School of Environment and Development Faculty of Humanities Challenges at School level surrounding Ethical Approval for research Rosie Williams Teaching.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QAA Research Teaching Linkages: Enhancing Graduate Attributes Theme Linda Juleff, QAA Steering Group Representative.
Advertisements

The School Research Ethics Committee Welsh School of Architecture.
An Introduction to the Ethics Review Procedure Lindsay Unwin: Research & Innovation Services, UREC Secretary.
The Time Allocation Survey (TAS) – Example Activities Department of Finance Julia Hastings – May 2011.
Graduate Research Degree Orientation 2013 Decision Making and Governance.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR PROSPECTIVE RESEARCHERS.
Comparative student and staff numbers. Total student numbers (fte)
Introduction to PhD Code of Practice Jo FerrieInterim Director Graduate Training September 2013.
SACS CASI Background Dedicated to advancing excellence in education worldwide, AdvancED provides accreditation, research, and professional services to.
Student to generate their ethical approval form alongside their research proposal which will be reviewed and considered by a member of academic staff (Project.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
Out of school hours care Contract management plan information session.
Quality Assurance at the University of Edinburgh Business School Dr Inger Seiferheld, Director of Quality & Accreditations
Student Attendance Monitoring Martina Daly 23 rd September, 2010.
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) What is RCR? New Requirements for RCR Who Does it Affect? When? Data Management What is the Institutional Plan? What.
School of Arts and Social Sciences 28 April 2010.
Region 5: RAB Meeting National Co-op Program 3/25/03 Region 5: RAB Meeting National Co-op Program 3/25/03.
 The IRB: Why, what and how  Core Concerns: Subject selection, subject consent to participate, confidentiality  IRB Protocol Forms  Contact Information.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
STRUCTURE Institute of Mathematics and Statistics (IMS): Part of Faculty of Science, Technology and Medical Studies (STMS) Responsibilities - Mathematics.
Humanities and Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee (HSSREC) April 2014.
CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT PRESENTATION BY PROF. MITULLAH; PROF. NYINGURO & PROF. THOITHI AT SENSITIZATION WORKSHOP FOR DEANS, DIRECTORS, CHAIRS OF DEPARTMENTS.
CEUs: Delivering Quality Programs Across Texas Presented by Bret Hendricks and Bobbie Lawrence.
Academic Approval and Periodic Review Staff Development for Chairs and Secretaries of Approval and Periodic Review Events.
Approaching your final years of research Kate Marsh Faculty Director of Postgraduate Research, Humanities & Social Sciences.
1 Office of the Vice President for Planning and Policy Overview of Policy Administration.
WCHRI Summer Studentship Competition 2016 Venue: ECHA Date: January 12, 2016.
Reasons for non- attendance at induction by international students Claire O'Leary, University of Birmingham, July 2009.
Academic Workload Allocation Model, or Teaching Load Database.
IRB Presentation to the Pediatric Ethics Subcommittee of the FDA regarding “Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist Test in Disorders of Puberty”
Introduction to the Doctoral Training Centre (DTC) for Transart Institute doctoral students.
Writing for funding Faculty of Humanities Postgraduate Research Training John Canning
WCHRI Graduate Studentship Competition 2016 WCHRI Grants Michelle Bailleux, Research Grants Administrator
SEBE Ethics Information Rod Gameson & Richard Hall.
NINE DTP Northern Ireland and North East Doctoral Training Partnership
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
A LITTLE BIT ABOUT US EDUCATION E-REB
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Improving your English Language English Language Education (ELE)
Process for reviewing Masters and UG student ethics applications
TN: TEACH AACTE Grant TN TEACH: The TN EPP Assistive and Collaborative Help Network.
Research Ethics: a short guide for Staff 2017/18
Research Ethics: a short guide for PhD students 2017/18
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
Chair of Chemistry Graduate School
Training Appendix Revised January 2018.
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
Support for Heads of Department and Departmental Managers
Meeting Quality Standards when working in collaboration
A LITTLE BIT ABOUT US EDUCATION E-REB
Linking assurance and enhancement
Chair’s Actions Researcher completes the Online Ethics Checklist
Overview of Sabbatical Leave Policies and Procedures
Submission rates workshop Department of Economics
Process for reviewing student ethics applications
Researcher completes the Online Ethics Checklist
Dr. Sarah Quinton, UREC Chair,
Chair’s Actions Researcher completes the Online Ethics Checklist
Managing the Supervisory relationship and Support
Progression and Advancement
Assessment and completion
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Student Administration & Support (SA&S)
Research Degree Independent Chair Workshop 4 April 2019
Preparation for the Doctoral Examination 11 March 2019
GC University Lahore Quality Enhancement Cell
Presentation transcript:

School of Environment and Development Faculty of Humanities Challenges at School level surrounding Ethical Approval for research Rosie Williams Teaching and Learning Administrator

Background The School of Environment and Development (SED) combines the discipline areas of Geography, Planning & Landscape, Architecture, and the Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM) c.80 academic staff c.1000 undergraduate students c.650 postgraduate taught students c.170 postgraduate research students

Background (cont) Much of the research undertaken by both staff and students of all levels is applied, and involves primary data gathering from human subjects. A large proportion of the work undertaken is overseas in developing countries, with vulnerable groups.

School Ethical Advisory Group Chaired by Director of Research Has representation from each of the 4 disciplines, the Research Development Administrator and Teaching and Learning Administrator Vets all Ethical Applications for the School from students and staff Currently meets monthly

Staff Ethical Approval Staff are given guidance via School intranet into how to complete the form. Recent workshop held to give best practice in Ethical Approval Staff are informed by School Research Team during research bid process about Ethical Approval Around submissions a year from Academic Staff

Taught Students Ethical Approval School recently had approval from UEC for two sets of guidelines  Ethics Approval for Student Research Projects with Adults able to give Informed Consent  Ethics Approval for Student Research Projects with Young Adults and Children These guidelines alongside completed and signed tick sheets act as the ethical approval. Without these guidelines around 400+ UGT and PGT approval forms would need to be viewed by the School and the UEC between September- March each year

PGR Students Ethical Approval 3 year PGR students in SED generally follow a standard timetable registering in September, and submitting a first year continuation review in May Fieldwork/primary research generally begins around the start of their second year in September Leaves a small window for a fully formed research plan to be submitted to UEC for Ethical Approval between March-June of each year (to be assured of approval for a September fieldwork start date)

PGR students Ethical Approval (cont) academic year 68 new entrants, all required to complete form for School vetting by School Ethical Advisory Group (SEAG) Around 6 were not undertaking primary research with humans Remaining 62 have been sent to UEC or are in process of being sent or are being revised and resubmitted to SEAG for future UEC approval.

Issues Around PGR Ethics Volume Timing Support needed for them to complete form Requirement to attend UEC with supervisor Lack of ability to forward plan a timetable for UEC submission and approval Possible consideration to grant Schools ability to approve “basic” primary research which meet clear criteria