Industry Standard CM Indicators Mike Hayes Exelon Nuclear CM SME CMBG Steering Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SITE HUMAN PERFORMANCE EVENT-FREE DAY RESET CRITERIA
Advertisements

Micro Control Solutions Stability System II rev. 6.4
DISTRICT FIVE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION UPDATE TRAINING Submission of Working Schedule Specification SP A.
INPO Update CMBG Meeting June 2013
Ensure Vendor/Engineer of Choice Product Quality
Good Practice Performance Indicators Engineering Practices Working Group Performance Indicator Sub-Group Engineering Performance Metrics D. C. Lowe October.
1 CMBG 2009 Copyright 2009 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations Configuration Management Activities, Including Margin Management David Hembree INPO June.
Cyber Security Plan Implementation Presentation to CMBG Glen Frix, Duke Energy June 20,
2007 CMBG Conference Temporary Configuration Changes Tony Hathcock Duke Energy - Oconee June 18-20, 2007 Charleston, SC.
Cumulative Impacts James Slider November 7, 2013.
10.5 Report Performance The process of collecting and distributing performance information, including status reports, progress measurements and forecasts.
Page 1 R Risk-Driven and Iterative Development. Page 2 R Copyright © 1997 by Rational Software Corporation What the Iterative Life Cycle Is Not It is.
Readiness Index – Is your application ready for Production? Jeff Tatelman SQuAD October 2008.
Development plan and quality plan for your Project
Office of Project Management Metrics Report Presentation
1 CMBG 2009 PSEG Nuclear Vendor Technical Document Program Deficiencies, Successes, and Cost Savings Presented By: Paul Davis PSEG Nuclear, Engineering.
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin.
1 CMBG History Presented By: John Parler CMBG Steering Committee.
2007 CMBG Conference David Hembree Institute of Nuclear Power Operations June 20, 2007 Charleston, SC INPO Perspective on Configuration Management.
INPO Update Operational Excellence Outcomes and Configuration Management Glenn J. Neises, INPO Sr. Evaluator June 2004 CMBG Glenn J. Neises, INPO Sr. Evaluator.
Project Status Report Presenter Name Presentation Date.
RIC 2009 Rulemaking Process: “NRC and Industry Perspectives on Improving Quality, Timeliness, and Consistency in 10 CFR 50.55a “A New Approach” Jacob Zimmerman.
CM Training Best Practices John Parler VC Summer Station.
Margin Management. PAGE 2 Margin Management Plant Shutdowns 1.Late 1990’s – numerous “surprise” long-term plant shutdowns 2.Shutdowns resulted when a.
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG Characteristics of a Good Calculation Program Presented.
Modification Process Simplification Mike Hayes Exelon Nuclear.
EDS 2 Early Delivery Systems Review and Request for Approval May 2007 John Webb.
Obsolescence Impact on Configuration Management
Integrating EM QA Performance Metrics with Performance Analysis Processes August 26, 2009 Robert Hinds, Manager, Quality Assurance Engineering & Greg Peterson,
Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin Management Bill Kline FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) June 2, 2008 Shell Beach, CA.
2006 CMBG Conference Keith A. Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna 2006 CMBG Conference June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA Configuration Management Awareness Training.
2006 CMBG Conference Workshop 2: Facilitator: Keith Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA.
Project Chartering & Approval Process
2010 CMBG Conference Temporary Design Changes Tony Hathcock Duke Energy - Oconee June , 2010 Charlotte, NC.
Electronic Design Change Process Paul Tobin Jr.- PKMJ Technical Services.
APPLICATIONS What’s New in MPPM? March 2013 APPLICATIONS01 March 2013| 1 Quality Function.
Dynamics GP Inventory GPUG St. Louis Chapter Meeting Tuesday, September 15 th, Getting more out of your.
1 CMBG 2009 Planning for Obsolescence June 27, 2009 John Parler South Carolina Electric & Gas.
Standard Design Process Overview
Budgeting in Microsoft Dynamics AX BY: BRAD GEHRLS AND RYAN SEITZ.
Delivering the Nuclear Promise Overview
Introduction to CMIS, an Electronic Design Change Process Presented by: Mark Gillis (FirstEnergy) and Brad Diggans (Rolls-Royce)
Design Oversight Working Group (DOWG) – Next Steps
Instructor: Lloyd Hancock
CM-101 Configuration Management Fundamentals
DNP Initiative ENG-003 Standard Design Process Overview Configuration Management Benchmarking Group June 12, 2017.
Configuration Management (CM) Standard Performance Measures
Writing a Project Plan.
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Description of Revision
Presented By: Mike Stout – PPL Glenn Neises - INPO
CMBG Performance Indicator Working Group
Configuration Control and the Standard Nuclear Performance Model
Fast Track Modifications Keith Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna
Document Update Benchmark results
Break Out 6: CM Organizational Structure
Program Status (Chart 1)
Results of Design Reviews
Margin Management Configuration Management Benchmarking Group
Design Oversight Working Group (DOWG) Status Update
FSAR Configuration Control at PPL Susquehanna, LLC.
CMBG Performance Indicator Workshop
Jim Powers - Director, Fleet Engineering
Configuration Management AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee April 9, 2019 Cleveland 2005.
Workshop 1: Processing Facility Configuration Information
Vendor Technical Information
Final Design Authorization
Superintendent – Design Engineering
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
Key Activities/ Milestones
Presentation transcript:

Industry Standard CM Indicators Mike Hayes Exelon Nuclear CM SME CMBG Steering Committee

Design Quality Control (also called Mod Quality) Consequential errors (incl ) Utility design quality Vendor design quality

Configuration Control Temp Mods; total number (a blue window) Temp Mods; greater than 1 operating cycle Document Updates – vendor manuals – calcs – drawings – design package closure (or days to mod closure) 2

Work Scope Control Outage or T-week milestone adherence Design changes off track (in recovery) Production monitoring (study) 3

Cross-Functional Organizational Behaviors in CM Partially implemented Mods Design complete but not scheduled Designs added after milestone (fast track) Number of top plant health issues (for example margin issues, Top 10, degraded/NC etc.) > X years old since original submittal that require a design solution [timeliness metric for important CM/design issue resolution] 4

Indicator Basis Document 5 Indicator Title:Revision No.:Group Leads: Description: Applicable Industry Documents (INPO, NRC, etc.):Trajectory Driving Forces: Org Eff / Workload / Proficiency Indicator Reporting Levels: Unit / Station/ FleetInput Period: Monthly / Quarterly / Biannually Graded/Colored or Information Only (select one)Leading or Lagging(select one) Raw Data Element:Data Units:Data Source: Calculations: Performance Criteria: Identify data series (raw data or calculated) that will be colored by performance criteria: Data to Display on Chart: Site Fleet Data to Display on Table: Site Fleet Additional Comments Fields Required: Indicator Uses: What is the basis or source of the data elements selected? What is the basis or source of the calculations? What is the basis or source of the performance criteria? Reason for Current Revision (if applicable) Date of Revision (if applicable): Industry Peer Reviewers: