1 SBUV/2 Calibration Lessons Over 30 Years: 1985-2015 Liang-Kang Huang, Matthew DeLand, Steve Taylor Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) / NASA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Products from the OMPS Limb Profiler (LP) instrument on the Suomi NPP Satellite Pawan K. Bhartia Earth Sciences Division- Atmospheres NASA Goddard Space.
Advertisements

Atmospheric Correction Algorithm for the GOCI Jae Hyun Ahn* Joo-Hyung Ryu* Young Jae Park* Yu-Hwan Ahn* Im Sang Oh** Korea Ocean Research & Development.
Characterization of ATMS Bias Using GPSRO Observations Lin Lin 1,2, Fuzhong Weng 2 and Xiaolei Zou 3 1 Earth Resources Technology, Inc.
WP 3: Absorbing Aerosol Index (AAI) WP 10: Level-1 validation L.G. Tilstra 1, I. Aben 2, and P. Stammes 1 1 Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.
Brown Bag Lunch Lecture ABI Calibration
Presentation on OMPS Nadir Mapper Wavelength Shift Adjustment for Earth-view Measurements.
Extending the Records: OMPS Ozone Products NOAA Satellite Science Week L. Flynn with contributions from the NOAA and NASA OMPS S-NPP Teams.
Validation of Solar Backscatter Radiances Using Antarctic Ice Glen Jaross and Jeremy Warner Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Lanham, Maryland, USA.
SBUV/2 Observations of Atmospheric Response to Solar Variations Matthew DeLand Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) Background -SBUV/2 instruments.
Pre-launch Characterization of the CERES Flight Model 5 (FM5) Instrument on NPP S. Thomas a, K. J. Priestley b, M. Shankar a, N. P. Smith a, M. G. Timcoe.
Results from the OMPS Nadir Instruments on Suomi NPP Satellite
DIRECT TROPOSPHERIC OZONE RETRIEVALS FROM SATELLITE ULTRAVIOLET RADIANCES Alexander D. Frolov, University of Maryland Robert D. Hudson, University of.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Ozone Climate Data Records.
Variability of Total Column Ozone During JAN JUN 2011: Consistency Among Four Independent Multi-year Data Records E.W. Chiou ADNET Systems Inc.,
High Altitude Equatorial Clouds as Seen with the OSIRIS InfraRed Imager A.E. Bourassa, D.A. Degenstein, N.D. Lloyd and E.J. Llewellyn Institute of Space.
1 Ozone Profile Retrieval from SBUV/2 Sweep Mode Data---Preliminary Results Xiong Liu, Kelly Chance Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Matthew.
Karthaus, September 2005 Wouter Greuell IMAU, Utrecht, NL -Why? -Cloud masking -Retrieval method -An application: estimate surface mass balance from satellite.
Calibration Status of Instruments to Measure Scattered UV L. Flynn, with contributions from presentations by M. DeLand, G. Jaross, S. Taylor, T. Beck,
METO 621 Lesson 27. Albedo 200 – 400 nm Solar Backscatter Ultraviolet (SBUV) The previous slide shows the albedo of the earth viewed from the nadir.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 SBUV/2 Wavelengths Solar Earth Ratio Science Challenges: Changes in instrument.
Now That I Know That… What Do I Do? (Analyzing your Microtop Solar Radiometry Data)
Cloud algorithms and applications for TEMPO Joanna Joiner, Alexander Vasilkov, Nick Krotkov, Sergey Marchenko, Eun-Su Yang, Sunny Choi (NASA GSFC)
1 Detection and Determination of Channel Frequency Shift in AMSU-A Observations Cheng-Zhi Zou and Wenhui Wang IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada, July 24-28,
October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 1 MEIDEX – Crew Tutorial Calibration of IMC-201 Adam D. Devir, MEIDEX Payload Manager.
NASA, CGMS-41, July 2013 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Calibration/validation of Operational Instruments at NASA Langley Research.
University of Wisconsin - Madison Space Science and Engineering Center (SSEC) High Spectral Resolution IR Observing & Instruments Hank Revercomb (Part.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Infrared Temperature and.
Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Expected Validation of Envisat Ozone Data E. Hilsenrath NASA Goddard.
Evaluation of OMPS sensor and EV SDR performance Conclusions: Sensors are performing well Calibrations are very good; no sign of degradation Comparisons.
ISCCP Calibration 25 th Anniversary Symposium July 23, 2008 NASA GISS Christopher L. Bishop Columbia University New York, New York.
Delta Review for SNPP OMPS SDR Earth View Products NOAA/NESDIS/STAR August 17, 2015 OMPS SDR Team Fuzhong Weng.
A Long Term Data Record of the Ozone Vertical Distribution IN43B-1150 by Richard McPeters 1, Stacey Frith 2, and Val Soika 3 1) NASA GSFC
Evaluation of OMI total column ozone with four different algorithms SAO OE, NASA TOMS, KNMI OE/DOAS Juseon Bak 1, Jae H. Kim 1, Xiong Liu 2 1 Pusan National.
Retrieval of Vertical Columns of Sulfur Dioxide from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development, Validation, and Error Analysis Chulkyu Lee.
C. Lerot 1, M. Koukouli 2, T. Danckaert 1, D. Balis 2, and M. Van Roozendael 1 1 BIRA-IASB, Belgium 2 LAP/AUTH, Greece S5P L2 Verification Meeting – 19-20/05/2015.
TOMS Ozone Retrieval Sensitivity to Assumption of Lambertian Cloud Surface Part 1. Scattering Phase Function Xiong Liu, 1 Mike Newchurch, 1,2 Robert Loughman.
1 Monitoring Tropospheric Ozone from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Xiong Liu 1,2,3, Pawan K. Bhartia 3, Kelly Chance 2, Thomas P. Kurosu 2, Robert.
Recent Solar Irradiance Data From SBUV/2 and OMI Matthew DeLand and Sergey Marchenko Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) SOLID WP-2 Workshop.
MODIS Sea-Surface Temperatures for GHRSST-PP Peter J. Minnett & Robert H. Evans Otis Brown, Erica Key, Goshka Szczodrak, Kay Kilpatrick, Warner Baringer,
SBUV(/2) and SSBUV Solar Irradiance Measurements Matthew DeLand Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) 1 st SOLID Annual Assembly LPC2E, Orleans,
Validation of OMPS-LP Radiances P. K. Bhartia, Leslie Moy, Zhong Chen, Steve Taylor NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland, USA.
Ozone PEATE 2/20/20161 OMPS LP Release 2 - Status Matt DeLand (for the PEATE team) SSAI 5 December 2013.
1 Results for OMPS NP OMPS NPP ST Meeting 8/15/2013 L. Flynn (STAR) with contributions from Wei Yu, Jiangou Niu, Zhihua Zhang, Eric Beach, Trevor Beck.
Overview of Climate Observational Requirements for GOES-R Herbert Jacobowitz Short & Associates, Inc.
Flight Tests of the Novel TechSat Satellite Ozone Meter Algorithms and Measurement Processing Results M. Guelman, F. Ortenberg, B. Wolfson Asher Space.
Preliminary Documentation for: Earth Surface and Atmospheric Reflectivity ESDR Since 1979 from Multiple Satellites (TOMS, SBUV, SBUV-2, OMI, SeaWiFS, NPP,
OMI BSDF Validation Using Antarctic and Greenland Ice Glen Jaross and Jeremy Warner Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Lanham, Maryland, USA Outline.
Which Measurement Characterization are the Most Important for UV Instruments?* *That depends on your application. L. Flynn With slides from NASA and NOAA.
1 CLARREO Advances in Reflected Solar Spectra Calibration Accuracy K. Thome 1, N. Fox 2, G. Kopp 3, J. McCorkel 1, P. Pilewskie 3 1 NASA/Goddard Space.
Thomas C. Stone U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ USA GSICS Research Working Group Meeting EUMETSAT 24−28 March 2014 Using the Moon as a Radiometric.
GRWG UV Sub-Group Briefing Report
GSICS DCC calibration update
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation Updates
Assumption of Lambertian Cloud Surface (I)
Cloud Trends and Anomalies Observed by MISR
V2.0 minus V2.5 RSAS Tangent Height Difference Orbit 3761
Verifying the DCC methodology calibration transfer
An Overview of MODIS Reflective Solar Bands Calibration and Performance Jack Xiong NASA / GSFC GRWG Web Meeting on Reference Instruments and Their Traceability.
Using SCIAMACHY to calibrate GEO imagers
On the use of Ray-Matching to transfer calibration
MODIS Lunar Calibration Data Preparation and Results for GIRO Testing
Characterizing DCC as invariant calibration target
Lunar reflectance model based on SELENE/SP data
Status of MODIS and VIIRS Reflective Solar Calibration
In-orbit Calibration for FY-3C/TOU
Inter-calibration of the SEVIRI solar bands against MODIS Aqua, using Deep Convective Clouds as transfer targets Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration.
Retrieval of SO2 Vertical Columns from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development and Validation Chulkyu Lee, Aaron van Dokelaar, Gray O’Byrne:
GRWG UV Sub-Group Briefing Report & Introducing Special Session on Strategy for Inter-calibration of SWIR Spectrometers Rose Munro.
Strawman Plan for Inter-Calibration of Solar Channels
Potential contribution to
Presentation transcript:

1 SBUV/2 Calibration Lessons Over 30 Years: Liang-Kang Huang, Matthew DeLand, Steve Taylor Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) / NASA Goddard Space Flight Center GSICS GRWG-UVSG Meeting College Park, MD 8-9 October 2015

2 Overview Backscattered ultraviolet (BUV) profile ozone data record began in Includes 7 SBUV/2 instruments covering present. Similar instrument design allows use of common analysis techniques for all instruments, but each SBUV/2 also has unique characteristics. Consistent instrument calibration and accurate long-term characterization are needed to produce ozone data sets that can be merged for trend studies.

3 Approach Evaluate Day-1 photometric calibration and time- dependent characterization for each instrument. Satellite orbits drift in local time complicates comparisons due to trace gas diurnal change and difference in measurement solar zenith angle. Overlapping data records provide best opportunity for intercalibration. Evaluate inter-instrument calibration using radiances, rather than retrieved ozone.

4 Prelaunch Radiometric Calibration Prelaunch radiance and irradiance calibration tests use same NIST irradiance lamp standards. Solar and test diffusers are deployed at the same position consecutively and repeatedly. Accuracy of albedo (sun- normalized radiance) calibration therefore depends on BRDF of laboratory diffuser.

5 Instrument Characterization Many laboratory characterization tests are validated on-orbit using different types of measurements (both calibration and science): – Wavelength calibration: Mercury lamp, solar spectrum. – Electronic offset (dark signal): Sensor door closed, night side Earth view. – Electronic gain ratio: Selected Earth view scenes with overlapping valid signals in two gain ranges. – Solar diffuser goniometry: Monochromatic solar measurements (elevation angle response, wavelength dependence). – Non-linearity: Monochromatic Earth view.

6 Absolute Calibration – On-Orbit Validation Diffuser reflectivity: On-board mercury lamp data from prelaunch, before solar exposure, to weekly schedule. Irradiance: “Day 1” solar measurement vs. reference data set. Normalized Radiance: Antarctic reflectivity (bright scene) should be very consistent between instruments.

7 Absolute Calibration - Intercomparison Early SBUV/2 instruments (NOAA-9, NOAA-11, NOAA-14) used coincidence analysis with SSBUV flights to transfer laboratory-validated calibration to on-orbit instrument. Later instruments compare seasonal average reflectivity at 340 nm, using Antarctic snow/ice high plateau regions with low surface relief and distant from coast. NOAA-17 & 19 retains prelaunch calibration, NOAA-16 & 18 adjusted to NOAA-17.

8 Channel-to-Channel Calibration Wavelength dependence is based lab standards (1% uncertainty). Calibration error in single SBUV channel can propagate retrieved ozone profile errors beyond nominal weighting function altitude range for that channel. Use radiance residual values produced by retrieval algorithm. Estimate adjustment value for worst channel by running retrieval algorithm without using that channel. Adjust albedo calibration and iterate process to determine specific (self-consistent) set of adjustments for all profile wavelengths to apply in ozone processing.

9 Channel-to-Channel (more) Short wavelengths ( nm) are adjusted with 5 o equatorial zonal means with low surface reflectivity. Long wavelengths ( nm) are adjusted at mid- high latitudes where retrieved ozone profiles with an extra longer wavelength channel are consistent with those without that channel. Goal is to have all final residuals below threshold of ±0.1 N-value. Final set of adjustments is not unique, and may include any errors in forward model radiative transfer calculations.

10 Time-Dependent Calibration – Solar Irrandiance SBUV/2 on-board calibration system uses mercury lamp to monitor relative changes in diffuser reflectivity at emission line wavelengths. Diffuser degradation-corrected solar measurements then capture time-dependent and wavelength-dependent instrument response changes. Need estimated adjustment for solar activity at λ < 300 nm. Long-term accuracy is ≤0.2% per year.

11 Time-Dependent Calibration - Reflectivity Assume that surface reflectivity of Antarctic and Greenland snow and ice-covered regions (at 340 nm) remains constant with time. Choose reference year to de-seasonalize short-term variations due to SZA. Correct for small ozone absorption. This procedure gives instrument throughput changes to ≤0.5% uncertainty.

12 Intercalibration of Instruments - 1 Original philosophy was to evaluate calibration differences at Equator, where ozone variability is smaller. SBUV/2 orbit drift leads to local time differences in coincidence match-ups  Diurnal ozone variations (during daytime hours) will affect radiance comparisons. Select coincidence data based on no local time difference (typically at high latitudes) and consistent total ozone to derive inter-instrument adjustments.

13 Intercalibration of Instruments - 2 Creation of SBUV Version 8.6 data sets used two methods. NOAA-11 data (adjusted based on SSBUV comparisons) were used as reference to derive individual channel adjustments for Nimbus-7, NOAA-9. NOAA-17 was used as reference instrument to derive individual channel adjustments for NOAA-14 through NOAA-19.

Coincidence Comparison SBUV/2 Monochromator scans 12 channels with 1.25 s/channel integration time and 32s cycle. No identical views between two instruments. Take normalized radiance measurements within 100km and 1 hour distance. Screen for low ozone gradient (<20DU) and small scene reflectivity change (<0.04). Use TOMRAD and a retrieved set of ozone profile and scene cloud to compute radiance difference between two instruments for SZA and wavelength differences. Large number of samples for better statistics.

Coincidence Comparison -N19 stability

Coincidence Comparison – OMPS NP

17 Summary All SBUV/2s use laboratory tests as the basis for albedo (channel-to-channel) wavelength dependence. Use polar snow/ice target to make wavelength independent adjustment to some (N16 & N18) prelaunch albedo calibration. On-board lamp for diffuser reflectivity calibration, solar irradiance measurement and polar snow/ice radiance measurement together provide instrument sensitivity time dependence. Adjustments based on inter-instrument comparison lead to more consistent ozone profile products among SBUV/2s. Coincidence comparison among instruments is also used to validate their albedo calibrations.

Time-Dependent Calibration – Solar Irradiance (backup) SBUV/2 on-board calibration system uses mercury lamp to monitor relative changes in diffuser reflectivity at emission line wavelengths. Diffuser degradation-corrected solar measurements then capture time-dependent and wavelength-dependent instrument response changes. Need estimated adjustment for solar activity at λ < 300 nm. Long-term accuracy is ≤0.2% per year. 18