Mercury Method 1631: It’s Not As Bad As We Thought It Would Be Dana Folley, PERCS Unit 2005 NC Pretreatment Workshop August 23, 2005 Charlotte, NC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
North Carolina Eastern Regional Mercury Study: Results Michelle Woolfolk NC Division of Water Quality Presented April 19, 2004 at the CSSA Meeting.
Advertisements

Presented by Melanie Williams. Plan Schedule Water Quality Status Trends Chain of Lakes Basinwide Issues Recommendations & goals Public Review Comments.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee August 24, 2010 Metro Permit Reissuance Proposed.
1 Mixing Zones, Reasonable Potential Analysis, and Permit Limits A Quick Overview Steve Schnurbusch Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
Landfill Water Quality Project Paul Brooks, Lea Bullard, Leslie Harper, Amanda Strickland, Sarah van Schagen April 30, 2004 University of North Carolina.
©Lloyd Gosselink Rochelle & Townsend, P.C. Presented by: LAUREN KALISEK (512) Congress Avenue Suite 1900 Austin, Texas.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Mercury.
Deborah Gore Division of Water Resources. G.S C (a1) Report Discharge of Untreated Wastewater to the Department Permit issued under this Part.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
1 State Water Quality Assessments Under the Clean Water Act Charles Spooner Assessment and Watershed Protection Division Monitoring Branch National Water.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
The Nevada Department of Agriculture Water Quality Program The Nevada Department of Agriculture has been involved in groundwater protection since 1990.
Mark Richards Virginia Department of Environmental Quality What’s in Your Water? A Discussion of Threats to Virginia’s Water Quality William & Mary School.
Paonia/Collbran Low Flow Presentation Water Quality Work Group Meeting June 9, 2004.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.
Managing Mercury in Dental Offices Greg Newman Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance.
WQBELs Karen Holligan May 6, WQBELs – A Four-Piece Puzzle Numerical criteria (toxic pollutants) Water body quality Effluent fraction Bioavailable.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Lake Erie HABs Workshop Bill Fischbein Supervising Attorney Water Programs March 16, 2012 – Toledo March 30, Columbus.
Proposed 2013 Revision to ORSANCO Pollution Control Standards for Discharges to the Ohio River.
PERMITTING AND COMPLIANCE Wastewater Utility Council May 17, 2006.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Overview of WQ Standards Rule & WQ Assessment 303(d) LIst 1 Susan Braley Water Quality Program
► engineers scientists architects constructors ► Managing Mercury Mania Jerald O. Thaler, P.E. Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber, Inc. Michigan Water Environment.
Hydrostatic Testing Draft General Permit Draft Permit Stakeholder Outreach Meeting April 23, 2015 Moderated by: Lillian Gonzalez, Unit Manager, Permits.
Regulations that Protect Clean Water Jocelyn Mullen, P.E. PART 2 OF PRESENTATION Presented at The Water Course January 27, 2010 Mesa County Water Association.
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
Mercury Sources to Water and Associated Impacts Chris Piehler.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
Surface Water Standards Triennial Review and Implementation Connie Brower Nikki Remington-Julie Grzyb-Sandra Moore NC Division of Water Quality.
Water Quality Standards, TMDLs and Bioassessment Tom Porta, P.E. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning.
BACKRIVER TMDL PROJECT Technical Outreach Prepared by MDE/TARSA Prepared for the Baltimore Harbor Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002.
STATUS OF ECOLOGY’S DRAFT FLOW BLENDING POLICY WATER QUALITY PARTNERSHIP MEETING January 20, 2005.
Source Control Planning for Municipal Wastewater System Permit Compliance Environmental Trade Fair & Conference Austin, TX. May 6, 2015 David James Santiago.
Paul Novak, Ohio EPA. Committee Meetings/Agenda  March call of full committee  April meeting with IDEM, OEPA, ORSANCO on streamlined variance.
History and Progress of DEQ’s Mercury Programs Albert E. Hindrichs.
EPA REGION VI MINIMUM QUANTIFICATION LEVELS (MQLs) WHAT THE “L” IS GOING ON? 25 th EPA Annual Pretreatment Workshop Addison, TX 8/5/09 Allen Gilliam ADEQ.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
NPDES Wastewater Permitting Update 2015 NCMA Workshop Tom Belnick DWR/NPDES Permitting.
Review of Current Conditions Report and Work Plan for Area 1 Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical Outreach Services for Communities.
Point Source Loads and Decision Criteria for Toxics Modeling Baltimore Harbor TMDL Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002.
Clean Water Act Mrs. Perryman Mrs. Trimble. Clean Water Act “Restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters”
William Telliard U.S. EPA Office of Science and Technology
Preliminary Scoping Effort. Presentation Objectives Identify need for additional sources of future funding Provide background on how elements were identified.
I RIS E NVIRONMENTAL Independent Review of Documents Pertaining to the Lehigh Southwest Cement Permanente Facility Rob Balas & John McLaughlin February.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
Selenium Aquatic Life Criteria and Implementation ORSANCO Technical Committee Meeting October 21, 2009 Holly Green, USEPA Office of Science and Technology.
High Rock Lake Nutrient Modeling Update Pam Behm - NC Division of Water Resources Environmental Management Commission Water Quality Committee Information.
NPDES Permitting for Coal Ash Ponds in North Carolina EMC Meeting January 12, 2012 Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D. 1.
Connie Brower NC DENR Division of Water Resources.
WQBELs Karen Holligan September 23, WQBELs – A Four-Piece Puzzle Numerical criteria (toxic pollutants) Water body quality Effluent fraction Bioavailable.
TTWG Report & Technical Topics SRRTTF Meeting Dave Dilks March 16, 2016.
Texas Surface Water Quality Standards Update Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader Joe Martin Water Quality Standards Work Leader.
Mercury: What’s going on? Michelle Woolfolk, Modeling Unit Discharger meetings:December 18, 2002 and January 15, 2003.
Selenium: The Curse of the West
Mercury Minimization Plans
Water Quality Control Commission Hearing June 8, 2015
Request Approval of (d) Listing Methodology
Division of Water Resources Overview
Environmental Management Commission Information Item January 8, 2015
Single Event Violations
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
Report of Proceedings Surface Water Quality Standards Triennial Review Environmental Management Commission November 13, 2014 Steve Tedder – EMC Hearing.
Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program
303(d) List March 9, 2016 WQC Jeff Manning, DWR
Mercury TMDL Review & Permitting Strategy Update
Industrial Pollutants in the Haw: Community Impacts and Action
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Presentation transcript:

Mercury Method 1631: It’s Not As Bad As We Thought It Would Be Dana Folley, PERCS Unit 2005 NC Pretreatment Workshop August 23, 2005 Charlotte, NC

Mercury Sources Natural Sources - volcanoes, forest fires, soils Manmade Sources - coal-fired power plants, incinerators, manufacturing, dental amalgam WWTP –sewer pipe slime bio-accumulates Hg, releases Hg when slough off –Sediments accumulate Hg, heavy flow sends Hg to WWTP –WWTP equipment with mercury – bearings, switches - seals fail Mercury crosses state, regional, global boundaries

Minamata Disease Japan 1956

Minamata Memorial MAYBE DELETE??

EPA Saves Snowball in Vegas (2004)! Waynesville – 10/04 1/2 cup spilled, cleaning lady to hospital, house decon- taminated Asheboro – 2005 resident collects periodic table elements - 39 lbs, plus!

North Carolina Fish Consumption Advice Issued in April 2002 Advises restricted consumption of largemouth bass, chain pickerel, bowfin caught from NC waters Establishes range of south and east of I-85

Water Bodies on 303(d) List for Mercury 303(d) list to EPA of impaired NC waters - based on actual fish tissue analysis –Entire Lumber River Basin –Roanoke River (Va portion too?) –Parts of Neuse River main stem (NEW) –Albemarle Sound –Atlantic Ocean - for King Mackerel only –7 other creeks, rivers, and lakes in the Cape Fear, Roanoke, Pasquotank, White Oak and Yadkin Basins

Water Quality Standards - Water NC WQS: –Aquatic Life (Freshwater chronic): 12 ng/l (0.012 ug/l) –Aquatic Life (Saltwater chronic): 25 ng/l Great Lakes WQS: –Human Health:1.8 ng/l –Wildlife:1.3 ng/l EPA Criteria –Aquatic Life (Freshwater acute):1,400 ng/l –Aquatic Life (Freshwater chronic): 770 ng/l Drinking Water Standard - 2,000 ng/l NC Groundwater WQS – 1,100 ng/l

Water Quality Criteria- Fish Tissue EPA Human Health Criterion: –0.3 mg Methyl Hg/kg fish NC DHHS Fish Advisory: –0.4 mg Total-Hg/kg fish Compare to Japan 1956 Minamata Exposure: –Residents consumed fish with 20 mg methyl mercury per kg of fish during several meals per week for years How to convert fish tissue criteria to water column criteria?

EPA Method Why use it?

EPA Method Clean Sampling

NC Method 1631 Requirements Based on EPA agreement, DWQ required Method 1631 for effluent sampling at applicable NPDES facilities beginning September 1, –Current or potential NPDES limit is 200 ng/l or below (see mercury limit calculator on PERCS mercury webpage) –And –Mercury is pollutant of concern (on NPDES limits page, pretreatment program, or major municipal)

Method DMR Effluent 1631 Results NEEDS A LOT OF WORK TO BRING UP TO DATE First Year Results - 96% of effluent samples below the WQS (<12 ng/l). Why such good results? –Clean sampling, pretreatment, pollutant removal, etc.

NC Mercury NPDES Permitting Requirements Mercury limit now expressed as Weekly Average Class III and IV WWTPs - Weekly effluent Class I and II WWTPs -Twice per month effluent For new limits, propose compliance schedule to allow for source evaluation, budgeting, etc.

NC NPDES Permitting for Non-Impaired Waters WWTP Receiving Waterbody is not Hg-impaired i.e, not on 303(d) list Calculate NPDES limit in normal fashion, taking into account dilution at 10 year drought stream flow (7Q10) Perform normal Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA) with 7Q10 dilution If “reasonable potential” exists for WWTP to violate limit, add limit and Compliance Schedule

NC NPDES Permitting for Hg-Impaired Waters WWTP Receiving Waterbody is Hg-impaired and on 303(d) list EPA assumes upstream is already at NC WQS, so do not allow 7Q10 dilution NPDES limit will be equal to NCWQS = 12 ng/l Perform Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA) with NO dilution If “reasonable potential” exists for WWTP to violate limit, add limit and Compliance Schedule Facility can collect upstream samples to test assumption.

NC NPDES Permitting for Hg- Impaired Waters with TMDLs Current TMDLs (Lumber, Cashie) have shown point sources to be minimal contributor to mercury load. TMDL can be expressed in NPDES permits as a mass load limit (eg. grams/day) or require implementation of a Pollution Prevention (P2) strategy. PERCS and Division of Pollution Prevention and Environmental Assistance (DPPEA) currently preparing P2 language.

NC NPDES Compliance For those with limits already, generic SOC with P2 requirement is being developed for any non-compliant facilities. Regions continue with civil penalty discretion.

NC NPDES Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) Enter mercury data in same units as are on NPDES limits page. Enter all effluent mercury data, even LTMP/STMP.

NPDES Compliance - Pretreatment Remember MSDSs don’t tell you about inactive ingredients or contaminants. What if mercury is in ambient or raw water supplies? –Drinking Water Standard - 2,000 ng/l –NC Groundwater WQS – 1,100 ng/l If Mercury is everywhere, what good will slapping “zero” limits on a few “big bad SIUs” do? Dentists!!!!!!

Method 1631 and Pretreatment Requirements NC DWQ PERCS will only require 1631 for other locations (Influent, Uncontrollable, SIU, etc.) if there is a problem at your effluent, i.e., you are having significant limits violations December 18, 2002 PERCS webpage

Method 1631 and Pretreatment Of the few Pretreatment POTWs that had been having detections above 200 ng/l using 245.1, most are NOT having any hits any where near 200 ng/l with 1631 and 1669!!!!!!! 24 HWAs using 1631 for effluent, 9 also using 1631 influent –18 approved, 6 more in house

Method 1631 and Pretreatment ave of ave range of ave Influent –Only –only Effluent – 0.68 –Max individual effluent 102.4

Method 1631 and Pretreatment ave of ave range of ave Removal Rate96%87% - 99% MAHL triples or quadruples 5 without tertiary filters – no real difference

Method 1631 and Pretreatment Uncontrollable ave of ave range of ave Sampling Mass balance – 470 EPA Literature 300

NC Water Quality Standard (WSQ) Current NC WQS adopted in 1989 based on EPA’s 1988 Water Quality Criteria EPA’s new (January 2001) Ambient Water Quality Criteria is expressed as 0.3 mg/kg methyl mercury in fish tissue Need Bio-accumulation Factors (BAFs) to translate WQC into total mercury surface water quality target/standard EPA Guidance on this still not out

NC Eastern Regional Mercury Study (ERMS) Gather NC specific stream and fish tissue data needed to calculate BAFs and perform translation Implemented Nov 2002-Aug 2003 Final Report on web-site next year Mercury Study Extension – covers the French Broad to the Pasquotank

ERMS Target water column levels to protect human health (fish consumption) Goal 3a: Target water levels

ERMS Measured Total Mercury in WWTP effluentMAYBE NOT USE if DMR sum shows same Goal 4: Mercury in effluent

DWQ Water Quality Standard Using Method 1631, NC Mercury WQS will be exceeded in surface waters in some cases. Appears existing WQS is not protective of consumption of largemouth bass except for smaller fish, and even then not in all cases. Although recommended by EPA, BAF approach assumes relationship between mercury fish tissue and mercury (or methyl mercury) in water column is linear. This may not be true. Need EPA WQC Implementation Guidance

And now for the big picture…

Mercury Questions? All s are PERCS - Pretreatment: ?????????, NC DWQ, PERCS Unit (919) ext. ???, – –NC DWQ Mercury 1631 letters (NPDES - 8/30/02 and 8/1303; Pretreatment 12/18/02) –Mercury NPDES limit calculator –Method 1631 and 1669 (clean sampling) documents –Presentations, guidance, and links

Mercury Questions? NPDES: Tom Belnick, NC DWQ, Point Source Branch (919) ext. 543 – NC DWQ Laboratory (919) –Metals Unit Roy Byrd, Lead Chemist, ext DWQ 1631 lab up and running!!! –Laboratory Certification Unit James Meyer, Supervisor, ext

Mercury Questions? ERMS/TMDL/303(D) List: Michelle Woolfolk, NC DWQ, Modeling&TMDL Unit (919) ext. 505 – WQS: Connie Brower,NC DWQ Standards Unit (919) ext. 380, – Fish Advisories: Luanne Williams, NC Dept Health and Human Services (919)

Mercury Questions? Biological Assessment (Fish tissue) –Mark Hale, Planning - Basinwide Plans – Ambient & Coalition Monitoring –

Mercury - Summary Mercury can be bad in the environment and to human health, especially as Methyl mercury Incidents of Mercury Contamination are still occurring Some NC waters have fish exceeding health criteria, DHSS issued fish consumption advice notices for half of NC

Mercury - Summary Most NC NPDES facilities below NC WQS –Those in significant violation can get P2 SOCs NPDES Civil Penalty Discretion Continues New/Renewal NPDES Limits will be weekly averages New NPDES Limits will include compliance schedule TMDL Limits may be expressed as P2 schedules

Mercury – Summary (continued) Method 1631 works well on WWTP influent, uncontrollable, and SIUs WWTP site-specific 1631 removal rates much higher than EPA Literature Site-specific 1631 Uncontrollable within range of EPA literature DWQ PERCS may adopt NC literature removal rate and uncontrollable

Mercury – Summary (continued) DWQ continues to study NC site- specific mercury water body conditions and basis for NC WQS

Questions?