(Srm) model application: SRM was developed by Martinec (1975) in small European basins. With the progress of satellite remote sensing of snow cover, SRM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydrology Rainfall - Runoff Modeling (I)
Advertisements

Global Precipitation Precipitation averages just about 1 meter per year over Earth but, like wealth, varies widely from place to place and from time to.
C2 NWS Snow Model. C2 Snow Model Terms  SWE - Snow water equivalent  AESC - Areal extent of snow cover  Heat Deficit - Energy required to bring the.
Climate and Hydrological and Extremes in Lake Victoria Basin An Assessment of Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Variability and Change Impacts on.
Runoff Processes Daene C. McKinney
Hydrological Modeling for Upper Chao Phraya Basin Using HEC-HMS UNDP/ADAPT Asia-Pacific First Regional Training Workshop Assessing Costs and Benefits of.
Estimation and Prediction of Fresh Water Runoff Based on Atmospheric Data: Preliminary results Cody D. S. Sipkema 4 th Year Environmental Engineering Co-op.
International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development Kathmandu, Nepal Mandira Singh Shrestha Satellite rainfall application in the Narayani basin CORDEX.
Effects of climate variability on hydrological processes in Marmot Creek: Approach and Challenges Evan Siemens and Dr. John Pomeroy Centre for Hydrology,
Application and Evaluation of a Snowmelt Runoff Model in the Tamor River Basin, Eastern Himalaya using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo Data Assimilation Approach.
Upper Brushy Creek Flood Study – Flood mapping and management Rainfall depths were derived using USGS SIR , Atlas of Depth Duration Frequency.
Medium-range Hydrometeorological Forecasts of the Big Wood Basin in 2006 (plus a look forward at 2007…) A Project for the Pacific Northwest Regional Collaboratory.
Using 925 mb Temperatures to Improve Operational River Forecasts Ronald S. W. Horwood Meteorologist National Weather Service Northeast River Forecast Center.
Hydrological Modeling FISH 513 April 10, Overview: What is wrong with simple statistical regressions of hydrologic response on impervious area?
Outline Background, climatology & variability Role of snow in the global climate system Indicators of climate change Future projections & implications.
From Topographic Maps to Digital Elevation Models Daniel Sheehan IS&T Academic Computing Anne Graham MIT Libraries.
Hydrology & Water Resources Engineering
For the lack of ground data the verification of the TRMM performance could not be checked for the entire catchments, however it has been tested over Bangladesh.
6/3/2010 ER FFG Conference An Overview of Gridded Flash Flood Guidance; A Spatially Distributed Runoff and Threshold-Runoff Based Approach Erick Boehmler.
CARPE DIEM Centre for Water Resources Research NUID-UCD Contribution to Area-3 Dusseldorf meeting 26th to 28th May 2003.
Recent advances in remote sensing in hydrology
Assessment of Hydrology of Bhutan What would be the impacts of changes in agriculture (including irrigation) and forestry practices on local and regional.
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 Slide 1 Analysis of Evaporation Basic Calibration Workshop March 10-13, 2009 LMRFC.
By studying the layers of snowpack we can improve our predictions of when and where avalanches are likely to occur. Note that precipitation amounts seem.
HEC-HMS Runoff Computation.
1 P. Givone, Cemagref - Direction Scientifique PREVISION DES CRUES Hydrological Models for Flood Forecast.
Preliminary Applications of the HL-RDHM within the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Ed Clark, Hydrologist Presented July 26 th, 2007 as part of the.
Snow Properties Relation to Runoff
RESULTS OF RESEARCH RELATED TO CHARIS IN KAZAKHSTAN I. Severskiy, L. Kogutenko.
MODSCAG fractional snow covered area (fSCA )for central and southern Sierra Nevada Spatial distribution of snow water equivalent across the central and.
Quality control of daily data on example of Central European series of air temperature, relative humidity and precipitation P. Štěpánek (1), P. Zahradníček.
Source waters and flow paths in an alpine catchment, Colorado, Front Range, United States Fengjing Liu, Mark W. Williams, and Nel Caine 2004.
Adjustment of Global Gridded Precipitation for Orographic Effects Jennifer Adam.
Spatial distribution of snow water equivalent across the central and southern Sierra Nevada Roger Bales, Robert Rice, Xiande Meng Sierra Nevada Research.
Additional data sources and model structure: help or hindrance? Olga Semenova State Hydrological Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia Pedro Restrepo Office.
Review of SWRCB Water Availability Analysis Emphasis on Dry Creek Water Availability Analysis.
WISKI Open Water and Ice Bernard Trevor, M.Eng. P.Eng. River Forecast Section Environment and Sustainable Resource Development WISKI ESRD Users Conference.
Evapotranspiration Estimates over Canada based on Observed, GR2 and NARR forcings Korolevich, V., Fernandes, R., Wang, S., Simic, A., Gong, F. Natural.
Terrain Susceptibility Kyle Renner GIS in Water Resources 2015
ARC GIS IN THE SANTA RIVER BASIN IN PERU GIS in Water Resources Fall 2006 Professor: Dr. David Maidment Presented by Presented by Eusebio Ingol.
Surface Water Surface runoff - Precipitation or snowmelt which moves across the land surface ultimately channelizing into streams or rivers or discharging.
Task B7. Monitoring and Forecasting for Water Management and Drought/Flood Hazards Goals National scale characterization of snow water resources (Afghanistan’s.
Basic Hydrology: Rainfall-Runoff – I
CE 374 K – Hydrology Second Quiz Review Daene C. McKinney.
Hydrological Forecasting. Introduction: How to use knowledge to predict from existing data, what will happen in future?. This is a fundamental problem.
DEVELOPMENT OF A CELL BASED MODEL FOR STREAM FLOW PREDICTION IN UNGAUGED BASINS USING GIS DATA P B Hunukumbura & S B Weerakoon Department of Civil Engineering,
TOP_PRMS George Leavesley, Dave Wolock, and Rick Webb.
The Importance of Snowmelt Runoff Modeling for Sustainable Development and Disaster Prevention Muzafar Malikov Space Research Centre Academy of Sciences.
STORM WATER DRAINAGE. Precipitation on any ground finds its own way to run off to the point from where it can flow in line and continue to meet generally.
-1 DR. S & S. S GHANDHY GOVT. ENGINEERING COLLEGE, SURAT. SUB : HYDROLOGY & WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING ( ) TOPIC : HYETOGRAPH & HYDROGRAPH ANALYSIS.
Hydrology & Water Resources Engineering ( )
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 4
UNIT – III FLOODS Types of floods Following are the various types of floods: 1.Probable Maximum Flood (PMF):This is the flood resulting from the most sever.
Integrated measurements & modeling of Sierra Nevada water budgets UCM PI: Roger Bales LLNL Co-PI: Reed Maxwell.
BUILDING AND RUNNING THE HYDROLOGICAL MODEL
HYDROLOGY Lecture 10 Unit Hydrograph
Rainfall-Runoff modeling
Simulation of stream flow using WetSpa Model
Digital model for estimation of flash floods using GIS
Change in Flood Risk across Canada under Changing Climate
USING NUMERICAL PREDICTED RAINFALL DATA FOR A DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODEL TO ENHANCE FLOOD FORECAST: A CASE STUDY IN CENTRAL VIETNAM Nguyen Thanh.
Precipitation Analysis
Hydrology CIVL341.
Floods and Flood Routing
Preciptation.
Preciptation.
Hydrology CIVL341 Introduction
Chapter Four RUNOFF When a storm occurs, a portion of rainfall infiltrates into the ground and some portion may evaporate. The rest flows as a thin sheet.
HEC-HMS Runoff Computation Modeling Direct Runoff with HEC-HMS Empirical models Empirical models - traditional UH models - traditional UH models - a.
Hydrologic modeling of Waller Creek
Presentation transcript:

(Srm) model application: SRM was developed by Martinec (1975) in small European basins. With the progress of satellite remote sensing of snow cover, SRM has been applied to larger and larger basins. The Snowmelt-Runoff Model (SRM) is designed to simulate and forecast daily stream flow in mountain basins where snowmelt is a major runoff factor. Most recently, it has also been applied to evaluate the effect of a changed climate on seasonal snow cover and runoff. basin of the Ganges River Recently, the runoff was modeled in the basin of the Ganges River, which has an area of 917,444 km 2 and an elevation range from 0 to 8,840 m, m.s.l. Contrary to the original assumptions, there appear to be no limits for application with regard to the basin size and the elevation range.

INPUTSTAGE DERIVATIONSTAGE MODELSTAGE OUTPUTSTAGE Daily Discharge Simulation Watershe d 0.25˚ gridded Daily Rainfall Data_2013 Daily Temperatur e for 2013 Snow cover Mapping for 2013 Slope & Aspect. Derivation of Parameters, Variables & Constants Landsat 8 (OLI/TIRS Bands) Ancillary Data SRTM Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Q n+1 = {[ C Sn.a n (T n + ΔT n ) S n + C Rn.P n ].A.(10000/86400).(1-k n+1 )}+ Q n.k n+1. Basin Elevation Snowmelt Runoff Modeling

Snowmelt runoff model: Q n+1 = {[C Sn.a n (T n + Δ T n ) S n + C Rn.P n ].A.(10000/86400).(1-k n+1 ) }+ Q n k n+1. where: Q = average daily discharge [m 3 s -1 ] C = runoff coefficient expressing the losses as a ratio (runoff/precipitation), with C S referring to snowmelt and C R to rain a = degree-day factor [cm o C -1 d -1 ] indicating the snowmelt depth resulting from 1 degree-day S = ratio of the snow covered area to the total area P = precipitation contributing to runoff [cm]. A preselected threshold temperature, T CRIT, determines whether this contribution is rainfall and immediate. If precipitation is determined by T CRIT to be new snow, it is kept on storage over the hitherto snow free area until melting conditions occur. A = area of the basin or zone [km 2 ] Source: Jaroslav Martinec, Albert Rango & Ralph Roberts., S R M - SNOWMELT RUNOFF MODEL, USER’S MANUAL - UPDATED EDITION FOR WINDOWS, WinSRM Version 1.11., February, 2008.

T= number of degree-days [ o C d] Δ T= the adjustment by temperature lapse rate when extrapolating the temperature from the station to the average hypsometric elevation of the basin or zone [ o C d] (0.67 o C lapse per 100m rise in elevation) (17) k = recession coefficient indicating the decline of discharge in a period without snowmelt or rainfall: k = (m, m + 1 are the sequence of days during a true recession flow period). n = sequence of days during the discharge computation period. Equation is written for a time lag between the daily temperature cycle and the resulting discharge cycle of 18 hours. In this case, the number of degree- days measured on the nth day corresponds to the discharge on the n + 1 day. Various lag times can be introduced by a subroutine. conversion from cmkm 2 d -1 to m 3 s -1

 T, S and P are variables to be measured or determined each day, c R, c S, lapse rate to determine T, T CRIT, k and the lag time are parameters which are characteristic for a given basin or, more generally, for a given climate.  If the elevation range of the basin exceeds 500 m, it is recommended that the basin be subdivided into elevation zones of about 500 m each. For an elevation range of 1500 m and three elevation zones A, B and C, the model equation becomes:

Snowmelt runoff model necessities for execution: 1. Basin characteristics 1.1 Basin and zone areas 1.2 Aspect 1.2 Area-elevation curve (Hypsometric Mean) 2. Variables 2.1 Temperature, ˚C 2.2 Precipitation, P 2.3 Snow covered area, S 3. Parameters 3.1 Runoff coefficient, c 3.2 Degree-day factor, a 3.3 Temperature lapse rate, 3.4 Critical temperature, T CRIT 3.5 Rainfall contributing area, RCA 3.6 Recession coefficient, k 3.7 Time Lag, L 4. SRM For Windows (Winsrm 1.11)

Basin Characteristics Table 6: Showing area and % area of 6 elevation zones S.noElevation ZonesArea in Sq.km% Area

Area Elevation curve – hypsometric mean elevation Area of Different Elevation Zones showing hypsometric mean elevation of each Zones Zone Elevation in m Area in Sq.km% Area Mean Area Hypsometric Mean Elev.(m)

zone wise aspect and its corresponding area

Daily temperature data Daily minimum, Maximum values are collected and average is taken as input

Temperature - Extrapolation = temperature lapse rate [  C per 100 m] = altitude of the temperature station [m] = hypsometric mean elevation of a zone [m]

Rainfall Distribution of rainfall varies in the different area of the catchment degree gridded rainfall gives number of observations in the different zones of the catchment. Each elevation zone covers 2 or 3 grids in the catchment. In that case average rainfall of number of grids is considered for each elevation zones in rainfall derivations.

Snow cover Area Multi temporal Satellite data used

APPLICATION OF SRM Step 1: Entering of basin characteristics derived using DEM. Step 2: It is add stimulation stage which is the second stage of adding constant parameters. Step 3: Addition of variables are proceeded through clicking Data -> Variables-> period of record, the table opened, from which the records prepared for 365 days san be added zone wise. Step 4: It involves in running the simulation to get the Discharge for the entire year. It can be done by clicking Run -> Simulation -> Year Round Simulation using the model.

Discharge calculated for the year 2013 using this model and software application gives quantum of annual discharge of million cubic meters in the Dhauliganga catchment. Average discharge of about m³/s inferred from the simulated values.

Basin Discharge Simulation Results The discharge derived from the software for the year 2013 shows peak discharge of 1110 m³/s in the mid of June where the peaks of snow melt as well as rainfall occurs together with total yearly discharge of Million m³. Daily average discharge for the year is m³/s where as 80% discharge occurs in the month of June, July and August at an average rate of 200 to 450 m³/s.

conclusion Snowmelt runoff modeling for the Dhauliganga catchment area is done effectively by integrated Remote Sensing based snow cover assessment, DEM and hydro meteorological data in temperature index model. Further improvements can be made for achieving better results by validating the model with observed discharge data, running the model for longer duration about 5 to 10 years and usage of high resolution optical cloud free data or microwave data for snow melt runoff assessment.