FY2012 NSGP APPLICATION WORKSHOP Cheryl Murray & Alison Belcher Mayor’s Office of Public Safety & Homeland Security.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of Homeland Security Site Assistance Visit (SAV)
Advertisements

Idaho Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources Protection Program and Fusion Center Brief.
A Brief Overview of Emergency Management Office of Emergency Management April 2006 Prepared By: The Spartanburg County Office of Emergency Management.
THIRA FEPA Mid Year Work Session THIRA – EMPG/HSGP Grant Requirement Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) “THIRA processes.
Unit 6: Procuring and Managing Resources CERT Program Manager.
National Infrastructure Protection Plan
National Protection and Programs Directorate Department of Homeland Security The Office of Infrastructure Protection Cybersecurity Brief [Date of presentation]
Fiscal Year 2008 Urban Areas Security Initiative Nonprofit Security Grant Program Investment Justification Questions, Criteria, and Prioritization Methodology.
State Homeland Security Assessment and Strategy Program State Process and SHSS.
Office for Domestic Preparedness Overview Briefing National Governors Association March 13, 2003 Department of Homeland Security Andrew T. Mitchell Acting.
Investment Justifications IJ Template and Examples 1.
Preparedness Grant Programs FEMA/Grant Programs Directorate
Update Training Meeting
RCPGP. How We Got Here Grants Overview RCPGP Sites Overview Seattle New York/ New Jersey National Capital Region Norfolk Chicago Bay Area Los Angeles/
Environmental Justice (EJ) & Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Grant Programs California Department of Transportation District 3 January 25,
Made Possible by the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program Funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Event Location Date Title.
N EW Y ORK S TATE O FFICE OF E MERGENCY M ANAGEMENT Director Bill Davis.
First 5 LA Invoicing & Budget Modification Workshop OHCD Contractors FY
1 Preparing Texas Today... Texas Preparedness Workshop November 16-17, 2005 Austin, Texas A Texas Community Partnership...for Tomorrow’s Challenges Governor’s.
Jeffery Graviet Emergency Services Coordinator, Salt Lake County Chairperson, Salt Lake Urban Area Working Group.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
October 27, 2005 Contra Costa Operational Area Homeland Security Strategic and Tactical Planning and Hazardous Materials Response Assessment Project Overview.
Community Development & Planning Grant Pre-Application Meeting April 17,
Isdefe ISXXXX XX Your best ally Panel: Future scenarios for European critical infrastructures protection Carlos Martí Sempere. Essen.
Unit 8:COOP Plan and Procedures  Explain purpose of a COOP plan  Propose an outline for a COOP plan  Identify procedures that can effectively support.
© 2001 Carnegie Mellon University S8A-1 OCTAVE SM Process 8 Develop Protection Strategy Workshop A: Protection Strategy Development Software Engineering.
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES. Purpose of the Program To assist Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) to expand their role.
BSAF-BIONET Meeting Robert J. Hashimoto, CBSP University of California, Berkeley October 2, 2009.
Digital Learning Innovation Fund Bidders Conference July 2,
Oconee County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Kickoff Meeting Brian Laughlin Hazard Mitigation Planner Georgia Emergency.
FY 2013 Emergency Management Grants Program (EMPG)
Critical Infrastructure Protection Overview Building a safer, more secure, more resilient America The National Infrastructure Protection Plan, released.
Critical Infrastructure Protection: Program Overview
Homeland Security Grant Program 2015 Process Michelle Hanneken Illinois Emergency Management Agency.
2012 Homeland Security Grant Program Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division Mr. Sam Jonker-Burke Mr. Mike Curtis April.
1 Public Safety Interoperable Communications (PSIC) Grant Program Laura Pettus, Program Specialist Public Safety Interoperable Communications.
RISE Grant: Proposal Writing Workshop UAF RISE Board February 21, 2014.
Grants to States to Support Oral Health Workforce Activities HRSA Pre-Review Conference Call April 14, 2015 U.S. Department of Health and Human.
Survivor Centric Emergency Management Integrating the Access and Functional Needs of the Whole Community Before, During and After Disasters August 2015.
Fiscal Year 2015 Health Infrastructure Investment Program (HIIP) Funding Opportunity Announcement: HRSA Objective Review Committee Application Technical.
Strengthening Applications September BHPr Application Review Criteria Detailed instructions/information about specific funding priorities will always.
1 State Homeland Security: Priorities and Funding R. Chris McIlroy Homeland Security and Technology Division National Governors Association.
FY 2007 Homeland Security Competitive Grant Process.
1. Welcome to the FY 2015 California State Nonprofit Security Grant (CSNSGP) Investment Justification Workshop Presented by Cal OES Infrastructure Protection.
Vers national spatial data infrastructure training program NSDI Cooperative Agreements Program (CAP) Introduction to the Cooperative Agreements.
STATE AND LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION GRANT PROGRAM 1 December 6, 2012.
Fiscal Year 2016 Health Center Program Substance Abuse Service Expansion Competing Supplement Funding Opportunity Number: HRSA Technical Assistance.
Strengthening Communities Awarded to support the development and implementation of collaborate and innovative community projects that address economic.
What is Emergency ?. A serious situation or occurrence that happens unexpectedly and demands immediate action.
USACE Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets Workshop Sandra K. Knight, PhD, PE, D.WRE Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, FEMA August.
COSCDA Annual Conference PROGRAM PURPOSE Goal: To encourage communities to focus on workforce development as a long-term economic development strategy.
Fiscal Year 2007 Urban Area Security Initiative Nonprofit Security Grant Program Investment Justification Questions, Criteria, and Prioritization Methodology.
Office for Domestic Preparedness Overview Briefing Bob Johns Branch Chief State and Local Program Management Division June 4, 2003 Department of Homeland.
National Center for Research Resources NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH T r a n s l a t I n g r e s e a r c h f r o m b a s i c d i s c o v e r y t o i m.
Recreation & Security HPR 413. General Security Must encompass all operations of the organization Should be written into management plans – Plans include.
Homeland Security Grant Program Emergency Preparedness Conference – June 2009 NH Department of Safety John J. Barthelmes, Commissioner Earl M. Sweeney,
2016 THIRA & State Homeland Security Grant. Threat & Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) National Preparedness Goal driven Annual Assessment.
MODULE 4 FHIP NOFA – FACTOR 3. What will be covered in Module 3: Factor 3 - Maximum Points and Distribution for each sub-factor Factor 3 – Sub-factor:
Governor’s Office of Emergency Services 1 The Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Application and Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) Training.
FY2009 NSGP Application Workshop. To ensure that nonprofit organizations from the Houston Urban Area are equipped to develop strong proposals that will.
DHS/ODP OVERVIEW The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office for Domestic Preparedness (ODP) implements programs designed to enhance the preparedness.
North Carolina Emergency Management Homeland Security Grants Management Tuesday, March 22 1:00 - 1:45 pm Harrah's Conference Center Ash Meeting Room Callion.
1 Portland Office of Emergency Management (POEM) Urban Areas Security Initiative State Homeland Security Office of Domestic Preparedness - Grant Programs.
CU Development Grants 2016 Information Session 482 MacOdrum Library June 2 nd, 2016.
Overview Briefing Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (THIRA) Presidential Policy Directive 8 / PPD-8: National Preparedness May 2012.
Regional Improvement Planning Workshop
FY 2019 Homeland Security Grant Programs HS Grant Regional Meetings
Presentation transcript:

FY2012 NSGP APPLICATION WORKSHOP Cheryl Murray & Alison Belcher Mayor’s Office of Public Safety & Homeland Security

Funds are intended to support target hardening activities for nonprofit organizations that are at high risk of terrorist attack. NSGP 101

 FUNDS: How much?  Max of $74,250  $75,000 minus SAA’s M&A (1%)  NO LOCAL MATCH REQUIREMENT

NSGP 101  TARGET HARDENING ACTIVITIES  Improvements designed to deter or delay an attack. Examples include: Lighting Security cameras Fencing Bollards X-ray machines

NSGP 101  HIGH RISK OF TERRORISM  Prior threats or attacks against the organization or closely related organizations by a terrorist network, organization or cell  Symbolic value of the site as a highly recognized institution that renders it a possible target of terrorism  Role of the organization in response or recovery from terrorist attacks  Findings from prior risk assessments (threat, vulnerability) [Note: current and site specific is better!]

NSGP 101  ELIGIBILITY  501(c)3  At high-risk of terrorist attack  Located within the five-county Houston Urban Area Harris County Fort Bend County Montgomery County Brazoria County Galveston County  NIMS adoption & implementation

NSGP 101 YearAmountAppsFundedHouston FY2008$15 mil FY2009$15 mil FY2010$19 mil FY2011$19 mil FY2012$10 milTBD≈150TBD  IT’S A VERY COMPETITIVE PROGRAM!

NSGP 101  APPLICATION & REVIEW PROCESS Nonprofit Develop Application Submit to Urban Area by 10:59 pm Wednesday April 4, Urban Area Receive all applications Review and score proposals based on DHS Scoring Worksheet SAA Rank order all applications based on DHS criteria (Need, Impact) Submit to DHS on or before May 4, 2012 DHS Review highest ranked $15 million in applications Announce awards (August-Sept 2012)

1. Management & Administration 2. Equipment 3. Training NSGP ALLOWABLE ACTIVITIES

 MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION  SAA will take 1% (up to $750)  Nonprofit may use up to 5% of the balance  Allowable M&A activities Staff or consultants to help manage the award Compliance-related activities Travel expenses associated with managing the grant Meeting expenses associated with managing the grant

NSGP ALLOWABLE ACTIVITIES  EQUIPMENT  Only two categories of allowable equipment: Physical Security Enhancement Equipment Inspection & Screening Systems  Access the Authorized Equipment List at:

NSGP ALLOWABLE ACTIVITIES  Physical Security Enhancement Equipment (Examples)  Explosion Protection Equipment Blast-Resistant Trash Receptacles Blast/Shock/Impact Resistant Building Systems  Surveillance, Warning, Access/Intrusion Control Alarm Systems & Sensors Impact Resistant Doors & Gates Fixed Area Lighting Inspection & Screening Systems Physical Access Control Systems Video Assessment Security Systems

NSGP ALLOWABLE ACTIVITIES  Inspection & Screening Systems(Examples)  Inspection Systems Mobile Search & Inspection X-Ray Systems  Screening Systems Personnel/Package Screening Systems

NSGP ALLOWABLE ACTIVITIES  TRAINING  Only courses in the US are allowable. Examples: Protecting critical infrastructure, cyber security, target hardening, terrorism awareness/employee preparedness It MUST address a specific threat and/or vulnerability  Allowable training costs include: Attendance fees Materials, supplies, equipment

NSGP UNALLOWABLE ACTIVITIES  YOU CAN’T USE GRANT FUNDS FOR:  Hiring public safety personnel  Construction  Overtime and/or backfill  Developing a security assessment  Paying someone to write your application  General operating expenses  Proof-of-concept initiatives, or assessments of technology that is under development

 Federal funding  Administration (EHP, documentation)  Short performance period (≈18 months) NSGP SOME CONSIDERATIONS

 FY 2012 NSGP Investment Justification  Use the provided Excel form only.  Incomplete submissions will not be given opportunity to provide additional responses. NSGP APPLICATION TEMPLATE

I. APPLICANT INFORMATION  Legal Name of Organization  Physical Address (with City and County)  Year Facility was Constructed  Organization Type  501(c)3 Number  DUNS (Dun & Bradstreet) Number (NOT OPTIONAL!)  FY2012 Urban Area: >>Houston  FY2012 Federal Funding Requested  FY2012 Total Project Cost  Current Contracts with DHS? (NOT including NSGP)  Investment Phase: New or Ongoing?

NSGP APPLICATION TEMPLATE II. BACKGROUND (Describe your organization)  Membership and Community Served  Integration with broader state & local preparedness efforts (e.g., CERT, Citizen Corps, etc.)  Symbolic value of your site as a highly recognized national or historical institution that renders the site a potential target of terrorism  Any role in responding to or recovering from terrorist attacks Score: provided all, some or none of the information.

NSGP APPLICATION TEMPLATE III. RISK  THREAT Identify and substantiate prior threats and attacks against your organization or closely- related organizations BY A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION, NETWORK OR CELL. Reference prior risk assessments, police findings and/or insurance claims. Score: How well did the applicant address findings from prior risk assessments, police reports, and/or insurance claims? (not at all, poorly, partially, adequately, or thoroughly)

NSGP APPLICATION TEMPLATE III. RISK, cont’d  VULNERABILITIES Identify and describe the specific vulnerabilities that make you susceptible to destruction, incapacitation or exploitation by a terrorist attack. Score: How well did the applicant address the organization's susceptibility to destruction, incapacitation, or exploitation by a terrorist attack? (not at all, poorly, partially, adequately, or thoroughly)

NSGP APPLICATION TEMPLATE III. RISK, cont’d  CONSEQUENCES Discuss potential negative effects on the organization's asset, system, and/or network if damaged, destroyed, or disrupted. Score: How well did the applicant address potential negative effects on the organization’s asset system and/or network if damaged, destroyed, or disrupted by a terrorist attack? (not at all, poorly, partially, adequately, or thoroughly)

NSGP APPLICATION TEMPLATE IV. TARGET HARDENING  Describe what you propose to do. Score: Did the applicant describe how the proposed activity will mitigate identified risk(s)? (not at all, poorly, partially, adequately, or thoroughly) Score: Did the proposed activity focus on prevention of and/or protection against the risk of a terrorist attack? (not at all, poorly, partially, adequately, or thoroughly)

NSGP APPLICATION TEMPLATE V. MILESTONES  Name the milestone: then explain briefly the key activities that will occur  Provide a start and completion date Score: Did the applicant provide specific milestones that present a clear sequence of events (yes, no) Score: How well do the milestones present a clear sequence of events, build on one another, and allow the applicant to reach intended objectives during the performance period? (not at all, poorly, partially, adequately, or thoroughly) Score: How well did the applicant describe the milestones and key activities… (not at all, poorly, partially, adequately, or thoroughly)

NSGP APPLICATION TEMPLATE VI. PROJECT MANAGEMENT  Describe how this project will be managed Who will manage the project? (define the management team, include roles/responsibilities, governance structure, subject matter experts, etc.) Potential challenges Coordination with state and local HS partners Score: Did the applicant describe at a high level roles and responsibilities of the management team, governance structure, and subject matter expertise (yes, no) Score: How well does the applicant justify the effectiveness of the management team…to support implementation (not at all, poorly, partially, adequately, or thoroughly)

NSGP APPLICATION TEMPLATE VII. IMPACT  Outputs and Outcomes…AND explain how these will mitigate the risks you identified under the Background & Risk sections!  Which specific NPG core capabilities does this investment work to achieve? Access Control & Identity Verification CyberSecurity Long-term Vulnerability Reduction Physical Protective Measures  Explain if this investment supports building the capability or sustaining the capability..AND HOW! Score: (How well) did the applicant describe how their outcomes will mitigate risks outlined in Background and Risk sections, and build or support the identified NPG capabilities? (not at all, poorly, partially, adequately, or thoroughly)

NSGP APPLICATION TEMPLATE BONUS: FUNDING HISTORY  Have you received NSGP before? (yes/no)  What years? (list all)  Funding Amount  Investment type  Additional information: Use this space to explain, for example, why you need additional funding if you’ve received a grant in the past, to explain what an effective recipient you were (e.g., spent all the money in the prescribed period, etc.). Score: One bonus point if not previously funded.

 Submit Excel worksheet FY2012 NSGP TX_Houston_NonprofitName  to:  Don’t forget the attachment!  Watch for an confirming receipt NSGP SUBMISSION PROCESS

 Wednesday, April 4, 2012  BEFORE 10:59 pm  Note that neither local staff nor the SAA can extend or waive this deadline. NSGP DEADLINE

 Alison Belcher    Bryan Hatfield   FOR MORE INFORMATION