KM3NeT Optical Calibration Umberto Emanuele IFIC (CSIC – University of Valencia, Spain) WPF/L KM3NeT Meeting Nikhef 5 th - 7 th July 2010 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trigger issues for KM3NeT the large scale underwater neutrino telescope the project objectives design aspects from the KM3NeT TDR trigger issues outlook.
Advertisements

Collaboration Meeting CERN, 6-10 Feb 2012 Collaboration Meeting CERN, 6-10 Feb 2012 Agustín Sánchez Losa IFIC (CSIC – Universitat de València)
Calibration of NT200+ with the external Laser Antipin Konstantin MEPhI (Moscow) Zeuthen,
IMPACT OF WATER OPTICAL PROPERTIES ON RECONSTRUCTION: HINTS FROM THE OB DATA. A PRELIMINARY STUDY ANTARES Collaboration Meeting CERN, February 07 th -10.
Transmission length measurements: a “multi- wavelength” analysis from the OB data H Yepes IFIC (CSIC – Universitat de València) ANTARES Collaboration Meeting.
H Yepes, C Bigongiari, J Zuñiga, JdD Zornoza IFIC (CSIC - Universidad de Valencia) NEWS ON ABSORPTION LENGTH MEASUREMENT WITH THE OB SYSTEM ANTARES COLLABORATION.
AN UPDATE ON ABSORPTION LENGTH MEASUREMENT WITH THE OB SYSTEM ANTARES Collaboration Meeting Paris (France), September 20th-24th H Yepes, J Barrios IFIC.
Energy Reconstruction Algorithms for the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope J.D. Zornoza 1, A. Romeyer 2, R. Bruijn 3 on Behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 1.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
H Yepes, C Bigongiari, J Zuñiga, JdD Zornoza IFIC (CSIC - Universidad de Valencia) STATUS OF THE ABSORPTION LENGTH MEASUREMENT WITH THE OB SYSTEM ANTARES.
STATUS OF THE ABSORPTION LENGTH MEASUREMENT ANTARES collaboration meeting Clermont-Ferrand (France), May 17th-20th 1 H Yepes, JdD Zornoza, J Zuñiga, C.
AN UPDATE ON ABSORPTION LENGTH MEASUREMENT WITH THE OB SYSTEM ANTARES Collaboration Meeting Paris (France), September 20th-24th H Yepes, J Barrios IFIC.
J.P. Gómez-González. Outline Introduction: The ANTARES neutrino telescope Time calibration Muon track residuals based method: Description and implementation.
KM3NeT detector optimization with HOU simulation and reconstruction software A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 - Paris,
The ANTARES experiment is currently the largest underwater neutrino telescope and is taking high quality data since Sea water is used as the detection.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Characterization of Silicon Photomultipliers for beam loss monitors Lee Liverpool University weekly meeting.
Hanoi, Aug. 6-12, 2006 Pascal Vernin 1 Antares Status report P.Vernin CEA Saclay, Dapnia On behalf of the Antares collaboration P.Vernin
Leroy Nicolas, HESS Calibration results, 28 th ICRC Tsukuba Japan, August Calibration results of the first two H·E·S·S· telescopes Nicolas Leroy.
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
Francisco Salesa Greus IFIC (CSIC–Universitat de València, Spain) Representing the KM3NeT Consortium 4 th International Workshop on Very Large Volume Neutrino.
AN UPDATE ON ABSORPTION LENGTH MEASUREMENT WITH THE OB SYSTEM ANTARES Collaboration Meeting Paris (France), September 20th-24th H Yepes, J Zuñiga IFIC.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Marseilles, 29June-3 July.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Experimental set-up Abstract Modeling of processes in the MCP PMT Timing and Cross-Talk Properties of BURLE Multi-Channel MCP PMTs S.Korpar a,b, R.Dolenec.
Outrigger Timing Calibration & Reconstruction Milagro – 11/17/03 Shoup – 1 Purpose: To incorporate outrigger hits in event angle fitting Additionally incorporated.
Amsterdam 29 March 2011 Fernando Urbano IFIC (CSIC – Universidad de Valencia) KM3NeT Optical Calibration Laser Beacon and Nanobeacon Status.
Status of gravitational lens paper Internal note: Results of the optical properties of sea water in the ANTARES site with the OB system.
Report of the HOU contribution to KM3NeT TDR (WP2) A. G. Tsirigotis In the framework of the KM3NeT Design Study WP2 Meeting - Erlangen, May 2009.
Experimental set-up for on the bench tests Abstract Modeling of processes in the MCP PMT Timing and Cross-Talk Properties of BURLE/Photonis Multi-Channel.
Calibration Methods and Tools for KM3NeT V. Kulikovskiy on behalf of the KM3NeT collaboration.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
KM3NeT Pylos meeting, April, 2007 Some preliminary studies for the positioning calibration of KM3NeT Miguel Ardid Universitat Politècnica de València.
Acoustic Calibration for the KM3NeT Pre-Production Module Alexander Enzenhöfer on behalf of the KM3NeT consortium VLV T 2011 Erlangen, –
CEA DSM Irfu Reconstruction and analysis of ANTARES 5 line data Niccolò Cottini on behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration XX th Rencontres de Blois 21 / 05.
The ANTARES detector: background sources and effects on detector performance S. Escoffier CNRS Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille on behalf.
First results from the Biocams J. Brunner. Cameras on floor 1 and floor 5 together with an OM and an ADCP Floor 1 –80m above sea floor Floor 5 –270m above.
Time calibration system for the KM3NeT deep sea neutrino telescope S. Toscano, IFIC (Instituto de Física Corpuscular)
Time Calibration with Optical Beacons Pylos, Apr 2007 C.Bigongiari IFIC Pylos, Apr 2007 C.Bigongiari IFIC (CSIC – Universitat de València)
Ciro Bigongiari, Salvatore Mangano Results of the optical properties of sea water with the OB system.
Time Calibration of the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope 2 nd International Conference on Technology and Instrumentation in Particle Physics 08 – 14 June 2011.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
TRANSMISSION LENGTH STATUS HAROLD YEPES-RAMIREZ IFIC, January 12 th
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
PMT measurements in Antares Oleg Kalekin on behalf of Antares collaboration VLVnT 2011 Erlangen
Calibration of Under Water Neutrino Telescope ANTARES Garabed HALLADJIAN October 15 th, 2008 GDR Neutrino, CPPM, Marseille.
1 Ciro Bigongiari, Salvatore Mangano Results of the optical properties of sea water with the OB system.
Ciro Bigongiari, Salvatore Mangano, Results of the optical properties of sea water with the OB system.
Photon Transport Monte Carlo September 27, 2004 Matthew Jones/Riei IshizikiPurdue University Overview Physical processes PMT and electronics response Some.
A. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Reconstruction, Background Rejection Tools.
Characterization of Hamamatsu R12199 PMTs Oleg Kalekin KM3NeT Meeting CPPM, Marseille
Development of combined sensors for UHE neutrino detection Alexander Enzenhöfer ARENA 2010 Nantes,
Status of Detector Characterization a.k.a. Calibration & Monitoring Project Year 2 objectives ( → Mar ‘04) 1. Calibration plan (first draft in March.
Geant4 Simulation for KM3 Georgios Stavropoulos NESTOR Institute WP2 meeting, Paris December 2008.
Umberto Emanuele IFIC (CSIC-UV), Valencia (Spain) Status of Time Calibration System forKM3NeT.
Marseille 29 January 2013 Diego Real IFIC (CSIC – Universidad de Valencia) Instrumentation for Optical Calibration: Laser Beacon and Nanobeacon.
Measurement of the group refractive index in the ANTARES site with the Optical Beacons at 3 wavelengths ● Introduction ● Method ● Measurement with Monte.
Group refractive index ● Method ● Additional runs ● Wavelength distribution ● Systematics ● Results.
Light velocity at new wavelengths
Comparison between Aasim and Calibob
Simulation and Reconstruction code using Mathematica
Measurement of water optical properties in ANTARES
Tracking System at CERN 06 and 07 test beams
ANTARES time calibration
on behalf of the NEMO Collaboration
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
Atmospheric muons in ANTARES
Nanobeacon: A low cost calibration instrument for KM3NeT
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Presentation transcript:

KM3NeT Optical Calibration Umberto Emanuele IFIC (CSIC – University of Valencia, Spain) WPF/L KM3NeT Meeting Nikhef 5 th - 7 th July

Outline Time Calibration requirements Optical Beacons: ANTARES experience Optical Beacons for KM3NeT In situ tests of KM3NeT LEDs LASER: ANTARES results and KM3NeT prospects Time Calibration Simulation Conclusions 2

Time Calibration requirements Absolute time resolution -> Can be determined with a precision better than 110 ns (enough to correlate with astrophysics processes). Relative time resolution -> Chromatic dispersion and scattering amounts to σ ∼ 2 ns (at 50 m) -> TTS and PMT electronics contributions are less than 2 ns -> Time precision required for calibration offsets is σ ≤ 1 ns 3 Before deployment, the time calibration constants are determined in the laboratory. Time resolution cross-checks -> For OMs in the same storey, K 40 can be used for charge and intra-storey time calibration. -> Reconstructed muons can be used to further refine and cross- check the determination of the time constants. OM 0 OM 1 OM 2 40 K 40 Ca   Gaussian peak on coincidence plot Taking difference s by pairs Cherenkov e - (  decay )

1. Time Offsets determination Time residuals should be characterized by mean values well centered at zero. 4 storey 2 storey 9 storey 15 storey 21 Line 2 However, there is a linear delay due to the combination of Early photon + Walk effect. Deviations from the straight line are used for calibration. OM 0OM 1OM 2 storey LOB-ARS (ns) Optical Beacons (ANTARES experience) 4

Water current ≠ 0  60 m 300 m  60 m Water current = 0 L1L1 L2L2 L1L1 L2L2 L 1 = L 2 L 1 ≠ L 2 Example with ANTARES Lines 3, 4 and 5 which are quite aligned 2. Illuminating adjacent lines Storey rotationAnticorrelation Time Difference LOB L4F2 flashing to OMs L3 LOB L5F2 flashing to OMs L3 5 Optical Beacons (ANTARES experience) Relative intra DU calibration using adjacent OB will be complex. Too many corrections to apply

The early photon effect appears at high light regimes. It produces a delay in the arrival time similar to the walk effect. The PMT is unable to resolve multiple photons arriving at the same time. Only the arrival time of the earliest photons is recorded. Toy MC RUN Early photon effect Early Photon Region Single Photoelectron Region 6 Optical Beacons (ANTARES experience) 4. Time Resolution σ ~ 0.4 ns Time difference between a LED OB and an OM Electronics contribution less than 0.5 ns 0 0 0

HV tuning Hint of some ‘bad’ OMs Back to standard ~0.5 ns RMS ~ 2 ns RMS ~ 0.6 ns Retuning of feeding HV can be corrected with the OBs 5. High Voltage retuning 7 An Optical Beacon system can correct the T 0 s in case of unexpected changes as HV retuning Optical Beacons (ANTARES experience)

6. Laser Beacons 8 Optical Beacons (ANTARES experience) L1 L2 L3 L4 L6 L9 L7 Laser Beacon L5 L8 L10 Inter DU calibration by means of the Laser Beacon provides a common reference with a fixed position. Range from 160 m (~p.e. level) to 240 m (lack of statistics). Mean value of the time difference Laser - ARS for each floor. Data points fitted to a flat distribution. Intra DU calibration possible. Data 2007 Data 2008

9 RMS ~0.5 ns NO positioning corrected positioning corrected L7 F1 6. Laser Beacons Optical Beacons (ANTARES experience) The laser is fixed on the anchor. It can be used to check the line movements. If the line is considered rigid and straight, the time residuals has a RMS ~ 2.3 ns. Taking into account the shape of the line the values are distributed within RMS ~ 0.5 ns. CROSS-CHECK POSITIONING RMS ~2.3ns

INTER D.U. Calibration : Laser 532 nm 485 nm - Higher intensity ( > μJ ) and shorter pulses (< 1 ns) - No synchronization needed - More expensive but less redundancy required - Tunable by Liquid Crystal Optical attenuator - Collimated beam -> Diffusion device needed Decoupling inter-intra D.U. Calibration systems INTRA D.U. Calibration : Nano-Beacon Upward single LED housed inside OMs - Less expensive and high redundancy - Not triggered by the clock to avoid electronic noise - Frequency of several kHz depending on the DAQ system (300 ANTARES is too low) - Avoid cumbersome synchronization process, only one (or two) LED per nanobeacon Optical Calibration for KM3NeT

Pulser: Auto-triggered – External clock not needed Controlled by one (or two) DC Voltage: Two designs: 1.- LED intensity and frequency inter-correlated 2.- LED intensity and frequency non-correlated Control Electronic board: Select the intensity of flashing Select the trigger (external or auto-trigger) Provides an external trigger signal Select the frequency of the external trigger Optical Beacon for KM3NeT 1. NanoBeacon – First Prototypes I1 – Positive Power Suply (3.3 or 5 Volts) I2 – GND - Negative Power Supply (0 Volts) I3 – SDA of the I2C bus I4 – SDL of the I2C bus O1 – Trigger output O2 – Voltage to set flash intensity O3 – Common GND

Two PVC made pieces: One piece glued to the glass sphere (fixed) The second one screwed (in) to the first one: Holds the LED + Electronics Protect the PMT from the Nano-Beacon Light Possibility of replacement The final design depends on the definitive OM solution First prototypes are going to be tested on ANTARES line 9 Optical Beacon for KM3NeT 2. Preliminary Mechanics

Only intra D.U. calibration 1 LED integrated in the upper part of the OMs -> Higher Intensity and range (Not Cleaved) -> Simple electronics and mechanics (inexpensive) a.u. Optical Beacon for KM3NeT 3. Opening Angle A 15°opening angle is sufficient to illuminate OMs above the beacon even in perpendicular arrangement including potential misalignment 3m 40m

A LED Beacon (L12F2) with 4 LED candidates for KM3NeT is actually working in ANTARES. LED modelRise time (ns) (nm) FWHM (º)Intensity (pJ) CB CB NSPB500S AB Four Calibration Runs have been analyzed 2 UV LEDs and 4 different Blue LEDs In situ tests of KM3NeT LEDs RUNLEDN. Flashes 45161CB CB AB NSPB500S20061 Standard ANTARES setup Frequency = 300 Hz Duration = 1-2 min Standard ANTARES setup Frequency = 300 Hz Duration = 1-2 min 14 Special LED Beacon More calibration runs with more statistics under study

Run LED CB26 In situ tests of KM3NeT LEDs Intra DU calibration with KM3NeT LEDs 15 Early Photon Region Photoelectron Region

In situ tests of KM3NeT LEDs In KM3NeT Separation between floors bigger (30-40 m), less points in the fits. Longer D.U. distances, ~600 m. Optical Calibration will be performed in both early and photoelectron regions. But calibration in the Photoelectron region requires. 10 TIMES BIGGER FREQUENCY !!! OR 10 TIMES LONGER CALIBRATION RUNS !!! IMPORTANT POINT What will be the maximum KM3NeT DAQ acquisition frequency? Optical calibration will depend strongly on that ! Calibration regions and maximum distance 16

In situ tests of KM3NeT LEDs 17 Calibration regions and maximum distance 0.1 Hits per flash 1 Hits per flash Photoelectron region ANTARES max distance 150 m, Early-photon region limit LED MODEL 1 p.e./ flash 0.1 p.e./ flash ANTARES STD 70m150m CB26145m230m CB30120m195m AB87145m235m NSPB500150m250m

LASER: ANTARES results and KM3NeT prospects ENERGY per PULSE 0.1 p.e./ flash 0.01 p.e./ flash 0.2 mJ170.0 m210.0 m 0.4 mJ205.0 m250.0 m 1.2 mJ240.0 m285.0 m 18 KM3NeT LASERs will have higher intensity (≥ 12 mJ) and longer range * Run High Intensity (1.2 mJ) * Run Low Intensity (0.4 mJ) * Run Low Intensity (0.2 mJ) # Hits/# Flash LASER range in ANTARES Laser intensity can be changed by liquid crystal optical attenuator 0.1 Hits per flash 0.01 Hits per flash

Time Calibration simulation (LED & Laser) Water optical properties simulation Time Calibration simulation (LED & Laser) Water optical properties simulation 19 Time Calibration Simulation CALIBOB Special simulation code for timing calibration with Optical Beacons (includes OM angular acceptance, emission light distribution and ARS response) Special simulation code for timing calibration with Optical Beacons (includes OM angular acceptance, emission light distribution and ARS response) Used currently in ANTARES for: DATA MC, CALIBOB Laser Beacon time calibration simulation

Time Calibration software has been optimized for KM3NeT Already tuned to KM3NeT layouts Time Calibration Simulations are well working Scattering, early photon and photoelectron regions are well reproduced Time Calibration software has been optimized for KM3NeT Already tuned to KM3NeT layouts Time Calibration Simulations are well working Scattering, early photon and photoelectron regions are well reproduced Time Calibration Simulation Kalibob for KM3NeT 20 λ OF SCATTERING = ∞ λ OF SCATTERING = 60 m λ OF SCATTERING = 40 m Gaus+Exponential convolution fit will improve time offsets values

21 Conclusions Decoupling intra/inter DU calibration  Global movements of the DU don’t allow a “trouble-free” calibration Intra DU calibration  Time calibration less subject to positioning and DU rotation  Less intensity required (may be just 1-2 LED per floor)  Scattering + attenuation corrections not so critical  Cross-check of first storeys by means Laser Beacons Inter DU calibration  Possible with Laser Beacons  Directly correlated with detector angular resolution  Cross-check with the positioning system HV  By means of the Optical Beacons system is possible to correct the T 0 s in case of unexpected changes as HV retuning DAQ  High frequency rate of DAQ is fundamental to calibrate in the photo-electron region (enough statistics to fit the time residual distributions) Time Calibration Software  MC simulation tool (KALIBOB) ready to optimize the time calibration

22

Back Up 23

θ OM SPHERE NANOBEACON θ ~ 20º or 30º In principle and following our experience with the LED Beacons in ANTARES the bio- fouling is negligible. According to the studies carried out in ANTARES an angle of 20 º would reduce the effects of the bio-fouling. Light Optical Beacon for KM3NeT 4. Zenith Angle

Nano-Beacon Beacon LED 5mmØ, ap. 30° Alumium screen system for cooling e/o & e/e conversion PCB Screen to shield conversion board Space for sphere logic (incl. LED driver) provisional

2. Illuminating adjacent lines ANTARES experience advises against illuminating adjacent lines with Optical Beacons Natural movements of the DU do not allow a “trouble-free” calibration. Small rotations of a DU determine a big variation in angular acceptance of PMTs. Displacements of the DU change distances and T 0 s. Inter & Intra DU calibration by lateral LEDs will be complex. Too many corrections to apply. Not advisable 26 Optical Beacons (ANTARES experience)