PRESENTATION TO THE UTFAB TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 2010 BY – DOUGLAS SATTERFIELD CLASSROOM SUPPORT SERVICES-ACNS, EXT Classroom Technology Proposal 2010/2011

UTFAB Spring Update New Large Smart Classrooms Completed FY2010 BuildingRoomCapacity 1ClarkC ClarkC ClarkC EngineeringB237 5EngineeringB327 6Education1342 7NESBB10135 Pictures

148 General Assignment Classrooms Over 10,000 seats Currently 128 G.A. Rooms are Smart Classroom 20 GA Rooms are left needing to be Technology Equipped Our Goal is to have 100% of the GA classrooms upgraded to be Smart Classrooms by Spring 2012 UTFAB Spring 2010 Classroom Technology 2010/ 2011 Current Technology Equipped Smart Classrooms

Remaining GA rooms / Projected Completion BUILDINGROOMCapacity UTFAB Supported Classroom Technology FY10 1CLARKC36040NEW Completed 2CLARKC36145NEW Completed 3CLARKC36237NEW Completed 4EDUCATION1342NEW Completed 5ENGINEERINGB 237NEW Completed 6ENGINEERINGB 327NEW Completed 7Natural Enviromental SciB 10135NEW Completed Projected Completion 1Eddy932 FY Eddy1132 FY Eddy10630 FY Eddy10930 FY Education23632 FY Pathology10955 FY CHEMISTRYB30128 FY MicrobiologyA FY Gifford31230 FY Education124 FY Education235 FY Education830 FY Natural Resources10627 FY Natural Resources11228 FY Natural Resources11530 FY Plant ScienceA FY ANIMAL SCIENCE20036 FY ANIMAL SCIENCE20529 FY CLARKC14012 FY Eddy11010 FY 2012

New Standard Functional Lectern Design Standard Crestron Touch Panel and Control System Bright Wide 16:10 image and screen New style ceiling speakers that blend in with the room Bluray and HDMI Laptop inputs High quality – High resolution Document Cameras Upscaling DVD/VCR Combo Units Aux video inputs including HDMI Theft Security for the projector UTFAB Spring 2010 Classroom Technology 2010/ 2011 Current Standard Large Smart Classrooms Equipment Overview

UTFAB Spring 2010 Classroom Technology 2010/ 2011 Proposed New Rooms Large Lectern Smart Classrooms BuildingRoomCapacity 1 Eddy932 2 Eddy Eddy Eddy Education Pathology ChemistryB Gifford Microbiology11427

Room Rebuilds?..... Criteria….Considerations Rooms that are:  Used by Many Students  Problematic for students and instructors  Difficult to Maintain  Unsightly/Non-Standard Lecterns  Outdated Technology  Under-Funded when built  Eddy Eddy UTFAB Spring 2010 Classroom Technology 2010/ 2011 Proposed Smart Classroom Room Rebuilds

UTFAB Spring 2010 Classroom Technology 2010/ 2011 Proposed Smart Classroom Room Rebuilds BuildingRoomCapacity 1 Eddy Eddy Eddy Eddy Eddy11732 Students and Sections being taught in Eddy : SPCM 200: SPCM 207: SPCM 300: 24 CO 150: 24 - F 624: 20 - LFRE 335: 25 Grand total: 1461 Students

Technology refresh rooms : New Projector – 16:10 – w/5 year warranty New Screen – wide aspect ratio New up scaling DVD/VCR with HDMI HDMI / Laptop input New standard control system and Touch Panel  4/10 rooms – need to have controls updated New video switcher - Upgraded to classroom standard UTFAB Spring 2010 Classroom Technology 2010/ 2011 Smart Classroom - Technology Refresh Overview

UTFAB Spring 2010 Classroom Technology 2010/ 2011 Proposed New Rooms Large Lectern Smart Classrooms BuildingRoomCapacity 1 Engineering*D Engineering*E Engineering*E Engineering Forestry* Mil. Science Mil. Science Eddy ClarkC Gifford33268 * Includes Control System Upgrades

Proposed Project / Funding Overview

Additional information Links  Standard Large Smart Classroom – detailed spreadsheet Standard Large Smart Classroom – detailed spreadsheet  CSU 2010 Technology Refresh Breakout – Spreadsheet CSU 2010 Technology Refresh Breakout – Spreadsheet  Eddy 113 – 117 Smart Classroom Rebuild breakout Eddy 113 – 117 Smart Classroom Rebuild breakout  CSS – Installation Breakdown – spreadsheet CSS – Installation Breakdown – spreadsheet  CSU Smart Classroom Standard Full Documentation CSU Smart Classroom Standard Full Documentation

UTFAB Spring 2010 Classroom Technology 2010/ 2011 Smart Classroom - UTFAB Funding Rules 1. Benefit as many students as possibleClassroom Technology benefits both the Students and Faculty. 2. Ability to effectively utilize the feeMuch thought goes into the decision of what is best for the classrooms 3. Not funded by CFTNew G.A. Classrooms not supported by individual Colleges CFT 4. Adherence to budget and accountabilityYour decision. 5. Potential for direct student useAbsolutely. 6. Effort, thought & clarity in the planYour decision. 7. Quantitative usage data10 am – 2 pm GA rooms are 80 % filled 8. Financial co-sponsorshipCRB room maintenance /upgrades 9. Central/distributed balanceNot applicable here. 10. Cost/benefit ratioYour decision.

UTFAB Spring 2010 Classroom Technology 2010/ 2011 Smart Classroom - UTFAB 2011 Wrap up Thank You for your continued Support Any Questions on the Plan for 2011?