Nevada Nevada Educator Performance Framework – Other Licensed Personnel Recommendations Dr. Pamela Salazar, Chair, Nevada Teachers and Leaders Council.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
Connecting Teacher Evaluation to Student Academic Progress Implementing Standard 7 0 August 2012.
Illinois State Board of Education
Elementary School Counselor
1 Triangulated Standards-based Evaluation Framework Kathleen J. Skinner, Ed.D. Director, MTA Center for Education Policy & Practice Kansas Evaluation Committee.
SB 578: Professional Development and Renewal Jeffrey A. Aranowski, Division Supervisor Public School Recognition/Office of the General Counsel Illinois.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Student Learning and Growth Goals 101: Requirements and Recommendations Spring 2015 Webinar.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
Southeastern Louisiana University College of Education & Human Development Conceptual Framework: Setting the Standard for Excellence through Best Practice.
Curriculum Leadership The Central Figure is the Principal.
Module 1: PERA Illinois Administrative Code Part 50
Measuring Principal Effectiveness Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Measuring Principal.
December 6, 2007 Site-Based Governance Local and National Models iDivision Los Angeles Unified School District January 2008.
Teacher/Principal Evaluation Overview (Digging a bit deeper) April 19, 2011 Dana Anderson, ESD 113 Teaching and Learning.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
April –February 2014 – Advisory Council (SCAC) convenes –April 2014 – NYSED School Counselor Summit –June 2014 – Summit recommendations to BOR.
UPDATE: SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAMS BOCES STAFF/CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK MARCH 5, 2015 Gloria A. Jean, President, NYS School Counselor Association.
Nevada Educator Evaluation Presented by: The Nevada Teachers and Leaders Council.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Program Guidelines for Students who are Visually Impaired PRESENTATION TO: California Transcribers.
What Does Supplement, Not Supplant Mean?. 2 Fiscal Requirements Supplement, not Supplant –
Educator Evaluation Spring Convening Connecting Policy, Practice and Practitioners May 28-29, 2014 Marlborough, Massachusetts.
Kathy Mears National Catholic Educational Association Teacher Performance Development Process.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
Minnesota FAED Project Survey Deaf Education Summit April 22, 2010.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Teacher Evaluation: Professional Practice Compass Update April 2012.
Title II, Part A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
PUSD Evaluations for Governing Board Presentation May 14, 2015 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Update on the MA Task Force on Evaluation of Teachers and Administrators Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Associate Commissioner.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Presentation to the Rhode Island Association of School Committees: A Comparative Analysis of Education Governance in Rhode Island and Massachusetts John.
Dr. Mary Czajkowski Superintendent, Barnstable Public Schools MASCA SPRING CONFERENCE MAKING CHANGE HAPPEN.
 Teachers 21 June 8,  Wiki with Resources o
Organizational Process The activities conducted by an educational institution or school is called organizational process Which consist of series of steps.
Teachers of Teachers of Mathematics (TOTOM) Bend, OR September 6, 2013 Mark Freed, ODE Mathematics Education Specialist ODE Update.
1 SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. 2 Purpose: School Site Council The organization by which the school community comes together to chart the school’s path to improvement.
Implementing NVACS The State Role. State Law NRS NRS NRS
English Mastery Council Update District Policy Criteria Recommendations to the Nevada State Board of Education Dr. Magdalena Martinez, Chair - English.
E VALUATION R ECOMMENDATIONS FOR O THER L ICENSED E DUCATIONAL P ERSONNEL (OLEP)/G ROUP 3 State Board of Education Meeting November 12, 2015.
STAND UP FOR OHIO’S CHILDREN : BE COUNTED! Here is what is at stake on Tuesday, November 11, 2014: Elementary school art Elementary school music Elementary.
Washoe County School District Application to use an Alternate Teacher Evaluation System State Board of Education Meeting April 28, 2016.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
1. 2 The Great Teaching and Leading Fund (GTLF) was created in the State General Fund during Nevada’s 78th Legislative Session (2015) via Senate Bill.
Montgomery Township Board of Education
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
So, What is Teacher Leadership?
Arizona Teaching Standards
State Board of Education Progress Update
Additional Staffing Request
Recommendation: ASD Licensed Specialist
School Health Advisory Council SHAC Overview October 12, 2017
Colorado Department of Education
Presentation transcript:

Nevada Nevada Educator Performance Framework – Other Licensed Personnel Recommendations Dr. Pamela Salazar, Chair, Nevada Teachers and Leaders Council (TLC) Presentation to Nevada State Board of Education, April 30, 2015

Charge of the Nevada Teachers and Leaders Council SB 407(2013) added to NRS NRS NRS requires the Teachers and Leaders Council (TLC) to: >Make recommendations to the State Board of Education concerning the adoption of regulations for establishing a statewide performance evaluation system that includes:  “…without limitation, a principal, vice principal, counselors, librarians and other licensed educational personnel…”  “…3c: consider the role of professional standards…counselors, librarians, and other licensed educational personnel.”

History: TLC and Group The TLC adopted a guiding belief that certain “specialist personnel who serve as licensed employees who spend at least 50% of the work year devoted to providing educational services that support students to access and/or process the curriculum to meet the academic standards within the realm of all educational settings” be included in the statewide performance evaluation framework.

NRS NRS District Accountability Report 2(b) “Other staff” means all persons who are not reported as administrators or teachers, including, without limitation: (1) School counselors, school nurses and other employees who spend at least 50 percent of their work year providing emotional support, non-instructional guidance or medical support to pupils;

NRS NRS District Accountability Report (c) “Teacher” means a person licensed pursuant to chapter 391 of NRS who is classified by the board of trustees of the school district: (1) As a teacher and who spends at least 50 percent of his or her work year providing instruction or discipline to pupils; or (2) As instructional support staff, who does not hold a supervisory position and who spends not more than 50 percent of his or her work year providing instruction to pupils. Such instructional support staff includes, without limitation, librarians and persons who provide instructional support.

Recommended Criteria for Defining Group 3 Educators Licensed by NDE AND Teacher who serves as “Instructional Support” because they spend not more than 50% of their work year providing instruction to students/learners OR Educational Personnel who spend at least 50% of their work year providing student level and/or system level services that support students to access and/or process the curriculum to meet the academic standard

Grouping of OLP Educators GroupTeaching Professional with Unique Roles Specialized Educational Professionals Definition Defined by function: Librarians Other licensed educational personnel who spend not more than 50% of their work year providing instruction to students/learners Defined by function: Counselors Other licensed educational personnel who spend at least 50% of their work year providing student level or system level services that support students to access and/or process the curriculum

Teaching Professionals with Unique Roles Instructional Standards Rubric

Specialized Educational Professionals Professional Practice Standards

Suggestions Regarding Instructional Standards GroupTeaching Professionals with Unique Roles (purple rubric) Specialized Educational Professionals (green rubric) Instructional Standards Modify the indicators to begin with verbs-eliminating need for “teacher” language and broadening the reach to all professionals and context Expand and define evidence and descriptors that provide for the nuance for each indicator – this would NOT modify the indicator language Modify the indicators to begin with verbs-eliminating the need for “teacher” language and broadening the reach to all professionals and context Expand and define evidence and descriptors that provide for the nuance for each indicator- this would NOT modify the indicator language Add addendum to rubric regarding level of implementation. (yellow bar) “Understands and/or utilizes the standards to enable self, students, teaching staff/colleagues and/or parents to:”

Suggestions Regarding Professional Responsibilities Replace NEPF Teacher Professional Responsibilities Standard 5 Student Perception with new Standard 5, Professional Performance, to include the indicators: Engages in evidence and/or data-based decision-making to manage and provide services/support Demonstrates current professional knowledge and competency to provide direct and/or indirect professional services to support the learner Manages program, caseload, and/or workload related to specific role and responsibilities

Professional Responsibilities Rubric

Weightings Group Teaching Professionals with Unique Roles Specialized Educational Professionals Weighting 25% Instructional Standards 25% Professional Responsibilities Standards 15% Professional Practice Standards 35% Professional Responsibilities Standards