RADIANCE SPACE Janet W. Campbell, Timothy S. Moore, and Mark D. Dowell Ocean Process Analysis Laboratory University of New.

Uncertainty estimates in input (Rrs) and output ocean color data: a brief review Stéphane Maritorena – ERI/UCSB.

2 Remote sensing applications in Oceanography: How much we can see using ocean color? Adapted from lectures by: Martin A Montes Rutgers University Institute.

1 Remote sensing applications in Oceanography: How much we can see using ocean color? Martin A Montes Ph.D Rutgers University Institute of Marine and Coastal.

MODIS Regional and Global Cloud Variability Brent C. Maddux 1,2 Steve Platnick 3, Steven A. Ackerman 1,2, Paul Menzel 1, Kathy Strabala 1, Richard Frey.

Temporal and Spatial Variations of Sea Surface Temperature and Chlorophyll a in Coastal Waters of North Carolina Team Members: Brittany Maybin Yao Messan.

UNH Coastal Observing Center NASA GEO-CAPE workshop August 19, 2008 Ocean Biological Properties Ru Morrison.

In situ science in support of satellite ocean color objectives Jeremy Werdell NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Science Systems & Applications, Inc. 6 Jun.

The IOCCG Atmospheric Correction Working Group Status Report The Eighth IOCCG Committee Meeting Department of Animal Biology and Genetics University.

Abstract The match-up data comparisons with field data published on the SeaBASS web site show accuracies for MODIS Terra radiances.

Chapter 7 Atmospheric correction and ocean color algorithm Remote Sensing of Ocean Color Instructor: Dr. Cheng-Chien LiuCheng-Chien Liu Department of Earth.

Retrieving Coastal Optical Properties from MERIS S. Ladner 1, P. Lyon 2, R. Arnone 2, R. Gould 2, T. Lawson 1, P. Martinolich 1 1) QinetiQ North America,

Light Absorption in the Sea: Remote Sensing Retrievals Needed for Light Distribution with Depth, Affecting Heat, Water, and Carbon Budgets By Kendall L.

Recent advances for the inversion of the particulate backscattering coefficient at different wavelengths H. Loisel, C. Jamet, and D. Dessailly.

Environmental Remote Sensing in The Great Lakes and Oceans By Arthur S. Brooks Professor Emeritus of Biological Sciences and Center for Great Lakes Studies.

ISAC Contribution to Ocean Color activity Mediterranean high resolution surface chlorophyll mapping Use available bio-optical data sets to estimate the.

Remote Sensing & Satellite Research Group

ISAC Contribution to Ocean Color activity Mediterranean high resolution surface chlorophyll mapping Use available bio-optical data sets to estimate the.

8th IOCCG Meeting in Florence, Italy (24-26 Feb 03) Current Status of MODIS (Terra and Aqua) by Chuck Trees for the MODIS Team Members.

The generation and development of the long term Mediterranean SSR products The aims are: 1.to identify and develop of an optimal algorithm for the Mediterranean.

MODIS Ocean Color Processing Chuck McClain* Processing Approach Calibration/Validation Gene Feldman* Data Processing & Distribution MODIS Team Meeting/

ASSESSMENT OF OPTICAL CLOSURE USING THE PLUMES AND BLOOMS IN-SITU OPTICAL DATASET, SANTA BARBARA CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA Tihomir S. Kostadinov, David A. Siegel,

MODIS OCEAN QA Browse Imagery (MQABI Browse Tool) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Sept 4, 2003

Ocean Color Remote Sensing Pete Strutton, COAS/OSU.

Prospects for Using Historical Transmissometer Data in Large-Scale Assessment of Particular Organic Carbon A.V. Mishonov, W.D. Gardner, & M.J. Richardson.

What is the key science driver for using Ocean Colour Radiometry (OCR) for research and applications? What is OCR, and what does it provide? Examples of.

Ocean Color Products: The challenge of going from stocks to rates

Optical Water Mass Classification for Interpretation of Coastal Carbon Flux Processes R.W. Gould, Jr. & R.A. Arnone Naval Research Laboratory, Code 7333,

Definition and assessment of a regional Mediterranean Sea ocean colour algorithm for surface chlorophyll Gianluca Volpe National Oceanography Centre, Southampton.

Development of ocean color algorithms in the Mediterranean Sea Rosalia Santoleri 1,, Gianluca Volpe 1, Simone Colella 1,3, Salvatore Marullo 2, Maurizio.

Andrew Heidinger and Michael Pavolonis

UV Aerosol Product Status and Outlook Omar Torres and Changwoo Ahn OMI Science Team Meeting Outline -Status -Product Assessment OMI-MODIS Comparison OMI-Aeronet.

Suhung Shen James G. Acker Denis Nadeau George Serafino Goddard Earth Sciences (GES) Data and Information Services Center (DISC) Distributed Active Archive.

Progresses in IMaRS Caiyun Zhang Sept. 28, SST validation over Florida Keys 2. Potential application of ocean color remote sensing on deriving.

Jinlong Li 1, Jun Li 1, Christopher C. Schmidt 1, Timothy J. Schmit 2, and W. Paul Menzel 2 1 Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies.

The effect of wind on the estimated plume extension of the La Plata River Erica Darken Summer 2004.

2014 Aquarius / SACD Science Team Meeting Agenda and Objectives Summarize the completion of NASA’s Aquarius 3-year prime salinity measurement mission (November.

Fluorescence Line Height (FLH) Ricardo Letelier, Mark Abbott, Jasmine Nahorniak Oregon State University.

Development of ocean color algorithms in the Mediterranean Sea

Validation of Coastwatch Ocean Color products S. Ramachandran, R. Sinha ( SP Systems NOAA/NESDIS) Kent Hughes and C. W. Brown ( NOAA/NESDIS/ORA,

ISAC Contribution to Ocean Color activity Mediterranean high resolution surface chlorophyll mapping Use available bio-optical data sets to estimate the.

New Fluorescence Algorithms for the MERIS Sensor Yannick Huot and Marcel Babin Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche Antoine Mangin and Odile Fanton.

Estimating the uncertainties in the products of inversion algorithms or, how do we set the error bars for our inversion results? Emmanuel Boss, U. of Maine.

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Image: MODIS Land Group,

Polarization analysis in MODIS Gerhard Meister, Ewa Kwiatkowska, Bryan Franz, Chuck McClain Ocean Biology Processing Group 18 June 2008 Polarization Technology.

CIOSS Ocean Optics Aug 2005 Ocean Optics, Cal/Val Plans, CDR Records for Ocean Color Ricardo M Letelier Oregon State University Outline - Defining Ocean.

A class-based approach for mapping the uncertainty of empirical chlorophyll algorithms Timothy S. Moore University of New Hampshire NASA OCRT Meeting May.

NASA OBPG Update OCRT Meeting 23 April 2012 Bryan Franz and the NASA Ocean Biology Processing Group.

AIRS Land Surface Temperature and Emissivity Validation Bob Knuteson Hank Revercomb, Dave Tobin, Ken Vinson, Chia Lee University of Wisconsin-Madison Space.

MODIS Data Product Status Numbers 19, 23, & 26 Dennis K Clark 18 December 2001.

“Regional” adjustments of SAA parameterization Mark Dowell & Timothy Moore EC-JRCNURC & UNH.

International Ocean Color Science Meeting, Darmstadt, Germany, May 6-8, 2013 III. MODIS-Aqua normalized water leaving radiance nLw III.1. R2010 vs. R2012.

OC3522Summer 2001 OC Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Summer 2001 Ocean Color.

Date of download: 6/17/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Location of the study area within the Bay of Biscay and oceanographic sampling.

Ocean color atmospheric correction – Using a bio-optical model to address the “black pixel assumption” Ocean Optics Class University of Maine July 2011.

VIIRS-derived Chlorophyll-a using the Ocean Color Index method SeungHyun Son 1,2 and Menghua Wang 1 1 NOAA/NESDIS/STAR, E/RA3, College Park, MD, USA 2.

Group Presentation, July 17, 2013

Developing NPP algorithms for the Arctic

Introduction to Satellite Remote Sensing (continued)

Presentation transcript:

Comparison of MODIS and SeaWiFS Chlorophyll Products: Collection 4 Results Janet W. Campbell and Timothy S. Moore University of New Hampshire MODIS Science Team Meeting Greenbelt, Maryland July 23, 2002

The Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) was launched in August It continues to operate and produce ocean color and land color data. Earlier this month, the entire data set was reprocessed for the 4 th time.

Comparison of MODIS and SeaWiFS Chlorophyll Products: Collection 4 Results MODIS Oceans: Collection 4 began June 2, 2002 SeaWiFS: Reprocessing V.4 as of July 9, 2002

MODIS Chlorophylls: Chlor_MODIS (MOD19: Dennis Clark) Chlor_a_2 (MOD21:Janet Campbell) Chlor_a_3 (MOD21: Ken Carder) SeaWiFS Chlorophyll: OC4.v4 John E. O’Reilly (NASA TM , Vol. 11)

Why so many MODIS chlorophylls? What’s the difference? Originally there were 2 algorithms: “Case 1” waters:Chlor_MODIS (Clark) This is an empirical algorithm based on a statistical regression between chlorophyll and radiance ratios. “Case 2” waters:Chlor_a_3 (Carder) This is a semi-analytic (model-based) inversion algorithm. This approach is required in optically complex “case 2” (coastal) waters.

Chlor_MODIS December 2000 (Collection 3) This algorithm was based on regression involving HPLC chlorophyll(s). n=93, r 2 =0.915, std error of estimate =

Chlor_MODIS (Dennis Clark): December 2000 Collection 3: Based on 443 to 551 band ratio… analogous to CZCS algorithm. Collection 4: Based on ratio to 551.

Chlor_a_3 December 2000 (Collection 3) This “semi-analytic” algorithm accounts for pigment packaging effects in nutrient-replete and nutrient-deplete conditions.

Chlor_a_3 (Ken Carder): December 2000 Collection 3: Used Reynolds SST to determine nutrient deplete/replete status Collection 4: Uses MODIS SST (daytime  m) to determine nutrient deplete/replete status.

More recently a 3 rd algorithm was added: “SeaWiFS-analog” Chlor_a_2 (Campbell) This is an empirical algorithm using the 443:551 and 488:551 band ratios whichever is greater. SeaWiFS algorithmOC4.v4 (O’Reilly) This is an empirical algorithm using the 443:555, 490:555 and 510:555 band ratios whichever is greater.

Chlor_a_2 December 2000 (Collection 3) This “SeaWiFS analog” algorithm is based on the same data set used to parameterize the SeaWiFS algorithm.

Chlor_a_2 (“SeaWiFS analog”): December 2000 Collection 3: Used OC3M algorithm developed by Jay O’Reilly et al. Collection 4: Uses the same OC3M algorithm applied to reprocessed radiances.

The Chlor_a_2 algorithm was proposed by the developers of the OC4.v4 SeaWiFS algorithm. It was called OC3M (3 band, M for MODIS)

SeaWiFS December 2000 (Reprocessing 3)

Reprocessing 3 Reprocessing 4 SeaWiFS: December 2000

Collection 4 December 2000

Global 36 km Chlor_MODIS Chlor_a2 Chlor_a3 Product forRMSBiasRMSBiasRMSBias Dec Dec. 2-9, Jun. 2-9, Jun. 2, Dec. 4, Apr. 8, Comparisons of Global 36-km MODIS Chlorophyll with SeaWiFS Note: Units are decades of log. Bias is average difference of MODIS minus SeaWiFS; RMS is root-mean-square difference.

CONCLUSIONS (as of December 2001) MODIS and SeaWiFS chlorophylls agree reasonably well. RMS ~ 0.2 log units RMS ~ 0.3 log units when comparing MODIS or SeaWiFS with in-situ chlorophyll measurements. The differences can be explained in terms of pigment packaging (Chlor_a_3 vs. SeaWiFS), or surface layer drift (e.g. Liu et al. 2001). The Chlor_a_2 product is ready to be validated after the next reprocessing. By definition, if it is compatible with SeaWiFS, then it is valid.

CONCLUSIONS (Today) MODIS and SeaWiFS chlorophylls agree reasonably well. RMS ~ 0.2 log units RMS ~ 0.3 log units when comparing MODIS or SeaWiFS with in-situ chlorophyll measurements. The differences can be explained in terms of pigment packaging (Chlor_a_3 vs. SeaWiFS), or surface layer drift (e.g. Liu et al. 2001). The Collection 4 Chlor_a_2 product is now validated, since it is consistent with SeaWiFS.

Can the high-resolution MODIS bands be used to develop a chlorophyll algorithm with improved resolution in coastal waters? Chlor_a_2 algorithm uses: 3 bands at 1 km: 443, 488, 551 nm High resolution bands are: 2 bands at 250 m: 645, 860 nm 5 bands at 500 m: 469, 555, 1240, 1640, 2130 nm

The Chlor_a_2 algorithm uses the ratio of 443 to 551 or 488 to 551 whichever is greater

In a Level-2 granule from the Northern Gulf of Mexico, we regressed: Chlor_a_2 versus 469:555 ratio and Chlor_a_3 versus 469:555 ratio where the radiance ratio was based on 500-m bands (MOD09 Surface Reflectance Product) degraded to 1 km and co-registered with the ocean color data.

Chlor_a2 and Chlor_a3. Chlorophylls derived with MOD09 data.

1-km Chlor_a2500-m “Chlor_a2”

1-km Chlor_a3500-m “Chlor_a3”